The idea of using TENs has been borrowed from the medical practice where this technique is routinely used for the management of long bone fractures in children
(Mahar et al., 2004; Hunter, 2005; Singh et al., 2006; El-Adl et al 2009). As per authors, this is the first report on the clinical use of TENs for the stabilization of radius-ulna fractures in young dogs. The clinical use of TENs for femoral fractures in growing dogs has been recently published
(Sodhi et al., 2021).
Greyhounds have longest radius-ulna bones compared to other breeds kept in the region of study and are used for racing purpose which might be the reason for majority radius-ulna fractures in greyhounds. Higher incidence of radius-ulna fractures in racing greyhounds associated with bumping or hitting one another, or dogs hitting a rail or pole on the track surface are reported
(Bloomberg and Dugger, 1988). Distal radial fractures in small and toy dog breeds are common and are usually reported with a high rate of complications including nonunion
(Welch et al., 1997). Besides, distal radius-ulna fracture, particularly in heavy breed dogs, is prone to become open
(Singh et al., 2021).
Radiographically, the fractures were either transverse (n=6) (Fig 3a and b) or short oblique (n=4) with a mean minimum diameter of medullary canal 4.40±1.27 mm (range 2.0-6.6 mm). The mean±SD time required for TEN’s placement was 64.50±15.76 min (range 46-90 mins). The placement of TENs was easy in most cases (n=8). Since, adult dogs have narrow medullary cavity, so in two dogs (aged 14 and 19 months), it was difficult to place TENS in normograde manner so TENs were placed in the distal fragment using retrograde method. The size of TENs used was 2 mm and 1 mm in 4 dogs each, while 1.5 mm in 2 dogs, (mean±SD 1.5±0.47 mm for each nail) and pin to medullary canal ratio was 61.98±9.42% (45.40 - 75.00%). The medullary canal diameter of radial bone was narrow so it was possible to place comparatively small sized TENs (< 2 mm). Therefore young (with wider medullary canal) and light weighing dogs are most ideal.
Immediate postoperative radiographs reveals placement of TENs pins, symmetrically and to engage proximal bone fragment satisfactorily in majority of the fractures (6 out of 10) (Fig 3c and d). Whereas out of remaining 4 cases, TENs implant could not be placed satisfactorily, such as non-symmetric insertion of TENs pins into distal fragment in one dog, non-symmetric seating of TENs pins into proximal fragment (n=2) and placement of one pin only. Majority of the fracture showed grade 1 reduction (n=8) on immediate post-operative radiographs whereas one each showed grade 2 and 3 reduction.
Day 12 radiographs reveal stable implants in 8 dogs. Six dogs had evidence of uniform callus formation (16.00 ± 30.50mm long and 2.00±2.83 mm wide), but fracture line was visible whereas in the remaining callus formation was not appreciable. Two dogs had complications; one angulation at fracture site and in second pin break was recorded at day 12. Angulation at the fracture site was associated with the non-symmetric pins placement.
Surgical wound healed in all dogs on day 12 of surgery, but pain and inflammation was present. In 4 dogs operated with TENs small wounds were present at the pin insertion site. On day 45, pain and inflammation was present in 4 and 3 dogs, respectively and these also had implants related complications. On day 45, the length and width of callus was 22.80±12.34 mm and 3.50±2.69 mm, respectively. At 60 days length and width of callus was 26±5.57mm and 4.33±0.58mm, respectively (Fig 3e and f) was increased non-significantly.
No significant difference in the length of operated and contralateral healthy radial bone was noted on days 0 and 60. However, in comparison to operated bone on day 60 (202.67±6.68 cm), the mean length of contralateral healthy bone was non-significantly more (215.80±50.98 cm) indicating possible damage to the distal physis intraoperatively or during trauma.
Markedly reduced ROM of carpal joint was observed on day 12 (72.4±29.24°) that improved non-significantly on day 45 (79.2±35.77) and reached near normal at day 60 (106 ±9.64°) compared to contra-lateral healthy carpal joint (123.33±15.27°). During early follow up period, markedly reduced ROM of carpus in operated limbs could be due to pain associated reduced flexion angles whereas extension angles remained unaffected. During later stages of follow up (day 60), the functional outcome evidenced by better goniometry angles could be due to the fact that TENs were placed intramedullary and did not interfere with the extra osseous structure
(Sodhi et al., 2021). Gill et al (2018) reported better functional outcome and reduced stiffness of stifle joint associated with single end threaded pin as compared to cross pinning technique used to stabilize supracondylar fracture in dogs.
Weight bearing scores on walking increased gradually from 12th (1.62±1.51) to 45thday (2.57±1.51) and day 60 (3.75±0.5) and full (4.0±0) at day 90. Lameness score was found non-significantly more on day 12 (4.12±0.99) as compared to day 45 (2.88±2.47) and day 60 (1±1.55). Lameness score gradually decreases on day 45 and day 60 and 90, non-significantly.
Majority of the dogs (n=5) had no complication whereas in one each dog revealed complications like suture line infection along with angulation at fracture site (greyhound, male, 19 month), suture line infection with both the pins migrated distally and mild angulation (greyhound, female, 12 month), one pin (medial) migrated and exposed externally (greyhound, female, 18 month), pin breakage and in another dog, suture line infection was recorded. Majority of the complications (4 out of 5) recovered fully with conservative treatment or suitable surgical intervention except one grey hound male dog, aged 19 month showed angulation at fracture site leading to marked persistent lameness even on follow up of 9 months which could be associated with malunion. However, owner did not bring the dog for radiographic evaluation and pin removal. Long term follow up revealed resumption of full (n=9) and acceptable (n=1) functional outcome.
In one Pomeranian dog (14month) in which single TENS (1mm) could be placed in the radial bone had complication of pin breakage at the fracture site after 15 days. The broken distal TENS was removed after one month and the fracture was allowed to heal conservatively with full functional outcome after 2 months. In contrast,
Prabhukumar et al., (2020) used single stainless steel elastic stable IM nail to stabilize radial of two young dogs, successfully, without any implant related complications.
The TENs is currently used in medical practice to stabilize long bone fractures in children in which two nails of same diameter are inserted symmetrically in a dynamic cross intramedullary fashion to achieve biomechanical stability from the divergent ‘C’ configuration that provides six points of fixation (3 point fixation with each nail). The nails are pre curved to about three times the narrowest (isthmus) diameter of bone to achieve dynamic stability
(Hunter, 2005). The dense metaphyseal region of children’s developing bones offers sufficient nail anchoring at entry points. By achieving axial and rotational stability, these nails decrease the chances of angulation in both anterio-posterior and varus/valgus
(Singh et al., 2006) that helps to develop early bridging callus
(Hunter, 2005). The TENs are especially effective for closed forearm fractures in children as intact muscle envelope around the injured bone provides biomechanical stability.
Distal migration of TENs, in the present study, could be due to the fact that nails were placed straight without pre-contouring; however, bending of nails outwards caused nails contouring to some extent itself (Fig, 2b, 3d and 3f). Instability due to asymmetric nails insertion could be the reason for wound related complications. Most of the complications were observed in dogs aged above 1 year and heavy weight dogs. Further studies involving large sample size and placement of an additional pin in the ulnar bone are warranted that may improve implant stability and may reduce complications. Despite better pin to medullary canal ratio (61.98±9.42%), higher complications were recorded in radius-ulna fractures which could be due to the limitation of use of smaller sized pins (due to narrow medullary canal), longer bones and heavier body weight of dogs.