Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Prevalence of Bacterial Diseases in Ornamental Fish Rearing Units of Kolathur, Tamil Nadu, India

R. Srinath1, A. Uma1,*
1Department of Aquatic Animal Health Management, Dr. M.G.R Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Ponneri-601 204, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: Ornamental fishkeeping is a widely embraced hobby globally. In India, Kolathur, Chennai Tamil Nadu is an important ornamental fish hub involved in trading of ornamental fishes. As a lucrative industry, the ornamental fish trade faces significant challenges due to diseases caused by various pathogens, impacting market value and causing economic losses. 

Methods: A surveillance study was conducted in Kolathur, Chennai, from December 2022 to August 2023. Ornamental fish samples exhibiting clinical signs of bacterial diseases were collected from the farms and retail outlets. Bacterial isolation and identification techniques, including conventional and PCR detection, were employed to isolate and identify bacterial strains from infected fish samples.

Result: Out of 196 fish samples, 51 (29.4%) were found infected with bacterial pathogens. The prevalent bacterial pathogens included Aeromonas veronii (47%), A.caviae (17%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15%), Streptococcus sp. (11.3%), Mycobacterium fortuitum (5.6%) and Shewanella sp. (3.7%). Different fish families exhibited varying susceptibility to bacterial diseases, with cyprinids being the most affected (56.6%). The findings stress the importance of adhering to health regulations to prevent transboundary spread and suggest the development of targeted management strategies to sustain the health of ornamental fish populations.

Ornamental fish keeping is widely practised as a popular hobby across the globe, adorning the homes and gardens. A substantial number of households in developed countries embrace this hobby, with roughly 16% in Australia, 13% in UK, 10% in USA and 1.25% in India nurturing ornamental fish within their premises. In India, notably, cities like Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai serve as pivotal hubs for trading ornamental fishes. In exports Kolkata holds the major share of approximately 90%, followed by Mumbai (8%) and Chennai (2%) contributing to India’s ornamental fish trade (Ghosh et al., 2002).
       
Fish diseases stem from a combination of underlying and perpetuating factors, a concept elucidated by (Chapman et al.,1997). The major cause of diseases in aquatic organism is due to wide spread distribution of bacterial pathogens and stress caused by intensification of practices. On a global scale, the aquaculture industry has witnessed over 13 bacterial genera implicated as major bacterial diseases (Pridgeon and Klesius, 2012). Bacterial infections caused due to fluctuations in key physical and chemical parameters of pond water, such as abrupt changes in turbidity, temperature, salinity, pH, water conductivity and dissolved oxygen levels (Islam et al., 2019; Nadirah et al., 2013).
       
Kolathur, located in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India is a ornamental fish trading hub with 1,850 operational ornamental fish producing units operating in Kolathur and adjacent regions of Athur and Devambattu with a worth about US$ 0.5-1.1 million are traded annually (Shinoj et al., 2021). Due to a high volume and an increasing incidence of diseases including the transboundary diseases there is a growing concern within the industry. Whenever live animals are moved, there is potential transfer of the pathogens with the host as well. In order to prevent the spread of diseases across boundaries without unjustified trade restrictions, international regulations regarding the health state of livestock have been implemented (Grant and Arita, 2017). To address this situation, it is essential to conduct a prevalence study to assess the incidence of existing diseases, identify potential emerging diseases and establish screening protocols. Additionally, there is a need to formulate new guidelines and responsibilities in this regard. The implementation of aquatic animal health control measures is tailored based on the health status of both importing and exporting countries, particularly concerning the presence of World Organisation for Animal Health (formerly as OIE) listed pathogens that pose a high risk if introduced to a pathogen-free zone. This underscores the potential of ornamental fish to serve as transboundary carriers of significant diseases (Ariel, 2005). Hence, the present study was carried out to understand the occurrence of bacterial diseases in ornamental fishes at Kolathur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sample collection
 
Ornamental fish samples showing clinical signs lethargy, abnormal swimming behaviour, ulceration on the body, eroded scales, tail rot and fin rot were collected as a part of the surveillance study conducted during Dec 2022 to Aug 2023 in the ornamental fish farms and outlets of Kolathur (GPS: 13.126004°E; 80.209976°N), Chennai. The fishes were transported to the wet lab of State Referral Laboratory Aquatic Animal Health, TNJFU, Madhavaram in live condition. The samples were aseptically dissected and the disease signs in internal organs were recorded. The skin, gill and fin scrapings were collected from the live infected fish samples and the wet mounts were examined under the microscope for parasite infestation.
 
