Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 56 issue 11 (november 2022) : 1369-1376

Detection and Molecular Characterization of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Isolates of Cattle Origin in Eastern Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh

V. Yadav1,*, R.K. Joshi1, N. Joshi2, Amit Kumar3, S.V. Singh4, D. Niyogi5
1Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, NDUAT, Kumarganj-224 229, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2Department of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, NDUAT, Kumarganj-224 229, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3Department of Immunology and Defense Mechanism, College of Biotechnology, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut-250 110, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, NDUAT, Kumarganj-224 229, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India.
5Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, NDUAT, Kumarganj-224 229, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Cite article:- Yadav V., Joshi R.K., Joshi N., Kumar Amit, Singh S.V., Niyogi D. (2022). Detection and Molecular Characterization of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Isolates of Cattle Origin in Eastern Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 56(11): 1369-1376. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4762.
Background: Antibiotics are widely used in animals and human for treatment without referring an antibiogram that resulted into the proliferation of ESBL producing strains. Nowadays resistance to β-lactam groups of antibiotic is expanding rapidly worldwide and threatening the public healthcare due to limited treatment options. Therefore this study aimed to detect ESBL resistance genes in E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolated from various sources of cattle in this area of study. 

Methods: Total 240 samples were collected during August, 2019 to June, 2020, from two districts of Eastern plain zone of Uttar Pradesh. E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates were confirmed using uidA and 16S rRNA gene respectively. In vitro antibiotic sensitivity test was performed using disc diffusion method. ESBL producing isolates was confirmed by DDST, ESBL E-strip and PCR analysis by targeting (bla-CTX-M-1, bla-CTX-M-9, bla-TEM and bla-SHV) genes.

Result: PCR analysis of these isolates confirmed 135(56.25%) as E. coli and 16(6.67%) as Klebsiella spp. Antibiotics found to be most resistant were ampicillin (89.40%) followed by cefotaxime (72.18%), cefpodoxime (71.52%), ceftriaxone (66.9%), aztreonam (61.0%) and ceftazidime (54.30%). Total 101(66.88%) isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers using DDST and 92(60.92%) by ESBL E-strip test. ESBL genes were detected in 87(57.61%) isolates by PCR analysis and among them, bla-CTX-M-1 was found most dominant gene.
The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially among Enterobacteriaceae has been increasingly problematic and posses serious threat for both human and animal health (WHO, 2013). It is directly related with the use of these drugs in animal husbandry at insufficient doses and unprofessional choice which limit the treatment options. Resistant bacteria include both pathogenic and commensal organisms, with the later serving as a potential reservoir for mobile resistance elements (Khachatryan et al., 2004). Resistance among ESBL organism is mediated by enzyme Extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBLs) that hydrolyses most of the β-lactam antibiotics and mediates resistance against penicillins, 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins (Saravanan et al., 2018). Among Enterobacteriaceae, E. coli and Klebsiella spp. are major ESBL producers and have been identified as global threat due to their increasing prevalence in livestock in last few years (Reuland et al., 2013). ESBL has been also reported in various niches as commensal in human, animals and environment. Such ecological niches may serve as reservoir and vehicle for transmission and dissemination in production animals due to their direct contact with food chain (Madec et al., 2017).
 
Since no in depth study has been done on distribution of ESBL among cattle in this area of study and also their possible role in development of resistance to other species or pathogens. The present study will provide database to help the field veterinarians, pharmaceuticals and policy makers in proper selection of antibiotics for treatment.
Study area
 
This study was carried out in the Department of Veterinary Microbiology, C.V. Sc. and A.H. Kumarganj, Ayodhya. The samples were collected from Ayodhya and Sultanpur district of Eastern Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh, India. The study was conducted between August 2019 and December 2020.
 
