Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Effect of Dietary Seaweed Supplementation on Growth, Feed Utilization, Digestibility Co-efficient, Digestive Enzyme Activity and Challenge Study against Aeromonas hydrophila of Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus

A. Priyatharshni1,*, Cheryl Antony1, B. Ahilan1, A. Uma1, P. Chidambaram1, P. Ruby1, E. Prabu1
1Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Dr. M.G.R. Fisheries College and Research Institute, Ponneri-601 204, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: The present study aimed to determine the growth, digestibility co-efficient, digestive enzyme activity and disease resistance of juvenile GIFT tilapia fed with Ulva seaweed meal supplemented diet.

Methods: The study was undertaken with different inclusion levels of Ulva seaweed meal (USM) such as raw (UR) and fermented (UF) Ulva meal (UR-5, UR-10, UR-15, UF-5, UF-10 and UF-15% of diet) and control feed (C) for a period of 60 days.

Result: GIFT fed with fermented Ulva meal at a 10% inclusion level in their diet exhibited the highest growth performance (41.43 g) followed by UF5 (41.07±0.43 g), UR5 (39.65±0.36 g), control (39.09±0.20 g), UF15 (38.67±0.26 g), UR10 (38.47±1.47 g) and UR15 (35.77±0.35 g) diet. The Highest Apparent Digestibility Coefficient (ADC) for Crude Protein (85.14±0.91%) was observed in fishes fed with fermented Ulva meal at a 10% inclusion rate than other treatments and the control groups for Dry Matter, Ether Extract, and Gross Energy. The enzymatic activities of digestive enzymes, namely Amylase activity (0.029±0.00 units/mg protein/min), Protease activity (0.147±0.0 units/mgprotein/min) and Lipase activity (0.273±0.05 units/mg protein/min), showed higher levels in the group of fishes fed with a diet containing 10% fermented Ulva meal, as compared to the other treatment groups and the control. Increased survival rate (86.66%) was observed when the fishes were challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila at the end of the trial for Ulva based diets. The results obtained on histopathology showed the presence of lower degree levels of infection in 10% fermented Ulva meal supplementation.The present study concluded that dietary Ulva meal requirement for juvenile GIFT tilapia can be at 10% of Ulva Fermented (UF) and UF-5, Ulva Raw (UR) 5%, control (C), UF-15, UR-10 and UR-15 diet respectively.

The role of nutrition, feed and feed management is significant in advancement of sustainable aquaculture. Feed constitutes predominant and recurring expenditure in aquaculture, it is essential that artificial feed should be scientifically formulated, processed and delivered to fish farming system. Marine macroalgae, referred to as seaweed, offer an alternative option to plant meal and provide unique and valuable dietary component in formulated fish diets. Global cultivation of algae, dominated by marine macroalgae known as seaweeds, grew by half a million tonnes in 2020, up by 1.4% from 34.6 million tonnes in 2019 (FAO, 2022). The classification “macroalgae” encompasses three distinct taxonomic groups: Rhodophyta (red), Chlorophyta (green) and Phaeophyta (brown). The nutritional composition of macroalgae can differ significantly among species, genera, divisions, seasons and locations. Seaweeds have the capacity to act as an additional source of food in the nutrition of fish. Nakagawa et al., (1984) conducted one of the earliest documented research studies on the incorporation of macroalgae in manufactured diets for finfish followed by numerous studies have been undertaken on various fish species, investigating a range of seaweed species. These studies have demonstrated that there is considerable potential for the incorporation of seaweed in fish diets, particularly when protein level in the seaweed is sufficiently high and it possesses a balanced amino acid profile comparable to that of the main plant protein ingredients (Angell et al., 2016). The present investigation is to evaluate the efficacy of incorporating seaweed into the diet on the growth performance, digestibility, digestive enzymes activity and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila during  intensive farming of GIF tilapia.
Experimental diets
 
The fermentation of seaweed meal was carried out in accordance with methodology delineated by Siddik et al., (2018). Following the completion of the fermentation process, seaweed meal underwent drying process in hot air oven at a temperature of 40°C for 48 hours and subsequently served as the test ingredient. The proximate composition of raw and fermented seaweeds is presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Proximate composition of Ulva sp seaweeds.


 
Feed formulation
 
Six isonitrogenous (320 g/kg) and isocaloric (4395 Kcal/kg) experimental diets were prepared utilizing Ulva seaweeds and a control diet without seaweed. The proximate composition of ingredients and experimental diet are detailed in Table 2.

