In the present study, it was observed that breed had a highly significant effect (P<0.01) on semen volume (Table 2). The least square means for semen volume in Murrah and Nili Ravi buffalo bulls were found to be 3.602±0.077 ml and 4.353±0.104 ml, respectively (Table 2). The similar findings were also reported for Nili Ravi (4.67±1.62 ml) buffalo bulls (Muhammad
et al., 2000). A non-significant and lower estimate of per ejaculate semen volume in Murrah and Nili Ravi buffalo bulls (3.04±1.81 and 2.67±0.44 ml, respectively) were reported by
Miraz et al., (2022). As compared to our study, higher estimates of semen volume were reported by
Khatun et al., (2013) in Murrah (5.50±0.176 ml) and crossbred cattle (5.81±0.176 ml) bulls.
A non-significant effect of breed on semen colour was observed during the present study (Table 2). The least square means for semen colour in Murrah and Nili Ravi bulls were found to be 1.000±0.003 and 1.007±0.005, respectively.
Muhammad et al., (2000) observed that in Nili Ravi buffalo bulls milky to creamy colour is an indication of good sperm concentration. Breed had a highly significant effect (P<0.01) on consistency (Table 2). In Murrah and Nili Ravi bulls, the least square means for consistency of semen were found to be 2.737±0.029 and 2.496±0.038, respectively (Table 2).
It was observed that breed had a highly significant effect (P<0.01) on mass activity (Table 2). In Murrah and Nili Ravi bulls, the least square means for the mass activity of semen were found to be 3.159±0.064 and 2.732±0.127, respectively (Table 2). A similar result (2.65±1.14) was reported by Muhammad
et al., (2000) in Nili Ravi buffalo bulls. However, lower estimates (1.88±0.07) of mass activity in Nili Ravi bulls were reported by Younis (1996). However,
Saeed (1990) observed a higher mass activity (3.49) in adult buffalo bulls. On the other hand,
Bhakat et al., (2015) reported that seasonal variations had a non-significant effect on semen volume.
Breed had a highly significant effect (P<0.01) on total sperm count. The least square means for total sperm counts in Murrah and Nili Ravi buffalo bulls were 1,482.176±32.211 million/ml and 1,152.543±37.793 million/ml, respectively. A non-significant effect of breed on initial motility was observed (Table 2). For initial motility, least square means were found to be 78.429±0.006% and 77.750±0.010% in Murrah and Nili Ravi buffalo bulls, respectively. Lower estimates of initial motility were reported by
Younis (1996) and Muhammad
et al., (2000) (60.45±0.48, 56.89±0.65%, respectively) in Nili Ravi buffalo bulls and by
Suryaprakasam and Rao (1993) (69.00±0.86%) in Murrah buffalo bulls.
It was observed that breed had a highly significant effect (P<0.01) on post thaw motility (Table 2). The least square means for post thaw motility were found to be 47.465±0.016% and 42.052±0.019%, in Murrah and Nili Ravi buffalo bulls, respectively (Table 2).
Miraz et al., (2022) also observed a significant effect (P<0.01) of breed on post thaw motility in buffalo (Indigenous, Murrah and Nili Ravi) bulls.
Effect of seasons on semen quality traits
The season has both direct and indirect effects on the semen quality traits. The temperature, humidity, rainfall and photoperiod are macro and microclimatic components that have a direct effect on the animal while the season affects vegetation and fodder quality indirectly. In this study, a non-significant effect of season of semen collection on overall per-ejaculate semen volume was observed. The overall least square means for semen volume during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were found to be 4.127±0.189, 3.988±0.158, 3.971±0.129, 3.920±0.125 and 3.881±0.107 ml, respectively (Table 3).
The season of semen collection had a non-significant effect on semen colour. For semen colour, the overall least square means were 1.000±0.008, 1.000±0.007, 1.017±0.006, 1.000±0.006 and 1.000±0.005 during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons, respectively (Table 3). Statistical analysis showed that the season of semen collection had a highly significant effect (P<0.01) on consistency. The overall least square means for consistency of semen during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were observed as 2.667±0.070, 2.716±0.059, 2.437±0.048, 2.642±0.046 and 2.622±0.040 bulls, respectively (Table 3). So, it was observed that overall consistency was lowest during the rainy season compared to other seasons.
Season of semen collection had a non-significant effect on overall mass activity. For mass activity, the overall least square means during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were 2.786±0.292, 3.217±0.132, 2.855±0.098, 2.980±0.080 and 2.889±0.083, respectively (Table 3).
Gill et al., (1974) observed lower mass activity in buffalo bulls during the winter season (3.06), while,
Muhammad et al., (2000) reported that water buffalo bull possesses better mass activity during autumn and lower during the winter season. Overall, least square means for total sperm count during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were 1,314.223±73.298, 1,505.904±60.791, 1,263.823±49.800, 1,255.968±46.896 and 1,246.879±40.796 million/ml respectively (Table 3). During the summer season, significantly (P<0.05) the higher sperm count was observed.
The season had a significant effect (P<0.01) on post thaw motility in buffalo bulls. The post thaw motility during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were found to be 47.134±0.077, 38.459±0.059, 44.994±0.036, 45.689±0.031 and 47.552±0.022%, respectively (Table 3). From the above results, it can be concluded that post thaw motility is higher at lower temperatures and lower when the environmental temperature is higher.
Effect of breed and season interaction on semen quality traits
The effect of breed and season interaction was estimated in the analysis to know the semen quality traits during different seasons in Murrah and Nili Ravi buffalo bulls. The comparison has been made row-wise, since the columns represent different seasons if there is no common symbol between the levels of sub-effects then it indicates a significant difference at a 5% level of significance (Table 4).
