The egg production, duck day egg production percent, egg weight and feed intake were significantly (P<0.05) higher in ducks fed diet with inclusion of fish meal (Table 3). The feed conversion ratio and cost of feed/dozen egg were significantly (P<0.05) better in laying ducks fed fish meal diet. Similar to present findings,
Mundhem and Opstvedt (1981) observed that inclusion of fish meal in the diet of layers significantly increased the egg production with improvement in the efficiency of feed utilisation compared to soybean meal. In an earlier study, significantly higher (P<0.05) egg production and better feed conversion ratio were reported in laying hens fed 3% fish meal compared to control group fed only soybean meal
(Rowghani et al., 2007). In contrast,
Yuan (1989) reported that fish meal can be replaced by soybean meal supplemented with synthetic amino acids for ducklings. There was significant decrease in egg production (Nos), duck day egg production % and poor FCR and cost of egg production per dozen eggs (Table 1) due to replacement of fish meal by soybean meal along with additional lysine and methionine. This may be due to the high quality protein in fish meal compared to plant protein source like soybean meal
(Fanatico et al., (2018); highly available form of calcium and phosphorous in fish meal (
Mile and Jacob, 2011); fish meal is an excellent source of all essential amino acids particularly lysine and methionine
(Scott et al., 1982); it is also a good source of unidentified factors (
Bondi, 1987). Earlier researchers also observed that the egg production, fertility and hatchability have improved due to inclusion of fish meal in the diet of laying hens (
Almayehu et al., 2015). The above extraordinary nutritional qualities in fish meal might have increased the egg production significantly with a great margin in ducks fed fish meal compared to those fed soybean meal with or without additional lysine and methionine. In contrast,
Thongwittaya and Tasaki (1996) observed normal egg production in laying ducks fed on a diet based on soybean meal (21%) with no fish meal, however, supplementation with methionine and lysine increased the egg production. Results of an earlier study demonstrated that replacement of fish meal with either different vegetable proteins or synthetic amino acids gave better results in efficiency of production and cost of production (
Rama Rao et al., 1998). The digestibility/retention of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) and crude fibre (CF) were higher in ducks fed diet with fish meal compared to those fed diet without fish meal and with amino acid supplementation (Table 4). Higher DM metabolizability was reported in white pekin ducks
(Naik et al., 2021) and in Khaki Campbell ducks
(Joshi et al., 2015). However, lower DM digestibility was reported in White Pekin and Khaki Campbell ducks, respectively
(Sahoo et al., 2014). The OM digestibility was higher than the values reported by
Sahoo et al., (2014) and similar to
Joshi et al., (2015). The metabolizability of CP values were higher than the values reported by
Naik et al., (2021) and
Sahoo et al., (2014). The metabolizability of EE in present study was significantly higher in T
2 group (without fish meal) and higher than the values reported by earlier workers
(Joshi et al., 2015). The CF metabolizability values were higher than the values (41.57 to 51.23 and 59.57 to 62.05) reported by earlier workers
(Sahoo et al., 2014 and
Naik et al., 2021). The nitrogen balance (2.69 to 2.98) and nitrogen balance as % of N intake (75.93 to 78.75) were higher in groups fed fish meal compared to other treatment groups. Similar values of nitrogen balance (2.35 to 4.22) and lower nitrogen balance as % of N intake (67.40 to 70.09) were reported by earlier researchers
(Naik et al., 2021). The difference in the values of nutrient metabolizability among the findings of various studies might be due to the difference in the feeding regimes. The egg weight was similar for all the treatment groups. However, higher (P<0.05) egg weight was reported in laying hens fed 3% fish meal compared to those fed only soybean meal as a protein source
(Rowghani et al., 2007). On the other hand, significant (P<0.05) increase in egg weight was reported in egg laying ducks and Hy-Line laying hens as dietary lysine level was increased
(Fouad et al., 2018 and
Proschaska et al., 1996). The egg quality parameters
i.e. shape index, albumen index, yolk index, haugh units, shell thickness with and without membranes and albumen % were significantly (P<0.05) better in laying ducks fed diets with SBM (without fish meal diet) and diet 3 with addition of lysine and methionine (Table 5). Earlier researchers reported that albumen quality increased with increased dietary lysine concentration
(Balnave et al., 2000). Since, better albumen quality implies better albumen height which is a indication of better albumen index and haugh unit .This may be the reason of better egg quality
i.e. albumen index and haugh unit in ducks fed diet with soybean meal replacing fish meal with or without additional lysine and methionine.
However, earlier workers reported that dietary supplementation of lysine had no effects on egg shape index and haugh unit
(Fouad et al., 2018). In contrast, no improvement in haugh unit in Hy-Line Brown laying hens and Hy-Line W-36 laying hens was reported due to dietary supplementation of lysine (
da Rocha et al., 2009 and
Souza et al., 2014). The value of haugh unit ranged from 92.51-97.24 in present study. In contrast, lower value (87.80 -90.45) was reported in Khaki Campbell laying ducks in earlier study
(Swain et al., 2020).