Anatomical yield and proximate composition of RFW
The anatomical yield of RFW (FH, FN, SC and SB) varied significantly (p<0.05) among small, medium and large rohu fish (Table 1). Small fish generated more waste (49.45%) than that of medium (34.51%) and large (34.54) fish. Lower yield of head (27.62, 32.43 and 22.11% in common carp, bighead carp and grass carp respectively)
(Skałecki et al., 2015) than found in our study might be due to species difference.
Moisture, fat, crude protein and ash differed significantly (p<0.05) among all wastes (Table 2). Though SB constitutes a small fraction (1.42-1.91% by wet weight) of total generated waste, it can be mostly preferred for peptide extraction because of its highest protein content (>34%) among fish wastes. Protein content in scales of farmed grass carp (
Ctenopharyngodon idella) (21.74%)
(Naqvi et al., 2014) was closer to that found in rohu scales (22.9%). More protein (4% in FH), fat (11% in FH) and ash (17% in SC) were found in rohu in our study than grass carp
(Naqvi et al., 2014). In contrast comparatively less moisture (3% in FH and 1% in SC), ash (11% in FH and 2.5% in SC) and protein (1% in SC) were also observed in rohu (in our study) than grass carp
(Naqvi et al., 2014).
Alcalase concentration
With increase in alcalase concentration from 0.5 to 2% (v/w) there was a significant (p<0.05) increase in DH, ACE inhibition and PY (Fig 1A). However, ACE inhibition and PY decreased beyond 2.5% (v/w) alcalase concentration but DH continued to increase. In salmon (
Salmon salar) skin hydrolyzed by alcalase, See
et al (2011) found 2.5% enzyme as optimum for highest DH (77.03%). In eel (
Monopterus sp.) protein hydrolysate with alcalase (1.5-2%) showed DH ranging 36-69%
(Baharuddin et al., 2016). In grass carp (
Ctenopharyngodon idella) skin hydrolysate obtained with increasing alcalase enzyme to substrate ratio (0.12 to 1.08) showed increasing DH (5.02 to 14.9%)
(Wasswa et al., 2007). In our study ACE inhibition reduced from 61.1 to 56.6% as alcalase concentration increased from 2 to 2.5% (v/w). Similar result is reported in lizard fish (
Saurida elongata) muscle protein hydrolysate wherein ACE inhibitory activity decreased from 78 to 70% with increase in E/S from 1:1 to 1.5:1
(Wu et al., 2012). Optimum PY (amount of peptide/s (g) produced per 1 g crude protein) in pig bone collagen peptide was 36% with alcalase (6000/ u/g powder) at 6% substrate concentration
(Wu et al., 2019).
Hydrolysis temperature
DH, ACE inhibition and PY increased significantly (p<0.05) with increase in hydrolysis temperature (Fig 1B). Higher percentage of all these reduced dependent variables were noticed between 50-60°C which further reduced beyond 60°C. This may be due to degradation of enzyme at higher temperature. Similar increase in DH (36 to 69%) with increasing temperature (40 to 60°C) observed in eel (
Monopterus sp.) protein hydrolysate
(Baharuddin et al., 2016). In our study a DH reduced from 19.9 to 15.9% beyond 65°C. Similar decrease (71 to 61%) in DH reported in alcalase hydrolysate of salmon (
Salmon salar) skin
(See et al., (2011) when temperature increased from 55.3°C to 70°C. The result was consistent with the optimal temperature (55°C) of alcalase enzyme. Highest ACE inhibition (62.2% at 60°C) did not increase at >60°C might be due to inactivation of enzyme at higher temperature. Alcalase hydrolysate of Basa fish skin showed 33.3% ACE inhibition at 52°C
(Zhang et al., 2016). Minced striped snakehead hydrolyzed with alcalase (3% g/mL) showed 70% ACE inhibition at 55°C
(Ma, et al., 2021). Our study showed PY 51.8% at 60°C.
