The comparative efficacy of Ovsynch and double PG Ovsynch protocols and pregnancy rate with sex-sorted semen is shown in Table 1. The lower pregnancy rate was observed in Ovsynch synchronized buffaloes compared to double PG Ovsynch synchronized buffaloes respectively. The results are non-significant at (p<0.05) between the groups.
The results of the present study for estrus exhibition or synchronization after the Ovsynch treatment (Group-I) are in agreement with results obtained by
Navarange et al., (2011) Nakrani et al. (2014) and
Savani et al. (2017) reported 100% estrus response with the Ovsynch protocol in buffaloes. The results of the present study for estrus exhibition or synchronization after double PG Ovsynch treatment (Group-II) are in concurrence with results obtained by
Carvalho et al. (2015), Wiltbank et al. (2015),
Borchardt et al., (2018), Nowicki et al. (2019), Rheinberger et al. (2020) and
Tippenhauer et al., (2021) reported 100% estrus exhibition after double PG Ovsynch synchronization in buffaloes. The variation in the estrus response could be due to differences in parity, management practices, estrus detection methods, body score of animals, cyclic stage of animals and dose of agonist used in the synchronization protocols. The low estrus response and ovulation observed by some authors may be due to implementation of the protocol in non-breeding season or during summer season.
Estrus signs exhibited in Ovsynch and double PG Ovsynch protocols are shown in Table 2. Congestion of the vaginal mucus membrane was predominant sign shown by buffaloes in the Ovsynch and double PG Ovsynch groups.
In present study, the frequent micturition and congestion of vaginal mucus membrane signs shown were lesser than those reported by
Sawant (2021) which might be due to the high milk production of buffaloes and signs reported in synchronized estrus. The variation in the estrual signs shown by buffaloes may be due to season, management practices of buffaloes, frequency of estrus detection, spontaneous or induced estrus and milk yield of animals.
In present study, a higher pregnancy rate was observed in double PG Ovsynch compared to the Ovsynch protocol. The results are non-significant (p<0.05) between the groups (Table 1). The pregnancy rate for sex-sorted semen in Ovsynch synchronization was in harmony with results reported by
Shinde et al. (2022) as 40% pregnancy rate in sex-sorted and 50% in conventional groups treated with Ovsynch synchronization protocol in Gir cows.
Carvalho et al. (2015) reported 32% and 37% pregnancy rates per artificial insemination (P/AI) in Ovsynch and double PG and reported cows treated with double PGF
2α injections with lower P4 concentration on the day of TAI had better reproductive outcomes.
Wiltbank et al. (2015) reported increased pregnancies (36.1 vs. 33.3%) per artificial insemination compared with cows with a single dose of PGF. They concluded second PGF treatment in the Ovsynch protocols could increase pregnancy success by about 10%, which is in accordance with present research findings.
Borchardt et al. (2018) observed that there was a clear benefit of an additional PGF2a treatment during the Ovsynch protocol on luteal regression (+11.6 percentage units) and on P/AI (+4.6 percentage units).
Nowickiv et al., (2019) reported the pregnancy loss rate was lower in cows receiving two PGF2a treatments than in the control animals.
Rheinberger et al., (2020) reported cconception rates that were 7% (95% CI 2%-12%) greater in double Ovsynch protocol than cows receiving the original Ovsynch program. After adjusting for age, days in milk at mating start date and herd, the odds of conception to FTAI was significantly greater for modified Ovsynch cows (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.12-1.66) compared with original Ovsynch cows.
Borchardt et al. (2021) reported there was a clear benefit of an additional PGF
2a treatment during the Ovsynch protocol on pregnancy per insemination despite additional costs for hormones and labor. This additional treatment with PGF
2a on day eight was more profitable in 95% of all scenarios because of the associated increase in fertility, which is accordance with present result findings.
Tippenhauer et al., (2021) observed pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) was 31.8% (n=888) in the Ovsynch protocol and 40.3% (n=871) in GPPG protocol respectively and concluded that the addition of a second PGF treatment on day eight during seven day Ovsynch protocol increased P/AI compared to Ovsynch. The variation in the pregnancy rate may be a difference in parity, site of semen deposition, no. of sperms in frozen semen dose, AI technician, season, body condition score, managemental and nutritional conditions, exogenous supplementation of hormones after insemination and spontaneous or induced estrus.