Isolation of bacterial pathogens
 
For isolation of bacterial pathogens, swab samples were collected aseptically from the ulcers, haemorhages on the skin and inoculated in appropriate bacteriological media (Tryptic soy broth) (Himedia, India) and incubated at 35±2°C for 20-24 h. The infected tissue from internal organs were homogenised in PBS, inoculated in liquid media (Himedia, India) and incubated at 35±2°C for 20-24 h. Further isolation was carried out on specific bacteriological media viz., Aeromonas isolation medium base for Aeromonas sp. and Pseudomonas sp., Streptococcus selective agar Streptococcus sp. and Thiosulfate citrate bile salt (TCBS) agar for Shewanella sp (Himedia, India).
       
For isolation of Mycobacterium sp. tissue samples from the infected fish were homogenized and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min, the pellets were suspended in 1 ml of 12% sulfuric acid, incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The pellet was added with distilled water followed by centrifugation. Again, the pellet was resuspended in 200 µl of distilled water and inoculated into Middlebrook 7H9 broth with an indicator (Himedia and incubated for 7-10 days at 37°C). Conventional identification of Mycobacterium sp. involves observation of pink granules in the broth and microscopically examining the Ziehl-Neelsen stained bacterial cultures. The bacterial isolates were identified by following conventional biochemical methods viz., Gram staining, catalase, oxidase, indole, methyl red, voges proskaur, citrate utilisation, nitrate reduction and Pyrazinamidase test. Prevalence data was generated by the application of the formula:
 
  
 
Subsequently, graphical representation was created based on the obtained prevalence values.
 
PCR detection of bacterial pathogens
 
Total genomic DNA was isolated from pure cultures of bacterial pathogens using bacterial total DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA from isolates were amplified with the primers targeting 16s rDNA (Weisburg et al., 1991), aerolysin gene for detection of Aeromonas sp. (Nawaz et al., 2010) and heat shock protein for detection of Mycobacterium sp. (Kim et al., 2005). The PCR amplified products were sequenced (Eurofins, India), analysed for their similarity with the sequences available in the GenBank, NCBI, their identity were confirmed and submitted for the Accession nos.
Among the total number of 196 fishes screened 51 (29.4%) fish samples were found infected with bacterial pathogens. About 53 bacterial isolates which included Aeromonas veronii (n=25), A.caviae (n=9), Pseudomonas aerginosa (n=8), Streptococcus sp. (n=6), Shewanella sp. (n=2), Mycobacterium fortuitum (n=3) were isolated from infected ornamental fishes. Table 1.1 and 1.2 represents the biochemical results for the isolated bacterial pathogens and species were confirmed by PCR and sequence analysis has been carried out. PCR amplification (Fig 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3) and sequence analysis confirmation of the isolates for the infected fishes are shown in Table 2.
 
 

Table 1.1: Biochemical characterization of bacterial pathogens isolated in this study.


 

Table 1.2: Biochemical characterization of Mycobacterium sp. isolated in this study.


 

Fig 1.1: PCR amplification aerolysin gene of Aeromonas sp.


 

Fig 1.2: PCR amplification of hsp 90 gene of Mycobacterium sp.


 

Fig 1.3: PCR amplification of of 16s rDNA bacterial pathogens.


 

Table 2: GenBank accession nos. (NCBI) of the bacterial pathogens isolated in the study.