Sample collection
 
Total 240 samples (120 milk samples and 120 faecal samples) were collected from 5 tehsils of Ayodhya and 3 tehsils of Sultanpur district. Samples were collected randomly and sampling consisted of 10 normal and 5 mastitic milk samples from each of the tehsil. Likewise, 10 normal and 5 diarrhoeic faecal samples from above mentioned regions. California mastitis test was used for screening of mastitic milk samples. Approximately 5 ml of milk was collected into sterilized test tubes and faecal samples were collected by swab technique. All collected samples were immediately transported to bacteriology laboratory in an icebox.
 
Isolation and Identification
 
All samples were enriched with 2 ml nutrient broth and incubated for 24 hrs at 37oC. A loopful of inoculum was directly streaked on MacConkey agar plates added with 2 mg/L cefotaxime and incubated at 37oC for 24 hr. Plates showing pink colonies were picked up and streaked on Eosine Methylene Blue agar plates. Colonies showing greenish metallic sheen were tentatively considered as E. coli while dark centred light purple colonies with mucoid appearance were suspected as Klebsiella spp. A single pure colony was picked up and transferred to nutrient agar slant. Further identification of the isolates was done by various biochemical tests viz. IMViC pattern, catalase test, nitrate reduction, urease test, triple sugar iron agar and sugar fermentation reaction as per the method of Edward and Ewing (1972) and PCR analysis.
 
Extraction of genomic DNA
 
The DNA templates were prepared by using snap-chill method as described by Franco et al., (2008).
 
Molecular identification of E. coli and Klebsiella spp.
 
All presumptively positive E. coli isolates were confirmed by PCR amplification using species specific uidA and Klebsiella spp. by bacteria specific 16S rRNA gene as per method described by Anbazhagan et al., (2010) and Andersson et al., (2008) respectively (Table 1). PCR reaction was carried out in total 25 µl volume constituted 12.5 µl of 2X EmeraldAmp GT Master Mix, 8.5 µl nuclease free water, 1 µl mixture of the forward and reverse primers (0.5 µl each primer, conc. 0.5 µM each primer) and 3.0 µl of template DNA. Amplification was performed using thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). The cycling conditions of PCR are mentioned in Table 1.
 

Table 1: Oligonucleotide primer sequences used for amplification of uidA and 16S rRNA genes and PCR cycling conditions used.


 
Antibiotic sensitivity testing
 
All the confirmed isolates (151) were subjected to in vitroantibiotic sensitivity testing against 13 antibiotics of HiMedia mentioned in Table 4. It was performed by disc diffusion method (Bauer et al., 1966) on Muller Hinton agar (MHA) (HiMedia) plates inoculated with 1.5×108 organism/ml and incubated at 37oC for 24 hrs and isolates were classified as susceptible and resistant based on interpretation criteria of Clinical Standard Laboratory Institute (2019). The isolates showing reduced susceptibility towards cefotaxime, cefpodoxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone and aztreonam were screened as ESBL producers.
 
Confirmation of ESBL producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp. by phenotypic methods
 
Double disc synergy test (DDST)
 
The screened isolates were further confirmed by DDST using ESBL kit 1 and Kit 3 (Hi-media) (Fig 3). The commercially available discs were placed at 25 mm apart on MHA plates inoculated with1.5×108 organism/ml and incubated at 37oC for 24 hrs. The results were interpreted as per CLSI guidelines (2019).
 

Fig 3: DDST for confirmation of ESBL producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp.


 
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ESBL E-test
 
This test was done by placing E-strip on MHA plates inoculated with 1.5´108 organism/ml and incubated at 37oC for 24 hrs. The result was interpreted as per CLSI guidelines (2019) (Fig 4).
 

Fig 4: ESBL E-strip test for confirmation of ESBL producing E. coli. and Klebsiella spp.


 
Detection of ESBL genes by polymerase chain reaction
 
Extraction of plasmid DNA
 
Single pure colony of ESBL positive isolates were inoculated into 10 ml of Luria-Bertani (LB) broth medium (HiMedia, India) and incubated at 37oC for 18 hrs in shaking incubator. After that plasmid DNA was isolated using GeneJet plasmid Miniprep kit (Thermo Scientific) as per the instruction of the manufacturers.
 
