Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 57 issue 12 (december 2023) : 1740-1746

A Pioneering Assessment on the Physico-chemical and Health Status of a Small Sub-tropical Reservoir in North-Eastern, India

Sanjenbam Bidyasagar1, Yumnam Bedajit Singh2,*, Ch Basudha Devi3, Geetanjali Deshmukhee1, A.K. Jaswar1, Sukham Monalisha1, Gusheinzed Waikhom4
1ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, Mumbai-400 061, Maharastra, India.
2Central Agricultural University, Imphal-795 001, Manipur, India.
3ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Manipur Centre, Lamphelpat-795 004, Manipur, India.
4College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Lembucherra, Agartala-799 210, Tripura, India.
Cite article:- Bidyasagar Sanjenbam, Singh Bedajit Yumnam, Devi Basudha Ch, Deshmukhee Geetanjali, Jaswar A.K., Monalisha Sukham, Waikhom Gusheinzed (2023). A Pioneering Assessment on the Physico-chemical and Health Status of a Small Sub-tropical Reservoir in North-Eastern, India . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 57(12): 1740-1746. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5195.

Background: The water resources of Northeast (NE) Indian reservoirs have been largely overlooked, despite their immense potential in various aspects. A comprehensive analysis of water quality parameters was conducted to assess the physio-chemical changes and health status of Maphou or Mapithel reservoir, Manipur, NE, India. 

Methods: Sub-surface water samples were collected from June 2021 to May 2022 to assess the spatio-temporal changes. Trophic State Index (TSI), Morpho Edaphic Index (MEI), Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and fish yield potential were calculated. The average water spread area was calculated through Normalised Difference Water Index (NDWI) method.

Result: A total of eighteen (18) water quality parameters were examined following Standard Methods. ANOVA analysis indicated that all water quality parameters, except total alkalinity, exhibited significant seasonal variations (p<0.05). Spatially, most of the water quality was found to be insignificant, except for Chl-a and depth (p<0.05). All the water quality parameters were within acceptable ranges for the growth and survival of aquatic biotic resources. No signs of pollution were observed. The trophic status of the reservoir was found in an oligotrophic state. The MEI was estimated as 8.55 and the average fish yield for the reservoir was 14.98 kg ha-1, which is below the national average yield of small reservoir (49.9 kg ha-1). The MSY was estimated to be 21.46 kg ha-1. Heatmap cluster analysis revealed three distinct clusters of months. The actual average water spread area was determined to be 852.62 ha, hence the reservoir can be categorised as small reservoir.

A reservoir is a dynamic aquatic ecosystem which combines the features of both lentic and lotic environments. Primarily built for hydroelectricity generation, irrigation and water supply, which also served as an important fishery ground in many Southeast Asian countries. These water bodies have been found to hold tremendous potential for fish production. In fact, India is blessed with vast reservoir resources, covering an area of 3.52 million hectares, comprising 19,386 reservoirs (Sarkar et al., 2019). Unfortunately, water quality degradation in reservoirs has become a major concern due to anthropogenic activities, particularly urbanization, water abstraction, discharge of and inadequate treatment of untreated domestic and industrial wastewater, etc. which poses a serious threat to lives and raises concerns for domestic consumption, agriculture and fisheries use (Teshome, 2020). Eutrophication, in particular, has emerged as a significant global threat to aquatic ecosystems in recent decades (González and Roldán, 2019). Therefore, evaluation of the health status of reservoir becomes crucial for scientific management and implementation of important legislative measures.
       
Trophic State Index (TSI) is one of the powerful tools for indirectly assessing eutrophication and has been extensively applied in ecological studies and monitoring programs (Carlson, 1977). The trophic status serves as an indicator of anthropogenic impacts on water quality and the ecological functioning of the aquatic ecosystem (Cunha et al., 2013).
       
Henderson and Welcomme (1974) devised the term “Morpho Edaphic Index (MEI)”, which gained popularity and was widely adopted in various regions. It serves as an indicator of both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of fish yields and can be utilized to determine the stocking densities of fingerlings in inland water reservoirs. Sugunan et al., (2002) developed equations for the estimation of fish yield and MSY based on the MEI, which fits the best for the estimation of productivity of the Indian reservoir.
       
