Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Molecular Characterization of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus Serotype A from Mizoram

Satyabrat Dutta1,*, Parimal Roychoudhury1, Tapan Kumar Dutta1, Nayanmoni Konwar1, Richa Sarkar1, Prasant Kumar Subudhi1
1Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Aizawl-796 014, Mizoram, India.
Background: Foot and mouth disease virus serotype A has been reported from different states of India and is considered to be the third most commonly encountered serotype besides serotype O and Asia1. Serotype A viruses are most diverse in nature and have been globally grouped into 26 different types. 

Methods: Foot and mouth disease virus serotype A could be detected from an outbreak in Mizoram that occurred in April 2020. The virus could be confirmed by performing a polymerase chain reaction targeting the 5' UTR region and subsequent serotype-specific multiplex PCR. The full-length VP1 capsid protein gene of the virus could be amplified, cloned and sequenced. 

Result: Sequence analysis revealed the virus belonging to genotype VII of serotype A. Deduce amino acid sequence comparison it has been observed that the 144R-G-D146tripeptidein the G-H loop remains conserved. However, the present sequence (OL419371), when compared with the Indian vaccine strain of serotype-A(HM854025) as well as the 2001 Mizoram outbreak (AF390659) revealed 11 amino acid differences with the Indian vaccine strain and almost 36 amino acid differences with Mizoram 2001 isolate in different amino acid positions. This indicates the diverse nature of the virus within a geographical area.Background: Foot and mouth disease virus serotype A has been reported from different states of India and is considered to be the third most commonly encountered serotype besides serotype O and Asia1. Serotype A viruses are most diverse in nature and have been globally grouped into 26 different types. 
 
 
 
Most of the marginal farmers in India depend upon the livestock sector for their livelihood. FMD outbreaks usually result in a huge amount of loss for them due to low output from herds and limitations of export in exaggerated areas. (Kitching and Hughes, 2002; Perry and Rich, 2007). There are records of about 5,000-6000 outbreaks occurring in our country yearly affecting nearly 3-3.5 lakh animals with a calculated economic loss of Rs. 4,300 cores. (Mukhopadhyay,1992). The virus belongs to the genus Aphthovirus of the Picornaviridae family and exists as 7 clinically indistinguishable serotypes: O, A, Asia-1, South African Territory-1 (SAT-1), (SAT-2), SAT-3 and C, almost all of them having various subtypes (Domingo et al., 2003). Natural Infection and clinical recovery or immunization with one serotype are generally unable to defend the host animal against infection from other serotypes. (Ferris and Dawson, 1988; Knowles and Samuel, 1995; Giridharan et al., 2005). As cross-protective antibodies are not able to be developed by alternative serotypes and subtypes which results in diminished strategies of mass vaccination programs for controlling and preventing the disease (Zhang et al., 2015; Beskawy et al., 2016). In the North-Eastern states of India, the incidence of FMD is highest with type “O” which is usually followed by other serotypes including the type “Asia-1” and “A”. Sarma et al., (1992). It has been reported that serotype O is responsible for most of the outbreaks/cases(80%) in India followed by Asia1(12%) and A (8%), respectively. Subramaniam et al., (2013) and Tosh et al., (2002) reported based on VP1 sequence analysis that, serotype A can be distributed into 10 major genotypes (designated as I-X) and the majority of the Indian strain belonged to the genotype I, IV, VI and VII. Tosh et al., (2002). So, it is very important to characterize circulating field viruses to develop potential immunotherapeutic and multivalent vaccines. The present study was conducted to identify the molecular type of FMDV from an outbreak in Mizoram that occurred in April, 2020.
Location
 
The study was carried out at the Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram.
 
Samples
Total 10 numbers of Fresh Tissue samples (Tongue epithelium and leg scar) were collected from the outbreaks of FMDV in Mizoram during April, 2020 and samples were selected for the present study. A total of 3 samples were processed for isolation and molecular detection of the foot and mouth disease virus. One positive control was used for comparison during molecular detection.
 
Virus detection
 
Confirmation of the FMD virus was done by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) by targeting 5'-UTR [8] and serotype-specific multiplex PCR [2]. Total viral RNA was extracted from 3 tissue samples (Tongue epithelium and leg scar) from the clinically infected animals using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat. No. 52904, QIAGEN) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. For the synthesis of cDNA, Maxima H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Cat. No. K1651, Thermo Scientific) was used as per the manufacturer’s protocol.
 
