The effect of different extenders on the sperm motility and viability of frozen Turkey semen

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.6825    | Article Id: B-440 | Page : 235-241
Citation :- The effect of different extenders on the sperm motilityand viability of frozen Turkey semen .Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2017.(51):235-241

Mehmet Kuzlu and Atilla Taskin*

ataskin@ahievran.edu.tr
Address :

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ahi Evran, 40100, Turkey.

Submitted Date : 15-01-2016
Accepted Date : 26-09-2016

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop long-term storage methods for turkey semen using different extenders. During the study, the massage method was used twice a week to collect the semen from five turkeys, a total of 44 times. The collected fresh semen’s average ejaculate quantity, sperm concentration, motility and vitality values were determined as 0.22±0.01 ml, 3.5±0.17 x109 sp/ml, 77.0±1.44% and 86.2±0.95 % respectively. In this study, glucose (G) including 5% Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) cryoprotective, tris-glucose (TG), lactated Ringer’s (LR), and lactated Ringer’s glucose (LRG) extenders were used. The Turkey semen was combined and divided into four equal parts, and subsequently diluted at a ratio of 1:3 and equilibrated at +4°C for 90 minutes. Following equilibration, the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen vapor to   - 80°C for five minutes, and stored at -196°C in liquid nitrogen. After freezing and thawing, the highest motility value was obtained from the G extender (43.3% ±1.62%) followed by LRG (24.6±1.53%), LR (12.6±0.92%)  and  TG (12.2±0.66%). The vitality values were recorded as 55.8±1.89%, 23.8±1.58%, 21.5±1.10% and 36.5±1.59% respectively. The motility and vitality values were significantly (p<0.01) more for the glucose extender than those for other extenders. Therefore, it was concluded that glucose extender is better option for the long-term storage of Turkey semen.

Keywords

Cryopreservation Motility Sperm Turkey Vitality.

References

  1. Akcay, E., Tekin, N., Selcuk, M. and Cevik, M. (1997).Preservation in various diluents of turkeysemen at 4°C. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 44: 137-149.
  2. Akcay, E., Varisli, O. and Tekin, N. (2006). Fertilizing ability of turkey semen diluted with simple sugar-based extenders after cooled storage. World Poultry Science Association. EPC 2006-XII European Poultry Conference. Verona. 
  3. Alkan, S., Baran A., Ozdas, B.and Evecen, M. (2002). Morphological defects in turkey semen. Turk J Vet Anim Sci.26: 1087-1092.
  4. Bakst, M.R.and Dymond, J.S. (2015). Artificial insemination in poultry. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/54918
  5. Blesbois, E. (2007). Current status in avian semen cryopreservation. Poult Sci. 63: 213-222.
  6. Bucak, MN. and Tekin, N. (2007). Kriyoprotektanlar ve gamet hücrelerinin dondurulmasinda kriyoprotektif etki, Ankara Uni Vet Fak Derg. 54: 67-72.
  7. Graham, J.W. (2007.). Cryopreservation of avian spermatozoa. Second Edition, edited by John G. Day and Glyn Stacey. 219-225.
  8. Ilgaz, B., and Tekin, N. (1990). Studies on spermatiological characteristics and artificial insemination in American bronze turkeys. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 37: 620-631.
  9. Kadioglu, A. (2011). (Ed). Who Laboratuar El Kitabi. 5. Baski, Istanbul, Nobel Yayincilik.
  10. Keskin, O., Tekin, N., and Akçay, E. (1995). Erbro irki horoz spermalarinin farkli sulandirici ve kryoprotektanlarla dondurulmasi. Lalahan Hay Araº Enst Derg. 35: 110-125.
  11. Kowalczyk, A., and Lukaszewicz, E. (2012). The possibility of obtaining intergeneric hybrids via White Ko³uda (Anser anserL.) goose insemination with fresh and frozen-thawed Canada goose (Branta canadensis L.) gander semen. Theriogenology. 77: 507-513.
  12. Long, J.A., Purdy, P.H., Zuidberg, K., Hiemstra, S.J., Velleman, S.G., and Woelders, H. (2014). Cryopreservation of turkey semen. Effect of breeding line and freezing method on post-thaw sperm quality, fertilization, and hatching. Cryobiology.68: 371-378.
  13. Lukaszewicz, E. (2001). Effect of semen filtration and dilution rate on morphology and fertility of frozen gander spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 55: 1819-1829.
  14. Lukaszewicz, E. (2002). An effective method for freezing white Italian gander semen. Theriogenology. 58: 19-27.
  15. Makhafola, M.B., Lehloenya, K.C., Mphaphathi, M.L., Dinnyes, A.and Nedambale, T.L. (2009). The effect of breed on the survivability and motility rate of cryopreserved cock semen. S Afr J Anim Sci. 39: 242-245.
  16. Massip, A. (2001). Cryopreservation of embryos of farm animal. Reprod Dom Anim. 36: 49-55.
  17. Medeiros, C.M.O., Forell, F., Oliveira, A.T.D., and Rodrigues, J.L. (2002). Current status of sperm cryopreservation: why isn’t it better? Theriogenology. 57: 327-44.
  18. Palasz, A.T., and Mapletopt, R.J. (1996). Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos and oocytes: recent advances. Biotechnol Adv. 14: 127-149.
  19. Pandian, C.and Prabakaran, R. (2012). Effect of genetic groups and cryoprotectants on pre-freeze and post-thaw sperm motility of turkey semen. The North-East Veterinarian.12: 28-29.
  20. Rosato, M.P., Centoducati, G., Santacroce, M.P., and Iaffaldano, N. (2012). Effects of lycopene on in vitro quality lipid peroxidation in refrigerated and cryopreserved turkey spermatozoa. Brit Poult Sci.53: 545-552.
  21. Roushdy, K.H., El-Sherbieny, M.A., Abd El-Gany, F.A.and El-Sayed, M.A. (2014). Semen cryopreservation for two local chicken strains as a tool for conservation of Egyptian local genetic resources, Egypt Poult Sci, 34: 607-618.
  22. Seigneurin, F.and Blesbois, E. (1995). Effects of the freezing rate on viability and fertility of frozen-thawed fowl spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 43: 1351-1358.
  23. Tai, J.J.L., Chen, J.C., Wu, K.C., Wang, S.D.and Tai, C. (2001). Cryopreservation of gander semen. Brit Poult Sci.42: 384-    388.
  24. Tarvis, K.M. (2013. New methods for cryopreserving rooster spermatozoa. Master’s Thesis, Colorado State University-    Department of Biomedical Sciences.
  25. Tunali, G. (2014). Sperm kriyoprezervasyon teknikleri ve fertilizasyon basarisindaki rolü. Androloji Bülteni Dergisi.16: 123-128.
  26. Turkoglu, M., Sarica M. and Eleroglu, H. (2005). Hindi Yetistiriciligi. 1. Baski, Samsun, Otak Form-Ofset.

Global Footprints