The reservoirs in NE India have generally been overlooked in terms of scientific surveys, with only a few exceptions in Meghalaya (Sharma and Sharma, 2021); Mizoram (Sharma and Pachuau, 2016); Nagaland (Rongsenkumzuk et al., 2019); and Tripura (Bhattacharya and Saha, 1986). The Maphou reservoir, Manipur came into its existence in 2015 with the commissioning of the Maphou or Mapithel dam which resulted in the displacement of more than 5000 villagers, submerging 560 ha of cultivable hilly tracks and the loss of many livelihoods. However, it is strongly believed that by harnessing opportunities for fisheries and aquaculture, the reservoir can significantly enhance the economy and improve the alternative livelihoods for the affected people.
       
Recently, the state and central government has started focusing on enhancing fisheries potential of the reservoir through the state fisheries department, KVKs etc., in collaboration with National Fisheries Institutions. However, it is essential to conduct preliminary scientific research to understand the patterns of change in the physico-chemical parameters and trophic status of the reservoir. Though there are many studies on these aspects for many reservoirs from other regions (Sugunan, 2000), but studies in the context of Maphou reservoir, situated in Manipur, India is limited. In this backdrop, the present study was carried out to evaluate the physico-chemical parameters and determine the overall health status of the reservoir so that scientific resource management strategies could be formulated and implemented for the overall development of this important aquatic resource in NE, India.
Study area
 
The current study was carried out in the Maphou reservoir, situated at coordinates 94°8'33"E and 24°49'30"N, located in the Kamjong district, approximately 36 km away from Imphal, Manipur. The average elevation is 850 meters above the mean sea level (MSL) and has a catchment area of approximately 569 km2. The total length of the reservoir is 10 km stretch over the Thoubal River along the Mapithel hill range, hence sometimes referred to as the Mapithel dam. The study area was illustrated using ArcGIS software Version 10.3.4322 and depicted in Fig 1.
 

Fig 1: (a) Map showing the location of sampling sites in the Maphou reservoir, NE India. (b) Photograph of Maphou reservoir.


 
Sample collection
 
Monthly water sampling was conducted from June 2021 to May 2022. Eighteen (18) physico-chemical parameters were evaluated. Water temperature (WT), electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solid (TDS) and pH were measured using a portable digital handheld device (HM Digital COM-360 Waterproof pH/EC/TDS/Temp Meter), transparency (SD) was measured using a Secchi disc (20 cm diameter), depth (meter) was measured using Depth Trax 1H and while dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured instantly. Additionally, other water quality parameters such as free carbon dioxide (free CO2), total alkalinity (TA), total hardness (TH), total phosphate (TP), nitrate (NO3-N), nitrite (NO2-N), ammonia (NH3), BOD5 and Chlorophyll-a were estimated in Fishery Division, ICAR-Research Centre for NEH Region, Manipur centre’s laboratory. All analyses and sample preservation were performed following Standard Methods (APHA, 2012). The gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) were estimated using the “light and dark bottle” method (Gardner and Gran, 1927).
 
Heatmap cluster analysis
 
A heatmap cluster analysis was performed to identify clusters of months that exhibited similar patterns of physico-chemical parameters using average group cluster method and Euclidean distance type as adopted by Setia et al., (2021).
 
Trophic assessment
 
The trophic state index (TSI) was estimated following the method of Carlson (1977) modified by Lamparelli (2004) for tropical lake/reservoir, the mathematical equations are given below:

TSI (Chl-a) = 10×(6-[2.04-{0.695×lnChl-a}/ln2])
TSI (SD) = 10× (6-[0.64+{lnSD/ln2}])
TSI (TP) = 10× (6-[ln{80.32/TP}/ln2])
TSImean = [TSI(Chl-a)+TSI(SD)+TSI(TP)]/3
Where,
TSI = Trophic state index;
SD = Sacchi disc transparency in meter;
TP = Total phosphate in mg L-1 and Chl-a in mg L-1.
 
Morpho-Edaphic Index and fish yield potential
 
The MEI was calculated following the method of Henderson and Welcomme (1974). Both mean MSY and average fish yield were estimated following the equation developed by Sugunan et al., (2002), solely developed for approximate estimation in Indian reservoirs.

