Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Lateral Approach for Distal Articular Fractures of Humerus in Canines-A Review of 4 Cases

C. Premsairam1,*, Tarunbir Singh1, Shashi Kant Mahajan1, Jitender Mohindroo1
1Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.
Background: Humeral condylar fractures have fracture lines that extend through the joint surface and through one or both epicondyles or epicondylar crests, or into the distal shaft. Addressing the distal articular Humeral fractures in dogs through lateral approach by using positional transcondylar screws.

Methods: A total of four cases of dogs with different age groups, breeds and sex with fore limb lameness caused due to trauma were included in the study. Clinical and standard radiological examination of all revealed intercondylar fractures with reduced range of motion where the fracture of the condyle extending from the articular surface. After preoperative evaluation all the animals were subjected to surgical reduction by lateral approach under general anaesthesia using positional transcondylar screws (n=2) with or without K-wires in cross fashion (n=2). This approach avoided the necessity of olecranon osteotomy and triceps tenotomy with their associated complications.

Result: Excellent limb utility was obtained during postoperative period by clinical and radiographical grading system. To conclude, the use of fully threaded cortical screws was found effective for surgical management of distal humeral condylar fractures in dogs via lateral exposure.
The humerus is a unique bone due to its shape and forms the skeleton of the arm. It is the least commonly affected long bone for fractures in canines. Low incidence of these fractures combined with the unique anatomy makes correction challenging (Denny, 1983). Almost half of the humerus fractures occur in the distal aspect and most of them are comminuted (Cardona et al., 2015). Fractures of the humeral condyle are common and divide into the lateral, medial and intercondylar condyles. Intra-articular fractures in young growing animals involve the distal humerus growth plate and are more commonly classified as Salter-Harris type IV (Perry et al., 2015). A study reported that the condylar fractures are most commonly occurring event in dogs, accounting for 41% of cases out of which majority occurs in lateral side followed by medial condyle. The intracondylar (T-Y) fractures represent 25.9% to 35% is also one among them. Reduction of condylar fractures can be challenging, especially it involves articular surface, which results in residual lameness and reduced range of elbow joint motion with osteoarthritis (Rorvik, 1993). They require immediate surgical stabilization which in turn led to medial elbow subluxation and joint deformity (Denny and Butterworth, 2000). In addition to these, the most commonly encountered complications of elbow affections are elbow arthrosis, non-union, fixation failure, seroma formation and infections (McCartney et al., 2007). Various surgical techniques have been recommended to address these fractures which includes transcondylar lag screws, K-wire fixation, bone plates and screws (Perry et al., 2015). Different approaches like olecranon osteotomy, triceps tenotomy, lateral and medial approach for better visualization and proper anatomical reduction (Anderson et al., 1990). The potential complications arising from the osteotomy and tenotomy were premature closure of ulnar growth plate, reduced range of motion and residual lameness (Moores, 2006). The present study was carried out to repair humeral condylar fractures by lateral approach, hence avoiding the need for more difficult procedures such as olecranon osteotomy and triceps tendon tenotomy and simplifying the fixation technique
A total of 4 dogs (A1, A2, A3 and A4) of different of different age, breeds and sex were presented during the year 2021 with a history of acute forelimb lameness to the Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana (Table 1).

Table 1: Signalment, anamnesis, clinical, radiographical, implant details and postoperative assessment.