Detection of CTX-M genes (bla-CTX-M-1, bla-CTX-M-9), bla-TEM and bla-SHV genes
 
Genotypic confirmation of ESBL genes was done in a total reaction volume of 25 µl for CTX-M and bla-TEM as per method described by Dallenne et al., (2010) and bla-SHV genes by Bhattacharjee et al., (2007). Amplicon size, primer sequence of targeted genes and cyclic conditions of PCR are mentioned in Table 2. Multiplex PCR was performed for CTX-M genes and simplex PCR was performed for bla-TEM and bla-SHV genes.  Amplified products (5 µl) were mixed with 3 µl of bromophenol blue dye (6X) and electrophoresis was done in 2% agarose gel for CTX-M genes using 50bp ladder and in 0.8% gel for bla-TEM and bla-SHV genes using 1 kb ladder at 60-70 mA for 40 min and gel was visualized using the UV illuminator (GeNei Bangalore, India).
 

Table 2: Detail of primers and PCR conditions used detection of ESBLs genes in isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella spp.

A total 240 samples of milk and faeces were collected, out of which 152 (63.33%) isolates were presumptively identified as E. coli and 24 (10.0%) as Klebsiella spp. on the basis of morphological and biochemical characteristics. Further PCR analysis of these isolates confirmed 135 (56.25%) as E. coli and 16 (6.67%) as Klebsiella spp. (Table 3, Fig 1 and 2). In the present study, E. coli was predominant among isolates recovered from both milk and faecal samples. These finding were in concordance with the findings of Ibrahim et al., (2018) and Kotsoana et al., (2019). Higher isolation rate of E. coli in this study might be attributed to high prevalence of E. coli in the gut flora of ruminants.
 

Table 3: Isolation rate of E. coli and Klebsiella spp. from apparently healthy and clinical samples of cattle.


 

Fig 1: PCR amplification of uidA gene (556 bp).


 

Fig 2: PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene (265 bp).


       
The results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) are mentioned in Table 4. The AST revealed that most resistant antibiotics were ampicillin (89.40%) followed by cefotaxime (72.18%), cefpodoxime (71.52%), ceftriaxone (66.9%), aztreonam (61.0%) and ceftazidime (54.30%) but drugs such as gentamicin, amikacin and chloramphenicol were found to be 100% sensitive. There are several reports that corroborate with the finding of this study (Ramasamy et al., 2021; Batabyal et al., 2018; Badri et al., 2017). In this study, carbapenem antibiotics like imipenem and meropenem also showed resistance against these isolates, 18.75% to 12.50% for Klebsiella spp. and 8.89 to 3.7% for E. coli respectively (Table 4). Although these antibiotics are not allowed to use in animal husbandry practices anywhere in the country, even then resistance in animal isolates may emerged and propagated as a result of clinical use in human medicine and transfer of these resistant genes to zoonotic pathogens (Bhardwaj, 2015). In this study 81.52% (75/92) isolates were found to be multidrug resistant (MDR), which highlighted a potential threat to human health and thereby limiting the therapeutic options. 
 

Table 4: In vitro antimicrobial drug resistance pattern of E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Isolates.


       
The present study also aimed to determine the proportion of ESBL phenotypes among clinical and apparently healthy samples. Total 151 isolates (135 E. coli and 16 Klebsiella spp.) were subjected to screening and confirmatory phenotypic tests. Out of 151 isolates, 129 (85.43%) were presumed as ESBL producer by AST. In phenotypic confirmatory testing, 101 (66.88%) isolates were confirmed as ESBL positive by DDST and 92 (60.92% by ESBL-E strip test. Final confirmation was done by PCR analysis which revealed 87 (57.61%) ESBL positive isolates (Table 5). There was little difference in the sensitivity of both phenotypic confirmatory tests and PCR analysis and this observation corroborated with the findings of Badri et al., (2017) and Olowe et al., (2015).
       