MEImean = [Specific conductivity(mS)]/[(mean depth (m)]
MSYmean(kg ha-1) = 0.9897*MEI1.3888
Fish yieldaverage (kg ha-1) = 3.984*MEI0.6374
 
Statistical analysis
 
One-way ANOVA analysis was carried out using SPSS (version 25). Heatmap cluster analysis was performed in Origin Pro. 9.9. Average water spread was estimated using ArcGIS version 10.3.4322 with NDWI method. TSI, MSY and average fish yield were calculated using MS-Excel (2013).
Dynamics of physicochemical parameters
 
Descriptive statistics of all water quality parameters are given in Table 1. The ANOVA results revealed significant seasonal variations in water quality parameters at a significance level of p<0.05, except for total alkalinity (Table 2). However, spatially, there were no significant differences observed, except for depth and Chl-a, which showed significance at a level of p<0.05 (Table 3). The water quality parameters observed were found to be within the standard ranges specified by Jhingran (1990). The water temperature of the reservoir indicated high productivity and a favourable environment for warm water fish culture (Saha et al., 2021). Although, the Maphou reservoir is small in size, its mean depth (24.1±11.5 m) resembles that of a medium-sized reservoir due to its location along the Mapithel hill ranges. The mean transparency (2.36±0.59 m) of the reservoir corresponds to good water quality (Lourantou et al., 2007). The TDS and EC values were found to be significantly lower than the maximum permissible limits (WHO, 1997). In accordance with Jhingran (1990), the EC value (154.65± 30.8 mS cm-1) was within the permissible range, indicating that the reservoir could be classified as a moderately productive reservoir. The average TDS value (77.12±15.3 mg L-1) was significantly lower than the maximum desirable limit of 500 mg L-1, specified by WHO (1997). The mean DO (9.52 ± 2.13 mg L-1) was high due to strong wind action in the prevailing upland region and vigorous mixing of the sub-surface water. The pH range remained within the highest permissible range (Jhingran, 1990). Based on the observed mean pH value (8.17±0.66), the water body could be classified as medium productive and will support good fishery (Das and Nandi, 2001). The pH range in reservoir ecosystems, as stated by Moehl and Davies (1993), can vary from 5 to 10. Alkaline pH is commonly observed in tropical and temperate reservoirs (Mwaura, 2006). It is worth mentioning that other NE reservoirs such as Kyrdemkulai and Nongmahir, of Meghalaya are acidic in nature due to the presence of an acidic bed and catchment area (Sugunan and Yadava, 1991).  A typical inverse relationship between free CO2 and pH was observed. The low mean BOD5 value (0.63±0.27 mg L-1) suggests unpolluted and healthy water (Chapman, 1992). The annual mean value of total alkalinity of the reservoir was 66.45±4.7 mg L-1 which can be considered as a medium productive water body (Jhingran, 1990). The annual mean value of the total hardness (72.4±8.85 mg L-1) was found within the recommended range for fishery (Kumar et al., 2020) and falls under the category of moderately soft water (Mato, 2002) while, the other reservoirs of Northeast, India were categorised as a soft water (Sharma and Pachuau, 2016; Sharma and Sharma, 2021). The nutrient values viz., TP (0.035±0.01 mg L-1) and NO3-N (0.039±0.02 mg L-1) are low but within the acceptable ranges as per Jhingran (1990). The value of NH3 (0.034± 0.018 mg L-1) and NO2-N (0.047±0.035 mg L-1) were also lower. Sugunan, (2000) stated that most of Indian reservoirs are low in nutrient level and reservoirs constructed on low-order streams near mountains often experience less flow and lower input of organic matter and nutrients, resulting in sparse plankton. According to the OECD (1982) standard, a Chl-a concentration of less than 3 mg L-1 indicates poor nutrient conditions and oligotrophic water, which results in low phytoplankton biomass. In the present study, the mean Chl-a (2.05±0.94 mg L-1) of the Maphou reservoir was lower than the recommended value therefore, it could be in an oligotrophic state because the water bodies situated near the mountains typically receive limited nutrients and have lower organic and nutrient inputs (Ward and Stanford, 1983). Both GPP (0.939±0.36 mgC m-3 hr-1) and NPP (0.504±0.26 mgC m-3 hr-1) values are greater than the findings of Som Kamla Amba Reservoir (Parmar and Sharma, 2018) and Morwane Dam (Babar and Raje, 2015). Overall, the observed water quality parameters indicated the existence of a healthy condition in the Maphou reservoir.
 