Clinical and radiographical examinations were done prior to surgery to assess the condition of the animal. Under general anaesthesia, surgical stabilization via lateral approach by exposing the condyles, a pointed reduction clamps or forceps were used to hold them together (Fig 2) and the glide hole for the screw fixation was drilled from lateral to medial aspects. A positional transcondylar screws alone or with ancillary fixation techniques (K-wires) were performed and the fracture fragments were reduced. Postoperatively Meloxicam (Inj. Melonex ®, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ahmedabad) @ 0.2 mg/Kg S/C was administered once a day on day 1 followed by 0.1 mg/kg for 3 days along with I/V administration of Cefotaxime @ 20 mg/kg (Inj.Taxim®; Alkem Laboratories Ltd., India) for 5 days. The surgical outcome was assessed by clinical and radiographical examinations for the functional limb usage.
Mean age of the dogs was 1.2±0.9 (from 0.3 to 4 years) belonging to different breeds Pointer cross, Non-Descriptive, Pomeranian and Labrador Retriever one each. Majority of the animals were males (75%, n=3) while one animal was female. Higher population distribution, aggressive temperament and owners’ preference have been attributed to the greater number of male dogs affected (Thilagar and Balasubramanium, 1988). The body weights of the animals ranged from 9.3 to 22 kgs (14.9±3.1) and all of them were ideal in their body condition as no visible ribs but palpable with only a slight fat covering, tucked abdominal viewed from laterally and waist present from dorsally along with smooth contour over tail base (Jones, 2006). The major etiological cause for the fracture was road traffic accident (n=2) followed by dog bite (n=1) and fall from height (n=1). Similar incidence was found by Jain et al., (2018) in their study. Bardet et al., (1983) stated that right humerus was more commonly affected limb which differed from the present study as the left (n=2) and right (n=2) side of the limbs were equally affected. However, all the animals were apparently healthy upon clinical evaluation without any concurrent injuries. Time lapse of the trauma to the day of presentation ranged from 1 to 20 days. The delay was due to the attempt of conservative treatment at local hospitals. In case of articular fractures, delayed fixation and prolonged immobilization resulted in osteoarthritis. This may have directly affected the joint to cause post traumatic osteoarthritis with delay in early stabilization especially the condylar fractures of humerus (Gordon et al., 2003).

Clinical evaluation in all the animals showed lameness, pain, crepitus, dropped elbow, dorsally resting paw (neuropraxia) and abnormal angulation of the affected limb with poor limb usage on the day of presentation. A painful soft tissue swelling was noticed in all animals. Proprioception was present in two animals and absent in other two. Olaifa (2018) was of view that the neuropraxia was due to the compression of the peripheral nerve endings causing neurological deficits by temporary interruption in the transmission of electrical impulses and generally was associated with the humeral and elbow traumas. The muscle trauma and soft tissue swelling from the trauma might have diminished the proprioception reflex (Fossum, 2013). The present study also emphasized the importance in palpation of the elbow swellings, which helped to differentiate joint effusions (fluctuating swelling) from degenerative joint disease (firm and generalized swelling). These signs were most commonly encountered clinical presentation in humerus fractures and elbow joint affections (Simpson, 2004).

The passive range of motion (ROM) included the flexion (62.25±8.29), extension (164.0±6.49) and range of motion (101.75±3.90) of the affected limb and the contralateral limb (Flexion: 33.7±0.85; Extension: 168±0.70; ROM: 134.25±1.54) on the day of presentation (Table 2).

Table 2: Passive range of motion.



There was a highly significant difference noticed between the affected limb and contralateral limb in flexion (P<0.001) and range of motion (P<0.001). Millis and Levine (2014) found the average flexion between 20° to 40° and extension in between 160° to 170° in healthy canines with no musculoskeletal affections. In the present study, the ROM was reduced preoperatively in the affected limb which might be due to the obvious pain, neuropraxia and the surrounding soft tissue swelling from the trauma. However, the contralateral limb had normal values as there was no concurrent injuries which further used to evaluate the postoperative clinical assessment.

Under general anaesthesia the animal was positioned on lateral recumbency with the fractured limb facing upwards. In the present study rather than olecranon osteotomy and triceps tendon tenotomy a separate lateral approach was employed for the fixation of intercondylar fractures (Fig 1) Mckee et al., (2005).

Fig 1: Photograph showing Lateral Skin incision for the exposure of elbow joint.



Fig 2: Application of positional transcondylar Screw from lateral approach.



Two animals (A2 and A4) with Salter-Harris type IV fractures (Fig 3) in which the fractured lateral condyles were stabilized using a full threaded self-tapping cortical screw alone from lateral epicondyle to medial condyle (Fig 2) as a sole method of fixation to reduce the intercondylar fractures (Fig 6).

Fig 3: Preoperative Radiographs showing Salter-Harris type IV fracture.