Table 2: Formulation and proximate composition of experimental diets with varying inclusion levels of Ulva meal (g/kg of diet).


 
Experimental fish and feeding trial
 
420 Nos of GIF tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) used in the experiment. The fishes procured from the Centre for Sustainable Aquaculture (CeSA), TNJFU, Barur, Tamil Nadu. The experimental design consisted of six sets of treatments and one control set, each with three replicates. The 21 FRP tanks with a water volume of 350 liters (length: 94 cm, height: 61 cm and breadth: 70 cm) were used for stocking fishes. Prior to the commencement of the experiment, all experimental tanks underwent thorough cleaning and disinfection. The tanks were filled with water upto 75% of their total volume and provided with suitable aeration facilitated by an oil-free air compressor. The fish seeds were acclimatized in tanks made of fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP). Prior to the experiment, each fish was graded based on its weight. GIF tilapia juveniles, weighing 2.51 g, were stocked in each experimental tank at a density of 20 individuals/m2. The fish were provided with food equal to 5% of their total body mass on a daily basis, which was divided into three equal portions and given thrice a day. Uneaten feed and fecal matter were removed daily and water exchange of 10% was done to maintain optimum water quality. Sampling of fish bio-growth was conducted fortnightly throughout the feeding trial, daily monitoring of water quality parameters was performed and average values were recorded according to standard procedure (APHA, 2005) and the recorded values are presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Optimum water quality parameters observed during the experimental trial.


 
Fish sampling
 
The sampling occurred at 15-day intervals. The specific bio-growth indices used are listed below:
 
Bio-growth parameters
               
 
 
 
Digestibility studies
 
Faecal collection
 
The GIFT juveniles stocked in FRP tanks were initially fed at 5% of body weight and feeding ration was adjusted to avoid the accumulation of uneaten feed. Feeding and the faeces collection were done twice a day. The tanks were siphoned to remove faeces. The collected faeces were filtered and washed quickly with distilled water, dried and stored in freezer until analysis as per Cruz-Suarez et al., (2009).
 
Apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC)
 
The apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of the experimental diets was analysed using chromic oxide (Cr2 O3) as an inert marker at 1 g/kg of the diet. The concentrations of the nutrients considered and the concentration of chromium in the experimental diets and in GIF tilapia faeces were estimated respectively to determine the ADC.
                               
Digestive enzyme activity analysis
 
Intestines from sampled experimental GIFT were removed aseptically added with 0.25 M sucrose solution and homogenised using tissue homogenizer and centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was separated and stored at -20°C until further analysis. The reducing sugars produced due to gluco amylase and alpha amylase on carbohydrates were estimated using Dinitro salicylic acid (DNS) method (Rick and Stegbauer, 1974). Protease activity was determined following the method of Moore and Stein (1948), using bovine serum albumin as the substrate. The specific activity of protease was expressed as ìg of leucine liberated/mg tissue protein/h at 37°C. The lipase activity was assayed following the method of Cherry and Crandell (1932).
 
Challenge study against Aeromonas hydrophila
 
At the end of the 90 days experimental trials, fishes from all treatment tanks were challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. The bacteria culture was obtained from State Referral Laboratory for Aquatic Animal Health, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University. The isolate was grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB Hi Media, India) for 24 h (30-31°C) centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min followed by pellet resuspension in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2). The suspension in sterile PBS was injected intramuscularly (60 µl) in healthy tilapia obtained from all the treatments, delivering 1.92*107CFU/fish. The infected moribund fish with typical haemorrhagic wounds at the site of injection were sacrificed for the histopathological study after 10 dpi. Internal organs were dissected, rinsed in normal saline and fixed in 10% formalin buffer for 24 hrs. The fixed tissues were washed in a series of ethyl alcohol of varying concentration (70%, 80%, 90% and 100% respectively) and embedded in paraffin wax. The tissues were sectioned at 5 mm, later stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) (Alyahya et al., 2018). The histopathological analysis was performed in the Department of Pathology, Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai.
 