Table 1: Descriptive statistics of water quality parameters of Maphou reservoir.


 

Table 2: ANOVA, Post Hoc test following Duncan test showing seasonal changes in water quality parameters (data expressed as mean±SD).


 

Table 3: ANOVA Post Hoc test following Duncan test of sitewise depicting only the significant changes in water quality parameters (Data presented as mean±SD).


 
Cluster analysis
 
Heatmap cluster analysis is depicted in Fig 2, based on the result of the month-wise cluster analysis, two major clusters, namely cluster 1 and cluster 2, were identified. Cluster 1 was further divided into two sub-clusters, cluster 1a and cluster 1b, based on differential physico-chemical parameters. Cluster 1a comprised the month of May, June and July. Cluster 1b consisted December, January, February, March and April. Cluster 2 includes the month of August, September, October and November. Therefore, heatmap cluster analysis suggests that the reservoir experienced three distinct seasons due to the marked seasonal fluctuation of water level and rainfall attributed to nutrient supply. However, Sugunan (2000) suggested four seasons in Indian reservoirs based on the plankton dynamics.
 

Fig 2: Heatmap showing cluster of the months that experienced similar physico-chemical parameters.


 
Trophic state index
 
Seasonal and site-wise variations of TSI were presented in ANOVA Table 4 and 5, respectively. Temporally, all the TSI values were significantly different (p<0.05) but spatially only TSI (Chl-a) showed a significant difference (p<0.05). According to Lamparelli (2004), aquatic ecosystems can be categorised into ultra-oligotrophic (TSI <24), oligotrophic (TSI 24 to ≤44), mesotrophic (44 to ≤54), eutrophic (54 to ≤74) and hypertrophic (>74). The resultant mean TSI for each four seasons (monsoon = 41.63±2.93; post-monsoon= 36.08± 4.69; winter = 37.59±3.04); pre-monsoon = 42.19±3.79) experienced an oligotrophic state. Most of the studied reservoirs located in the hilly area tend to be oligotrophic in nature (Sharma, 1995; Murugesan et al., 2003). Among the TSI, the highest mean value was supported by TSI (Chl-a) (45.72±3.7) followed by TSI (SD) (41.7±3.32) and least by TSI (TP) (30.7±5.23), indicating that the plankton production was contributed by phosphorous and turbidity level of the water. Pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons showed higher average trophic status which might be due to nutrient supply during monsoon rainfall and occasional rainfall in pre-monsoon. The reservoir is best suited for cage culture because of its oligotrophic state.
 

Table 4: ANOVA Post Hoc test following Duncan test showing temporal variation of TSI (Data presented as mean±SD).


 

Table 5: ANOVA Post Hoc test following Duncan test showing spatial variation of TSI (Data presented as mean±SD).


 
MEI, MSY, Fish yield
 
The MEI, based on electrical conductivity and depth was calculated as 8.55 which is higher than the upland reservoir Pong Dam (Sugunan, 1995) but lower than Gumti reservoir (16.63) of Tripura (Bhattacharya and Saha, 1986). The MEI indicates the reservoir’s ecological condition and is an important input for production potential estimation. The estimated fish yield was 14.98 kg ha-1, which is lower than the national average yield of small reservoirs (Sugunan, 1995). However, the value is very close to Pong dam (Sugunan et al., 2002). The mean MSY (21.46 kg ha-1) of the reservoir is close to the upland Pong dam (23.4 kg ha-1) of Himachal Pradesh (Sugunan, 1995) and Kabini reservoir (23.86 kg ha-1) of Karnataka (Sugunan et al., 2002) but lower than Gumti reservoir (50 kg ha-1) of Tripura, NE, India (Bhattacharya and Saha, 1986). The average water spread area of Maphou reservoir was 1,215 ha at Full Reservoir Level (FRL) at an elevation of 880.75 meter due to which the reservoir was categorised under medium reservoir (Borah et al., 2023), but the actual average water spread area of the reservoir was found to be 852.625 ha in the current study. Therefore, the reservoir can be categorised and validated as a small reservoir (<1,000 ha) based on the classification provided by Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
The Maphou water is medium soft and alkaline fit for the growth and survival of aquatic life. In the present study, the overall health status of the reservoir indicated an oligotrophic condition with no evidence of pollution threats. Estimated fish yield production and MSY were lower, however, it can be improved through stock enhancement with suitable fish species and implementation of cages at suitable sites. Educational and awareness programmes should be conducted to disseminate the fisheries status and conservation strategies at the local level. The outcome of this study could serve as a crucial foundation for crafting effective strategies aimed at conserving the reservoir ecosystem. Moreover, these results could contribute to the implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management with utilization of advanced software tools such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) to gain insights into the intricate web of food chains and energy dynamics that underlie the ecosystem.
The first author is grateful to the Director of ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai for granting permission to conduct research work in Manipur and extends thanks to ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Manipur Centre, Lamphelpat, Manipur for providing the necessary facilities to accomplish the work.
 
