Sample collection
Suspected outbreaks of swinepox in Assam were recorded from 2016 to 2017. From the infected animals, (about 1-3 months of age, of either sex) scab and serum samples were collected. Random serum samples of in-contact pigs in the farms or from the vicinity of the suspected outbreak areas, including serum samples of pigs from Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh were collected and used.
PCR confirmation of swinepox
Viral DNA was isolated from the specimens using QIAamp DNA mini kit (Hilden, Germany) and quantify.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed targeting amplification of
SPV120 gene including a portion of
SPV119 gene of SWPV using specific primers (Table 1). PCR was carried out in 50 µl reaction volume using
Pfu DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific). The concentration of the template used for the PCR reaction was 37 ng/µl. The PCR was set with 95
oC for 5 minutes as denaturing temperature, 30 cycles of denaturing at 95
oC for 1 minute followed by annealed at 52
oC for 30 seconds, extension at 72
oC for 30 seconds and final extension at 72
oC for 5 minutes. A product of 755 bp was visualized in 2% agarose gel.
Sequencing and Phylogenetic analysis of swinepox based on extracellular enveloped protein gene
Amplified products of PCR were purified and TA-cloning was done using pMD20-T vector (Takara; Cat. #6028) after appending the poly A tail in the PCR product. Further, the vector was sequenced and sequence analysis was done using online and offline software.
Phylogenetic analysis was done by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method using the molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version nine (MEGA 9) software. Selected identical extracellular envelop gene sequences of other poxviruses were retrieved from GenBank for comparative analysis.
Electron microscopy of swinepox suspected scab
For further confirmation of SWPV infection, four scab samples were sent to the Sophisticated Instrument Facility unit (SAIF), North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya for TEM and electron micrographs were visualized.
Isolation of swinepox virus in laboratory, PCR confirmation and virus quantification
PK-15 cell line was used for virus isolation. For
in-vitro infection with SWPV, approximately 5x10
5 cells were seeded in 25 cm
2 tissue culture flask to attain 60-70% confluency on the day of virus inoculation. A cell suspension of 10% (W/V) of 300 µl was used for inoculation. The infected flasks were maintained with a 2% maintenance medium.
Virus titer was determined
in vitro by calculating the Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID) using the procedure of Reed and Muench method (1938); a series of 10-fold dilutions of the original virus sample was made and TCID50 titer was determined as 10
3 TCID50/
50 µl in 3 days.
Development of cell culture-based indirect ELISA for sero-surveillance study of swinepox
After confirmation of swinepox by PCR and determining the virus titer, the cell culture supernatant (after 5
th passage) was freeze-thawed and centrifuged at 5000 rpm 4oC for 10 minutes and then the supernatant was heat-inactivated at 56
oC for 30 minutes
(Ouchi et al., 1988) for its further use as coating antigen of Indirect ELISA with carbonate-bicarbonate buffer. Pre-blocking was done with 3% LAH (50 µl/well). After incubation with primary antibody (Swine infected/ convalescent serum) (50 µl) (1:50) in 3% LAH, anti-pig IgG HRPO-conjugated secondary antibody was added to each well. For detection, freshly prepared chromogen-substrate mixture was added and the reaction was stopped by 50 µl of stop solution (1M H
2SO
4). The plate was read at 490 nm in a plate reader.
Samples, showing OD490 value as double or more than double the mean of negative serum control (using bovine serum samples as negative control) were considered as positive for SWPV (Positive serum control range: 0.30-1.20; Negative serum Control range: 0.07-0.20; Conjugate Control and Blank OD below 0.07).
Virus neutralization test (VNT)
Serum samples used for ELISA development were tested for neutralizing antibodies to SWPV (Teppema and De Boer, 1975). Briefly, after inactivation, sera were serially diluted in DMEM (1:2 and 1:4) in 96-well plates in duplicates. A SWPV suspension containing 10
3 TCID50/
50 µl volume was added to each well and incubated at 37
oC in a 5% CO
2 incubator. Subsequently, approximately 3x10
4 PK-15 cells/wells were added and the plates were incubated until viable CPE were observed in the wells. Results were expressed as positive or negative on the basis of detection/neutralization of virus-induced CPE.
Development of sandwich ELISA for antigenic detection of swinepox
An in-house Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (s-ELISA) was developed to measure the SWPV antigen in the scabs. The cell culture supernatant was used (procedure; head 2.6 first paragraph) to raise hyperimmune serum against SWPV in rabbits. (Three months old, New Zealand white, male rabbits) using the protocol mentioned in Table 2. Sufficient titer was obtained as compare to initial days of blood collection received after the 28
th day of injection with a dilution of 1:500 of the serum in 3% LAH in coating buffer.
This polyclonal serum diluted 1:500 in 3% LAH in coating buffer was used as the coating antibody in MaxiSorp® plates. Unpurified 10% tissue suspension was used to detect the SWPV antigen. Known positive serum (iELISA positive serum sample and scab from the same animal positive in SWPV PCR) from the natural outbreaks were used as tracing antibody in 1:50 dilutions. 50 µl of anti-pig IgG Horse-Radish Peroxidase (HRPO) conjugate diluted at 1:500 in ELISA blocking buffer was used. For detection, freshly prepared chromogen-substrate mixture was added and the reaction was stopped by stop solution (1M H
2SO
4). Absorbance of individual wells was measured at 490 nm in an ELISA reader. The results were interpreted as corrected OD values obtained by subtracting the OD value of background wells from the OD value of test wells. The difference of OD value ³0.1 was considered as positive.
Statistical analysis and graphs
Chi-square test was used to determine significant difference among the results in different diagnostic tests, using the software MedCalc v18.5 for Windows (MedCalc Software). Further Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), calculation of positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) and the agreement test (inter-rater agreement-ê coefficient) were conducted with the help of the same software to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the tests. The ê coefficient was calculated to determine the magnitude of the statistical agreement between cell cultures based on indirect ELISA and VNT.