Table 5: Distribution of ESBL positive E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates according to screening, phenotypic and genotypic confirmation tests.


 
Gene distribution study of ESBL positive isolates was carried out using PCR by targeting CTX-M (bla-CTX-M-1, bla-CTX-M-9), bla-TEM and bla-SHV genes (Fig 5, 6, 7). Over all prevalence of ESBL gene was found to be 65.21% for bla-CTX-M-1 followed by bla-CTX-M-9, bla-TEM and bla-SHV with 41.30%, 31.52% and 27.17%, respectively. The present finding revealed predominance of bla-CTX-M-1 gene in this area. Similarly various co-workers across the world have also reported high frequency of bla-CTX-M gene in different sample sources (Badri et al., 2017; Ibrahim et al., 2018; Paghdar et al., 2020; Olowe et al., 2015; Yadav et al., 2019; Schmid et al., 2013). Multiple co-existences of bla genes were also observed which has been mentioned in Table 6. Similar to this finding, co-existence of bla genes was also reported by various workers (Yadav et al., 2019; Tekinar and Ozpinar 2016).
 

Fig 5: Multiplex PCR amplification of bla-CTX-M-1(688 bp) and bla-CTX-M-9(561 bp).


 

Fig 6: PCR amplification of bla-TEM gene (800 bp).


 

Fig 7: PCR amplification of bla-SHV gene (392 bp).


 

Table 6: Distribution of ESBL genes among ESBL positive isolates.

This study highlighted, higher occurrence of ESBL producing E. coli than Klebsiella spp. and most of the isolates showed resistance to ampicillin, 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, which is an alarming situation for this area. Despite this, some isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella spp. also exhibited resistance against carbapenems, even without its use in animal husbandry practices, which are not a good sign from public health point of view. Therefore, a specific study on rational use of antibiotics and continuous monitoring for resistance genes against these antibiotics in livestock is warranted.
The author is thankful to Dean, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Kumarganj and livestock owners of the Ayodhya and Sultanpur districts for their kind support during collection of samples.
None.

  1. Anbazhagan, D., Kathirvalu, G.G., Mansor, M., Yan, G.O.S., Yusof, M.Y. and Sckaran, S.D. (2010). Multiplex PCR assays for the detection of Enterobacteriaeceae in clinical samples. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 4(11): 1186-1191.

  2. Andersson, A.F., Lindberg, M., Jakobsson, H., Backhed, F., Nyren, P. and Engstrand, L. (2008). Comparative analysis of human gut microbiota by barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS One.

  3. Badri, A.M., Ibrahim, T.I., Mohamed, S.G., Garbi, M.I., Kabbashi, A.S. and Arbab M.H. (2017). Prevalence of ESBL producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from raw milk samples in Al Jazirah State, Sudan. Molecular Biology. 7(1): DOI: 10.4172/2168-9547.1000201.

  4. Batabyal, K., Banerjee, A., Pal, S., Dey, S., Joardar, S.N., Samanta, I., Isore, D.P. and Singh, A.D. (2018). Detection, characterization and antibiogram of ESBL E. coli isolated from bovine milk samples in West Bengal, India. Veterinary World. 11(10): 1423-1427.

  5. Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M., Sherris, J. S. and Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disc method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 45: 493.

  6. Bhardwaj, M., Singh, B.R., Murugan, M.S. and Prasannavadhana, D.S. (2015). Emergence of Carbapenemase producing pathogens in animals. Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta. 6: 6, DOI:10.4172/2153-2435.1000379.

  7. Bhattacharjee, A., Rajan Sen, M., Prakash, P. and Anupurba, S. (2007). Role of b-lactamase inhibitors in enterobacterial isolates producing ESBLs. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 61: 309-314.