Statistical analysis
 
All the data were presented as the mean values ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons at the significance level of 0.05 was used to compare the differences between the dietary groups. The data were statistically analyzed by SPSS 20.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). 
Influence of supplementation of Ulva meal on growth performances of GIF tilapia
 
The calculated growth parameters for experimental diets are given in Table 4. The present investigation demonstrated that the highest growth performances were observed in GIF tilapia when they were fed with supplementation of fermented Ulva meal at 10% in terms of weight gain (41.43±0.38 g) followed by UF5 (41.07±0.43 g), UR5 (39.65±0.36 g), control (39.09±0.20 g), UF15 (38.67±0.26 g), UR10 (38.47±1.47 g) and UR15 (35.77±0.35 g) diet. GIF tilapia fed with various inclusion levels of Ulva supplemented diets were given in Fig 1.

Table 4: Bio-growth performances and feed utilization of GIF tilapia juveniles fed varying inclusion levels of Ulva supplemented diets.



Fig 1: GIF tilapia fed with various inclusion levels of Ulva supplemented diets.



GIF tilapia fed with UF10 diet showed lowest FCR (1.34±0.00), highest SGR (0.99±0.00) and PER (2.37±0.07) followed by UF5 diet, UR5 diet, control diet, UF15 diet, UR10 diet and UR15 diet. Similarly, Nile tilapia fed with Ulva spp. (Ulva rigida and Ulva lactuca) at 10% inclusion showed improved growth performance (Valente et al., 2016). African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fed with Ulva lactuca at 10% inclusion showed improved growth performances (Abdel-Warith et al., 2015). Nile tilapia fed with Ulva meal at 5 to 10% inclusion showed improved growth performances (Guroy et al., 2007). Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) juveniles fed with Ulva spp. 10% inclusion showed improved growth performance (Silva et al., 2015). Gilthead seabream (S. aurata) fed with Ulva meal at 5% inclusion showed improved growth performances and survival rate (Wassef et al., 2005). Gilthead seabream fed with Ulva meal at 8% inclusion showed better protein utilization (Kissil and Lupatsch, 1992). European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed with Ulva lactuca at 5% inclusion showed improved growth performances, feed utilization, nutrient retention and survival rate (Wassef et al., 2013). Nile tilapia, scientifically known as Oreochromis niloticus, when provided with Ulva rigida at a rate of 5% incorporation, exhibited enhanced growth performance as reported by Guroy (2007). Similarly, Nile tilapia, (Oreochromis niloticus), showed improved growth performance when fed with Ulva lactuca at 5% inclusion, as documented by Khalafalla and El-Hais (2015). Moreover, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) demonstrated improved growth performance, feed efficiency, nutrient utilization and body composition when fed with Ulva meal at 5% inclusion, as indicated by Ergun et al., (2009). Furthermore, Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) experienced growth enhancement when fed with Ulva intestinalis at 1.5% sulfated polysaccharide inclusion, according to Safavi et al., (2019). Dusky kob (Argyrosomus japonicus) also displayed improved growth performance without adverse effects when fed with Ulva meal at 50 g/kg inclusion, as observed by Madibana et al., (2017). In addition, the growth performance of Solea senegalensis was found to be improved when fed with Ulva ohnoi at 5% inclusion, as reported by Vizcaino et al., (2018). Furthermore, juvenile grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) exhibited improved growth performance when fed with an extract of Ulva rigida at 10 mg kg-1 inclusion, as reported by Akbary and Aminikhoei (2018). The presence of sulfated polysaccharides, high protein, mineral contents and a favorable essential amino acid profile in Ulva sp stimulates the growth of beneficial intestinal bacteria and promotes antioxidant defense system, as indicated by Wassef et al., (2005). Similarly, this study also proved that GIF tilapia fed with fermented Ulva meal reflected positive growth performance as per the result given in Table 4.
 
Influence of Ulva meal on apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of GIF tilapia
 
The digestibility coefficient of GIF tilapia fed Ulva supplemented diets are given in Table 5. The present investigation demonstrated a significant increase in the Apparent Digestibility Coefficient (ADC) in fish that were fed Ulva meal diets. The GIF tilapia exhibited a higher level of increased ADC (85.14±0.91%) when fed with fermented Ulva meal at a 10% inclusion level, followed by UF5, UR5, control group, UF15, UR10 and UR15 diet.

Table 5: Apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) in GIF tilapia juveniles fed varying inclusion levels of Ulva supplemented diets.