 
Bacterial species-wise prevalence in fish samples
 
The analysis of the prevalence pattern of the bacterial pathogens in ornamental fishes of Kolathur showed that Aeromonas sp. (64.15%) (A.veronii-47%; A.caviae-17%) was the highly prevalent pathogen followed by Pseudomonas aerginosa (15%), Streptococcus sp. (11.3%), Mycobacterium fortuitum (5.6%) and Shewanella sp. (3.7%) (Fig 2).
 

Fig 2: Prevalence of bacterial pathogens in ornamental fishes of Kolathur, TN.


       
Fishes are susceptible to various infectious diseases caused by bacteria, virus, fungi and parasites and non-infectious diseases. Among the various diseases reported in aquaculture, bacterial fish diseases are considered important as they affect the development and expansion of ornamental fish farming practices due to reduced growth and mortality with the reported economic losses of about 15% (Mohd-Aris et al., 2019;). Bacterial pathogens that are gram-negative are known widely to infect ornamental fishes (Sorum, 2005). It is well known that the occurrence of new diseases are trading of live fishes is being reported from all around the world (Dias et al., 2012). Transportation of live fishes without proper screening is responsible for the cause of infectious diseases (Cardoso et al., 2019).
       
Aeromonas sp. being the major infectious agent in ornamental fish industry and opportunistic in nature (Hettiarachchi and Cheong, 1994; Chandrarathna et al., 2018).  They are highly diverse and probably shows different infection levels among fish hosts (Nwaj-Fyzul et al., 2007) and causing severe infection in immune-compromised individuals (Wu et al., 2019). A. veronii has been reported to be an important pathogen of Aeromonas genus causing disease outbreaks with clinical signs like haemorrhagic septicemia (Trichogaster sp.), dropsy (Astronotus ocellatus) tail and fin rot (Carassius auratus) (Sreedharan et al., 2013; Praveenraj et al., 2023) as well as contributing mass mortality in ornamental carps (Chen et al., 2019). Infected fish species and contaminated water are regarded as the routes of transmission for Aeromonas sp. (Thornton et al., 1999; Ozcan, 2023). In the present study, Aeromonas sp. associated with mass mortality and dropsy of Koi carp, Goldfish and Flower horn. Hatha and Nifty (2012) reported a high prevalence of Aeromonas sp. (37.5%) in ornamental fishes at Kerala. A. caviae formerly is known as A.punctata, causes infectious abdominal dropsy in fishes. Recently, Anjur et al., (2021) reported that A. caviae is the most dominant cause of bacterial disease in ornamental fishes. In contrast our study recorded A.veronii as the dominant pathogen (47%) in ornamental fish farms of Kolathur. This variation continues to elucidate the factors contributing to differences in pathogen prevalence, aiding in the development of targeted and effective strategies for disease management in ornamental fish populations.
 
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen known to affect fishes as they are opportunistic in certain environmental condition (Yoon et al., 2010). Causing various pathological signs viz., high mortality, scale desquamation, hemorrhagic skin ulceration, abdominal distension (ascites) and exophthalmia (Thomas et al., 2014; El-Bahar et al., 2019; Raj et al., 2004). Nair et al., (2021) reported mass mortality in Etroplus maculatus in P. aerginosa infected fishes and it is regarded as a surface pathogen. In this study, P. aerginosa infected fishes showed clinical signs which included abdominal dropsy, fin and tail rot in both tiger barb and goldfish with a prevalence of 15%. Previously, reported prevalence of this diseases in ornamental fishes were 2.13% in Poland (Saengsitthisak et al., 2020), 5% in Italy (Sicuro et al., 2020) and 7.1% in Thailand (Walczak et al., 2017) in ornamental fishes.
       
Streptococcosis is a septicemic disease affecting both cultured and wild populations of freshwater and marine fish species throughout the world (Kitao, 1981; Austin and Austin,1999). It is known to exhibit clinical signs, viz., erratic swimming; loss of buoyancy control, lethargy, ascites, darkening with high mortality rate (>50%) over a period of 3 to 7 days (Yanong and Francis-Floyd, 2002). Other clinical signs reported are weakness, loss of equilibrium in ram cichlid Mikrogeophagus ramirezi (Lazado et al., 2018) and mortality in doctor fish Garra rufa (Ruane et al., 2013). In this study, Goldfish, Koi carp and Devil cichlids infected with Streptococcus sp. exhibited lethargic movement, loss of equilibrium and erosion in scales with a prevalence of 11.3%. Streptococcus sp. prevalence of 1.3% has been recorded earlier in aquarium outlets in Malaysia (Nie et al., 2015).
       