The authors declare no conflicts of Interest.

  1. APHA, (2012). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed., Rice, [Baird, E.W., Eaton, R.B. and Clesceri, L.S.A.D. (Eds.)]; American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington, D.C. USA. 

  2. Babar, H.T. and Raje, G.B. (2015). Primary productivity study of Morawane Dam in Ratnagiri District of Maharashtra, India. Journal of Global Bioscinces. 4(2): 1430-1438.

  3. Bhattacharya, T. and Saha R.K. (1986). A comparative study of the physico-chemical conditions of the water and plankton of Gumti reservoir, open channel and river below hydel project in Tripura. Proc. Nat. Symp. Fish and Env. pp. 61-63.

  4. Borah S., Das, P., Yadav, A.K. and Das, S.C. (2023). Sustainable management of reservoir fisheries of Northeast India. Aquapost. 1: 29-31. 

  5. Carlson, R.E. (1977). A trophic state index for lakes 1. Limnology and Oceanography. 22(2): 361-369.

  6. Chapman, D. (1992). Water quality assessments; A guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring. UNESCO/WHO/ENEP.

  7. Cunha, D.G.F., do Carmo Calijuri, M. and Lamparelli, M.C. (2013). A trophic state index for tropical/subtropical reservoirs (TSItsr). Ecological Engineering. 60: 126-134.

  8. Das, S.R. and Nandi, N.C. (2001). Oxbow lake environment and management of Ichhamati river basin, West Bengal. Workshop on Lake Management in India. p. 27.

  9. Gardner, T. and Gran, H.H. (1927). Investigation of the production of plankton in the Oslo Fiord. Rapp. Et Proc-Verb. Cons Internat Explore Scient Mer Mediterr. 42: 1-48.

  10. González, E.J. and Roldán, G. (2019). Eutrophication and phytoplankton: Some generalities from lakes and reservoirs of the Americas. Microalgae from Physiology to Application. 1: 1-13.

  11. Henderson, H.F. and Welcomme, R.L. (1974). Relationship of yield to morpho-edaphic index and numbers of fishermen in African inland waters. CIFA Occas. pp.1-9.

  12. Jhingran, A.G. (1990). Recent Advances in the Reservoir Fisheries Management in India, In: Reservoir Fisheries of Asia. [De Silva, S. (ed.)], Proceedings of the 2nd Asian Reservoir  Fisheries Workshop Held in Honzhou Peoples Republic of China. 15-19 October 1990. p. 279.

  13. Kumar, D., Malik, D.S., Kumar, N., Gupta, N. and Gupta, V. (2020). Spatial changes in water and heavy metal contamination in water and sediment of river Ganga in the river belt Haridwar to Kanpur. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 42: 2059-2079.

  14. Lamparelli, M.C. (2004). Grau de Trofiaem Corpos D’ÕA gua do Estado de Sa o Paulo: Avaliac a odos me ìtodos de monitoramento. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sa o Paulo, Sa o Paulo, Brazil.

  15. Lourantou, A., Thomé, J.P. and Goffart, A. (2007). Water quality assessment of a recently refilled reservoir: The case of Bütgenbach Reservoir, Belgium. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management. 12(4): 261-274.

  16. Mato, R.R.A.M. (2002). Ground Water Pollution in Urban Dares Salaam, Tanzania: Assessing Vulnerability and Protection Priorities, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands. p. 219.

