Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Anatomy of the Liver of Mizoram Local Pig (Zovawk)

Swarup Debroy1, P.C. Kalita1,*, Arup Kalita1, O.P. Choudhary1, P.J. Doley1, Amitava Paul1, Rupan Sarkar1
1Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University (I), Selesih, Aizawl-796 015, Mizoram, India.
Background: The present study was aimed for the promotion and advancement of the anatomical knowledge at the gross, light microscopic and electron microscopic level in Zovawk (mizo local pig). 

Methods: The current investigation was done at the Instructional livestock farm, Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram and Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (SAIF), North Eastern Hill University (NEHU), Shillong, Meghalaya. Six liver samples were collected from six apparently healthy Zovawk animal of either sex and gross morphological observations were done directly after collection. Thereafter tissue samples were collected as such and were preserved in neutral buffer formalin (NBF) and in Karnovsky’s fixative for routine histology and transmission electron microscopic examination, respectively.

Result: Zovawk liver shows four distinct borders, i.e. medial, lateral, dorsal and ventral border, two surfaces, i.e. parietal surface or diaphragmatic surface and caudal or visceral surface and six distinct lobes. The average weight of Zovawk liver was 1.402 kg. Weight of the liver was highly correlated with body weight of animal. Histologically, Zovawk liver was characterized with thick Glisson’s capsule and thick connective tissue septa emerging from it, which gives the hepatic lobules its hexagonal shape. Sinusoids of adjacent hepatocytes were lined by stellate shaped Kupffer cells. The ultra-structural examination of liver shows that, the hepatocytes were rich in mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and glycogen granules. Free ribosome and well developed rER and dense lysosomal granules were common in those hepatocyte.
Indigenous pig breed of Mizoram, also known as Zovawk is dispersed in different parts of Mizoram, India. Lack of scientific breeding practice is responsible for the gradual decreasing of these pigs population. Age of puberty of these small sized animals is at 2.5 months with a body weight of 4.5 kg. They are very wary of their surrounding and can be used as watch animals because of their alert behavior (Hmar et al., 2010, Kalita et al., 2014, Prava et al., 2014). As a largest gland in animal body, liver has numerous multifaceted functions (Nickel et al., 1979). Six distinct lobes and two borders are characteristics features of pig liver. Average weight of an adult pig liver is about 1.5 to 2 kg (Getty, 2012). Pig liver is consists of 6 distinct lobes and two borders. Position of gall bladder in pigs is between the right medial lobe and quadrate lobe (Dyce et al., 1987). Microscopically, hepatic lobules and corresponding portal canals are seems to form the liver lobe. Contrary to other animals, Pig liver is characterized with distinct interlobular connective tissue septa emerges from Glisson’s capsule. Because of the geographical position no standard work have been done on the liver of this unique animal therefore this investigation was performed to set a baseline data of the organ.
Six apparently healthy Mizoram local pigs, irrespective of sex were utilized for this study. One liver samples from each animal were collected. Topographic study and gross measurements were taken right on the spot. Measurements of various physical parameters i.e. weight of the liver, length of the liver, width and thickness of the liver were evaluated. A physical balance was used to measure the weight of the liver. Length, width and thickness of the liver were measured by the measuring scale. Data obtained were then analyzed using statistical package SPSS version 20.

For histological examination, freshly collected liver samples were fixed in 10% NBF (Neutral buffer formalin) then standard tissue processing procedure were followed to make a tissue section of 6 µm thickness. Processed tissue sections were subsequently stained with H & E stain for observing normal tissue architecture.

For transmission electron microscopic examination multiple steps were followed to ensure proper ultra-structural viewing of the organ. Such as.

i. Fixation

Tissue samples for TEM studies were fixed in Karnovsky’s fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M Sodium cacodylate or Phosphate buffer at pH 7.2) for 2-4 hours at 4ºC. After washing in 0.1M buffer (3 changes of 15 minutes each).
 
ii. Washing

 
The fixed tissues were then washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) for three times of 15 minutes duration each at 4°C.
 
iii. Post-fixation

These washed tissues were later post fixed for 2 hours in 1% osmium tetraoxide at 4°C.
 
iv. Washing

The osmium tetroxide fixed tissues were again washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) for three times of 15 minutes duration each at 4°C.
 
v. Dehydration

 
Dehydration of tissues were done in graded acetone (i.e. 30, 50, 70, 80, 90% and dry acetone) for 30 minutes each at 4°C followed by dehydration in dry acetone once again for 30 minutes at room temperature.
 
vi. Clearing

 
The dehydrated tissues were then cleared in toluene-I and toluene-II for 30 minutes each.
 
vii. Infiltration

The infiltration of the cleared tissues was carried out as follows:
 
1. Part Embedding Medium and 3 parts of Toluene-12 hours
2. Parts Embedding Medium and 2 parts of toluene-12 hours
3. Parts Embedding Medium and 1 parts of Toluene-12 hours (under vacuum).
 