Fish Mycobacteriosis is one of the most devastating diseases in aquaculture in recent years. Mycobacteriosis causes chronic systemic infections in fish and is capable of causing skin lesions in human handlers due to its zoonotic nature (Ucko et al., 2002). Mycobacteriosis caused due to M. fortuitum and M. marinum has been reported in fishes (Puk et al., 2018).  M.fortuitum was described for the first time by Da costa cruz in 1938. Clinical signs viz., lethargic swimming, scoliosis, skin ulceration and loss of pigmentation have been reported in gold fish and other fishes (Lawhavinit et al., 2005; Gokul Raj et al., 2019; Dissanayake et al., 2017). Which are highly challenging to treat (Bartralot et al., 2005). In this present study, M. fortuitum infection was reported in Zebra fish, Goldfish and Guppies that showed lethargic movement and mortalities with a prevalence of 5.66%. Mycobacteriosis in ornamental fishes with a total prevalence of 46.8% have been recorded in Italy (Zanoni et al., 2008) and 50.1% in Poland (Puk and Guz, 2020). In India, the prevalence of mycobacterial infections in freshwater ornamental fish presents a significant concern. This is because, apart from causing infection in fish, these non-tuberculous mycobacteria have the potential to spread from fish and induce both localized and widespread infections in humans (Shukla et al., 2014).
       
Shewanellosis is an emerging disease in freshwater fishes caused by the bacteria of Shewanella sp. It has been generally isolated from sea water samples and putrefied fish (Stenstrom and Molin, 1990). The first documentation of disease outbreaks in freshwater fish attributable to this bacterium were reported in Poland in 2004. Recently Shewanella sp. has been reported as an opportunistic bacterial pathogen in fish and isolated from moribund goldfish in Turkey (Altun et al., 2014), common carp and other ornamental fishes exhibiting necrotic lesions and ulceration on skin. In this study, Shewanella sp. infected koi carp exhibited deep ulceration on skin and exudated around the kidney with a prevalence of 3.77%. Walczak et al., (2017) reported a prevalence of 7.1% in ornamental fishes from an aquarium shop in Poland. In the recent times, there is an escalation in the spread of Shewanella sp.  infections among freshwater fishes. Hence, there is an urgent need to undertake comprehensive studies on this bacterium concerning emerging risks (Pazdzoir et al., 2019).
 
Fish family-wise prevalence of bacterial diseases
 
The prevalence of bacterial pathogens in various fish families is presented in the Fig 3. Analysis of the pattern of prevalence of bacterial diseases in fish family-wise showed that cyprinids were the most susceptible to bacterial diseases with a disease prevalence rate of 56.6% caused by Aeromonas sp., Pseudomonas sp., Mycobacterium fortuitum and Shewanella sp. This may be attributed to the high contribution of Cyprinids, Gold fish and koi carp to the total number of fishes (93/196), being the most popular ornamental fishes in India and other countries. The next most susceptible fish family was cichlid, with a total disease prevalence of 15% (18/196), caused by Aeromonas sp., Streptococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Live bearers of Poecilidae family showed overall disease prevalence of 13.2% (21/196). Bacterial disease prevalence showed the least occurrence in fish families viz., Osphronemidae (27/196), Characidae (7/196) and Loricariidae (7/196) with an overall prevalence being less than 5% caused by Aeromonas sp. and Psedomonas sp. Whereas, no bacterial diseases were observed in fishes of families Adrianichthyidae, Pomacentridae, Gobiidae and Ambassidae.
 

Fig 3: Fish family-wise prevalence of bacterial pathogens in ornamental fishes.