  17. Moehl, J.F. and Davies, W.D. (1993). Fishery Intensification in Small Water Bodies: A Review for North America/by John F. Moehl and William D. Davies.

  18. Murugesan, V.K., Palaniswamy, R. and Manoharan, S. (2003). Productivity of reservoirs in Tamil Nadu with reference. Journal of Inland Fisheries Society India. 35(2): 50-56.

  19. Mwaura, F. (2006). Some aspects of water quality characteristics of small shallow tropical man-made reservoirs in Kenya. African Journal of Science and Technology. 7(1): 82-86.

  20. OECD. (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1982). Eutrophication of waters. Monitoring, assessment and control. Final report, OECD cooperative programme on monitoring of inland waters (Eutrophication control), Environment Directorate, OECD, Paris. p.154.

  21. Parmar, S. and Sharma, V. (2018). Seasonal variation in primary productivity of Som Kamla Amba reservoir of Dungarpur District, Rajasthan, India. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies. 5(3): 105-107.

  22. Rongsenkumzuk, D.S., Chini, M., Bhattacahrya, A., Kar Niladri M., Jha, B.C., Patra, B.C.  (2019). Variability in ichthyofaunal diversity indices and species distribution within the different stretches of doyang reservoir, Nagaland, India. International Journal of Current Research. 2(7): 5127-5134. 

  23. Saha, A., Parakkandi, J., Vijayakumar Leela, R., Salim, S.M., Panikkar, P., Muttanahalli Eregowda, V., Sarkar U.K. and Das, B.K. (2021). Evaluation of spatio-temporal variations in physico- chemical limnology, trophic status and cyanobacterial diversity of an impacted tropical reservoir, India for its sustainable management. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. pp. 1-16.

  24. Sarkar, S.D., Gogoi, P., Sarkar, U.K., Ghosh, B.D. and Mishal, P. (2019). Trophic State Index to assess aquatic ecosystem health. Indian Farming. 69(3): 63-66.

  25. Setia, R., Lamba, S., Chander, S., Kumar, V., Dhir, N., Sharma, M., Singh, R.P. and Pateriya, B. (2021). Hydrochemical evaluation of surface water quality of Sutlej River using multi-indices, multivariate statistics and GIS. Environmental  Earth Sciences. 80: 1-17.

  26. Sharma, B. K. (1995). Limnological studies in a small reservoir in Meghalaya (NE India). Tropical Limnology II. Satya Wacana University Press, Salatiga, Indonesia. pp. 1-11.

  27. Sharma, B.K. and Pachuau, L. (2016). Diversity of Phytoplankton of a sub-tropical reservoir of Mizoram, Northeast India.  International Journal of Aquatic Biology. 4(6): 360-369.

  28. Sharma, B.K. and Sharma, S. (2021). Zooplankton diversity of a sub-tropical small urban wetland of Meghalaya, northeast India with remarks on spatial variations. Journal of Limnology  and Freshwater Fisheries Research. 7(1): 213-228.

  29. Sugunan, V.V. (1995). Reservoir Fisheries of India. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 345. pp. 423.

  30. Sugunan, V.V. (2000). Ecology and fishery management of reservoirs in India. Hydrobiologia. 430(1-3): 121-147.

  31. Sugunan, V.V. and Yadava, Y.S. (1991). Feasibility studies for inland fisheries development of Kyrdemkulai reservoir. Central Inland Capture Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, p. 34.

  32. Sugunan, V.V., Mandal, S. K. and Krishna Rao, D.S. (2002). Fish yield prediction through Morpho-Edaphic Index and estimation of stocking density for Indian reservoirs. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 49(4): 369-378.

  33. Teshome, F.B. (2020). Seasonal water quality index and suitability of the water body to designated uses at the eastern catchment of Lake Hawassa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27: 279-290.

  34. Ward, J.V. and Stanford, J.W.J. (1983). The Serial Discontinuity Concept of Lotic Ecosystems. In Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems, [(ed.) Fontaine, T.D. and Bartell, S.M.] Ann Arbor, Michigan: Annual Arborial Science. pp. 29-42.

  35. World Health Organization. (1997). The world health report 1997: Conquering suffering; Enriching humanity. In The World Health Report 1997: Conquering Suffering; Enriching Humanity. p. 162.

Editorial Board

View all (0)