  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2019). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty- Ninth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100- S29. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

  9. Dallenne, C., Costa, D. A., Decre, D., Favier, C. and Arlet, G. (2010). Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important â-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 65(3): 490-495.

  10. Edward, P.R. and Ewing, W.H. (1972). Identification of Enterobacteriaceae (3rd edn.). Burges publicity Co. Minneapolis, Minnesota. 55: 415.

  11. Franco, S., Murphy, M.M., Li, G., Borjeson, T., Boboila, C. and Alt, F.W. (2008). DNA-PKcs and joining phase of Immunoglobulin heavy chain class switch recombination. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 205: 557-564. 

  12. Ibrahim, E.I., Sayed, F.H., Ashraf, M., Abd, E.I., Wahab, S.A.K. and Helmy A.T. (2018). Prevalence of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated from bovine mastitis milk. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 58(1): 102-108.

  13. Khachatryan, A.R., Hancock, D.D., Besser, T.E., Douglas, R. and Call, D.R. (2004). Role of calf-adapted E. coli in maintenance of antimicrobial drug resistance in dairy calves. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 70: 2752- 2757.

  14. Kotsoana, P., Montso, S.B.D., Ajay, K. and Collins, N.A. (2019). Antimicrobial resistance factors of ESBL producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from cattle farms and raw beef in North-west province, South Africa. Bio Med Research Internationals. 13 pages, http://doi.org/10.1155/1019/4318306.

  15. Madec, J.Y., Haenni, M., Nordmann, P., Poirel, L. (2017). ESBL/ AmpC and carbapenemase producing Entero bacteriaceae in animals: A threat for humans. Clinical Microbiology Infections. 23(11): 826-833.

  16. Olowe, O.A., Adewumi, O., Odewale, G., Ojurongbe, O. and Adefioye, O.J. (2015). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of ESBL producing E. coli obtained from animal faecal samples in Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental and Public health. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1155/2015/497980.

  17. Paghdar, D., Nayak, J., Mathakiya, R.A., Parmar, B.C., Gida, H.K. and Bhavsar, P.P. (2020). Isolation and Molecular characterization of ESBL producing E. coli from milk. Journal of Animal Research. 10(1): PP 143-148.

  18. Ramasamy, T., Keerthana, S., Srinivasan, M.R., Chandrasekar, D., Porteen, K., Borthakur, A., Elamaran, A. and Sriram, P. (2021). Molecular characterization of antibiotic resistance gene pattern of S. aureus and E. coli in mastitis affected dairy cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(4): 463-468.

  19. Reuland, E.A., Overdevest, I.T., Al Naiemi, N., Kalpoe, J.S., Rijnsburger, M.C., Raadsen, S.A., Ligtenberg-Burgman, I., vanderZwaluw, K.W., Heck, M., Savelkoul, P. H., et al. (2013). High prevalence of ESBL-E carriage in Dutch community patients with gastrointestinal complaints. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 19(6): 542-549.

  20. Saravanan, M., Ramachandran, B. and Barabadi, H. (2018). The prevalence and drug resistance pattern of ESBLs producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa. Microbial Pathogenesis. 114: 180-192.

  21. Schmid, A., Hormansdorfer, S., Messelhausser, U., Kasbohrer, A., Sauter-Louis, C. Mansfeld, R. (2013). Prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli on Bavarian Dairy and Beef Cattle Farms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 3027- 3032. 

  22. Tekinar, I.H. and Ozpinar, H. (2016). Occurrence and characteristics of ESBLs producing Enterobacteriaceae from food of animal origin. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 47: 444- 451.

  23. World Health Organization (2013). Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine-3rd revision [online]. Geneva Switzerland: (9789241504485).

  24. Yadav, A., Joshi, N. and Joshi, R.K. (2019). Occurrence of ESBLs  producing Enterobacteria in animal products and their Environments. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(5): 2255-2264.

Editorial Board

View all (0)