Loading...

Evaluation of Tramadol, Pentazocine Lactate and Meloxicam as Pre-emptive Analgesics for Pain Management in Canine Ovariohysterectomy

DOI: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4516    | Article Id: B-4516 | Page : 695-703
Citation :- Evaluation of Tramadol, Pentazocine Lactate and Meloxicam as Pre-emptive Analgesics for Pain Management in Canine Ovariohysterectomy.Indian Journal of Animal Research.2022.(56):695-703
S.N. Chaithra, Basanta Saikia, Bedanga Konwar, Hitesh Bayan, Kalyan Sarma, M.C. Lallianchhunga, Rahul Singh Arya snchaithrachandu@gmail.com
Address : College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih-796 014, Mizoram, India.
Submitted Date : 8-05-2021
Accepted Date : 26-07-2021

Abstract

Background: It is usually accepted that some degree of post-surgical pain will be commonly present. There are different pain scales adopted in veterinary practice to assess these behavioural signs to measure pain. VAS had been used in human medicine for many years to measure pain and was found equally satisfactory in dogs. Pre-emptive analgesia (PEA) is grasping popularity in recent days, the concept of which originated during the time of growing appreciation of dynamic characteristics of pain pathway for obtaining effective analgesia prior to the surgical trauma.
Methods: The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of tramadol, pentazocine lactate and meloxicam as pre-emptive analgesics in dogs premedicated with glycopyrrolate, induction and maintenance with propofol continuous rate infusion (CRI) for certain clinical and physiological parameters. The animals were randomly divided into three equal groups viz. Group-T, Group-P and Group-M comprising six animals in each group and all were premedicated with glycopyrrolate, I/M. After 10 minutes of pre-anaesthetic administration, pre-emptive analgesia was given (Tramadol in Group-T, Pentazocine lactate in Group-P and Meloxicam in Group-M intravenously). After 10 minutes of pre-emptive analgesic administration, induction was achieved with propofol I/V and also maintained by CRI method up to 1 hour. Clinical and physiological parameters were recorded at 0 (baseline) minute before premedication, thereafter at 10 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr and 3 hr after pre-emptive analgesic administration. 
Result: There was no sedation observed within 10 min following pre-emptive analgesia and quality of sedation was recorded as score-0 in all the groups. Time for induction was significantly higher in group-M as compared to group-T and P. Quality of induction in all the groups ranged from score-0 to score1, assessment of peri-operative analgesia was recorded as score-0 in group-T and group-P, whereas in group-M it ranged from score-0 to score-1. Depth of anaesthesia was recorded as score-0 to score-1 in all the groups and quality of recovery was recorded as score-0 to score-1 in group-T and group-P and score-1 to score-2 in group-M. Assessment of post-operative analgesia by VAS was significantly lower in group-T as compared to group-P and M. In all the three groups, the heart rate increased significantly at 30 min interval and thereafter it decreased significantly till the end of the study. Respiratory rate also decreased significantly till 1 hr and thereafter it gradually increased till the end of study in all the groups. Rectal temperature, SpO2, systolic pressure and diastolic pressure decreased significantly at 30 min and thereafter increased gradually and approached base values in all the groups.

Keywords

Continuous rate infusion (CRI) Glycopyrrolate Meloxicam Pentazocine lactate Pre-emptive analgesics Propofol Tramadol

