The sexual behavior of Deoni bulls was recorded at the time of semen collection. The overall means of LS (0-10), PS (0-4), ITS (0-4), RT (seconds), DT (seconds) and TTTM (seconds) were 7.12±0.16, 2.59±0.07, 2.48±0.07, 38.97±2.43, 2.51±0.07 and 40.65±2.42, respectively in Deoni bulls (Table 1). The analysis of variance revealed that the season had a non-significant effect on sexual behavior except the DT.
In the present study, the overall mean value of LS in Deoni bulls was 7.12±0.16, which is similar to the report of
Elrabie et al., (2008) in Sahiwal bulls (7.07±0.08),
Syarifuddin et al., (2016) in Bali cattle bulls (7.20±1.49),
Reddy and Sasikala (2013) in Sahiwal bulls (6.97±0.18). The season had a non-significant effect on LS in Deoni bulls (summer-7.00±0.35, rainy-7.00±0.26 and winter-7.50±0.23). The results of the present study are in agreement with the report
(Mahmood et al., 2013) in Cholistani artificially inseminated bulls (autumn-3.49±0.07, winter-3.50±0.07, dry summer-3.47±0.07 and wet summer-3.48±0.08). On the contrary,
Deka et al., (2019) observed the significant effect in Kankrej bulls (summer-6.70±0.18, monsoon-6.20±0.23 and winter-5.70±0.19),
Solanki et al., (2019) in Gir bulls (summer-5.23±0.22 and winter-5.96±0.22) and
Ahmad et al., (2005) in Sahiwal bulls (spring-3.39±0.21, summer-2.95±0.19, autumn-3.32±0.19 and winter-3.37±0.21).
The overall mean value of the protrusion score in Deoni bulls was 2.59±0.07, which is similar to the report of
Reddy and Sasikala (2013) in Sahiwal bulls (2.58±0.14),
Elrabie (2017) in Sahiwal bulls (2.63±0.08) and
Elrabie et al., (2008) in Sahiwal bulls (2.69±0.05). In the present study, we found that the season had a non-significant effect on the protrusion score in Deoni bulls. The findings of the present study are similar to the report of
Deka et al., (2019) who also found a non-significant effect of the season in Kankrej bulls (summer-2.94±0.03, monsoon- 2.92±0.03 and winter- 2.84±0.05). However,
Solanki et al., (2019) found that the season had a significant effect on protrusion score in Gir bulls (summer-2.68±0.07 and winter- 2.96±0.43).
The overall mean value of the intensity of thrust in Deoni bulls was found to be 2.48±0.07, which is higher than reported by
Reddy and Sasikala (2013) in Sahiwal bulls (2.33±0.21),
Elrabie (2017) in Sahiwal bulls (1.80±0.19) and
Singh et al., (2013) in Murrah buffalo bulls (1.80±0.19) and lower than reported by
Reddy and Sasikala (2013) in Jersey x Sahiwal crossbred bulls (3.46±0.08),
Deka et al., (2019) in Kankrej bulls (3.42±0.06),
Elrabie et al., (2008) in Sahiwal bulls (2.69±0.05) and
Singh et al., (2015) in Sahiwal bulls (2.62±0.07). We observed that the season had a non-significant effect on the intensity of thrust in Deoni bulls. The results of the present study are in agreement with the report of
Deka et al., (2019) in Kankrej bulls (summer-3.53±0.09, monsoon-3.47±0.09 and winter-3.27±0.11) and
Solanki et al., (2019) in Gir bulls (summer-3.19±0.11 and winter-3.40±0.39).
The overall mean value of the reaction time (seconds) in Deoni bulls was 38.97±2.43. The finding of the present study is in agreement with the report of
Singh et al., (2013) on Murrah buffalo bulls (40.00±1.89). The season had a non-significant effect on the reaction time in Deoni bulls. The results of the present study are in agreement with the report of
Deka et al., (2019) in Kankrej bulls (summer-120.14±08.24, monsoon- 108.94±09.23 and winter-107.53±08.98),
Mahmood et al., (2013) in Cholistani bulls (autumn-4.59±0.66 minutes, winter-3.82±0.51 minutes, dry summer-5.11±0.66 minutes and wet summer-4.89±0.60 minutes) and
Ahmad et al., (2005) in Sahiwal bulls (spring-2.46±0.43 minutes, summer- 2.78±0.41 minutes, autumn-2.54±0.65 minutes and winter- 2.75±0.52 minutes). On the contrary,
Solanki et al., (2019) found that the season had a significant effect on the reaction time (summer-153.54±4.82 and winter- 128.09±4.24).
The overall dismounting time (seconds) in Deoni bulls was 2.51±0.07. The finding of the present study is in agreement with the report of
Reddy and Sasikala (2013) in Jersey x Sahiwal crossbred bulls (2.67±0.15). In the present study, we found that the season had a significant effect on the DT. The DT was significantly (P<0.05) higher in summer (2.90±0.16) as compared to the rainy (2.50±0.09) and the winter (2.10±0.08) seasons.
In the current study, the overall mean value of the total time taken in mounting (seconds) in Deoni bulls was 40.65±2.42, which is similar to the report of
Reddy and Sasikala (2013) in Jersey x Sahiwal crossbred bulls (36.75±5.24). In the present study, the season had a non-significant effect on the TTTM in Deoni bulls. The results of the present study are in agreement with the report of
Deka et al., (2019) in Kankrej bulls (summer -175.20±11.00, monsoon -155.30±10.70 and winter -166.50±12.20).
The overall mean value of LS in Deoni bulls showed that the bulls were very active while semen collection and demonstrated pronounced libido. The difference in the libido score may be due to the use of different score cards and alterations in climatic conditions in the study location. The breed of the bulls, good housing and management practices followed at the study farm (Livestock Research Center) and comfortable climatic conditions throughout the year at the time of semen collection may be responsible for the non-significant difference in LS. The average value of PS found in the present study indicated that the Deoni bulls showed good to the very good protrusion of the penis from the prepuce. The higher PS of young bulls than the adult may be due to attainment of the maturity of tissues in reproductive organs and less expression of sexual performance was due to the aging process which results in lethargy and reduction in vigor. The overall mean value of ITS found in the present study indicated that the Deoni bulls exhibited good to very good thrust. The age and height of the bulls and high stimulation at the time of semen collection may be causative factors for variation in the intensity of thrust.
The average value of RT showed that the Deoni bulls were active and had high sexual stimulation before semen collection which means that better housing and management practices were followed for bulls. The difference in RT reported in different studies might be due to the age of bulls, climatic conditions and variation in the recording of the reaction time. The overall mean value of DT and TTTM found in the present study showed that the Deoni bulls were very quick to dismount dummy after ejaculation and rapidly during semen collection. The difference in age and breed of the bulls, management practices and recording of the time may be responsible factors for variation in DT and TTTM reported by different researchers.