       
In our research, we observed higher prevalence of bacterial diseases in egg laying fishes belonging to families viz., Cyprinidae, Osphronemidae, Cichlidae, Characidae, Loricariidae, Adrianichthyidae, Pomacentridae, Gobiidae and Ambassidae (egg layers). The total prevalence rate of diseases in egg layers was 87%, while live bearers of family Poecilidae exhibited a total bacterial diseases prevalence of 13%. These findings highlight that bacterial diseases prevalence can vary among different fish families, potentially due to differences in their inherent disease susceptibility/resistance, environmental factors, behaviour, physiology and inherent susceptibility to specific diseases. Of particular interest is the comparison with Sicuro et al., (2020) in which they have reported an exceptionally bacterial diseases prevalence of 68% in the Poeciliidae family (live bearers). Potential explanations may include variations in sampling methods, geographic regions, or the specific species within the Poeciliidae family was studied.
 
The fish samples were collected weekly twice during a total period of nine months (Dec 2022- Aug 2023). The most and prevalence of bacterial diseases was observed to increase from the month of December and peaked during January and reduced thereafter. As January is considered as a winter season, some pathogens thrive well in colder condition and certain diseases exhibited prolonged incubation, leading to severe infection in ornamental fishes. Conversely, May 2023 exhibited the lowest prevalence at 3.7%, signifying a lower proportion of infected hosts during that time, reinforcing the comparatively reduced microbial load (Fig 4).
 

Fig 4: Month wise prevalence of bacterial diseases in ornamental fishes.

In conclusion, this comprehensive study conducted in the ornamental fish farms in Kolathur, Chennai, illuminates the intricate dynamics of bacterial diseases affecting ornamental fish, underlining the critical need for robust disease surveillance and management practices in the ornamental fishkeeping industry. The identified bacterial pathogens, particularly the prevalence of Aeromonas veronii, A.caviae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus sp., Mycobacterium fortuitum and Shewanella sp. in various species of fishes provide valuable insights into the specific health challenges faced by various fish families. The observed variations in bacterial disease prevalence during various months emphasize the influence of seasonal and environmental factors. These findings not only contribute to the understanding of disease patterns but also underscore the necessity for collaborative research and adherence to health regulations to prevent the transboundary spread of ornamental fish diseases. The study’s implications extend to the development of targeted management strategies for the ornamental fish industry, aiming to mitigate economic losses and sustain the health of these cherished aquatic pets. For disease control and prevention emphasis should be given on proper sanitation and bio-security measures in the aquaculture production systems.
The authors acknowledge the research facilities extended by Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University to carry out this research work.
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

  1. Altun, S., Büyükekiz, A.G., Duman, M., Özyiðit, M.Ö., Karataº, S., Turgay, E. (2014). Isolation of Shewanella putrefaciens from goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus). Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh. 66. doi: 10.46989/ 001c.20750.

  2. Anjur, N., Sabran, S.F., Daud, H.M., Othman, N.Z. (2021). An update on the ornamental fish industry in Malaysia: Aeromonas hydrophila-associated disease and its treatment control. Veterinary World. 14(5): 1143-1152.

  3. Ariel, E. (2005). Ornamental fish as trans-boundary vectors of viral diseases. Diseases in Asian Aquaculture V. 103-112.

  4. Austin, B., Austin, D.A., Munn, C.B. (2007). Bacterial fish pathogens: Disease of farmed and wild fish Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Springer. 26, 552p.

  5. Austin, B., Austin, D.A. (1999). Bacterial Fish Pathogens, Disease of Farmed and Wild Fish, 3rd edn. (revised). Springer- Praxis, Godalming.

  6. Bartralot, R., Patos, V.G., Sitjas, D.,  Cano, L.R., Mollet, J.,  Casabona, M.N. and Pujol, R.M. (2005). Clinical patterns of cutaneous nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. British Journal of Dermatology. 152(4): 727-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06519.x.

  7. Cardoso, P.H.M., Moreno, A.M., Moreno, L.Z., Oliveira, C.H.D., Baroni, F.D.A., Maganha, S. R.D.L., Balian, S.D.C. (2019). Infectious diseases in aquarium ornamental pet fish: Prevention and control measures. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 56(2): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2019.151697.