References

  1. Adetunji, A., Ajadi, R.A. and Adewoye, C.O. (2002). Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol bolus versus continuous infusion technique in xylazine premedicated dogs. Isr. J. Vet. Med. 57: 139-45.
  2. Ahmad, R.A., Kinjavdekar, P., Amarpal. Aithal, H.P., Pawde, A.M. and Kumar, R. (2013). Potential use of dexmedetomidine for different levels of sedation, analgesia and anaesthesia in dogs. Vet. Med. 58(2): 87-95.
  3. Amarpal, Pawde, A.M., Singh, G.R., Pratap, K. and Kumar, N. (1996). Clinical evaluation of medetomidine with and without pentazocine in atropinized dogs. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 66(3): 219-222.
  4. Amengual, M., Flaherty, D., Auckburally, A., Bell, A.M., Scott, E.M. and Pawson, P. (2013). An evaluation of anaesthetic induction in healthy dogs using rapid intravenous injection of propofol or alfaxalone. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 40(5): 115-123.
  5. Anandmay, A.K., Dass, L.L., Sharma, A.K., Gupta, M.K., Singh, K.K. and Roy, B.K. (2016). Clinico- anaesthetic changes following administration of propofol alone and in combination of meperidine and pentazocine lactate in dogs. Vet. World. 9(11): 1178-1183.
  6. Borges, P.A., Nunes, N., Barbosa, V.F., Conceicao, E.D.V., Nishimori, C.T.D., Paula, D.P., Carareto, R., Thiesen, R. and Santos, P.A.C. (2008). Cardiorespiratory variables, bispectral index and recovery of anesthesia in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane, treated or not with tramadol. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zoo. 60(3): 613-619.
  7. Branson, K.R. (2007). ‘Injectable and Alternative Anaesthetic techniques’, In [W. Tranquili, J. Thurmon and K. Grimm (eds.)], Lumb and Jones’ Vet. Anaesth. Analg. Wiley- Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 273-298.
  8. Chandrashekarappa, M., Ananda, K.J., Ganganaik, S. and Ranganath, B.N. (2009). Haematological and biochemical studies during general anaesthesia induced with propofol and its combinations with pentazocine lactate and chloramphenicol in dogs. Indian J. Vet. Surg. 30(1): 43-44.
  9. Chandrashekarappa, M. and Ananda, K.J. (2009). Evaluation of anaesthetic combinations of propofol with pentazocine lactate and chloramphenicol in dog. Indian. Vet. J. 86: 577-579.
  10. Cross, A.R., Budsberg, S.C. and Keefe, T.J. (1997). Kinetic gait analysis assessment of meloxicam efficacy in a sodium urate-induced synovitis model in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 58: 626-631.
  11. Dyson, D.H. and Davies, R.J. (1999). Dose effect and benefits of glycopyrrolate in the treatment of bradycardia in anesthetized dogs. Can. Vet. J. 40: 327-331.
  12. Gupta, A.K., Bisla, R.S., Singh, K. and Kumar, A. (2009). Evaluation of buprenorphine and tramadol as pre-emptive analgesics following ovariohysterectomy in female dogs. Indian. J.  Vet. Surg. 30(1): 22-26.
  13. Kotur, P.F. (2006). Is Pre-emptive analgesia beneficial for post- operative pain management? I. J. Anaesth. 50(3): 228.
  14. Laredo, F.G., Belda, E., Murciano, J., Escobar, M., Navarro, A., Robinson, K.J. and Jones, R.S. (2004). Comparison of the analgesic effects of meloxicam and carprofen administered preoperatively to dogs undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Vet. Record. 155(21): 667-671.
  15. Lascelles, B.D.X., Cripps, P.J., Jones, A. and Waterman Pearson, A.E. (1998). Efficacy and kinetics of carprofen, administered preoperatively or postoperatively, for the prevention of pain in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet. Surg. 27(6): 568-582.
  16. Lewis, K.S. and Han, N.H. (1996). Tramadol: A centrally acting analgesic. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 54: 643-652.
  17. Martins, T.L., Kahvegian, M.A. and Noel-Morgan, J. (2010). Comparison of the effects of tramadol, codeine and ketoprofen alone or in combination on postoperative pain and on concentrations of blood glucose, serum cortisol and serum interleukin-6 in dogs undergoing maxillectomy or mandibulectomy. Am. J. Vet. Res. 71: 1019-1026.
  18. Mastrocinque, S. and Fantoni, D.T. (2003). A comparison of preoperative tramadol and morphine for the control of early postoperative pain in canine ovariohysterectomy. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 30(4): 220-228.
  19. Mathews, K.A. (1996). Nonsteroidal and anti-inflammatory analgesics in pain management in dogs and cats. Can. Vet. J. 37(9): 539.