Molecular characterization of FMDV by VP1 gene sequencing
 
The full-length VP1 gene was amplified using designed primers (Table 1) and was cloned in a TA cloning vector and sequenced by outsourcing at the University of Delhi (South campus), New Delhi. A reaction mixture of 25 µl containing 2.5 µl of 10X Taq buffer with 20 mM MgCl2, 2 µl of 10 mM dNTPs, 1 µl of each of 10 pM forward and reverse primers, 0.2 µl of 5 U/µl Taq polymerase and 2 µl of cDNA as template was prepared. Cycling condition was carried out as an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 57°C for 45 sec and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. A final extension was set at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified product was verified on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and was gel eluted using GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Cat. No. K0691, Thermo Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The purified product was used for cloning using InsTAclone PCR Cloning Kit (Cat. No. K1213, Thermo Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The gel-eluted PCR product was ligated with pTZ57R/T cloning vector and transformation was performed in competent DH5á (mutant Escherichia coli). The transformed cells were plated in LB ampicillin and incubated for 18 hrs at 37°C. The clone was confirmed by colony PCR and subsequently sequenced by outsourcing. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out on the basis of a full-length VP1 sequence using MEGA10 software. A phylogenetic tree was generated by using the Neighbor-Joining method, keeping bootstrap consensus from 1000 replicates. Deduced amino acid sequences of VP1 were compared using BioEdit software, with sequences of FMDV type A from previous outbreaks retrieved from GenBank.

Table 1: Primer sequences used in the present study.

Virus detection by PCR
 
RT-PCR targeting the 5¢UTR region gives an amplification of 328 bp fragment, confirming the FMDV, however, it cannot determine the serotype of the virus. Serotype-specific multiplex PCR for the serotypes O, A, C and Asia-1 confirms the virus as serotype A with amplification of 376 bp fragment of 1D gene of FMDV. In an endemic area where more than one serotype is circulating among the animal population, only a serotype-specific multiplex PCR can provide more accurate and rapid detection of the virus in outbreaks. Serotype-specific multiplex PCR described by Giridharan et al., (2005) consists of serotype-specific forward primers DHP-9 (Asia-1), DHP-13 (O), DHP-15 (A), DHP-16 (C) and universal reverse primer NK-61R, which gives expected size of 537 bp, 249 bp, 376 bp and 627 bp respectively.
 
Molecular characterization of VP1 capsid protein gene of FMDV
 
Positive amplification of full-length VP1 of 639 bp was observed in all 3 samples along with positive control, water control and no template control after electrophoresis (Fig 1).  One of the amplified genes was cloned and sequenced and also annotated and submitted to the GenBank and the accession number received is OL419371 for the present sequence. On the basis of the full-length VP1 gene, Phylogenetic analysis of the present isolate (OL419371) was carried out by comparing with 639 nucleotides of the coding region of VP1 sequences of different serotypes (O, A, C, Asia-1) of previous outbreaks in India as well as outbreaks of some countries. The same analysis was also carried out by comparing VP1 sequences of the present isolate (OL419371) with different isolates of only serotype A of previous outbreaks in India including the 2001 outbreak in Mizoram (AF390659). A phylogenetic tree was generated by comparing Serotype A (Taiwan, Pakistan, different Indian strains including Assam and Mizoram), Serotype O (Nepal, Bangladesh), Serotype Asia-1(Pakistan Baluchistan), Serotype C (Swidden, India) and Indian vaccine strain (HM854025) sequences were retrieved from GenBank data and included in the analysis (Table 2, Fig 2). Phylogenetic analysis reveals the present sequence belonging to serotype A of FMDV and within this serotype, there were several sub-clades indicating multiple genotypes within A serotype. Further, we compared the present isolate VP1 sequence with important geno groups within serotype A, circulating in Asian countries showing a cluster within genotype VII (Fig  2, 3). The similarity of the sequence within the serotype cluster ranged between 36.9-91.7% and within serotype A it ranged between 79-91.7%. However, the sequence of the outbreak of FMDV in Mizoram during 2001(AF390659) was found in a different phylogenetic clade i.e., genotype VI. Sequence similarity with the Indian vaccine strain was 89.1% and with the 2001 isolate was found to be 82.4%. Sequence similarity of the present isolate was found at 67.4% with Asia-1 strains, 66.6% with Serotype O strains and only 36.9-38.1 with serotype C strains.

Fig 1: Full-length PCR amplification of VP1 of serotype A FMDV with specific primer.



Table 2: Sequence used for the analysis of the present isolate.



Fig 2: Phylogenetic tree generated on the basis of full-length VP1(639nt) of present isolate when compared with other serotype sequences of previous outbreaks in India and other countries using MEGA10 software.