Preparation of Embedding Medium
 
Araldite cy212 - 10 ml
DDSA (dodecenyl succinic anhydrite) - 10 ml
DMP (2, 4, 6 tridimethylamino methyl phenol) - 0.4 ml
Plasticizer (Dibutyl phthalate) - 1.0 ml
The above gradients were added and stirred vigorously in order to mix them thoroughly. Then the air bubbles were allowed to settle down before use.
 
viii. Embedding

A pure embedding medium were use for embedding the tissue using gelatin capsule.
 
ix. Polymerization

 
The embedded blocks were kept at 50°C for 24 hours (polymerization) and then at 60°C for 48 hours.
 
x. Ultra-sectioning

 
Silver-to-gray (70-80 nm) ultrathin sections were cut with diamond knives using a ultra-microtome (Leica ultra-cut) UCT and mounted on copper grids.
 
xi. Negative staining

Uranyl acetate and lead citrate were used for staining the ultrathin sections which were then examined under a Transmission Electron Microscope, JEOL, JEM-2100, Japan which was operated at 80 KV.
 
xii. Photography

The photography was taken with the help of the digital camera which was inbuilt with the microscope.
 
xiii. Interpretation

Some of the interpretations were noted while viewing the tissues in the TEM and rest were done with the help of photomicrographs.
Gross parameters
 
Position
 
In this present study liver of Zovawk was located in the cranial and right side of the median plane in the intra thoracic part of the abdominal cavity immediately after diaphragm as also reported by Dyce et al., (1996), Pareek (2000) in sheep, Dhoolappa et al., (2007) in Indian donkey and Stamatova et al., (2012) in rabbit. It was also found in this study that zovawk liver was directed obliquely downward and forward from the 12th ribs to 6th intercostal space where as Pareek (2000) found that sheep liver was extended from the ninth rib or eighth inter-costal space to the caudal border of the last rib.
 
Color and shape
 
In this present study the shape of Zovawk liver was irregularly rectangular in shape. Similar findings were also noticed by Pareek (2000) in sheep. Endo et al., (2000) observed that the liver of a two-humped camel (Camelus bactrianus) appeared characteristically as an enlarged triangle in visceral aspect. While Osman (2008) observed in the liver of the pig that it was divided into two independent segments, right and left. Color of the Zovawk liver was cherry red to brownish red. Miller (1965) stated in dog that the liver of dog was deep red in color and firm in consistency in fresh state. Oushine and Zguigal (1983) and Smuts and Bezuidenhout (1987) found dark brown liver in camel. Smuts and Bezuidenhout (1987) reported that in camel, the liver was dark brown in the fresh state.
 
Borders and surfaces
 
In this present study liver shows 4 distinct borders similar findings were found by Pareek (2000) in sheep and Bamaniya (2013) in Marwari goat. The medial border presented oesophageal notch and parts of caudal venacava similar findings were reported by Pareek (2000) in sheep and Bamaniya (2013) in Marwari goat. However the posterior venacava was partly embedded in the medial border above the esophageal notch as described by Nickel et al., (1979) in ruminants. Zovawk liver showed 2 surfaces i.e. parietal surface or diaphragmatic surface and caudal or visceral surface similar findings were also found by Pareek (2000) in sheep, Modekar, et al., (2003) in the goat. The visceral surface of Zovawk liver was related to the part of stomach, duodenum and gall bladder. However the visceral surface of the liver was related to the part of reticulum, omasum, duodenum and gall bladder in Marwari goat (Bamaniya, 2013).
 