  20. Mathews, K.A., Pettifer, G., Foster, R. and McDonell, W. (2001). Safety and efficacy of preoperative administration of meloxicam, compared with that of ketoprofen and butorphanol in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery. Am. J. Vet. Res. 62(6): 882-888.
  21. McMillan, C.J., Livingston, A., Clark, C.R., Dowling, P.M., Taylor, S.M., Duke, T. and Terlinden, R. (2008). Pharmacokinetics of intravenous tramadol in dogs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 72(4): 325.
  22. Mondal, P., Nandi, S.K. and Ghosh, D. (2006). Postoperative analgesic effects of ketoprofen, meloxicam and tramadol in bitches. Indian Vet. J. 83(2): 165-167.
  23. Monteiro, E.R., Junior, A.R., Assis, H.M.Q., Campagnol, D. and Quitzan, J.G. (2009). Comparative study on the sedative effects of morphine, methadone, butorphanol or tramadol, in combination with acepromazine, in dogs. Vet. Anesth. Analg. 36(1): 25-33.
  24. Monteiro, E.R., Lobo, R.B., Nunes, J.S., Rangel, J.P. and Bitti, F.S. (2016). Tramadol does not enhance sedation induced by acepromazine in dogs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 80(4): 323-328.
  25. Natalini, C.C., da Silva Polydoro, A. and Crosignani, N. (2007). Effects of morphine or tramadol on thiopental anesthetic induction dosage and physiologic variables in halothane anesthetized dogs. Acta Sci. Vet. 35(2): 161-166.
  26. Pandey, S.K. and Sharma, I.J. (1986). Diazepam-pentazocine induced clinical and hematological- changes in canine surgical patients. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 56(9): 949-951.
  27. Pyati, S. and Gan, T.J. (2007). Perioperative pain management. CNS drugs. 21(3): 185-211.
  28. Reid, J. and Nolan, A.M. (1991).  A comparison of the postoperative analgesic and sedative effects of flimixin and pap aver etum in the dog. J. Small. Anim. Pract. 32(12): 603-608.
  29. Sahoo. (2015). Comparative studies of Butorphenol-Pentazocine- Tramadol in atropinised dogs anaesthetized with xylazine- propofol-midazolam Anaesthesia. MVSc, Thesis. WBUAFS, Kolkata.
  30. Saikia, B., Das, H., Bayan, H., Paul, R., Debbarma, A. and Sarma, N. (2019). Effects of Propofol, ketamine and their combination (Ketofol) as total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) on cardiopulmonary parameters in atropine and xylazine premedicated dogs. Int. J.  Chem. Stud. 7(1): 2193-2195.
  31. Sams, L., Braun, C., Allman, D. and Hofmeister, E. (2008). ‘A comparison of the effects of propofol and etomidate on the induction of anaesthesia and on cardiopulmonary parameters in dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 35(6): 488-494.
  32. Shinde, P.R., Chepte, S.D., Thorat, M.G., Raulkar, R.V., Ali, S.S., Fani, F.A., Anam, A.D., Bhave, N.P. and Vaidya, S.R. (2018). Clinical efficacy of ketofol and propofol in dog. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 7(6): 1949-1953.
  33. Slingsby, L.S. and Waterman-Pearson, A.E. (2000). Postoperative analgesia in the cat after ovariohysterectomy by use of carprofen, ketoprofen, meloxicam, or tolfenamic acid.  J.  Small. Anim. Pract. 41: 447-450.
  34. Taboada. F.M. and Leece. E.A. (2014). Comparison of propofol with ketofol, a propofol-ketamine admixture, for induction of anaesthesia in healthy dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 41(6): 575-582.
  35. Taylor, P.M. (1997). New developments in NSAIDs, in Proceedings. 6th Int. Congr. Vet. Anesthesiol. 49-52.
  36. Thejasree, P., Veena, P., Dhanalakshmi, N. and Veerabrahmaiah, K. (2017). Electrocardiographic studies in propofol and ketofol anaesthesia following atropine, diazepam and fentanyl premedication in dogs. Int. J. Livest. Res. 7(11): 113-117.
  37. Thejasree, P., Veena, P., Dhanalakshmi, N. and Veerabrahmaiah, K. (2018). Evaluation of propofol and ketofol anaesthesia following atropine, diazepam and fentanyl premedication in dogs. Int. J. Curr. Microbial. App. Sci. 7(11): 3130-3137.
  38. Weber, G.F. (2015). Pain Management. Molecular Therapies of Cancer. Springer International Publishing, Cham. 445-450.
  39. Wu, Y., Jia, N., Zhao, C., Li, Y., Shi, X.P., Li, Y.W., Wang, C., Li, R.L., Wang, J.W. and Wen, A.D. (2014). Synergistic antinociception of propofol-alfentanil combination in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 116: 25-29.

Global Footprints