Indian Journal of Animal Research
Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)
Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)
Effect of Different Nutrient Density Prelay Diets on Production Performance of White Leghorn Layers
Submitted04-07-2022|
Accepted29-12-2022|
First Online 24-01-2023|
Due to a genetic progress, modern pullets mature earlier than the hen of two decades ago. At the onset of egg production, the pullet’s quality greatly determines profitability during the laying cycle. Prelay period normally begins two to three weeks before the onset of egg production. Substantial body reserves before egg production are indispensable to achieve satisfactory hen performance (Eusebio-Balcazar et al., 2018). Adoption of proper nutrition needs to produce pullets that develop into profitable layers. Earlier studies suggest no beneficial effect by feeding high-nutrient-density diets during the laying period, but during the prelay period (Sujatha and Rajini, 2015). Based on the metabolic changes before onset of egg production, a low-density BIS (2007) diet during growing, may not support a present high-yielding layer to establish essential reservoirs. There is a need to consider dietary nutrient requirements for ME, CP and Ca during the prelay period in modern laying hens to match growing pullets’ physiological requirements and improve subsequent egg production. Thus, it aimed to study the effect of different nutrient density prelay diets on the subsequent performance of White Leghorn layers.
Experimental design
Experiment was conducted in the year 2019 (26th June 2019 to 16th December 2019) at Poultry Research Station, Veterinary and Dairy Science Unit, AAU, Anand, Gujarat. Total 180, 16-week-old White Leghorn pullets housed in California-type individual cages randomly assigned to six-prelay feeding strategies (kcal ME per kg/%CP/%Ca) during 16-18 weeks. Treatments were T0 (BIS control-2500/16.0/1.0), T1 (2700/16.0/1.0), T2 (2700/16.0/2.0), T3 (2700/16.0/2.5), T4 (2700/18.0/2.0) and T5 (2700/18.0/2.5). Subsequently, pullets from all groups were fed with BIS (2007) layer diet (2600/18.0/3.0) during 19-40 weeks. Each treatment consisted of five replicates, each with six pullets (30 pullets per treatment).
Parameters studied
Body weight gain (BWG) was recorded during 16-18 and 19-40 weeks. Daily feed consumption (g) per bird (FC) was recorded at the end of 16th, 17th, 18th and during 21-40 weeks of age. Average daily calcium (g) intake (CaI) and protein (g) intake (PI) were recorded (FC per bird per day x % nutrient in feed/100) for overall period of 16-18 and 17-40 weeks of age. The metabolic energy (kcal/bird) intake (MEI) was recorded (FC per bird per day x ME content in feed/1000) for overall period of 16-18 and 17-40 weeks of age. Production parameters viz., egg number (EN) and percent egg production (EP); and feed efficiency in terms of feed consumption (kg) per dozen eggs (FCDE) were recorded for overall period of 17-40 weeks. Performance Efficiency Index (PEI) recorded at 28th and 40th week and Egg Feed Price Ratio (EFPR) recorded at 40th week as per Narahari et al. (2000).
Statistical analysis
The data was analysed using completely randomized design as per Snedecor and Cochran (1994). Replicate means under each treatment were used for analysis.
Different prelay diets did not significantly affect pullets and layers BWG (Table 1) corroborates with Joseph et al., (2000), who reported that different prelay CP (14, 16, or 18%) did not influence BWG.
Feed consumption
Pullet’s (16th, 17th and 18th week) and laying hen’s FC (21-40 weeks) by feeding different prelay and single layer diet did not differ significantly (Table 1). Prelay CP effect corroborates with Keshavarz (1998) and Babiker et al., (2010) findings. Different prelay Ca levels did not change pullet’s FC corroborate with Kocbeker et al., (2017). Different prelay diets did not change layer’s FC. Overall, dietary Ca and protein had little or no influence on pullet’s FC provided that the diet’s energy level adjusted to bird’s requirement.
Calcium intake
Variation in the dietary prelay Ca caused significant differences (p<0.01) in the pullet’s daily CaI (Table 2).
Low-prelay-Ca (1.0%) in T0 and T1 significantly (p<0.01) reduced pullet’s daily CaI than moderate prelay Ca (2.0-2.5%) in T2, T3, T4 and T5. Among T2, T3, T4 and T5, significantly (p<0.01) higher pullet’s daily CaI was recorded in T3 and T5 (2.5% prelay Ca) followed by T2 and T4 (2.0% prelay Ca). Inclusion of moderate prelay Ca may help create better body Ca reserve than low prelay Ca (1.0%). Leeson and Summers (2008), Bouvarel et al., (2011) and Sujatha and Rajini (2015) suggested 2.0-2.5% prelay Ca agrees with the present findings. Low prelay Ca of 0.9-1.5% causes a negative Ca balance in hen (Bouvarel et al., 2011). This negative Ca balance occurred in young hen during early EP cannot be alleviated by high layer dietary Ca. Therefore, 2.0 to 2.5% prelay Ca significantly (p<0.05) improved pullet’s daily CaI is recommended to ensure the Ca balance than 1.0% prelay Ca. The laying hen’s daily CaI did not differ significantly due to the same Ca (3.0%) in all groups.
