Odum and Barrett, (1971) defined an ecotone as an area where two or more different ecosystems overlap and interact. They described it as a transition zone between communities, such as between a forest and grassland or between a soft bottom and hard bottom marine community. Odum also referred to the ecotone as a “junction zone or tension belt” that contains a unique set of organisms from the overlapping communities, as well as organisms that are specific to and often restricted to the ecotone itself. Mahseer, a globally renowned sport and table fish, is considered the national heritage of India (
Nautiyal, 2014).
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis are two threatened Mahseer fishes which need to be conserved
(Jha et al., 2018; Arunachalam, 2010). Even though there are multiple reports of assessment of these species in different rivers and other ecosystems. But no specific study has been conducted in an ecotone zone of a river. Thus, the current study is the first of its kind to study of two important threatened in a foothill-floodplain river interfaces ecotone zone.
Water quality parameters of River Jia Bhorali at Bhalukpong during the sampling period are given in Table 2. The study site is a flowing stream characterized by a moderate current and an average width of 60 m and depth of 1.5 m. The riverbed is composed of boulders (5%), cobbles (35%), coarse gravels (40%) and fine gravels (20%) according to the Indian Standard Soil Classification System (
Ranjan and Rao, 2000). The riparian zone is made up of shrubs, bushes and small trees like
Ziziphus mauritiana in the terrestrial part and pools and riffles in the aquatic part. The banks of the river are covered by the dense forest of Nameri National Park.
Water quality in the study area was found to be intermediate between that of foothill river water and floodplain river water when compared to previous reports of this river
(Khound et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2020). The continuous input of organic materials, such as plant litter, into the river may be a primary factor in this classification and the river continuum concept provides a suitable framework for its description. However, the riparian flora and fauna require further study.
The current study thoroughly examined and evaluated each collected specimen. The general body shape of identified
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis can be seen in Fig 2 (a and b). The body colour of fresh specimens
T. putitora were greenish and silvery on the side of the body, but turns reddish yellow or golden on the anal and pectoral fins. Mouth with lower jaw slightly shorter than the upper jaw, caudal fin deeply forked. The dorsal fin ray of the specimens found to be 11 (2/9); pectoral fin ray was 14-15, anal fin ray 7, pelvic fin ray count 8-9 while caudal fin ray count was 20. Lateral line scale found to vary between 25-27; scales above lateral line 4.5 and below lateral line 2.5 (Table 3 and 4). Based on this, the derived fin formula of
T. putitora is D11(2/9)P14-15V8-9A7(2/7)LLS25-27. The standard length (SL) of
T. putitora ranges 234-219 mm. A positive correlation was observed between total length and all the external body parts in
T. putitora (Table 5). In relation to TL, the highly correlated body parameters were FL (0.983), SL (0.932), VFL (0.906) and GL (0.905).
The scales of
N. hexagonolepis were hexagonal in shape as its name derived from it, snout length was less than that of the body depth and body color was dark brown in freshly collected specimens. The specimens were found to have 26-32 lateral line scales, 3.5-4.5 scales above lateral line and 2.5 scales below lateral line. The dorsal fin ray of the specimens found to be 11 (2/9); pectoral fin ray was 14-15, anal fin ray 7, pelvic fin ray count 8-9 while caudal fin ray count was 18-21. Lateral line scale found to be 25; scales above lateral line 3.5 and below lateral line 2.5 (Table 3 and 4). Based on this, the derived fin formula of
N. hexagonolepisis D11(2/9)P14-15V8-9A7(2/7)LLS25. The standard length (SL) of
N. hexagonolepis ranged from 211-256 mm. Positive correlation was observed between total length and the external body parts of
N. hexagonolepis except ED, LJL, GL, GW, DFH and DoM. The highly correlated body parameters in relation to TL were VFL (0.910), DaE (0.898), HD (0.895) and PFL (0.895).
The morphometric as well as meristic counts of
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis specimens recorded during the present study were found to be similar as described by previous authors
(Vishwanath et al., 2011; Langer et al., 2013 and
Laskar et al., 2013). The positive correlation between total length and other external morphological features observed during the present study indicates isometric growth pattern of
T. putitora in natural condition.
Langer et al., (2013) also reported similar morphometric relationship in Golden Mahseer from Jhajjar stream, J and K, India.
DNA barcoding
Identification of the Mahseer species were confirmed through DNA barcoding, the generated mitogenome sequences were submitted to NCBI and accession numbers were obtained (Table 5). The construction of a phylogenetic tree using maximum likelihood and neighbor-joining algorithms showed that the COI gene sequences of the specimens were closely related to those of
N. hexagonolepis and
T. putitora from other parts of the world (Fig 3). The overall genetic distance calculated within the species was 0.002 and 0.01 for
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis, respectively.
The COI gene sequence of
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis was compared to other sequences from various locations around the world available in the NCBI GenBank database. The blast alignment showed that the specimen was 98% identical to the other sequences of
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis, which, according to
Ward et al., (2005) confirms their identity as the species with 98-99% resemblance. The mitogenome sequences of the Mahseer species generated from the River Jia Bhoroli, Brahmaputra drainage is the first such kind of information. Phylogenetic analysis supports the close evolutionary relationship between the species, with a highest bootstrap value of 100. Despite the geographical distance, the COI gene sequences of the compared species are genetically similar, suggesting conservation throughout the evolutionary process. Based on both morphological and phylogenetic analyses from COI gene sequences, it is concluded that the barb species are
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis.
Population
The survey carried out over the course of one year studied a total of 1026 nos. of
N. hexagonolepis and 937nos. of
T. putitora in the Bhalukpong region of Jia Bhoroli river with the density of
N. hexagonolepis (with a CPUE of 4.3-12.6) higher in the study area compared to
T. putitora (with a CPUE of 4.1-10.3). Both species showed the highest density during March and the lowest in January. The current study found a high abundance of adult as well as young individuals of both fish species in this area. The riffles and pools provide excellent habitats for young and small fish (
de Moraris et al., 1995). The reproductive success of these populations is highly sensitive to any modifications of this ecotone zone (
Schiemer and Zalewski, 1992). The fish fauna in this ecotone zone was found to be rich and diverse and these ecotones likely play an important role as a diversified food source for the fish
(Khajuria et al., 2014). The higher abundance of fish in the study area indicates favorable conditions for these fish in this ecotone.
According to the IUCN,
T. putitora and
N. hexagonolepis are classified as endangered and near threatened, respectively
(Jha et al., 2018; Arunachalam, 2010). The major reasons of this classification are rise in water temperature, overfishing, loss of habitat, decline in quality of habitat resulting in loss of breeding grounds and from other anthropogenic effects
(Sarma et al., 2022). Hence, urgent efforts for conservation of these fish species are need of the hour. Past studies suggested that ecotones may act as hotspots for speciation, making them valuable areas for conservation investment as they can serve as centers for biodiversity.
Chapman et al., (1996) claimed ecotones as refugia for endangered fishes as populations in ecotones are often pre-adapted to changing environments and may be more resilient to environmental changes, such as climate change and invasions by non-native species. As ecotones are small in size yet rich in biodiversity, conserving these areas as
in-situ conservation may be a cost-effective strategy for maintaining biodiversity (
Karl, 2017).