Loading...

Effects of chronic exposure to 2G/3G cell phone radiation on in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.10769    | Article Id: B-454 | Page : 523-526
Citation :- Effects of chronic exposure to 2G/3G cell phone radiationon in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes .Indian Journal of Animal Research.2018.(52):523-526

Yusuf Ziya Guzey and Ali Galip Onal

yguzey@mku.edu.tr
Address :

Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, 31060, Hatay, Turkey.

Submitted Date : 9-02-2016
Accepted Date : 16-05-2016

Abstract

Mobile phone use has arisen and rapidly been increased during last decades and therefore electromagnetic radiation or heat sourcing from mobile phones and its possible damages has become focus of interest. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of mobile phone signals on in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes. A total of 224 bovine cumulus oocyte complexes were matured in vitro and separated into two groups, and only treatment group received mobile phone signals for 100 min by calling 5 min/h. Following maturation period, oocytes were stained by fluorescent stain to assess maturation rates. The results showed that oocytes reaching Metaphase I and Metaphase II stage were 35.2±2.24 % and 48.2±2.21 % for treatment group whereas 11.9±1.45 % and 73.8±4.60 % for controls, respectively (P<0.01). In conclusion, bovine oocyte maturation has been significantly reduced by mobile phone signals.

Keywords

Bovine EMF Electromagnetic field Maturation Oocyte.

References

  1. Acar, G.O., Yener, H.M., Savrun, F.K., Kalkan, T., Bayrak, I. and Enver, O. (2009). Thermal effects of mobile phones on facial nerves and surrounding soft tissue. Laryngoscope, 119: 559-562.
  2. Boni, R., Cuomo, A. and Tost,i E. (2002). Developmental Potential in Bovine Oocytes is Related to Cumulus-Oocyte Complex Grade, Calcium Current Activity, and Calcium Stores. Biology of Reproduction, 66: 836-842.
  3. Cecconi, S., Gualtieri, G., Di Bartolomeo, A., Troiani, G., Cifone, M.G. and Canipari, R. (2000). Evaluation of the effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on mammalian follicle development. Human Reproduction, 15:2319-2325.
  4. Chan Gye, M. and Jin Park, C. (2012). Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system. Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 39:1-9.
  5. Czyz, J., Guan, K., Zeng, Q., Nikolova, T., Meister, A., Schönborn, F., Schuderer, J., Kuster, N. and Wobus, A.M. (2004). High frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM signals) affect gene expression levels in tumor suppressor p53-deficient embryonic stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 25:296-307.
  6. Dasdag, S., Akdag, M.Z., Ulukaya, E., Uzunlar, A.K. and Yegin, D. (2008). Mobile phone exposure does not induce apoptosis on spermatogenesis in rats. Archives of Medical Research, 39: 40-44
  7. Ferreira, A.R., Knakievicz, T., Pasquali, M.A.B., Gelain, D.P., Da-Pizzol, F., Fernandez, C.E.R., Salles, A.A.A., Ferreira, H.B. and Moreira, J.C.F. (2006). Ultra-high frequency-electromagnetic field irradiation during pregnancy leads to an increase in erythrocytes micronuclei incidence in rat offspring. Life Sciences, 80: 43–50.
  8. Hardell, L., Carlberg, M. and Hansson, M.K. (2006). Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997-2003. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 79: 630-639
  9. Klaps, A., Ponocny, I., Winker, R., Kundi, M., Auersperg, F. and Barth, A. (2016). Mobile phone base stations and well-    being - A meta-analysis. The Science of the Total Environment, 544: 24-30
  10. Koval, T.M., Hart, R.W., Myser, W.C. and Hink, W.F. (1977). A comparison of survival and repair of UV-induced DNA damage in cultured insect versus mammalian cells. Genetics, 87: 513–518.
  11. Luo, Q., Yang, J., Zeng, Q.L., Zhu, X.M., Qian, Y.L. and Huang, H.F. (2006). 50-Hertz Electromagnetic Fields Induce gammaH2AX Foci Formation in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos in vitro. Biology of reproduction, 75:673-680.
  12. Myung, S.K., Ju, W., McDonnell, D.D., Lee, Y.J., Kazinets, G., Cheng, C.T. and Moskowitz, J.M. (2009). Mobile phone use and risk of tumors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27:5565-5572.
  13. Otto, M. and von Mühlendahl, K.E. (2007). Electromagnetic fields (EMF): Do they play a role in children’s environmental health (CEH)? International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 210:635-644
  14. Panagopoulos, D.J., Messini, N., Karabarbounis, A., Philippetis, A.L. and Margaritis, L.H. (2000). A mechanism for action of oscillating electric fields on cells. ochemical and biophysical research communications, 272:634-640.
  15. Panagopoulos, D.J., Karabarbounis, A. and Margaritis, L.H. (2002). Mechanism for action of electromagnetic fields on cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 298: 95–102
  16. Panagopoulos, D.J., Karabarbounis, A. and Margaritis, L.H. (2004). Effect of GSM 900-MHz Mobile Phone Radiation on the Reproductive Capacity of Drosophila melanogaster. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 23: 29–43.
  17. Parrish, J.J, Susko-Parrish, J.L, Leibfried-Rutledge, M.L, Crister, E.S, Eyestone, W.H. and First, N.L. (1986). Bovine in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed semen, Theriogenology, 25: 591-600.
  18. Phillips, J.L., Singh, N.P. and Lai, H. (2009). Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage. Pathophysiology, 16: 79–88.
  19. Soto, P., Natzke, R.P. and Hansen, P.J. (2003). Actions of tumor necrosis factor á on oocyte maturation and embryonic development in cattle. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 50: 380–388.
  20. Tokalov, S.V., Pieck, S. and Gutzeit, H.O. (2003). Comparison of the reactions to stress produced by X-rays or electromagnetic fields (50Hz) and heat: induction of heat shock genes and cell cycle effects in human cells. Journal of Applied Biomedicine, 1: 85 – 92.
  21. Yan, J.G, Agresti, M., Bruce, T., Yan, Y.H., Granlund, A. and Matloub, H.S. (2007). Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats. Fertility and Sterility 88: 957-964.

Global Footprints