Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

A 3R’s Research: Rapid Assessment of New Indigenously Made Ventilators in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Induced Rabbits by Non-invasive Method

M. Jayanthi1,*, Ghadevaru Sarathchandra2, M. Chandrasekar2, M.G. Mohamad Ali2, D. Balasubramanyam1, S.P. Preetha2, P. Satheeshkumar1
1Veterinary College and Research Institute, Theni-625 602, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Madras Veterinary College, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007, Tamil Nadu, India.

ABSTRACT

Background: Laboratory animal models were frequently used to assess the efficiency of newly made ventilators. Assessment of efficiency of these ventilators may be useful for human patients affected with respiratory distress or COVID-19.

Methods: Rabbits were randomly divided into four groups viz., negative control, positive control (ARDS induced), induced ARDS and co-treated with referral ventilator (VR), ARDS induced and co-treated with experimental ventilator (VE). The groups were assessed by measuring the BGA, vitals, tidal volume (VT) and other ventilator parameters.

Result: SpO2 of control group (98.75±0.25) did not reveal any significant difference with VR -1 hr (97.75±0.63), VR-3 hrs (97.75±0.95), VE-1 hr (96.75±1.11) and VE-3hrs (97.25±0.85). While comparing with other groups, ARDS group (61±7.69) revealed a highly significant decrease (p<0.01) in the SpO2 level. PEEP of control and other groups were found to be equal (4±0.00).

INTRODUCTION

Globally ~80% of the COVID-19 virus infected patients exhibited mild symptoms, 14% suffered with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pneumonia, 5% suffered from septic shock and organ failure (mostly respiratory failure) and in 2% cases it was found to be fatal. In ARDS, radiography shows bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on chest with impaired oxygen levels in blood (Cross and Matthay, 2011; Christoph and Carsten, 2015). Mechanical ventilators are the only support and can replace spontaneous breathing in ARDS patients. The ventilators are critical life-support devices that provide assistance to respiratory therapy to millions of patients every day. Before introducing any type of new ventilators, it has to be tested in animal models which provide practical means to investigate the risks and complications of the newly constructed assisted ventilation. Rabbit is the simplest laboratory animal model frequently used to test drugs and ventilators (Dellaca and Farre, 2009; Dukic, et al., 2016). The current experiment was to evaluate and compare the functions of experimental ventilator (VE) with well-established referral ventilator (VR) tested on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced rabbits. These non-invasive experimental procedures were supporting the principle of 3Rs (Replacement, reduction and refinement) research leads to reduction of animal sufferings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental animal and study design
 
Experiments were performed in accordance with ethical guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) (IAEC approval No. 105/SA/IAEC/2020). Sixteen adult New Zealand White strain rabbits (body weight between 2.50 to 3.00 kg) were purchased from CPCSEA approved vendor; Post Graduate Research Institute in Animal Sciences (PGRIAS), Kattupakkam, Chennai. Before the start of experiment, rabbits were acclimatized in 12 hours light and 12 hours dark cycle for 7 days. Animals had free access to water and lab animal feed. Rabbits were randomly divided into four groups. Group-I (Control) kept as untreated control (n=4). Group-II (ARDS) rabbits were induced with ARDS (n=4). ARDS was induced with 0.9% saline infusion and repetitive lavage in lung for 6 times via endotracheal tube with infant feeding tube at the dose rate of 30 ml /kg b. wt. (Kosutova et al., 2018) in semi-upright right and left lateral positions of the animal and was immediately suctioned. Group III (VR) rabbits (n=4) were induced with ARDS and co-treated with referral ventilator (Hamilton-C2) (VR). Group III rabbits were compared with Group IV (VE) rabbits (n=4) which are ARDS induced and co-treated with experimental ventilator (Bravo ICU ventilator) (VE). The groups were assessed by measuring the BGA, vitals, tidal volume (VT) and other ventilator parameters. All the animals were kept under constant observation throughout the entire period of study.
 
Procedure
 
i. Test lung
 
Test lung was performed prior to ventilation with referral (VR = Hamilton ventilator, model: Hamilton-C2) and experimental ventilator (VE = Bravo ventilator, model: Bravo ICU ventilator) (Fig 1). The already reported accuracy and clinical settings for Hamilton ventilator (RV) (Al Otaibi et al., 2019) were used for VR. The new indigenously made Bravo Ventilator (Experimental Ventilator) also had similar clinical settings and both the VR and VE were expected to have similar functions.
 