  8. Chandrarathna, H.P.S.U., Nikapitiya, C., Dananjaya, S.H.S., Wijerathne, C.U.B., Wimalasena, S.H.M.P., Kwun, H.J., De Zoysa, M. (2018). Outcome of co-infection with opportunistic and multidrug resistant Aeromonas hydrophila and A. veronii in zebrafish: Identification, characterization, pathogenicity and immune responses. Fish and Shellfish Immunology. 80: 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.06.049.

  9. Chapman, H.A., Riese, R.J., Shi, G.P. (1997). Emerging roles for cysteine proteases in human biology. Annual Review of Physiology. 59(1): 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.63.

  10. Chen, F., Sun, J., Han, Z., Yang, X., Xian, J.A., Lv, A., Shi, H. (2019). Isolation, identification and characteristics of Aeromonas veronii from diseased crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Frontiers in Microbiology. 10, 2742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02742.

  11. Dias, C., Mota, V., Martinez-Murcia, A. Saavedra, M.J. (2012). Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Aeromonas spp.  isolated from ornamental fish. J. Aquacult Res Dev.  3(131): 2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.1000131.

  12. Dissanayake, A., Perera, V., Jagoda, S.S.D.S., Roshani Edirisinghe, E.A., Arulkanthan, A. (2017). Characterisation of non- tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from apparently healthy and diseased fresh water ornamental fish in Sri Lanka. Asian Fisheries Science. 30(2): 118-129.

  13. El-Bahar, H.M., Ali, N.G., Aboyadak, I.M., Khalil, S.A.E.S., Ibrahim, M.S. (2019). Virulence genes contributing to Aeromonas hydrophila pathogenicity in Oreochromis niloticus. International Microbiology. 22: 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-019-00075-3.

  14. Ghosh, A., Mahapatra, B.K., Datta, N.C. (2002). Studies on native ornamental fish of West Bengal with a note on their conservation. Environment and Ecology. 20(4): 787-793.

  15. Gokulraj, A., Praveenraj, J., Gnanadesikan, R., Arumugam, U. (2019). Mycobacterial infection in ornamental fishes farmed in low saline waters of Tiruvallur District, India. Journal of Coastal Research. 86(SI): 134-137. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI86-020.1.

  16. Grant, J., Arita, S. (2017). Sanitary and phyto-sanitary measures: Assessment, measurement and impact. Agricultural and Food Policy International Relations/Trade. 56p. 

  17. Hatha, A.A.M., Nifty, J. (2012). Prevalence, distribution and drug resistance of motile aeromonads in freshwater ornamental fishes. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 59(2): 161-164.

  18. Hettiarachchi, D.C., Cheong, C.H. (1994). Some characteristics of Aeromonas hydrophila and Vibrio species isolated from bacterial disease outbreaks in ornamental fish culture in Sri Lanka. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka. 22(3): 261-269.

  19. Islam, M.M.M., Shafi, S., Bandh, S.A. and Shameem, N. (2019). Impact of Environmental Changes and Human Activities on Bacterial Diversity of Lakes. In: Freshwater Microbiology. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 817495-1.00003-7. (pp. 105-136).

  20. Kim, H., Kim, S.H., Shim, T.S., Kim, M.N., Bai, G.H., Park, Y.G., Kim, B.J. (2005). Differentiation of Mycobacterium species by analysis of the heat-shock protein 65 gene (hsp65).  International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 55(4): 1649-1656. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63553-0.

  21. Kitao, T., Aoki, T., Sakoh, R. (1981). Epizootic caused by β-haemoltytic Streptococcus species in cultured freshwater fish. Fish Pathology. 15(3-4): 301-307. https://doi.org/10.3147/ jsfp.15.301.

  22. Lawhavinit, O.A., Wada, S., Hatai, K. (2005). Combined Infection of Amoebae and Mycobacteria in Ranchu, Goldfish (Carassius auratus). In: Proceedings of 43rd Kasetsart University Annual Conference, Thailand, 1-4 February, 2005. Subject: Fisheries Kasetsart University. (pp. 3-9).