Fig 3: Phylogenetic tree generated on the basis of full-length VP1(639nt) of present isolate when compared with sequences of serotype A previous outbreaks in India including vaccine strains using MEGA10 software.


       
The deduced amino acid order of VP1 protein of the present isolate of FMDV was compared with other sequences of serotype A of previous outbreaks in India including Mizoram (AF390659) and vaccine strain (HM854025) retrieved from the GenBank. The antigenic site in FMDV serotype A is located in at the (40-60) position, G-H loop (138-154), (143-147) and (168-173) position. Hemadri et al., (2000). Several mutations in the deduced amino acid sequence are seen in the signal peptide domain of these regions which are the most important immunodominant region of the virus. In the G-H loop, the R(Arginine), G(Glycine) and D(Aspartate) tripeptide (144-146) which is conserved in all the genotypes and are very important because it helps in the attachment of the virus with the host cell. Tosh et al., (2002). Before this RGD region i.e., at position number 143, amino acid R(Arginine) is usually constant in genotype IV and VI of serotype A FMDV. This RGD position of amino acids is very important for the virus which has a greater role in the attachment of the virus with the host cells. These amino acids usually remain constant in all the genotypes of serotype A, which is also conserved in our present isolate. Whether, in group genotype VII, this amino acid at 143 position R(Arginine) is always substituted by T (Threonine). Mittal et al.,  (2005). This change was not observed in the isolates of 2001 outbreaks in Mizoram (AF390659) which was seen in the sub-clade of genotype IV. However, the presence of threonine before RGD tripeptide could be observed in the present sequence which is a clear indication of antigenic variation. Our present isolate OL419371 was compared with the Indian vaccine strain (HM854025) of serotype-A as well as Mizoram outbreak 2001(AF390659) isolates which were founded that there is 11 amino acid difference with the Indian vaccine strain and almost 36 amino acid difference with Mizoram 2001 isolate in different amino acid positions. Capsid protein VP1 is the most immunogenic protein of the virus. As a result of the substantial variability of the VP1 region among different topotypes and lineage, antibodies with low cross-reactivity within the same serotype may be produced; in other words, VP1 variability contributes to the antigenic diversity of various isolates. Jamal and Belsham, (2013; Nishi et al., (2017). Serotype A of the FMDV virus includes the most diverse group of viruses and has been described under 26 global genotypes. Mohapatra et al., (2008). In a study carried out by considering virus isolates over a period of 24 years, the FMDV serotype A isolates of India were divided into ten primary genotypes (marked as I–X). Tosh et al., (2002). In recent years, Indian isolates have been found in four genotypes (I, IV, VI and VII), with at least two genotypes (VI and VII) co-circulating in various states of the country. The investigation also revealed differences in genotype geographic distribution, with some (genotypes I and VII) being retrieved from broad geographic areas, sometimes even spanning continents, implying that the viruses have moved beyond continental limits. Hemadri et al., (2000). Similar amino acid substitutions in the antigenic site in FMDV serotype A have been found by Hemadri et al., (2000) and Tosh et al., (2002) in the (40-60) position, G-H loop (138- 154), (143-147) and (168-173) positions. Diversity among the virus isolates of previous outbreaks, vaccine strains and the circulating viruses is critical in terms of immunization because vaccinated animals may not develop full immunity in response to the circulating virus strain. High variance strain in circulating isolates and vaccine strain indicates possibilities of low-level immune protection against vaccination.
Foot and mouth disease virus serotype A, genotype VII could be detected in an outbreak in Mizoram that occurred in April, 2020. The highest Sequence homology up to 91.7% has been observed when compared with serotype A sequences. Deduced amino acid analysis of VP1 protein when compared with other serotypes A sequences revealed that the 144R-G-D146 motive present in the G-H loop of FMDV VP1 protein remains conserved. Overall,11 amino acid substitution was observed in the present sequence when compared with the Indian serotype A vaccine strain. A total of 36 amino acid substitutions were observed when compared with 2001 serotype A isolate of Mizoram in different major immunodominance amino acid positions of VP1 which may attribute to low-level immune protection against vaccination.
Authors are thankful to the Dean, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry and Vice-Chancellor, Central Agricultural University for providing the financial support and necessary facility to complete the research studies.
None

  1. Beskawy, M.A.E.L., Farag, V.M. and Saad, M.A. (2016). Epidemiological and clinic pathological studies of sheep naturally infected with Foot and Mouth Disease Virus (SAT2) in Egypt. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 49: 129-137. 

  2. Domingo, E., Escarmìs, C., Baranowski, E., Ruiz-Jarabo, C.M., Carrillo, E., Núñez, J.I., Sobrino, F. (2003). Evolution of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virus Research. 91(1): 47-63.