The soft tissue damage was moderate (50%, n = 2) in these two animals. The other two animals (A1 and A3) with 13C1 (Fig 4) and Salter-Harris type III fractures were stabilized using positional transcondylar screw and augmented with placement of Kirschner wires from the medial and lateral aspects (Fig 5) of the respective humeral condyles to neutralize the rotational forces.

Fig 4: Preoperative radiographs showing 13C1 type fracture.



Fig 5: Postoperative Radiographs showing Full threaded Self-tapping cortical screw with cross pinning.



Fig 6: Radiographs showing Full threaded Self-tapping cortical screw for stabilization of transcondylar fracture.



There was a marked soft tissue damage noticed in these two animals. Cook et al., (1999) and Guille et al., (2004) studied the lateral humeral condyle fractures and managed using antirotational Kirschner wires from the lateral condyle through the lateral epicondylar crest and through the medial cortex of the humeral diaphysis. They also stated that the positional transcondylar screws help to stabilize the intercondylar fractures and provide good interfragmentary compression.

Langley-Hobbs (2012) achieved rigid fixation of the condylar component with a transcondylar screw which creates compression between the fragments. The use of fully threaded cortical screw in the present study was a proposed treatment modality to repair Salter-Harris type IV fractures to reduce the risk of implant-related growth plate trauma (Lewis et al., 1991: Lefebvre et al., 2008). Screw length was (33.75±5.29 mm) ranged from 22-45 mm and width (3.17±0.34 mm) ranged between 2.5-4.0 mm. The facia and subcutaneous tissues were closed separately with polyglactin 910 of size 2/0 and skin with disposable skin staples. Postoperatively a light padded modified Robert-Jones bandage was applied up to the suture removal which helped to reduce the postoperative swelling of the limb and also protected the surgical site. Similar statement was given by Mckee et al., (2005) and which helped to protect the wound. Turner (2005) suggested that the bandage should not be continued more than 2 weeks of postoperative period. DeCamp et al., (2016) were of view that postoperative Robert-Jones Bandage could help in preventing seroma formation and postoperative wound dehiscence.

Radiographic healing was evaluated by Hammer et al., (1985) grading system in all the animals by recording the callus and stage of union from 2 weeks to 180 days (Fig 9) after surgery. Animals stabilized with transcondylar screws (A2 and A3) showed apparent bridging callus of the fracture line on 15th day (Fig 7) and homogenous bone structure after 30-60 days (Fig 8). Whereas in animals with transcondylar screws along with K-wire (A1 and A4) showed a massive bone trabecula crossing the fracture line on 20th day and homogenous bone structure after 30 days.

Fig 7: Postoperative radiographs showing the transcondylar screw in position on day 15.



Fig 8: Homogenous bone structure on 60th postoperative day - radiographs.



Fig 9: Complete radiographic union after 180 days.



The positive proprioception reflex was regained in 4.75±3.42 days and with initial weight bearing at 5.25±3.25 days which ranged from 2 (A2 to A4) to 15 days (A1). The functional limb usage and owner satisfaction were classified into four types which included; Poor- lameness with no weight bearing; Fair-consistent weight bearing with lameness; Good-normal weight bearing with mild lameness upon heavy exercise and Excellent-normal functional limb (Fox et al., 1995). Three animals (A2 to A4; 75%) showed fair and one (A1; 25%) animal showed poor limb usage on the day of weight bearing. After 15 to 20 days, good limb usage was noticed in 3 animals (A2 to A4; 75%) and poor in one (A1; 25%). Finally at 25 to 30 days, excellent limb function was seen in 75% (n = 3) and poor in 25% (n = 1) animal. Similar results were reported by Morgan et al., (2008) in which more than 70% of the dogs showed excellent functional outcome and 22% having poor outcome. On the contrary, Langley-Hobbs (2012); Vannini et al., (1988) stated that majority of dogs with intercondylar fractures involving the articular surface had good functional outcome than excellent recovery along with long term pain and lameness. In present study, positional transcondylar screw placement resulted in better interfragmentary compression and a greater bone screw contact area augmented with K-wires helped an excellent functional outcome which was in agreement with Perry et al., (2015) who reported an excellent success rate of intercondylar fractures. Radial nerve paralysis was observed in one animal as a complication in which the animal did not regain the functional outcome of the affected limb even after 30 days of surgery. Perry and Woods (2017) concluded that the vital neurological structures around the bone and joint make its repair very difficult and might have led to permanent radial nerve damage.