Protein intake
The 18.0% prelay CP (T4 and T5) significantly (p<0.05) increased pullets daily PI (Table 2) than 16.0% prelay CP (T0 and T1, T2 and T3). Results corroborate with the findings of Sujatha and Rajini (2015) recommended 18.0% prelay CP produced a pullet with better body protein before sexual maturity than 16.0% prelay CP. The higher PI at the beginning of the laying period might be required to produce larger eggs and to compensate BWG (Soares et al., 2003). However, the PI is dependent on the dietary energy concentration (Bouvarel et al., 2011). The laying hen’s daily PI fed with the same layer diet found to be non-significant. Bouvarel et al., (2011) reported that PI depends on the dietary ME. However, in the present study, both layer dietary ME and CP levels are the same that might not change laying hen’s PI.
Energy intake
Pullets MEI (Table 2) was significant (p<0.01) among different groups. The pullets daily MEI from control (T0) was significantly (p<0.01) lower than other prelay diets (T1 to T5). Low ME in the control diet (T0) caused significantly (p<0.01) lower daily pullets MEI than T1 to T5 diets. There was a slight numerically higher FC in pullets fed with diet T0 than T1 to T5 indicated that the prelay ME might change the pullet’s FC. Husseins et al., (1996) and Ding et al., (2016) also observed similar effects of changing the ME level, not by protein (Summers and Leeson, 1993). The prelay diet should contain 2700 kcal ME/kg, which maintains BWG during the prelay period. The laying hen’s daily MEI fed with the same layer diet (2600 kcal ME/kg) did not differ significantly. Rama Rao et al., (2011) recommended 2600 kcal ME/kg during initial production phase of White Leghorn layers than 2350 kcal ME/kg diet.
Egg number
Though EN (Table 3) was non-significant, the prelay diet (T5) produced 10.77 more eggs than control, indicating T5 diet supported for increasing EN agrees with the findings of Sujatha et al., (2014).
Egg production
Though the layers from all groups fed with same layer diet, non-significantly higher percent EP (Table 3) was observed when the prelay diet contained higher ME (2700 kcal/kg) and CP (18.0%), but when prelay Ca was increased to 2.5% along with higher ME and CP, the best overall EP (64.40%) was observed in T5. Pullets fed with BIS (2007) specification (T0) had lower EP (58.03%). The EP was numerically increased by 6.37% in T5 fed with high nutrient density prelay diet than control (T0) fed with low nutrient density prelay diet. Previous reports about using different levels of Ca (Kocbeker et al., 2017) in pullet’s prelay diet did not show beneficial effect on EP. Low-prelay CP (14.0% and 15.4%) diets (Leeson and Summers, 1981) did not have a significant effect on EP, whereas higher prelay CP (18.1%) diet (Joseph et al., 2000) had higher EP. Williams et al. (2000) suggested that higher EP could be associated with positive energy and protein balance during the prelay period. The best percent EP was observed in the present study with 2700 kcal ME/kg, 18.0% CP and 2.5% Ca in prelay diet, consistent with results reported by Sujatha et al., (2014).
Feed efficiency
Prelay ME, CP and Ca did not significantly differ layer’s FCDE (Table 3). However, T5 recorded numerically improved FCDE due to improved EP than others. The non-significant prelay diet effect on FCDE was in agreement with Keshavarz (1998) and Babiker et al., (2010) findings. Chauynarong et al., (2007) reported that the different prelay CP (12.0, 14.0 and 16.0% CP) did not affect feed efficiency. Kocbeker et al., (2017) found no difference in the layer’s feed efficiency provided with 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2% prelay Ca during 14-20 weeks.
Performance efficiency index and egg feed price ratio
The PEI (Table 4) did not differ significantly in 28th week; however, group T5 recorded non-significantly better PEI than others.
Prelay diet affects the performance of laying hens. High nutrient density prelay diet (18.0% CP, 2700 kcal ME/kg diet and 2.5% Ca) along with BIS (2007) layer diet might improve EN, EP, FCDE, PEI and EFPR without affecting BWG and FC during the first phase of laying in White Leghorn layers.
The authors are highly thankful to Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat for providing facilities for Ph.D. research.
None
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.