Hydrolysis time
There was a significant (p<0.05) increase in DH, ACE inhibition and PY with increase in hydrolysis time (Fig 1C). A rapid hydrolysis of RFWP at 60 min of hydrolysis indicated that large number of peptide bonds were cleaved. Later on, DH decreased significantly (p<0.05) until 180 min. and further reduced beyond 180 min. Similar to our study, DH increased from 5.02 to 14.9% in grass carp (
Ctenopharyngodon idella) skin hydrolysate when hydrolysis time increased from 75 to 120 min.
(Wasswa et al., 2007) and 36, 48 and 69% in eel (
Monopterus sp.) protein hydrolysate at 120, 180 and 300 min. of hydrolysis, respectively
(Baharuddin et al., 2016). PY (48.2%) found maximum at 240 min when DH and ACE inhibition showed reducing trend. This may be due to fact that more hydrolysis period allowed higher cleavage of protein leading to higher PY. However, optimum PY (36%) of pig bone collagen peptide found at 5 h of hydrolysis
(Wu et al., 2019).
Solid/liquid ratio
DH, ACE inhibition and PY increased significantly (p<0.05) with increase in S/L ratio (Fig 1D). Initially (at <0.4) there was a gradual increase followed by a sharp increase (from 0.4 to 0.8) and finally very minimal increase (beyond >0.8). The increase in solid (homogenized RFWP) per unit of liquid (reaction buffer) increases the substrate availability and thereby provide more active sites for the enzymatic activity. In alcalase hydrolysate of Basa fish skin highest ACE inhibition was reported at S/L ratio 1:8.05 g/mL (Zhang
et al., 2016) while in the minced striped snakehead (62% ACE inhibition) at 1:15 S/L
(Ma et al., 2021). Highest PY found in our study is 49.9%.
Optimization of enzymatic extraction process variables
RSM-BBD (32 runs) was performed to study the combined effect of 4 independent factors (X
1: Alcalase Concentration, X
2: Temperature, X
3: Time and X
4: S/L Ratio) on 3 dependent responses (DH, Y
1; ACE inhibition, Y
2 and PY, Y
3). A multiple regression analysis was performed using RSM to determine all the coefficients of linear (X
1, X
2, X
3, X
4), quadratic (X
12, X
22, X3
2, X
42) and interaction (X
1 X
2, X
1 X
3, X
1 X
4, X
2 X
3, X
2 X
4, X
3 X
4) terms to fit a full response surface model for the responses. In our study, a linear model term X
1 (alcalase concentration) found significant (p<0.05) for all the responses while X
2 (temperature) was significant (p<0.05) for PY only. X
3 and X
4 did not affect any response significantly (p>0.05). Additionally, a quadratic model term, X
22 showed significant (p>0.05) effect on all responses while other quadratic model term X
32 showed significant (p>0.05) effect on ACE inhibition and PY only.
Fig 2 illustrates contour (2D) and response surface (3D). Alcalase concentration significantly (p<0.05) influenced all the dependent variables. Temperature affected PY significantly (p<0.05) but not DH and ACE inhibition, however, temperature demonstrated significant effect on all the dependent variables of 2
nd order reaction but with negative effect on DH and PY. Time and S/L ratio were insignificant (p>0.05) for all the dependent variables. A final response surface regression equation obtained by RSM is as below (Eq. 4).
In our study the desirability profile indicated optimum DH (19.27%), ACE inhibition (54.98%) and PY (51.37%) with 1.08 % (v/w) alcalase concentration, 52.10°C temperature, 129.18 min hydrolysis time and 0.8:1 solid-liquid ratio. Taking the actual operations these may be adjusted to 1.1% (v/w), 52°C and 129 min. respectively. Similar results were reported in salmon skin hydrolysate (2.5% v/w alcalase, 55.3°C temperature resulted in 77% DH)
(See et al., 2011) and minced striped snakehead (5% w/v alcalase, 55°C temperature, 3 h hydrolysis and 1:25 g/mL S/L ratio exhibited 54.35% ACE inhibition)
(Ma et al., 2021).