The preoperative and postoperative flexion, extension and range of motion values were compared on day 30 within the affected and contralateral limbs (Table 2). Significant (P<0.05) reduction was observed between preoperative and postoperative flexion of the affected limb with no significant change in between contralateral and affected limb postoperatively which indicated the normal flexion. The extension angle was 157.0±7.03 with no difference. Preoperative to postoperative ROM values of affected limb was non-significant. However, there was a significant decrease (P<0.05) in compared with contralateral limb postoperatively. Vannini et al., (1988) also observed an increase in range of motion in condylar fractures after 4 weeks postoperatively. Simpson (2004) observed the full range of motion in intercondylar fractures repaired with positional transcondylar screws and K-wires after 3 weeks postoperatively.
Lateral approach without opening the joint was found to be convenient in managing the intercondylar fractures with improving the range of motion and early limb mobility. The use of fully threaded cortical screws was found effective for surgical management of distal articular humeral condylar fractures in dogs with radial nerve paralysis was one of the complications.
The authors acknowledge the funding received from Department of biotechnology (DBT) India under the scheme (Development of novel suture materials and implants for canine arthropathies (19/J).
None

  1. Anderson, T.J., Carmichael, S. and Miller, A. (1990). Intercondylar humeral fracture in the dog: A review of 20 cases. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 31(9): 437-442.

  2. Bardet, J.F., Hohn, R.B., Rudy, R.L. and Olmstead, M.L. (1983). Fractures of the humerus in dogs and cats a retrospective study of 130 cases. Veterinary Surgery. 12(2): 73-77.

  3. Cardona, R.S., Muñoz, R.L.C. and Silva, M.R.F. (2015). Closed reduction of humeral condylar fracture and elbow luxation in a dog. Revista MVZ Córdoba. 20(3): 4815-4821.

  4. Cook, J.L., Tomlinson, J.L. and Reed, A.L. (1999). Fluoroscopically guided closed reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the lateral portion of the humeral condyle: Prospective clinical study of the technique and results in ten dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 28(5): 315-321.

  5. DeCamp, C.E., Johnston, S.A., Déjardin, L.M. and Schaefer, S.L. (2016). Fractures of the Humerus. In: Brinker, Piermattei and Flo’sHandbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. (5th Edn.). Saunders/Elsevier. St Louis, pp 298-325.

  6. Denny, H.R. (1983). Condylar fractures of the humerus in the dog; a review of 133 cases. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 24(4): 185-197.

  7. Denny, H.R. and Butterworth, S.J. (2000). A Guide to Canine and Feline Orthopaedic Surgery. (4th Edn) Oxford, Blackwell Science. pp 199, 334.

  8. Fossum, T.W. (2013). Management of Specific Fractures. In: Small Animal Surgery. [Fossum, T.W. (Ed.)] 4th Edn. Elsevier Mosby, Missouri. pp. 1124-1133.

  9. Fox, S.M., Bray, J.C., Guerin, S.R. and Burbridge, H.M. (1995). Antebrachial deformities in the dog: Treatment with external fixation. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 36(7): 315-320.

  10. Gordon, W.J., Besancon, M.F., Conzemius, M.G., Miles, K.G., Kapatkin,  A.S. and Culp, W. T.N. (2003). Frequency of post-traumatic  osteoarthritis in dogs after repair of a humeral condylar fracture. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 16(1): 1-05.

  11. Guille, A.E., Lewis, D.D. anderson, T.P., Beaver, D.P., Carrera- Justiz, S.C., Thompson, M. S. and Wheeler, J.L. (2004). Evaluation of surgical repair of humeral condylar fractures using self-compressing Orthofix pins in 23 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 33(4): 314-322.

