Macro anatomical observation of preen gland of Kamrupa, white leg horn and daothigir fowl of Assam
In present investigation, it was found that the preen gland or oil gland or rump gland or Uropygial gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir fowl of Assam located just below the skin, on the dorsal aspect of the base of the tail. The glands were bilobed structure and it opened on to the surface of the skin by a nipple-like eminence (Fig 1, Fig 2 and Fig 3). The two lobes and the nipple like structure together form a somewhat heart shaped structure. The apexes of the glands were pointed whereas the bases of the glands were broad.
In present investigation, it was found that the preen gland or oil gland or rump gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir fowl of Assam located just below the skin, on the dorsal aspect of the base of the tail. The glands were bilobed structure and it opened on to the surface of the skin by a nipple-like eminence. Similar findings were reported by
Sadoon (2011) in Starling birds,
Salibian and Montalti (2009) in various avian species and
King and Mclelland (1975) in domestic fowl. The two lobes and the nipple like structure together form a somewhat heart shaped structure. These findings were in accordance with the findings of
Hodges (1974) in fowl. The apical portion of the glands were pointed whereas the base was broad.
Micro anatomical observation on the preen gland of Kamrupa, white leg horn and daothigir fowl of Assam
The capsule of the preen gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir was bounded by connective tissue capsule. The thickness of capsule of preen gland of Daothigir, White leg horn and Kamrupa were 40.32±1.61µm, 38.41±2.31 µm and 36.51±µm, respectively. The thickness of capsule of preen gland was more in Daothigir (Fig 4) compared to the Kamrupa and White leg horn. The thickness of capsule of preen gland of Kamrupa was thin compared to the White leg horn. The capsule was rich in blood vessels (Fig 4). The interlobular connective tissue observed among the secretary tubules of the gland. The interlobular connective tissues arise from the capsule of the gland. The inter tubular connective tissues also is rich in blood vessels. Numerous fibroblasts were observed in the interlobular connective tissues (Fig 5). The number of fibroblasts were abundant in the preen gland of Daothigir compared to the Kamrupa and White leg horn. The number of secretary tubules of preen gland in Kamrupa were less compared to the tubules of preen gland of White leg horn. The secretary tubules of the preen gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir were open in lumen of the gland (Fig 6). The preen gland parenchyma composed of secretary tubules; duct, which were differentiated by inter tubular connective tissue. The structure of the tubules was similar throughout the whole gland. The tubular epithelial cells were divided into basal or germinative, intermediate, secretary and degenerative layers (Fig 7). The basal or germinative layer consisted of one row of flat shaped cells lied on the basement membrane of the secretary tubules in the preen gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir. The intermediate layer was composed of 2 rows of polygonal cells which laid above the basal layer. The secretary layer was composed of 4 rows of polygonal cells contained lipid droplets as well as secretary granules in the preen gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir. The degenerative layer was adjacent to the lumen of each tubule, composed of few cells with pyknotic nuclei. Each secretary tubules classified into two zones,
i.
e., peripheral zone and central zone (Fig 8).
The preen gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir was bounded by connective tissue capsule. These findings concurred with the findings of
Kanasiya et al., (2017) in Kadaknath and White Leghorn breeds of poultry and
Ushakumary et al., (2011) in Guinea fowl. The thickness of capsule of preen gland of Daothigir, White leg horn and Kamrupa were 40.32±1.61µm, 38.41±2.31 µm and 36.51±µm, respectively. However, these could not be compared due to non-availability of literature. The thickness of capsule of preen gland was more in Daothigir compared to the Kamrupa and White leg horn. The thickness of capsule of preen gland of Kamrupa was thin compared to the White leg horn. The capsule was rich in blood vessels. The interlobular connective tissues were observed among the secretary tubules of the gland. The interlobular connective tissues that arise from the capsule of the gland was also rich in blood vessels. Numerous fibroblasts were observed in the interlobular connective tissue stroma The number of fibroblasts were abundant in the preen gland of Daothigir compared to the Kamrupa and White leg horn. The number of tubules of preen gland in Kamrupa were less compared to the alveoli of preen gland of White leg horn. The tubules of the preen gland of Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir were open in lumen of the gland. Similar observations were reported by
Harem et al., (2010) in osprey. The preen gland parenchyma composed of secretary tubules; duct as well as trabeculae, which were differentiated by inter tubular connective tissue. These findings were in total agreement with the findings of
Sawad (2006) in Moorhen and
Al-mehdawi (2003) in broiler birds. The structures of the tubules were similar throughout the whole gland of Kamrupa, White leghorn and Daothigir. Similar findings were reported by
Hodges (1974) in domestic fowl. The tubular epithelial cells were divided into basal or germinative, intermediate and secretary layers which corroborated with the observations recorded by
Mohamed (2019) in Mule duck. The basal or germinative layer consisted of one row of flat shaped cells lied on the basement membrane. In Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir, the intermediate layer was composed of 2 rows of polygonal cells lied on the basal layer. The secretary layer composed of 4 rows of polygonal cells contained lipid droplets as well as secretary granules in Kamrupa, White leg horn and Daothigir. Each secretary tubules classified into two zones,
i.
e. Peripheral zone and central zone. The observation in this study was similar to that of
Mohamed (2019) in Mule duck.