Likewise, there were noticeable alterations in the morphology of the digestive system in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) juveniles when Ulva was included in their diet (Silva et al., 2015). The inclusion of Ulva fasciata extract at 100 mg/kg in the diet of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) resulted in an enhancement of villus length and goblet cell number (Abo Raya et al., 2021). Furthermore, Solea senegalensis that were fed with Ulva ohnoi at 5% inclusion level exhibited an absence of damage in the intestinal mucosa and a significant increase in mucosal absorptive surface (Vizcaino et al., 2018). It should be noted that the height and width of intestinal villi and the number of goblet cells directly impact the digestion and nutrient absorption in fish (Elsabagh et al., 2018). The presence of antioxidant properties can prevent the oxidation of biological molecules, particularly lipids and proteins, consequently improving the processes of digestion and absorption (Mohan et al., 2019 and Ruby et al., 2022). Similarly, the results presented in Table 5 of this study also confirm that GIF tilapia fed with fermented Ulva meal exhibited positive responses in apparent digestibility coefficient.
 
Influence of Ulva meal on digestive enzyme activity of GIF tilapia
 
The digestive enzyme activity of GIF tilapia fed Ulva supplemented diets are given in Table 6. The present investigation observed higher activities of digestive enzymes, namely Amylase activity (0.029±0.00), Protease activity (0.147±0.00) and Lipase activity (0.273±0.05), in the 10% fermented Ulva meal supplemented diet compared to UF5 diet, UR5 diet, control diet, UF15 diet, UR10 diet and UR15 diet.

Table 6: Digestive enzyme activities in GIF tilapia juveniles fed varying inclusion levels of Ulva supplemented diets.



The presence of polysaccharides stimulates the secretion of digestive enzymes, leading to enhanced utilization and digestion of nutrients, ultimately resulting in improved health and growth (Mohan et al., 2016; Peixoto et al., 2016). Sulfated polysaccharides with antioxidant properties have the potential to prevent the oxidation of biological molecules, particularly lipids and proteins, thereby enhancing the processes of digestion and absorption (Mohan et al., 2019). Correspondingly, the current research also demonstrated a positive correlation between the consumption of fermented Ulva meal by GIF tilapia and the enhancement of digestive enzyme activities, as indicated in Table 6.
 
Influence of Ulva meal on disease resistance against Aeromonas hydophila infection in GIF tilapia
 
In this study, the survivility showed an increasing trend with fishes fed with Ulva meal as compared to control after challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. The relative survival percentage of GIF tilapia fed with varying inclusion levels of Ulva meal are given in Table 7. The highest relative survival percentage was recorded in UF10 group (80.00%) followed by UF5, control diet, UF15, UR10 and UR15 diet.

Table 7: Relative survival percentage of GIF tilapia juveniles fed varying inclusion levels of Ulva supplemented diets.



Histopathological changes in GIF tilapia fed with varying inclusion levels of Ulva meal supplemented diets were given in Fig 2. Results of histopathological study showed that the supplementation of 10% of fermented Ulva meal had presence of lower degree levels of infection than other treatments and control diet fed fishes. Similarly, Nile tilapia fed with Ulva fasciata extract at 100 mg/kg diet inclusion showed improved histomorphology of intestine with an increase in villi length and villi width and goblet cells numbers (AboRaya et al., 2021). Juvenile grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) fed with Ulva rigida extract inclusion showed decreased mortality against Photobacterium damselae (Akbary and Aminikhoei, 2018). Healthy morphometric structure of intestine increases the feed utilization and considered a good indicator of a healthy fish (BananKhojasteh, 2012). Goblet cells produce mucous to protect the mucosal layer from dehydration, injury and pathogenic microorganisms along the course of intestine (Lauriano et al., 2016). Similarly this study also proved that GIF tilapia fed with fermented Ulva meal reflected health improvement against A. hydrophila bacterial infection and increased relative survival percentage as per the result given in Table 7.

Fig 2: Histopathological changes in GIF tilapia fed varying inclusion levels of Ulva meal supplemented diets.

The utilization of Ulva seaweed meal in the diets of juvenile GIF tilapia resulted in improved growth performance and a better feed utilization. The inclusion of seaweed supplementation had a significant impact on digestibility, digestive enzyme activities and an improved immune enhancement against A. hydrophila as well as an improved relative survival percentage. This study concluded that inclusion of Ulva meal in the diet of GIF tilapia at a UF-10% of the diet, followed by UR5 diet, UR5 diet, control diet, UF15 diet, UR10 diet and UR15 diet improves growth and health status of fish.

