Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 51 issue 3 (june 2017) : 541-548

The effects of environmental enrichment objects on behaviors of Japanese quails at different cage stocking densities

Atilla Taskin*, Ufuk Karadavut
1<p>Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture,&nbsp;University of Ahi Evran, Kirsehir, Turkey.</p>
Cite article:- Taskin* Atilla, Karadavut Ufuk (2016). The effects of environmental enrichment objects on behaviors ofJapanese quails at different cage stocking densities . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51(3): 541-548. doi: 10.18805/ijar.10772.

The aim  of this study is  to investigate  the behaviors of  and monitor the changes  on behaviors of Japanese quails reared in different stocking density, through using different objects, (small red balls, bunch of rope, mirrors and beads) providing  environmental enrichment (EE) in the cages of  quails. Six hundred of 1 day old Japanese quail chicks (mixed sex) were used in this study. Birds were reared in battery cages with four floors, each of which has two separations. The quails were placed in cage dimension in the quantities of 10 quails (lower density: LD) and of 20 quails (higher density: HD) per separation. Our hypothesis was that EE would improve the welfare of quails. The birds were observed in their cages naturally in accordance with one-zero sampling, and home cage avoidance test was performed for these birds. While the applications have significant effect on feeding and relaxation behaviors (P<0.05 levels) in LD environment, the effect of comfort, social and other behaviors was realized at P<0.01 levels in the same environment. However in HD environment, only rest behavior was affected significantly in P<0.05 level, the other properties were affected in P<0.01 levels. The live weights weren’t affected from EE (for LD, P=0.134 and for HD P=0.216). It was determined in the result of this study that the objects hung in the quail cages had potential effect to improve the welfare of quails.

  1. Bailie, C. L. and O’Connell, N. E. (2015). The influence of providing perches and string on activity levels, fearfulness and leg health in commercial broiler chickens. Animal. 94: 660-668.

  2. Brenes, J. C., Lackinger, M., Höglinger, G. U., Schratt, G., Schwarting, R. K. W. and Wöhr, M. (2016). Differential effects of social and physical environmental enrichment on brain plasticity, cognition, and ultrasonic communication in rats. Journal of Comparative Neurology Special Issue: Brain Circuits of Positive Emotions, 524: 1586-1607.

  3. Buscherta, J., Sakalema, M. E., Saffaria, R., Hohoffa, C., Rothermundta, M., Arolta, V., Zhanga, W. and Ambréea, O. (2016). Prenatal immune activation in mice blocks the effects of environmental enrichment on exploratory behavior and microglia density. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 67: 10-20.

  4. Colton, S. and Fraley, G. S. (2014). The effects of environmental enrichment devices on feather picking in commercially housed Pekin ducks. Poult. Sci., 93: 2143-2150. 

  5. Daigle, C. L., Rodenburg, T. B., Bolhuis, J. E., Swanson, J. C. and Siegford, J. M. (2014). Use of dynamic and rewarding environmental enrichment to alleviate feather pecking in non- cage laying hens. Appl. Ani. Behav. Sci., 161: 75-85.

  6. Estevez, I. (2007). Behavior and environmental enrichment in broiler breeders, 29th in the Poultry Science Symposium Series, Edinburgh, UK.

  7. Hawkins, P., Morton, D. B., Cameron, D., Cuthill, I., Francis, R., Freire, R., Gosler, A., Healy, S., Hudson, A., Inglis, I., Jones, A., Kirkwood, J., Lawton, M., Monaghan, P., Sherwin, C. and Townsend, P. (2001). Laboratory birds: refinements in husbandry and procedures. Laborat. Anim., 35: 1-163.

  8. Holmes, A., Kinney, J. W., Wrenn, C. C., Li, Q., Yang, R. J., Ma, L., Vishwanath, J., Saavedra, M. C., Innerfield, C. E., Jacoby, A. S., Shine, J., Iismaa, T. P. and Crawley, J. N. (2003). Galanin GAL-R1 receptor null mutant mice display increased anxiety-like behavior specific to the elevated plus-maze. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 28: 1031-1044.

  9. Jones, R. B., Carmichael, N. L. and Rayner, E. (2000). Pecking preferences and pre-dispositions in domestic chicks: Implications for the development of environmental enrichment devices. Appl. Ani. Behav. Sci., 69: 291-312.

  10. Karabayir, A. and Tolu, C. (2008). Some Behavioral traits of the Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix Japonica) rearing in cages. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7: 1214-1217.

  11. Laurence, A., Houdelier, C., Calandreau, L., Arnould, C., Favreau-Peigné, A., Leterrier, C., Boissy, A. and Lumineau, S. (2015). Environmental enrichment reduces behavioral alterations induced by chronic stress in Japanese quail. Animal, 9: 331-338.

  12. Letzguß, H. and Bessei, W. (2009). Effects of environmental enrichment on the locomotor activity of turkeys, Poultry Welfare Symposium, Cervia, Italy. 

  13. Martin, P. R. and Bateson, P. (2007). Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  14. Meehan, C. L., Garner, J. P. and Mench, J. A. (2004). Environmental enrichment and development of cage stereotypy in Orange-winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica). Dev. Psychobiol., 44: 209-218.

  15. Miller, K.A. and Mench, J. A. (2005). The differential effects of four types of environmental enrichment on the activity budgets, fearfulness, and social proximity preference of Japanese quail. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 95: 169-187. 

  16. Newberry, R. C. (1995). Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 44: 229-243.

  17. OECD. (2003). OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals proposal for a new guideline. Avian repellency test. http:// 

  18. Persaud, K. N. and Galef, B. G. Jr. (2005). Female Japanese quail (Coturnix Japonica) mated with males that harassed them are unlikely to lay fertilized eggs. J. Comp. Psychol., 119: 440-446.

  19. Poggiagliolmia, S., Crowell-Davisa, S. L., Alworthb, L. C., Harveyb, S. B. (2011). Environmental enrichment of New Zealand White rabbits living in laboratory cages. J. Veter. Behav., 6: 343-350. 

  20. Seber, G. A. F. and Wild, C. J. (1989). Nonlinear Regression. John Wily&Sons.

  21. Tauson, R. (1998). Health and production in improved cage designs. Poult. Sci., 77: 1820-1827.

  22. Temizer, I., Donovan, J. C., Baier, H., Semmelhack, J. L. (2015). A visual pathway for looming-evoked escape in larval zebrafish. Curr. Biol., 25: 1823-1834.

  23. Wolfle, T. L. (2005). Introduction: Environmental enrichment. ILAR Journal 46: 79-82. 

  24. Young, R. (2003). Environmental enrichment for captive animals. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare Series. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

  25. Zucca, P., Antonelli, F. and Vallortigara, G. (2005). Detour behaviour in three species of birds: quails (Coturnix sp.), herring gulls (Laruscachinnans) and canaries (Serinuscanaria). Anim.Cogn., 8: 122-128. 


Editorial Board

View all (0)