100 milk samples were collected from cows with mastitis, 60 samples (60%) showed growth on MSA and/or EMB agar. In that, 40 samples were positive for
Staphylococcus spp. (66.67%) (Fig 1) and other 20 samples streaked onto EMB agar produced metallic green sheen (33.33%) positive for
E.
coli (Fig 2). Six samples (10%) were produced colonies in both MSA and EMB agar, indicative of polymicrobial infection.The isolates were characterized as
Staphylococcus spp (72.5%) and
E.
coli (35%) by using commercial biochemical test kits.
Genotypic confirmation of
Staphylococci spp was carried out through
tuf gene (Fig 3) and
S.
aureus through
nuc gene using PCR (Fig 4). Based on results, 77.5% (31/40) isolates were
Staphylococci spp and among these 41.94% (13/31) isolates were
S.
aureus. The presence of
E.
coli was identified in 35% of isolates (Fig 5).
The ABST targeted for
Staphylococcus spp isolates revealed 100% resistance against penicillin and ampicillin, 83.87% samples were observed resistant to methicillin and 80.65% were found to be resistant to tetracycline, gentamicin, vancomycin and amikacin. The co-trimoxazole showed 74.19% resistance and 61.29% samples resistant to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone. 58.06% and 51.61% noticed resistance to cefotaxime and enrofloxacin respectively.
Based on the sensitivity test,
E.
coli isolates revealed that 85.71% were found to be resistant to tetracycline, gentamicin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, co-trimoxazole, ampicillin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin and 75.43% samples resistant to enrofloxacin. Complete resistance (100%) was observed against penicillin, methicillin and vancomycin. Methicillin resistance was found that 38.46% in
S.
aureus (Fig 6) and 16.67% in other
Staphylococcus spp. The
blaTEM gene were expressed in 16.13% of
Staphylococcus spp and 14.29% of
E.
coli isolates.
The antibacterial effect of atorvastatin, vitamin D revealed no significant antibacterial activity against both
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli isolates (Fig 7). However, the combination of atorvastatin and vitamin D with ampicillin indicated wider zones of inhibition against both
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli (Fig 8 and 9).
There was increased MIC of tetracycline for
E.
coli (2.53 µg/ml) and
Staphylococcus spp (2.45 µg/ml) observed. The combination of tetracycline with atorvastatin and vitamin D decreased the MIC to 1.73 µg/ml and 1.51 µg/ml for
Staphylococcus spp respectively. Similarly, for
E.
coli, the MIC was reduced 1.89 µg/ml with tetracycline-atorvastatin and 1.56 µg/ml with tetracycline-vitamin D combination, which was non significant (Table 4).
The MIC of ampicillin for
E.
coli isolates was 22.62µg/ml and the recommended CLSI (2016) MIC breakpoint for ampicillin against E. coli is £8 µg/ml. The increase in MIC of ampicillin for
Staphylococcus spp isolates was 17.20 µg/ml where as the recommended MIC for ampicillin against
Staphylococcus spp by CLSI (2016) is £4 µg/ml. The MIC of ampicillin in combination with atorvastatin against
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli was 2.49 µg/ml and 2.61 µg/ml, respectively. The combination of ampicillin with vitamin D against both
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli produced an average MIC of 2.742 µg/ml and 1.092 µg/ml, respectively, which was statistically significant (Table 5).
In the present study,
Staphylococcus spp (77.5%) was the predominant bacteria isolated from the bovine mastitis, followed by
E.
coli (35%). Previous studies in our laboratory have also shown that
Staphylococcus spp (94%) and
E.
coli (50%) are the most common bacteria usually in mastitis affected milk
(Ramasamy et al., 2021). Similar findings were also reported by
Jeykumar et al., (2013) and
Nalband et al., (2020). Among these
Staphylococcus spp, 41.94% of samples were carried the
S.
aureus (
nuc) gene, which is the highest prevalence compared to our previous work (12.9%)
(Ramasamy et al., 2021). This may be due to increased resistance
S.
aureus organism in years progress.
ABST results revealed complete resistance of penicillin against both bacterias. The isolates of
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli were showed 80.65% and 85.71% resistance to tetracycline, respectively. Recent study also reported the
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli were resistant to penicillin and tetracycline with high MIC
(Anurag et al., 2021; Ramasamy et al., 2021). The increased resistance pattern observed in present study shows that β- lactams and tetracyclines are leading in front for the treatment of mastitis.
The lowest prevalence of beta lactam resistance genes were found in the both
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli isolates from bovine mastitis. None of the tested isolates was positive for
tet M and
tet B genes. There was increased resistance reported for
tet M (67.70%) and
tet B (75%) in our previous study
(Ramasamy et al., 2021). This variation in the resistance genes expression may be due to changes in the study period.
In the current study, the sole antibacterial effect of atorvastatin was not observed. This result was supported by
Manalo et al., (2017), who observed no antibacterial activity in
in vitro. This may be due to resistant bacterial isolates from clinical samples used in this study, whereas previous workers were used the laboratory standard bacterial culture. The combination of ampicillin and atorvastatin reduced the MIC of ampicillin against both
Staphylococcus spp and
E.
coli.
In vitro and
in vivo studies of statins have shown antimicrobial effects against both organisms
(Ko et al., 2018; Choudhary et al., 2015; Thangamalai et al., 2014).
The ampicillin-vitamin D displayed a synergistic antibacterial effect against both study organisms, with a significant decrease in MIC. Also, there is ample evidence to prove that vitamin D possesses antimicrobial properties
(Saputo et al., 2018; Youssef et al., 2011). However, it is still unclear how it is responsible for potentiating the antibacterial effect of another antibiotic.
Though the combination of tetracycline with the non-antibiotic drugs
viz., atorvastatin and vitamin D produced non-significant reduction in MIC against previously resistant clinical isolates. This difference between tetracycline and ampicillin might be because of tetracycline is primarily inhibiting the protein synthesis and ampicillin is a cell wall synthesis inhibitor.