A total of 283 queen cats were presented to Gynaecology and Obstetrics unit during the study period of one year, of which 62 cases were identified with obstetric emergencies. Fourteen cases were excluded because they were either aborting queens (n= 4), in normal stage one labour (n= 2) or post-parturient (n= 8). Cases considered for analysis included a total of 48 cats of which 45 were dystocic, one suffered prolapse of uterus and 2 had ectopic pregnancies. The mean age of the obstetric population of queens was 1.8 years and represented breeds that included domestic non-descript cats (n= 27) and Persians (n= 21). Thirteen cats were primiparous, 19 were multiparous while the parity status was unknown for 16 queens. Breeding was planned for 19 cats and for the remaining queens, it was unplanned.
Presenting complaints about the obstetric population of queens were visible abdominal contractions, lochial discharge, kittens presented in the vulva, prolonged interval between expulsion of kittens and restlessness exhibited by queens during peripartum period. The cause of dystocia in 75.56 per cent of cases (34/45) could be attributed to maternal including uterine inertia (n=28), uterine torsion (n=3) and constrictions of the birth canal (n=3). Dystocia due to foetal factors were identified in 11 cases (24.44%) including foetal oversize (n=4), malpresentation of the foetus (n=6) and dead emphysematous foetus (n=1). Observations of the present study agreed with the reports of Ekstrand and Forsberg (1994)
that, maternal origin of dystocia was predominant in cats and fetal origin were fewer. According to this study uterine inertia (62.22%) was the major cause of dystocia and this corroborated with the previous report of Jutkowitz (2005), w
ho specified uterine inertia as the predominant maternal cause in dystocic cats.
Vaginal lubrication followed by digital manipulation without medical management was successful in relieving dystocia in 7 cats and medical management was attempted in 35 cases (Table 1). Eleven cats failed completely to respond to medical management, while the response was partial in 8 cats. Total success rate to medical management of dystocia in cats under study was 45.71% which was higher than the previous reports of 31% by Gunn-Moore and Thrusfield (1995)
. Nineteen cats underwent surgery after medical management due to complete or partial failure to medical management. Three cats underwent direct CS without medical management owing to foetal distress (n=2) and pelvic fracture of the dam (n=1). The total number of cats which received surgical treatment was 48.89% (22/45) which was lower compared to other studies that reported surgical intervention of 75.0% (Gunn-Moore and Thrusfield, 1995
) and 79.4% (Ekstrand and Forsberg, 1994
Table 1: Management methods attempted for feline dystocia cases (n= 45).
A total of 153 kittens were born to all the 45 cats under report with dystocia, of which 83 (54.25%) were born before the presentation of the dam to the obstetric ward. Out of the 70 kittens born after dystocia management, nine kittens (12.86%) were delivered through digital manipulation, 27 kittens (38.57%) delivered after medical management and 34 kittens (48.57%) delivered through surgical intervention (Table 2). Total stillbirth observed was 49 (32.02%) of which 16 were kittens delivered through medical management, six kittens delivered through digital manipulation and 27 were from CS deliveries. Since queens with litter were discharged after treatment on the same day, the neonatal survival rate was not available for this study. According to Fournier (2017)
, stillbirth rate in general population of cats was 8.5% and in dystocic deliveries, the rate was 26.0% (Bailin, 2021
), which approximately corresponds to a stillbirth of 32.0% in this study. However, a high stillbirth rate (61.76%) in CS deliveries could be justified by a delayed presentation of the dystocia, uncertainty on culmination of delivery as well as from uterine torsions that compromised foetal viability.
Table 2: Neonatal (n= 153) outcome of different methods of dystocia management.
Uterine torsion was identified as the cause of dystocia in three cats and it was confirmed by abdominal sonography in one cat. In the other two cats with complaint of prolonged parturition and non-responsive to medical management, uterine torsion was confirmed on laparotomy. The degree of torsion was 1080° involving the uterine body in one cat (Fig 1) and for the other two cats, 360° torsion of the left uterine horn was observed. Two of these cats underwent ovariohysterectomy as the uterus appeared cyanotic and devitalized and a partial hysterectomy was performed in one cat as torsion was limited to only a segment of the left uterine horn. Proposed contributing factors for uterine torsion include excessive foetal movement, uterine contraction, rough handling during pregnancy, lack of tone in the pregnant uterus, lack of foetal fluids and previous stretching of the broad ligament in multiparous individuals (Biller and Haibel, 1987
). Presumptive diagnosis of uterine torsion is generally difficult and, in most cases, cats were presented with signs of dystocia and diagnosis made during explorative laparotomy. Due to the high frequency of vascular compromise and tissue devitalization, OHE is recommended for a better prognosis in feline uterine torsion cases (Freeman, 1988
). OHE was carried out in two of the cats diagnosed with uterine torsion in the present study. A partial hysterectomy was performed in one cat as torsion was limited to a segment of the left uterine horn. Authors had performed the same procedure previously in a rabbit identified with uterine torsion limited to a single horn and four months later to surgery the animal conceived and had a normal delivery (unpublished data).
Fig 1: Torsion of uterus of 10800.
Uterine rupture and ectopic pregnancies in two feline patients were accidental findings of this study. One of the cats was presented with a complaint of dystocia and emergency laparotomy revealed single horn pregnancy. The other horn found ruptured and adhered with omentum entangling foetal bones of a previous pregnancy. Another queen was presented three months after mating for general examination. On abdominal palpation crepitation was evident and radiography (Fig 2) revealed foetal bony parts in the abdomen. Explorative laparotomy revealed a ruptured uterus and denuded foetal bones entangled with omental mesentery and abdominal viscera (Fig 3). In both the cats, ovariohysterectomy was performed. The presence of mummified foetuses outside the uterus has been reported in queens. These have been classified as primary if there was no evidence of uterine rupture and secondary, if uterine rupture could be identified (Johnston et al., 2001).
In the current study, both the cases of ectopic pregnancy were identified as secondary due to ruptured uterus. The foetal bones denuded of tissues were attached to the omental mesentery and abdominal viscera in both cats. Clinical signs of illness are usually absent in queens with extra uterine mummified foetuses (Crownover and Yergen, 1976
) and it was factual in this study also as the condition was determined on laparotomy procedure for management of dystocia.
Fig 2: Abdominal radiograph-Ectopic pregnancy.
Fig 3: Ruptured uterus- foetal bones in abdomen.
A non-descript queen cat was presented with the complaint of postpartum uterine prolapse (Fig 4) and the interval between the expulsion of foetus and occurrence of prolapse was not clear as she was rescued from the street. Surgical management of correction was resorted in this cat with laparotomy and repositioning of uterus by vaginal manipulation and traction from inside through the laparotomy incision. Following reposition, OHE was performed owing to gross damage in the uterus. Uterine prolapse is relatively an uncommon obstetric emergency reported in cats and it was identified as the cause of maternal dystocia in 0.6% of cases (Ekstrand and Forsberg, 1994
). The treatment for uterine prolapse depends on the severity of damage to the uterus and included ovariohysterectomy if further breeding was not desirable. OHE could be performed before or after reduction depending on the degree of contamination of the prolapsed uterus (Johnston et al., 2001)
and in the mentioned case OHE was performed after reduction of the prolapsed uterus.
Fig 4: Post-partum uterine prolapse.