Fig 1: Test lung was performed prior to ventilation with referral and experimental ventilators.


 
ii. Anaesthesia and clinical monitoring
 
Anaesthesia was induced by administration of intramuscular injection of a mixture of ketamine @ 30 mg/kg and xylazine @ 4 mg/kg in the gluteal region of the rabbits. After 10 minutes interval, midazolam @ 0.2 mg/kg by i/m was injected to achieve adequate muscle relaxation. After the palpebral reflex and pain reflex were abolished, the rabbits were intubated and monitored with a pulse oximeter and an electrocardiograph. The information of oxygen saturation in arterial blood, respiration rate and pulse rate were recorded. The experimental animals’ bodies were covered by a heating blanket and their rectal temperature was maintained at 38 to 39oC (Rotta et al., 1999; Mullhaupt et al., 2017) (Fig 2).
 

Fig 2: Anesthesia and clinical monitoring.


 
iii. Haematology, Biochemical and blood gas analysis (BGA)
 
Arterial blood samples were collected for blood gases analysis (BGA) using Epoc reader Blood gas analyser and estimation of haematological parameters (Auto haemo-analyser, Bevet 2800) and biochemical parameters (A15 Biosystems). Blood sampling for BGA in ventilated rabbits was recorded at one hour and three hours after inducing ARDS. The volume of sample necessary for single BGA was 0.15 ml which was collected in a 1 ml heparin-rinsed insulin syringe from the auricular artery. All BGAs including the partial pressure of oxygen (PO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), pH of the whole blood, oxygen saturation (SO2) and concentration of bicarbonate ions (HCO3-) were measured by a portable BGA analyser (cartridges’ Epoc gas analyser) (Lord et al., 2010) (Fig 3).
 

Fig 3: Collection of blood sample for hematology, biochemical and blood gas analysis (BGA).


 
iv. Endotracheal intubation
 
After induction of anaesthesia, the rabbits were intubated by positioning them in left lateral recumbency and extending the neck of the rabbit. A lubricated No. 2.5 non-cuffed endotracheal tube was passed along the dorsal surface of the tongue and gently introduced into the trachea after the rabbit elicited cough reflex when the endotracheal tube tip touches the epiglottis. The correct position of endotracheal tube was assessed by radiography (Fig 4) (Kollef and Micek, 2010).
 

Fig 4: Endotracheal intubation in radiography.


 
v. Mechanical ventilation
 
The experimental ventilator was periodically auto-calibrated (inbuilt) for the set ventilator parameters. The animals were intubated and stabilized on positive pressure ventilation with the following settings: FiO2 = 100%, Flow = 10 L/min, respiratory rate (RR) = 40 breaths/min, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 4 cm H2O, tidal volume (VT) targeted to 8 ml/kg (with the peak inspiratory pressure, PIP not exceeding 15 cm H2O). Tidal volume (VT) was monitored continuously with a flow sensor connected to the endotracheal tube. Body temperature was continuously monitored with a rectal probe and covered with warmer blanket and it was also maintained by placing a heating pad underneath the animal. The pulse-oxymeter was attached to the ear of the animals in order to monitor saturated oxygen level of arterial blood (Fig 5) (Govoni et al., 2012; Krimsky et al., 2009).
 

Fig 5: Mechanical ventilation.


 
vi. Electrocardiography (ECG)
 
Adhesive electrocardiogram (ECG) patches or button electrodes were placed on right arm (red), left arm (yellow) and left leg (green) (Mirabella et al., 2014). Rabbits were kept on right lateral recumbency after applying gel on the corresponding site. The ECG tracing consisted of three primary complexes: P wave, QRS complex and T wave, which represent atrial depolarization and ventricular depolarization, respectively. ECG was used to detect abnormal rhythms associated with these conditions, including atrial fibrillation, ventricular premature complexes, ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia. Bradycardia was noticed after induction of anaesthesia, whereas atrial fibrillation, ventricular premature complexes, ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia were not observed (Fig 6).
 

Fig 6: Electrocardiography (ECG).


  
 
 
vii. Cell analysis in the broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF)
 
The lung was lavaged with saline (0.9% NaCl, 37°C, 3 × 10 ml/kg b. wt.) (Fig 7). BALF was collected and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 3 min. One drop of BALF sediment was used for smear preparation and microscopically examined for inflammatory cells / parasites after staining by Leishman, Giemsa and cocktail stain.
 

Fig 7: broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collection aided with endoscopy and staining of epithelial cells (40x).