  3. Ferris, N.P. and Dawson, M. (1988). Routine application of enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay in comparison with complement fixation for the diagnosis of foot-and-mouth and swine vesicular diseases. Veterinary Microbiology. 16(3): 201-209.

  4. Giridharan, P., Hemadri, D., Tosh, C., Sanyal, A. and Bandyopadyay, S.K. (2005). Development and evaluation of a multiplex PCR for differentiation of foot-and-mouth disease virus strains native to India. Journal of Virological Methods. 126: 1-11.

  5. Giridharan, P., Hemadri, D., Tosh, C., Sanyal, A., Bandyopadhyay, S.K. (2005). Development and evaluation of a multiplex PCR for differentiation of foot-and-mouth disease virus strains native to India. Journal of virological methods. 126(1-2): 1-11.

  6. Hemadri, D., Tosh, C., Venkataramanan, R., Sanyal, A., Samuel, A.R., Knowles, N.J., Kitching, R.P. (2000). Genetic analysis of foot-and-mouth disease virus type O isolates responsible for field outbreaks in India between 1993 and 1999. Epidemiology and Infection. 125(3): 729-736.

  7. Jamal, S. M., Belsham, G. J. (2013). Foot-and-mouth disease: past, present and future. Veterinary Research. 44(1): 1-14.

  8. Kitching, R.P. and Hughes, G.J. (2002). Clinical variation in foot and mouth disease: sheep and goats. Scientific and Technical Review. Office International des Epizooties. 21: 505-512.

  9. Knowles, N.J. and Samuel, A.R. (1995). Polymerase chain reaction amplification and cycle sequencing of the 1D (VP1) gene of foot-and-mouth disease viruses. Report of the Session of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth disease held at Vienna, Austria, September 19-22, 1994. FAO, Rome, pp: 45-53.

  10. Mittal, M., Tosh, C., Hemadri, D., Sanyal, A., Bandyopadhyay, S.K. (2005). Phylogeny, genome evolution and antigenic variability among endemic foot-and-mouth disease virus type A isolates from India. Archives of virology. 150(5): 911-928.

  11. Mohapatra, J.K., Hemadri, D., Rao, T.V.S., Sreenivasa, B.P., Subramaniam, S., Sanyal, A., Venkataramanan, R. (2008). Assessment of suitability of two serotype A candidate vaccine strains for inclusion in FMD vaccine in India. Veterinary microbiology.  131(1-2): 65-72.

  12. Mukhopadhyay, A.K. (1992). Distribution of FMD Virus Types and Subtypes in India. Summer Institute on Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Control of FMD. I. V. R. I. Bangalore, India.

  13. Nishi, T., Yamada, M., Fukai, K., Shimada, N., Morioka, K., Yoshida, K., Yamakawa, M. (2017). Genome variability of foot- and-mouth disease virus during the short period of the 2010 epidemic in Japan. Veterinary Microbiology. 199: 62-67.

  14. Perry, B.D. and Rich, K.M. (2007). Poverty impacts of foot-and- mouth disease and the poverty reduction implications of its control. Veterinary Record. 160(7): 238-41.

  15. Reid, S.M., Ferris, N.P., Hutchings, G.H., Samuel, A.R., Knowles, N.J. (2000). Primary diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Virological Methods. 89(1-2): 167-176.

  16. Sarma, D.K., Dutta, P.K., Harzarika, A.K. (1992). Foot-and-mouth disease in North Eastern India. Indian Veterinary Journal. 9: 63-64.

  17. Subramaniam. S., Pattnaik, B., Sanyal, A., Mohapatra, J.K., Pawar, S.S., Sharma, G.K., Das, B., Dash, B.B. (2013). Status of Foot and mouth Disease in India. Transboundary Emerging Disease. 60(3): 197-203.

  18. Tosh, C., Hemadri, D., Sanyal, A. (2002). Evidence of recombination in the capsid-coding region of type A foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of General Virology. 83(10): 2455-2460.

  19. Tosh, C., Sanyal, A., Hemadri, D., Venkataramanan, R. (2002). Phylogenetic analysis of serotype A foot-and-mouth disease virus isolated in India between 1977 and 2000. Archives of Virology. 147(3): 493-513.

  20. Zhang, Z., Pan, L., Ding, Y., Zhou, P., Lv, J., Chen, H., Fang, Y., Liu, X., Chang, H., Zhang, J. and Shao, J. (2015). Efficacy of synthetic peptide candidate vaccines against serotype- A foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 99(3): 1389-1398.

Editorial Board

View all (0)