  12. Hammer, R.R., Hammerby, S. and Lindholm, B. (1985). Accuracy of radiologic assessment of tibial shaft fracture union in humans. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 199: 233-238.

  13. Jain, R., Shukla, B.P., Nema, S., Shukla, S., Chabra, D. and Karmore, S.K. (2018). Incidence of fracture in dog: A retrospective study. Veterinary Practitioner. 19(1): 63-65.

  14. Jones, D. (2006). History and Physical Examination. In: Saunders Manual of Small Animal Practice. [Birchard, S. and Sherding, R. (Eds.)] 3rd Edn. An imprint of Elsevier Inc. St. Louis, Missouri, USA. p.7.

  15. Langley-Hobbs, S.J. (2012). Fractures of the humerus. In: Veterinary  Surgery: Small Animal. [Tobias, K.M. and Johnston, S.A. (Eds)] 1st Edn. Elsevier Saunders, St Louis, USA. pp 709- 723.

  16. Lefebvre, J.B.G., Robertson, T.R., Baines, S.J., Jeffery, N.D. and Langley-Hobbs, S.J. (2008). Assessment of humeral length in dogs after repair of Salter-Harris Type IV fracture of the lateral part of the humeral condyle. Veterinary Surgery. 37(6): 545-551.

  17. Lewis, D.D., Elkins, A.D. and Oakes, M.G. (1991). Repair of a Salter IV physeal fracture of the humeral condyle in a Chow-Chow using a cannulated screw. Veterinary and Comparative  Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 4(4): 140-143.

  18. McCartney, W.T., Comiskey, D.P., Mac Donald, B. and Garvan, C.B. (2007). Fixation of humeral intercondylar fractures using a lateral plate in 14 dogs supported by finite element analysis of repair. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics  and Traumatology. 20(4): 285-290.

  19. McKee, W.M., Macias, C. and Innes, J.F. (2005). Bilateral fixation of Y-T humeral condyle fractures via medial and lateral approaches in 29 dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 46(5): 217-226.

  20. Millis, D. and Levine, D. (2014). Joint Motions and Ranges. In: Canine Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy. [Millis, D. and Levine, D. (Eds.)] 2nd Edn. Elsevier, Saunders. China. p. 730.

  21. Moores, A. (2006). Humeral condylar fractures and incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle in dogs. In Practice. 28(7): 391-397.

  22. Morgan, O.D.E., Reetz, J.A., Brown, D.C., Tucker, S.M. and Mayhew,  P.D. (2008). Complication rate, outcome and risk factors associated with surgical repair of fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle in dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 21(5): 400-405.

  23. Olaifa, A.K. (2018). Successful management of radial nerve paralysis in a 2-year-old mongrel. International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports. 2(3): 70-72.

  24. Perry, K.L. and Woods, S. (2017). Fractures of the scapula. Companion Animal. 22(6): 340-348.

  25. Perry, K.L., Bruce, M., Woods, S., Davies, C., Heaps, L.A. and Arthurs, G.I. (2015). Effect of fixation method on postoperative  complication rates after surgical stabilization of lateral humeral condylar fractures in dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 44(2): 246-255.

  26. Rørvik, A.M. (1993). Risk factors for humeral condylar fractures in the dog: A retrospective study. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 34(6): 277-282.

  27. Simpson, A.M. (2004). Fractures of the humerus. Clinical Techniques  in Small Animal Practice. 19(3): 120-127.

  28. Thilagar, S. and Balasubramanian, N.N. (1988). A retrospective study on the incidence and anatomical locations in 204 cases of fracture in dogs. Cheiron. 17: 68-71.

  29. Turner, T.M. (2005). Fractures of the Proximal Humerus. In: AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat. [Johnson, A., Houlton, J.E.F. and Vannini, R. (Eds.)] Georg Thieme Verlag. pp. 209-215.

  30. Vannini, R., Olmstead, M. L. and Smeak, D.D. (1988). An epidemiological study of 151 distal humeral fractures in dogs and cats. The Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association (USA). 24: 531-536.

Editorial Board

View all (0)