  23. Lazado, C.C., Fridman, S., Sinai, T., Zilberg, D. (2018). First report of Streptococcus parauberis in a cultured freshwater ornamental fish, the ram cichlid Mikrogeophagus ramirezi (Myers and Harry, 1948). Journal of Fish Diseases. 41(1): 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12676.

  24. Mohd-Aris, A., Saad, M.Z., Daud, H.M., Yusof, M.T., Ina-Salwany, M.Y. (2019). Vibrio harveyi protease deletion mutant as a live attenuated vaccine candidate against vibriosis and transcriptome profiling following vaccination for Epinephelus fuscoguttatus. Aquaculture international. 27: 125-140.

  25. Nadirah, M., Wee, T.L., Najiah, M. (2013). Differential responses of Vibrio sp. to young and mature leaves extracts of Terminalia catappa L. International Food Research Journal. 20(2): 961-966.

  26. Nair, S.G., Lipton, A., De los Ríos-Escalante, P., Ibáñez-Arancibia, E. (2021). Isolation and characterization of bacterial pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter cloacae from the moribund fish, Etroplus maculatus. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 12: 1332-1349.

  27. Nawaz, M., Khan, S.A., Khan, A.A., Sung, K., Tran, Q., Kerdahi, K., Steele, R. (2010). Detection and characterization of virulence genes and integrons in Aeromonas veronii isolated from catfish. Food Microbiology. 27(3): 327-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.11.007.

  28. Newaj, F.A., Adesiyun, A.A., Mutani, A., Ramsubhag, A., Brunt, J., Austin, B. (2007). Bacillus subtilis AB1 controls Aeromonas infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Journal of Applied Microbiology. 103(5): 1699-1706.

  29. Nie, Z., Zheng, Y., Du, H., Xie, S., Wang, M. (2015). Dynamics and diversity of microbial community succession in traditional fermentation of Shanxi aged vinegar. Food Microbiology.  47: 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.006.

  30. Ozcan, F. (2023). Observation of inherently contaminated Oncorhynchus mykiss walbaum, 1792 by Aeromonas veronii with MALD?-TOF and culture methods and specification of antibiotic sensitivity profiles of agent in a commercial farms. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 57(2): 245- 248. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1444.

  31. PaŸdzior, E., Pêkala-Safiñska, A., Wasyl, D. (2019). Phenotypic diversity and potential virulence factors of the Shewanella putrefaciens group isolated from freshwater fish. Journal  of Veterinary Research. 63(3): 321-332.

  32. Praveenraj, J., Saravanan, K., Uma, A. and Kiruba-Sankar, R. (2023). First report of two bacterial diseases from the freshwater fishes of the Andaman Islands, India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1, 7. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5237.

  33. Pridgeon, J.W., Klesius, P.H. (2012). Major bacterial diseases in aquaculture and their vaccine development. CABI Reviews. (2012): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20127048.

  34. Puk, K., Banach, T., Wawrzyniak, A., Adaszek, £., Zietek, J., Winiarczyk, S., Guz, L. (2018). Detection of Mycobacterium marinum, M. peregrinum, M. fortuitum and M. abscessus in aquarium fish. J. Fish Dis. 41: 153-156.

  35. Puk, K., Guz, L. (2020). Occurrence of Mycobacterium spp. in ornamental fish. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 27(4): 535-539. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/114913.

  36. Raj, S.N., Shetty, N.P., Shetty, H.S. (2004). Seed bio-priming with Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates enhances growth of pearl millet plants and induces resistance against downy mildew. International Journal of Pest Management.  50(1): 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870310001626365.

  37. Ruane, N.M., Collins, E.M., Geary, M., Swords, D., Hickey, C., Geoghegan, F. (2013). Isolation of Streptococcus agalactiae and an aquatic birnavirus from doctor fish Garrarufa L. Irish Veterinary Journal. 66: 1-4.