The authors sincerely thank Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India for the grants and facilities offered. We also thank the Department of Aquaculture, Dr. M.G.R. Fisheries College and Research Institute, TNJFU for providing the Indoor aquaculture facility to conduct the feeding trial.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. 

  1. Abdel-warith, A.A., Younis, E.M.I. and Al-asgah, N.A. (2015). Potential use of green macroalgae Ulva lactuca as a feed supplement in diets on growth performance, feed utilization and body composition of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. King Saud University. 23(3): 404-409. 

  2. AboRaya, M.H., Alshehri, K.M., Abdelhameed, R.F., Elbialy, Z.I., Elhady, S.S. and Mohamed, R.A. (2021). Assessment of growth related parameters and immune biochemical profile of nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed dietary ulva fasciata extract. Aquaculture Research. 52(7): 3233- 3246.

  3. Akbary, P., Aminikhoei, Z. (2018). Effect of water-soluble polysaccharide extract from the green  alga Ulva rigida on growth performance, antioxidant enzyme activity and immune stimulation of grey mullet Mugil cephalus. J. Appl Phycol. 30: 1345-1353. 

  4. Alyahya, S.A., Ameen, F., Al-Niaeem, K.S., Al-Sa’adi, B.A., Hadi, S., Mostafa, A.A. (2018). Histopathological studies of experimental Aeromonas hydrophila infection in blue tilapia, Oreochromis aureus. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 25(1): 182-185. 

  5. Angell, A.R., Angell, S.F., de Nys, R., Paul, N.A. (2016). Seaweed as a protein source for mono-gastric livestock. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 54: 74-84.

  6. APHA, (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of the Water and Wastewater, 22nd Edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.

  7. BananKhojasteh, S.M. (2012). The morphology of the post-gastric alimentary canal in teleost fishes: A brief review. International Journal of Aquatic Science. 3: 71-88.

  8. Cherry, I.S. and Crandall, L.A. (1932). The specificity of pancreatic lipase: Its appearance in the blood after pancreatic injury. Am. J. Physiol. Legacy Content. 100(2): 266-273. 

  9. Cruz-Suarez, L.E., Tapia-Salazar, M., Villarreal-Cavazos, D., Beltran- Rocha, J., Nieto-Lopez, M. G., Lemme, A. and Ricque- Marie, D. (2009). Apparent dry matter, energy, protein and amino acid digestibility of four soybean ingredients in white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles. Aquaculture. 292(1-2): 87-94. 

  10. Elsabagh, M., Mohamed, R., Moustafa, E.M., Hamza, A., Farrag, F., Decamp, O., Dawood, M.A. and Eltholth, M. (2018). Assessing the impact of Bacillus strains mixture probiotic on water quality, growth performance, blood profile and intestinal morphology of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture Nutrition. 24: 1613-1622. 

  11. Ergun, S., Soytürk, M., Güroy, B., Güroy, D., Merrifield, D. (2009). Influence of Ulva meal on growth, feed utilization and body composition of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) at two levels of dietary lipid. Aquacult Int. 17: 355-361. 

  12. FAO, (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Towards Blue Transformation. Rome, FAO.

  13. Guroy, B.K., Cirik, Guroy, S., Sanver, D., Tekiny, A.A. (2007). Effects of Ulva rigida and Cystoseira barbata meals as a feed additive on growth performance, feed utilization and body composition of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Turkey J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 31: 91-97. 

  14. Khalafalla, M.M. and El-Hais, A.E.M. (2015). Evaluation of seaweeds Ulva rigida and Pterocladia capillaceaas dietary supplements in Nile tilapia fingerlings. Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development. 6(3): 1-5.

  15. Kissil, G. and Lupatsch, I. (1992). New approaches to fish feed in israeli mariculture as a result of environmental constraints. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture/Bamidgeh. 44(4): 125.

  16. Lauriano, E., Pergolizzi, S., Capillo, G., Kuciel, M., Alesci, A. and Faggio, C. (2016). Immunohistochemical characterization of Toll-like receptor 2 in gut epithelial cells and macrophages of goldfish Carassius auratus fed with a high-cholesterol diet. Fish and Shellfish Immunology. 59: 250-255. 

