DM intake and nutrient digestibility
The results in Table 2 indicate that the DM intake during metabolic trial was 5.40, 5.02 and 5.12 kg/d in control (0% CSM), T1 (75% CSM) and T2 (100% CSM) groups, respectively (Table 2). The DM intake in T1 and T2 groups was similar to C group. The treatment groups (T1 and T2) had similar DM intake to that of control indicating that CSM inclusion in the diet of buffalo calves had no adverse effect on palatability of the diet. However,
Tripathi et al., (2014) reported higher DM intake in lambs fed Bt-CSM based diet replacing groundnut oil meal. The digestibility of DM, OM, CP, NDF ADF and cellulose in the T1 and T2 groups was similar to C group. This indicates that nutrient digestibility was not affected (P>0.05) by replacing SBM with CSM at graded levels in the diet. The results of the current study are in agreement with the earlier results of
Fadel and Ashmawy (2015) who reported no significant difference in DM and OM digestibility of goats fed untreated CSM and CSM treated with tannin.
Tripathi et al., (2014) also reported non-significant difference in CP digestibility in lambs fed Bt-CSM and CSM replacing groundnut oil meal.
Similarly,
Silva et al., (2009) observed no significant difference in CP digestibility in cows fed with graded levels of CSM replacing SBM. However, the findings of the current study are contrary to those of
Nomeary et al., (2021), who reported significantly higher (P<0.05) CP digestibility in lambs fed CSM than those fed black cumin seed meal and sesame seed meal-based diets. The NDF digestibility are in accordance with the results previously observed by
Tripathi et al., (2014), who found similar NDF digestibility in lambs fed Bt-CSM and CSM replacing groundnut oil meal.
Silva et al., (2009) also reported no significant difference in NDF digestibility in cows fed CSM at graded levels replacing SBM.
Solomon et al., (2008) noted no difference in apparent digestibility of ADF among control and CSM supplemented goats. However,
Tripathi et al., (2014) reported significantly higher (P<0.05) ADF digestibility in lambs fed CSM based diet than Bt cottonseed meal diet and control (groundnut oil meal) diet.
Nitrogen balance
The total nitrogen (N) intake varied non-significantly among the groups indicating no effect of CSM inclusion on N intake (Table 2 and Fig 1). These results agree with the findings previously observed by
Tripathi et al., (2012) and
Lorena-Rezende et al., (2012) in the lambs and barrows fed CSM, respectively. Urinary-N, fecal-N and total N-outgo in T1 and T2 groups fed CSM based diets were as similar to that of C group in current study. Similar to our findings,
Li et al., (2012) reported no significant difference in N excretion from urine of pigs fed CSM diets and control (corn and soybean meal) diet.
Tripathi et al. (2012) also noted similar urinary N excretion among the lambs fed CSM, Bt-CSM and control (groundnut oil meal) diet.
Tripathi et al., (2012) reported similar faecal N excretion among the lambs fed CSM, Bt-CSM and control (groundnut oil meal) groups. Similar N-intake and total N-outgo in the present study was responsible for similar N balance among the groups. Similar N balance could be due to similar protein content of SBM and CSM used in the study and isonitrogenous concentrate mixtures fed to the animals. However,
Lorena-Rezende et al., (2012) reported that the diets containing cottonseed meal (30% replacement with control diet with or without enzymes) resulted in higher (P<0.01) amount of retained nitrogen as compared to control (corn and soybean meal) diet in barrows. Present finding is corroborated by
Tripathi et al., (2012) who reported no significant difference in N retention among lambs fed CSM and Bt-CSM diets replacing groundnut oil meal.
Growth performance
Results presented in Table 2 showed that there was no significant difference in the gain in body weight during the experimental period of 120 days among C, T1 and T2 groups. The average daily gain in T2 group was marginally higher than C and T1 groups, though the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The results of the present study were in accordance with those of
Tripathi et al., (2014) who found no significant difference in final BW, total BW gain and ADG among control, CSM and Bt-CSM fed lambs for 120 days.
Ojewola et al., (2006) also reported no significant difference in birds mean daily weight gain and feed to gain ratio in which CSM was substituted by SBM at graded levels.
However,
Nomeary et al. (2021) reported highest (P<0.05) daily BW gain in lambs fed CSM diet as compared to lambs fed black cumin seed meal, sesame seed meal and soybean meal diets, respectively.
Hassanabadi et al., (2009) also reported improved (P<0.05) weight gain and FCR in lysine supplemented CSM with 5, 10, 15, 20% levels in broiler chicks as compared to control group fed corn and soybean meal-based diet.
Blood metabolites
Blood metabolites are shown in Table 3. In this study, there were no differences (P>0.05) in glucose, BUN, total protein, albumin, triglycerides, cholesterol, AST, ALT and GGT among groups. The results are also in agreement with those of
Kannan et al., (2013) who reported non-significant difference in blood glucose (mg/dl) in lambs fed 40% raw CSM, 40% raw CSM supplemented with vitamin E and 40% CSM with 1.5% calcium hydroxide replacing soybean meal.
Saijpaul et al., (2006) revealed no significant difference in blood glucose in lactating crossbred cows fed water soaked whole linted cottonseed replacing equal quantity of control concentrate mixture.
Kannan et al., (2013) reported no significant difference in BUN in lambs fed 40% raw CSM, 40% vit E supplemented raw CSM and 40% calcium hydroxide treated CSM replacing SBM.
Kannan et al. (2013) noted no significant difference in serum albumin (g/dl) in lambs fed 40% raw CSM, 40% vit E supplemented raw CSM and 40% calcium hydroxide treated CSM replacing soybean meal. Similarly,
Saijpaul et al., (2006) also reported no significant difference in cholesterol in lactating crossbred cows fed water soaked whole linted cottonseed replacing equal quantity of control concentrate mixture.
Kannan et al., (2013) also reported no significant difference in AST and ALT in lambs fed 40% raw CSM, 40% vit E supplemented raw CSM, 40% calcium hydroxide treated CSM replacing SBM. The level of liver function enzymes (ALT and AST) in the current study was similar in treatment and control groups indicating no adverse effect of CSM feeding on liver function.
Cell mediated immune response
Treatment groups T1 and T2 exhibited similar CMI response to control group (Table 4). The CMI response was higher after 24 h of antigen administration in all the groups as compared to response after 48 h. Decrease in skin thickness
i.
e., CMI response after 48 h, 72 h and 96 h was almost similar in all the groups.
Nagalakshmi et al., (2001) reported that cooked, Ca(OH)
2 and iron treated raw CSM showed better cell mediated immunity (CMI) than raw CSM where the diets included 40% of either raw, 45 min cooked, 1% calcium hydroxide or iron treated CSM replacing deoiled groundnut cake in lambs. The similar immune response observed in CSM fed groups (T1 and T2) to that of control (C) group in the present study could be due to similar nutrient utilization which ultimately affects the cellular integrity and immune response of the animals. CSM inclusion the diet did not have any adverse effect on the immunity of animals.