The microscopic investigation of Giemsa stained peripheral blood smears of 228 water buffaloes detected 18 (7.89%) animals positive for the blue/purple coloured, rounded inclusion bodies of
A.
marginale located at the margins of the erythrocytes. These results are in concurrence with the findings in South-West Gujarat where a prevalence of 7.07% of
A.
marginale infection was observed in water buffaloes by routine microscopy of Giemsa stained blood smears
(Maharana et al., 2015). In the present investigation, 6.58% (15/228) of animals were found to be clinically infected and showed signs of pyrexia, progressive weakness, paleness of mucous membrane, tachycardia and tick infestation. The average level of parasitaemia in clinically positive animals was found as 1570.5± 876.8 ´ 106 infected RBCs per ml of blood which coincided with the observations of
Gale et al., (1996). Rickettsiaemia level exceeding 109 infected erythrocytes per ml of blood is indicative of acute infection, generally characterized by clinical manifestations. Recovery from acute anaplasmosis results in persistent infection and in such cases the level of rickettsiaemia is generally below the threshold levels of microscopic detection (106 infected erythrocytes per ml of blood). Moreover,
A.
marginale organisms remain undetected during conventional microscopic investigation and microscopy is, therefore, not a reliable tool for detecting presymptomatic or carrier animals
(Carelli et al., 2007; Aubry and Geale, 2011).
The PCR of the full length msp5 gene resulted in an amplicon of 633 bp in 29.39% (67/228) of animals (Fig 1). However, nested-PCR was highly sensitive in the detection of rickettsia in buffaloes using primers designed by de
Echaide et al., (1998). In the nested-PCR assay,
A.
marginale infection was revealed as the primary-PCR product of 457 bp in 35.5% (81/228) of buffaloes (Fig 2) while secondary-PCR generated amplicon of 343 bp in 64.0% (146/228) of these animals (Fig 3). The analytical sensitivity of the PCR assay for detection of genomic DNA of
A.
marginale using present set of primers was 200 picograms. A significant number of PCR amplicons (
n=20) were randomly sequenced which revealed nucleotide sequence specific to
A.
marginale. The PCR primers used in the present assay did not generate any amplicon when the genomic DNA of
T.
annulata,
B.
bigemina and T.
evansi were used as template. Based on the msp5 gene PCR assay, the prevalence of
A.
marginale was reported to be 57.5% in buffaloes in Sri Lanka
(Zhtldyz et al., 2019). In Colombia, a prevalence of 13.1% was observed in buffaloes using semi-nested PCR targeting the msp5 gene of
A.
marginale (James-Duenez et al., 2018). Molecular detection of
A.
marginale infection in buffaloes by PCR based on msp4 gene observed a prevalence of 8.0% in North-East Thailand
(Saetiew et al., 2015). A study on buffaloes in Pakistan by
Ashraf et al., (2013) using 16S RNA gene reported a prevalence of
A.
marginale in 7.0% of animals. The nested-PCR based on msp5 gene has been reported as the most sensitive assay (de
Echaide et al., 1998; Scoles et al., 2005; Singh et al., 2012; Mason et al., 2017; Bisen et al., 2021) for detecting
A.
marginale,
A.
centrale and
A.
ovis. Very few reports on the prevalence of
A.
marginale infection in water buffaloes are available from India. A three year old buffalo manifesting clinical signs of anaplasmosis and its complete recovery after treatment was reported by
Vatsya et al., (2013). A prevalence of anaplasmosis in 18.18% (4/22) buffaloes was reported by msp1β gene based PCR
(Sharma et al., 2013). Based on the amplification of 576 bp msp5 DNA, the detection rate of
A.
marginale was found to be 18.33% (11/60) in buffaloes in coastal South Gujarat
(Kumar et al., 2019). A study on
A.
marginale using msp5 based nested-PCR observed a prevalence of 73.1% in carrier cattle of North-west India
(Singh et al., 2012). Similar trends were observed in a study conducted in carrier cattle of North India which revealed a prevalence of 87.9% by nested-PCR based on msp5 gene of
A.
marginale (Bisen et al., 2021). In the present study, a large number of buffaloes found positive for anaplasmosis by microscopy and PCR were asymptomatic but only 6.58% of these buffaloes presented clinical signs of anaplasmosis. The clinical picture of
A.
marginale infection was revealed in only 1.90% of buffaloes in a study in coastal South Gujarat by
Kumar et al., (2019). Buffaloes are reported to be less susceptible to
A.
marginale infection than cattle as they are naturally resistant to tick infestation and can reduce the intensity of infection by preventing the multiplication of the pathogen in the cells
(Amira et al., 2020). Detection of persistently infected buffaloes and cattle is important to control the movement of infected animals into disease-free regions and also to formulate and implement strategic control measures against the spread of infection.