Lobation
 
In this study, Zovawk liver was distinctly lobulated on the visceral surface. Similar findings were reported by Pareek (2000) in sheep and Bamaniya (2013) in Marwari goat. Zovawk liver was divided in to 6 distinct lobes. Whereas Miller et al., (1965) reported that dog liver was divided into five lobes, Raghavan (1964) reported that in ox the liver was divided in four lobes, Getty (1977) reported that there was horse liver was divided in to 4 lobes and there was presence of 3 liver lobes in sheep and goat reported by Raghavan (1964) and Getty (1977) respectively.. An imaginary midline divides the Zovawk liver in to 2 halves, left and right liver. On the left side there is a presence of large left lateral and small left medial lobes. On the right side there is a larger right medial lobe and smaller right lateral lobe. Above the right lateral lobe there is a presence of caudate process. In Zovawk only caudate process was present in caudate lobe, whereas papillary process was not found. In live caudate process was not in relation with kidney so no renal impression was seen in the caudate process. In the midline smaller quadrate lobe was seen. Between the quadrate lobe and right medial lobe there was presence of gallbladder. Near the imaginary midline, below the caudate process there was presence of porta through which portal vein, hepatic artery pass (Fig 1 and 2).

Fig 1: Diaphragmatic surface of liver.



Fig 2: Visceral surface of the liver.


 
Weight
 
In this study, average weight of Zovawk liver was 1.402 kg. Whereas Nickel et al., (1979) recorded weight of liver as 0.775 kg in sheep. Miller, (1965) described that the average weight of liver of dog was 450 gm. It was highly correlated with body weight of animal (Table 2).
 
Length
 
In this study, average length of the Zovawk liver was 25.65 cm. While Pareek (2000) found that the average length was 8.97 inches in sheep.
 
Width
 
The width of the dorsal margin was ranged from 8.9 cm to 12 cm on an average of 11.22 cm. The width of middle margin was ranged from 21.4 cm to 30.2 cm on an average of 20.205 cm. The width of ventral margin was ranged from 13.5 cm to 18.3 cm on an average of 16.23 cm (Table 1). Width of middle margin was maximum and width of dorsal margin was minimum. which is similar with the findings of the May (1955) in sheep but was contrary with the findings of Pareek (2000) in sheep where he observed that that the dorsal margin of the liver was significantly larger than that of the ventral margin. Correlation between width of dorsal margin and width of middle margin with body weight is significant @ 5%, whereas correlation between widths of ventral margin body weight of animal is non-significant (Table 2).

Table 1: Different gross measurements of Zovawk liver.



Table 2: Correlation between different parameters of liver with body weight of the animals.


 
Thickness
 
Thickness of dorsal lobe was ranged from 2.3 cm to 4.1 cm on an average of 3.06 cm. Thickness of ventral lobe was ranged from 1.6 cm to 3.3 cm on an average of 2.2 cm. Thickness of caudate lobe was ranged from 0.9 cm to 1.15 cm on an average of 1.12 cm (Table 1). Whereas Miller, (1965) described that the average thickness of ventral lobe of liver was 6 cm in dog.
 
Histological examination
 
Externally Zovawk liver was covered by a thick, distinct connective tissue capsule (Fig 3). This connective tissue capsule is known as Glisson’s capsule; same was also reported by Kalita et al., (2019) in Zovawk and also by Copenhaver et al., (1967) in pig. This connective tissue capsule runs inside as well-defined connective tissue septa and divides the pig liver in to many distinct hexagonal liver lobules. These hexagonal liver lobules (Fig 4) were characterized by centrally placed central vein and a portal area in the periphery. Similar findings were reported by Kalita et al., (2019) in Zovawk whereas Pareek (2000) in sheep and Bamaniya (2013) in Marwari goat reported that, there were no distinct hexagonal shaped liver lobules in sheep and goat with scanty connective tissue septa. The central veins were connected with sub lobular veins, ran in the middle of the lobule and communicated directly, with sinusoids as also reported by Kalita et al., (2019) in Zovawk. Polygonal Hepatocytes (Fig 5) with centrally placed large, rounded nucleus with one or more nucleoli were seen. Hepatocytes were arranged in the form of one cell thick cord. These cords anastomosed with one another, enclosing spaces which contained the sinusoids. These findings compare well with the reports of Kalita et al., (2019) in Zovawk, Copenhaver et al., (1967) in pig and camel and Adibmoradi (2007) in horse. The sinusoids were formed between the hepatic cell cords and separated from the hepatocytes by a perisinusoidal. Sinusoids were lined by stellate shapedcells known as Kupffer’s cells. These cells were also observed by Kalita et al., (2019) in Zovawk, Pareek (2000) in sheep and Mahata et al., (2003) in spotted deer. Portal area was characterized by the presences of various vessels and ducts, i.e. portal vein, hepatic artery, bile duct (Fig 6).