 
Statistical analysis
 
Results were analyzed by complete randomized design using one-way ANOVA test and comparison of the means was done by Duncan’s Post-hoc test (multiple comparison test).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ventilator parameter
 
The parameters like temperature, pulse rate and PEEP did not show any significant differences in all four groups (Groups: I-Control, II-ARDS, III-VR and IV-VE). Significant difference (p<0.05) was observed in heart rate within VR group with 1 hr ventilation treatment (130.25±17.14) and 3 hrs ventilation treatment (181.00±4.30). Whereas, non significant difference was observed in VE groups where a constant heart rate (157±4.71) was maintained. A highly significant difference was observed in the initial respiratory rates in the ARDS induced groups (II-ARDS, III-VR and IV-VE) when compared with control and recorded as 62±2.58 in ARDS groups and 51.75±1.70 in control group. The normal respiratory rate of rabbits ranged between 40 to 60 breaths per minute and the obtained results confirm that the ARDS was successfully induced in ARDS, VR and VE groups, where the respiratory rate was increased due to acute stress. Simultaneously, control group was observed with 23.25±1.97 of tidal volume and 98.75±0.25 of SpO2, which significantly differ (p < 0.01) from other ARDS induced groups (II-ARDS, III-VR and IV-VE) as they recorded 18.00±1.15 of initial tidal volume and 61±7.69 of initial SpO2. After 1 hr ventilation treatment, both the RV and EV significantly reduced the respiratory rate (40.00±0.00), increased the tidal volume (RV: 22.00±0.15; VE: 18.00±1.15) and SpO2 (VR: 97.75±0.63; VE: 96.75±1.11) of each groups. No significant difference was observed between and within 1 hr and 3 hrs of ventilation in both the VR and VE groups (Table 1 and Fig 8).
 

Table 1: Ventilator parameter.


 

Fig 8: Line chart for comparing ventilator parameters before and after treatment (after 1hr and 3hrs).


 
Blood gas analysis (BGA)
 
There was non significant difference in the pH values of control and other groups (p>0.05). But parameters such as initial PCO2, PO2, HCO3 and SO2 showed high significant difference between the control and other ARDS induced groups (II-ARDS, III-VR and IV-VE). After 1 hr ventilation treatment both the RV and EV significantly reduced the PCO2, PO2, HCO3 and SO2 to the normal level. No significant difference was observed between and within 1 hr and 3 hrs of ventilation in both the VR and VE groups. The obtained results revealed that there were no functional differences between referral and experimental ventilators in the treatment of ARDS (Table 2 and Fig 9).
 

Table 2: Blood gas analysis (BGA).


 

Fig 9: Line chart for BGA.


 
Electrocardiography (ECG)
 
The ranges of different parameters of VR and VE group was given in the Table 3. Non-significant differences were found in the ECG analysis between the two treated groups.
 

Table 3: Electrocardiography (ECG).


 
Broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF)
 
The highest number of cells retrieved from both the VR and VE treated groups by BAL were the inflammatory cells namely macrophages, neutrophils which line the alveolar space. The alveolar macrophages were the most common cells in the BALF. Bacterial organisms (cocci) were also present in the BALF. This could possibly be due to the acute damage caused to the alveoli of lung as a result of ARDS (Bohlin et al., 2005; Fan et al., 2018).
 
Biochemical and Haematological profile
 
No significant difference was observed in the biochemical profile of ARDS induced groups (II-ARDS, III-VR and IV-VE) when compared with control (Table 4). There were no significant differences between the initial and final values of haemoglobin, PCV, RBC, WBC, platelet, monocyte and eosinophil count in the ARDS induced groups (VR and VE) before and after treatment (Table 5). Whereas, significant variations (p<0.05) were observed in other blood parameters like neutrophil (N) and lymphocytes (L) count between VR (N=33.75±2.17; L=62.00±2.12) and VE (N=60.75±2.06; L=36.25±1.93) groups and they were also significantly different from control (N=45.50±3.85; L=50.00±4.06) and ARDS (N=39.75±1.11; L=58.50±1.66) groups. These all were indicating that the ARDS induction may cause wide range of inflammatory response in the respiratory track which ultimately triggers the different range inflammatory cells counts in all ARDS, VR and VE groups. These different range of inflammatory cell counts shows non-significant difference with ARDS recovery rate in both ventilators treated group of VR and VE (Fig 10 and 11).
 

Table 4: Biochemical parameter.


 

Table 5: Haematological parameter.


 

Fig 10: Line chart for Bio-chemical parameter.


 

Fig 11: Line chart for Haematological parameter.