  38. Saengsitthisak, B., Chaisri, W., Punyapornwithaya, V., Mektrirat, R., Klayraung, S., Bernard, J.K., Pikulkaew, S. (2020). Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of multidrug-resistant aeromonads isolated from freshwater ornamental fish in Chiang Mai province. Pathogens. 9(11): 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110973.

  39. Shinoj, P., Baiju, K.K., Vijayagopal, P. (2021). Status and prospects of ornamental fish and fish feed industry in Southern India. Marine Fisheries Information Service, Technical and Extension Series. 248: 7-11.

  40. Shukla, J., Gupta, R., Thakur, K.G., Gokhale, R., Gopal, B. (2014). Structural basis for the redox sensitivity of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis SigK-RskA s-anti-s complex. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography.  70(4): 1026-1036. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714000121.

  41. Sicuro, B., Pastorino, P., Barbero, R., Barisone, S., Dellerba, D., Menconi, V., Prearo, M. (2020). Prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from imported ornamental fish in Italy: A translocation of resistant strains? Preventive  Veterinary Medicine. 175, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104880.

  42. Sicuro, B., Pastorino, P., Barbero, R., Barisone, S., Dellerba, D., Menconi, V., Prearo, M. (2020). Prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from imported ornamental fish in Italy: A translocation of resistant strains? Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 175: 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104880.

  43. Sorum, H. (2005). Antimicrobial drug resistance in fish pathogens.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin. 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817534.ch13.

  44. Sreedharan, K., Philip, R., Singh, I.S.B. (2013). Characterization and virulence potential of phenotypically diverse Aeromonas veronii isolates recovered from moribund freshwater ornamental fishes of Kerala, India. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 103: 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-012-9786-z.

  45. Stenström, I.M., Molin, G. (1990). Classification of the spoilage flora offish, with special reference to Shewanella putrefaciens. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 68(6): 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb05226.x.

  46. Thomas, J., Thanigaivel, S., Vijayakumar, S., Acharya, K., Shinge, D., Seelan, T.S.J.,  Chandrasekaran, N. (2014). Pathogenecity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Oreochromis mossambicus and treatment using lime oil nanoemulsion. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 116: 372-377. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.019.

  47. Thornton, J.M., Austin, D.A., Austin, B., Powell, R. (1999). Small subunit rRNA gene sequences of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. smithia and Haemophilus piscium reveal pronounced similarities with A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida.  Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 35(2): 155-158. doi: 10.3354/dao035155.

  48. Ucko, M., Colorni, A., Kvitt, H., Diamant, A., Zlotkin, A., Knibb, W.R. (2002). Strain variation in Mycobacterium marinum fish isolates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 68(11): 5281-5287. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.11.5281- 5287.2002.

  49. Walczak, N., Puk, K., Guz, L. (2017). Bacterial flora associated with diseased freshwater ornamental fish. Journal of Veterinary Research. 61(4): 445. doi: 10.1515/jvetres- 2017-0070.

  50. Weisburg, W.G., Barns, S.M., Pelletier, D.A., Lane, D.J. (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.  Journal of Bacteriology. 173(2): 697-703. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991.

  51. Wu, C.J., Ko, W.C., Lee, N.Y., Su, S.L., Li, C. W., Li, M.C., Chen, P.L. (2019). Aeromonas isolates from fish and patients in Tainan City, Taiwan: Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics.  Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 85(21): e01360- 19. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01360-19.

  52. Yanong, R.P., Francis-Floyd, R. (2002). Streptococcal infections of fish. Florida Cooperative Extension Service. IFAS, University of Florida. 1-5.

  53. Yoon, M.Y., Lee, K.M., Jeong, S.H., Kim, J., Yoon, S.S. (2010). Heterogeneous virulence potential and high antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from Korean pneumonia patients. The Journal of Microbiology.  48: 518-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-010-9388-2.

  54. Zanoni, R.G., Florio, D., Fioravanti, M.L., Rossi, M., Prearo, M. (2008). Occurrence of Mycobacterium spp. in ornamental  fish in Italy. Journal of Fish Diseases. 31(6): 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.00924.x.

Editorial Board

View all (0)