Fig 3: Liver capsule; GC= Glisson’s capsule.



Fig 4: Liver lobulation, C= Central vein, arrow head showing connective tissue septa.



Fig 5: Parenchyma of liver showing, H= hepatocytes, S= sinusoids, K= Kupffer’s cells.



Fig 6: Portal area of liver showing, P= portal vein, HA= hepatic artery, BD= Bile duct.


 
Transmission electron microscopic examination
 
The hepatocyte has a large, rounded nucleus, one or more prominent nucleoli and abundant cytoplasm. Very dense lysosomes bodies or lipofuscin granules were found. The sinusoidal endothelial cells were seen (Fig 7). The hepatocyte is rich in mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and glycogen cluster of free ribosome and well developed rER and sER (Fig 8) as reported by Lalla (1997) in camel. The mitochondria of the liver have a dense matrix and transversely or occasionally longitudinally oriented crests. The granular and agranular endoplasmic reticulum are in continuity in several locations. The cisternae are flattened with some content. The endoplasmic reticulum is in close association with the mitochondria (Fig 9). Dense lysosomal granules are common in the hepatocyte (Fig 8).

Fig 7: Parenchyma of liver showing N= Nucleus, bc= Bile canaliculi, e= endothelial cells.



Fig 8: Demonstration of cytoplasm of hepatocytes showing ly= Dense lysosomal granules (ly), M= Mitochondria, ER= Endoplasmic reticulum.



Fig 9: Cytoplasm of hepatocytes showing ER= Endoplasmic reticulum.



The sinusoidal endothelial cells were observed in widely separated areas. Very thin, fenestrated cytoplasmic extensions from the endothelial cells encompass the lumen of the sinusoidal blood vessel. Bile canaliculi appear as irregular pores between cells in the cords (Fig 7). Filamentous or tubular stems were seemed to interconnect some of the organelles. The microbodies generally appear somewhat smaller than the mitochondria. Shahien et al., (1977) reported that in camels, small to medium sized lipid droplets are mainly concentrated in the peripheral part of the hepatocytes along the sinusoids. The microbody is surrounded by a single membrane and this opportune section has passed through a dense nucleoid. This microbody is located among a number of glycogen granules. Glycogen granules were seen as dense granules in a rosette configuration (Fig 10).

Fig 10: Demonstration of M =Mitochondria, gy = Glycogen granules, mb = Microbodies.

In conclusion it can be said that, even though gross structure, overall cell morphologies, organelles within cells, appeared typical, there are few important ultrastuctural features which were quite different than other species such as Very dense lysosomes bodies or lipofuscin granules were found in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes which enhance the excretion properties of the liver. Apart from that this present investigation helps to set a baseline data about the gross and ultrastuctural features of the liver of this rear porcine breed of Mizoram.

  1. Adibmoradi M. (2007). Histological and histochemical studies of liver of caspian miniature horse from point of view of liver glycogen. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 19(2): 71-75.

  2. Bamaniya, M., Mathur, R., Joshi, S., Beniwal, G., Pal, R.S., Sikarwar, S. and Singh, A. (2013). Gross and topographical studies on liver of Marwari Goat (Capra hircus). XXVIII Annual Convention of IAVA and National Symposium Abstracts Bulletin, 11.

  3. Copenhaver, W.E., Kelly, D.E. and Wood, R.L. (1967). Bailey’s Text Book of Histology. VII End. The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore lgaku Shoin Ltd., Tokyo. pp. 527-543.

  4. Dhoolappa, M., Pawar A., Prasad,R.V. and Lakshmishree, K.T. (2007). Gross morphology of liver in Indian donkey (Equus asinus). Indian Journal of Animal Science. 76(1): 48-49.

  5. Dyce, K.M., Sack, W.O. and Wensing, C.J.G. (1996). The Text Book of Veterinary Anatomy, ll End., W.B. Saunder’s Company, Philadelphia, pp.: 136.