CONCLUSION

Our findings are supported by the SpO2 values of the experimental ventilator (VE) which is 96.75±1.11 and 97.25±0.85 at one hour and three hours, respectively. The present study reveals that the VE (model: Bravo ICU ventilator) performance was at least as protective as VR (Hamilton-C2). We conclude that VE is equal to that of VR. Furtherance, it is promulgated to carry out human clinical trials in respiratory distress like COVID-19. The VE was found to be alleviating the respiratory crisis induced by ARDS in rabbits and there were no adverse effects observed. After experiment, animals were kept under observation, no morbidity and mortality were observed. All the rabbits were recovered from the ARDS condition and it is suggested that after post treatment care, these animals may be used for similar kind of studies. This research suggests that for reducing rabbits use in ventilator assessment during COVID-19 pandemic situation this non-invasive method of ventilator assessment study may be the best choice which strongly supports the 3R’s principle. This research may support successful evaluation of newly made ventilators during this COVID-19 crisis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We profusely thank Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS) for according permission to undertake the study during COVID 19 crisis which exemplifies its vision and commitment towards one health.
 
Financial support
 
M/S Broadline Technologies Private Limited, Chennai 600006, Tamil Nadu, India.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The investigators declare that there is no conflict of interest in undertaking this study.

REFERENCES


  1. Al Otaibi, H.M., Ansari, K.A., Farooqi, F.A. (2019). Evaluation of mechanical ventilators’ accuracy in clinical settings: A quality control study. Saudi Critical Care Journal. 3: 123-8.

  2. Bohlin, K., Bouhafs, R.K., Jarstrand, C., Curstedt, T., Blennow, M., Robertson, B. (2005). Spontaneous breathing or mechanical ventilation alters lung compliance and tissue association of exogenous surfactant in preterm newborn rabbits. Pediatric Research. 57(5): 624-630.

  3. Cross, L. and Matthay, A. (2011). Biomarkers in acute lung injury: insights into the pathogenesis of acute lung injury. Critical Care Clinics. 27(2): 355-77.

  4. Christoph, S. and Carsten, L. (2015). Regulation of cardiac output in hypoxia. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 25(4): 53-59.

  5. Dellacà, R. and Farré, R. (2009). Non-invasive Ventilation: The Impact of Machine Choice. The Buyer’s Guide to Respiratory Care Products. Pp. 30-39.

  6. Dukic, L., Milevoj Kopcinovic, L., Dorotic, A. Barsic, I. (2016). Blood gas testing and related measurements: National recommendations on behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Biochemia Medica. 26(3): 318-36.

  7. Fan, E., Brodie, D., Slutsky, S. (2018). Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 319(7): 698-710. 

  8. Govoni, L., Dellaca, R.L., Peñuelas, O., Bellani, G., Artigas, A., Ferrer, M., Navajas, D., Pedotti, A. and Farré, R. (2012). Actual performance of mechanical ventilators in ICU: A multicentric quality control study. Medical Devices (Auckland, NZ). 5: 111.

  9. Krimsky, W., Mroz, B., McIlwaine, K., Surgenor, D., Christian, D., Corwin, L., Houston, D., Robison, C., Malayaman, N. (2009). A model for increasing patient safety in the intensive care unit: Increasing the implementation rates of proven safety measures. BMJ Quality and Safety. 18(1): 74-80.

  10. Kollef, M. and Micek, T. (2010). Using protocols to improve patient outcomes in the intensive care unit: focus on mechanical ventilation and sepsis. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 31(1): 19-30. 

  11. Kosutova, P., Mikolka, P., Kolomaznik, M., Balentova, S., Adamkov, M., Calkovska, A. and Mokra, D. (2018). Reduction of lung inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis by the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast in experimental model of acute lung injury. Physiological Research. 67: S645-S654.

  12. Lord, B., Boswood, A. and Petrie, A. (2010). Electrocardiography of the normal domestic pet rabbit. Veterinary Record. 167(25): 961-965.

  13. Mirabella, L., Grasselli, G., Haitsma, J.J., Zhang, H., Slutsky, A.S, Sinderby, C., Beck, J. (2014). Lung protection during non- invasive synchronized assist versus volume control in rabbits. Critical Care. 18(1): 1-3.

  14. Mullhaupt, D., Wenger, S., Kircher, P., Pfammatter, N., Hatt, J.M., Ohlerth, S. (2017). Computed tomography of the thorax in rabbits: a prospective study in ten clinically healthy New Zealand White rabbits. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 59(1): 72.

  15. Rotta, A., Gunnarsson, B., Hernan, L., Fuhrman, B., Steinhorn, D. (1999). Partial liquid ventilation influences pulmonary histopathology in an animal model of acute lung injury. Journal of Critical Care. 14(2): 84-92. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)