Season and breed interaction had a non-significant effect (p<0.05) on semen volume. In Murrah bulls, semen volume during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were found to be 3.882±0.229, 3.825±0.176, 3.508±0.153, 3.387±0.166 and 3.406±0.025 ml, respectively (Table 4). In Nili Ravi bulls, semen volume during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were 4.372±0.300, 4.150±0.262, 4.435±0.209, 4.453±0.188 and 4.355±0.177, respectively (Table 4).
Muhammad et al., (2000) reported that higher per ejaculate semen volume was observed in Nili Ravi bulls during the autumn season and low during the humid summer. Similarly,
Bhakat et al., (2015) observed that in Murrah buffalo bulls, seasonal variations had a non-significant effect on semen volume.
Non-significant effect (p<0.05) of season and breed interaction on semen colour was observed. The least square means for semen colour during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were 1.000±0.010, 1.000±0.008, 1.000±0.007, 1.000±0.007 and 1.000±0.005, in Murrah bulls, respectively and 1.000±0.014, 1.000±0.012, 1.033±0.009, 1.000±0.009 and 1.000±0.008, respectively, in Nili Ravi bulls (Table 4).
Muhammad et al., (2000) observed a less abnormalities (P<0.05) in semen colour in Nili Ravi buffalo bulls during autumn.
In Murrah bulls, the season had a non-significant effect on the consistency of semen. The least square means for consistency of semen during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were 2.622±0.085, 2.709±0.070, 2.796±0.059, 2.854±0.063 and 2.705±0.047, respectively (Table 4). But, in Nili Ravi bulls, the season had a significant effect (p<0.05) on the consistency of semen. In Nili Ravi bulls the least square means were found to be 2.712±0.112, 2.722±0.095, 2.079±0.076, 2.431±0.067 and 2.538±0.065, during spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons, respectively (Table 4).
Season and breed interaction had a non-significant effect on mass activity. During the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons the mass activity were observed as 3.071±0.207, 3.208±0.158, 3.226±0.021 and 3.179±0.026 and 3.109±0.020, respectively in Murrah bulls and 2.500±0.547, 3.225±0.212, 2.485±0.165, 2.782±0.112 and 2.669±0.133, respectively in Nili Ravi bulls (Table 4).
Bhakat et al., (2011) analysed that in Murrah buffalo bull season had a significant effect on mass activity.
Bajwa et al., (1982) observed lower mass activity during the winter season (2.23), whereas
Heuer et al., (1987), Nazir (1988) and
Bhakat et al., (2015) reported a non-significant effect of seasons on mass activity in Nili-Ravi and Murrah buffalo bulls.
A significant effect (p<0.05) of season and breed interaction on total sperm count has been observed. In Murrah buffalo bulls, total sperm count during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons was 1,378.515±100.260, 1,564.955±70.894, 1,668.181±63.219, 1,444.141±65.213 and 1,355.087±51.107 million/ml, respectively (Table 4). Total sperm count was higher in Murrah bulls during the rainy and summer followed by prewinter, spring and winter seasons. Total sperm count in Nili Ravi buffalo bulls during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were 1,249.931±106.951, 1,446.853±98.774, 859.464±76.964, 1,067.795±67.410 and 1,138.671±63.603 million/ml, respectively (Table 4). As far as the effect of the season is concerned, it has been observed that in Nili Ravi buffalo bulls, the total sperm count was significantly (P<0.05) higher during the summer, spring, and winter seasons, followed by the prewinter and rainy seasons, while
Muhammad et al., (2000) reported that in Nili Ravi buffalo bulls, the total sperm count was higher in milder (spring and autumn) seasons. A non-significant effect of season of semen collection on total sperm count was reported by
Bhakat et al., (2015) in Murrah buffalo bulls.
The least square analysis of variance revealed that season and breed interaction had a highly significant effect (P<0.01) on initial motility. In Murrah buffalo bulls during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons least square means for Initial motility were 74.081±0.054, 78.299±0.040, 80.735±0.025, 79.903±0.029 and 78.943±0.017%, respectively (Table 4). Initial motility was higher during the rainy, prewinter, winter and summer but comparatively lower during the spring season. In Nili Ravi buffalo bull’s the initial motility during the spring, summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons were found to be 85.213±0.086, 77.823±0.069, 75.850±0.040, 71.755±3.383 and 61.343±0.029%, respectively (Table 4). Further by Fisher’s least significant difference test, it has been observed that in Nili Ravi bulls initial motility was significantly (P<0.01) higher during the spring followed by summer, rainy, prewinter and winter seasons (Table 4).
Mohan et al., (1977) and
Gill et al., (1974) found that buffalo bulls had higher motility during the winter season (75 and 65%, respectively), whereas
Muhammad et al., (2000) and
Singh et al., (1992) reported that the Murrah breed had less initial motility during the winter. While
Saeed et al., (1990) found no relationship between the seasons and initial motility.
The non-significant effect of season and breed interaction on post thaw motility was observed. In Murrah bulls, the lowest post thaw motility was observed during the summer (37.679±0.091%) season, followed by rainy (47.186±0.060%), prewinter (47.866±0.064%), winter (51.233±0.034%) and spring (53.464±0.170%) seasons (Table 4). In Nili Ravi bulls, lowest estimates of post thaw motility were found to observed during the summer (39.241±0.143%) season, followed by spring (40.849±0.138%), rainy (42.812±0.083%), prewinter (43.538±0.061%) and winter (43.884±0.054%) seasons. Post thaw motility in both Murrah and Nili Ravi bulls was found to be lower during the hot season of the year (summer season).