  6. Dyce, K.M., Sack, W.O. and Wensing, C.J.G. (1987). The Text Book of Veterinary Anatomy, Third Edition. Sauders, The Curtis Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, p 781. 

  7. Endo, H., Gui, C., Dugarsuren, B., Erdemtu, B., Manglai, D. and Hayashi, Y. (2000). On the morphology of the liver in the two humped camel (Camelus bactrianus). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 29(4): 2 Toronto, pp. 75-82.

  8. Getty, R. (1977). Sisson and Grossman’s. The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals” Vl. The Mcmillan Company of India Ltd. Madras, Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta V Edn. pp. 908-913.

  9. Getty, R. (2012). Sisson and Grossman’s The anatomy of the domestic animals, volume 2, Affiliated East-West Press Private Limited, New Delhi, India, pp. 1280.

  10. Hmar, L., Saikia, P., Thazuali, L., Tolenkhomba, T.C. and Samanta, A.K. (2010). Conservation of zovawk-a small variety pig of Mizoram. Proceeding of National Symposium on Technology Management, Visioning and Up-scaling for Accelerating Livestock Production, Guwahati, India. p136.

  11. Kalita, P., Kalita, A., Doley, P., Choudhary, O., Das, H. and Debroy, S. (2019). Liver and pancreas of mizo local pig (Zovawk): A histomorphological and histochemical analysis. International Journal of Livestock Research. 9(1): 150-156. doi: 10.5455/ijlr.20180512115737.

  12. Kalita, A., Kalita, P.C. and Doley, P.J. (2014). Urinary system of mizo local pig (Zovawk) a gross morphological and morphometrical study. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1(3): 458-464.

  13. Lalla, S. and Drommer, W. (1997). Observation on the fine structure of the liver in the camel (Camelus dromedarius). Anat. Histol. Embryol. 26: 271-275.

  14. Mahata, T.K., Ghosh, R., Guha, K., Bhattacharyya, M.K. and Jana, C. (2003). Studies on histomorphological architecture of the liver of spotted deer (Cervus axis). Indian Journal of Animal Health. 42(1): 71-74.

  15. May, N.D.S. (1955). The Anatomy of the Sheep with instruction for its Dissection, the University of Queensland press Brisbane, pp. 105-107.

  16. Miller, M.E. (1965). Anatomy of the Dog. W.B. Saunder’s Company, London, pp. 699-705.

  17. Miller, M.E., Christensen, G.C. and Evans, H.E. (1965). Anatomy of the dog. W. B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia and London.

  18. Modekar, S.S., Bhosle, N.S. and Mamde, C.S. (2003). Morphological study of liver in Osmanabadi goat (Capra hircus). Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 15(1/2): 65-67.

  19. Nickel, R., Schummer, A. and Seiferle E. (1979). The viscera of the domestic mammals, Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamberg, pp.115, 121, 146.

  20. Osman, F.A., Wally, Y.R., Nady, F.A. E. and Rezk, H.M., (2008). Gross Anatomical Studies on the Portal Vein, Hepatic Artery and Bile Duct in the Liver of the Pig. J. Vet. Anat. 1(1): 59-72.

  21. Oushine, A. and Zguigal, H. (1983). External conformation and lobation of the liver of the dromedary, Indian Veterinary Journal. 51: 6843.

  22. Pareek, P. (2000). Gross and Histological studies of the liver in Magra Sheep (Ovis aries) M.V.Sc. Thesis College of Veterinary and Animal Science Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner. Pp.1-78.

  23. Prava, M., Tolenkhomba, T.C. and Ayub, A.M. (2014). Hematological profile of Zovawk- An indigenous pig of Mizoram. Veterinary World. 7(7): 505-508.

  24. Raghavan, D. (1964). Anatomy Ox, lst edn. Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi, pp. 370-374.

  25. Shahien, Y.M., Fahmy, M.F. and Sokkar, S.M. (1977). A histochemical study of the liver of normal camels. Vet. Med. J. (Cario). 25: 261-270.

  26. Smuts, M.M.S. and Bezuidenhout, A.J. (1987). Anatomy of the Dromedary. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, pp. 129-132.

  27. Stamatova, Y.K., Dimitrov, R., Kostov, D. and Yovchev, D. (2012). Anatomical morphological features of the liver in domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Trakia Journal of Sciences. 10(2): 85-90. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)