  17. Madibana, M.J., Mlambo, V., Lewis, B. and Fouché, C. (2017). Effect of graded levels of dietary seaweed (Ulva sp.) on growth, hematological and serum biochemical parameters in dusky kob, Argyrosomus japonicus. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 43(3): 249-254.

  18. Mohan, K., Padmanaban, A., Uthayakumar, V., Chandirasekar, R., Muralisankar, T., Santhanam, P. (2016). Effect of dietary Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides on biological and physiological responses of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture. 464: 42-49. 

  19. Mohan, K., Ravichandran, S., Muralisankar, T., Uthayakumar, V., Chandirasekar, R., Seedevi, P., Abirami, R.G., Rajan, D.K. (2019). Application of marine-derived polysaccharides as immune stimulants in aquaculture: A review of current knowledge and further perspectives. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 83: 1177-1193.

  20. Moore, S. and Stein, W.H. (1948). Photometric method for use in the chromatography of amino acids. J. Biol. Chem. 176: 367-388.

  21. Nakagawa, H., Kasahara, S., Sugiyama, T. and Wada, I. (1984). Usefulness of ulva-meal as feed supplementary in cultured black sea bream. Aquaculture. 1: 20-26. 

  22. Peixoto, M.J., Salas-Leitoìn, E., Pereira, L.F., Queiroz, A., Magalhaes, F., Pereira, R., Abreu, H., Reis, PA., Gonccalves, J.F.M., Ozorio, R.O.A. (2016). Role of dietary seaweed supplementation on growth performance, digestive capacity and immune and stress responsiveness in European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquculture Reports. 3: 189-197. 

  23. Rick, W. and Stegbauer, H.P. (1974). á-Amylase Measurement of Reducing Groups. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Academic Press. 885-890.

  24. Ruby, P., Ahilan, B., Antony, C., Manikandavelu, D., Selvaraj, S. and Moses, T.L.S. (2022). Evaluation of effect of the different stocking densities on growth performance, survival, water quality and body indices of pearlspot (Etroplus suratensis) fingerlings in biofloc technology. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 56(8): 1034-1040. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4922.

  25. Safavi, S.V., Kenari, A.A., Tabarsa, M. and Esmaeili, M. (2019). Effect of sulfated polysaccharides extracted from marine macroalgae (Ulva intestinalis and Gracilariopsis persica) on growth performance, fatty acid profile and immune response of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Journal of Applied Phycology. 31: 4021-403.

  26. Siddik, M.A., Howieson, J., Ilham, I. and Fotedar, R. (2018). Growth, biochemical response and liver health of juvenile barramundi (Lates calcarifer) fed fermented and non- fermented tuna hydrolysate as fishmeal protein replacement ingredients. Peer J. 6: 4870. doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/ peerj.4870.

  27. Silva, D.M., Valente, L.M.P., Sousa-Pinto, I., Pereira, R., Pires, M.A., Seixas, F., Rema, P. (2015). Evaluation of IMTA- produced seaweeds (Gracilaria, Porphyra and Ulva) as dietary ingredients in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L., juveniles. Effects on growth performance and gut histology. J. Appl. Phycol. 27: 1671-1680.

  28. Valente, L.M., Arauìjo, M., Batista, S., Peixoto, M.J., Sousa-Pinto, I., Brotas, V., Cunha, L.M. and Rema, P. (2016). Carotenoid deposition, flesh quality and immunological response of Nile tilapia fed increasing levels of IMTA-cultivated Ulva sp. J. of Applied Phycology. 28: 691-701. 

  29. Vizcaino, A., Rodiles, A., López, G., Saez, M., Herrera, M., Hachero- Cruzado, I., Moya, T.M., Cerón-García, M.C., Alarcón, F. (2018). Growth performance, body composition and digestive functionality of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858) juveniles fed diets including microalgae freeze-dried biomass. Fish Physiol Biochem. 44(2): 661- 677.

  30. Wassef, E.A., El-Sayed, A.F.M., Kandeel, K.M., Sakr, E.M. (2005). Evaluation of Pterocladia and Ulva meals as additives to gilthead seabream Sparus aurata diets. Egypt J. Aquat Res. 31: 321-332. 

  31. Wassef, E.A., El-Sayed, A.M., Eman, M.S.A.K.R. (2013). Pterocladia (Rhodophyta) and Ulva (Chlorophyta) as feed supplements for European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax L., fry. J. Appl. Phycol. 25: 1369-1376. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)