There was no significant difference among the groups in weekly body weight changes in pigs during the whole experimental period (Fig 1). Similar findings were found by
Cai et al., (2014) where maternal betaine supplementation did not affect the body weight of piglets, whereas
Liu et al., (2017) showed that maternal methyl donor supplementation during gestation affected average body weight of piglets and was not significantly differed from that in the methyl donor group at birth, but tended to be lower at weaning. The variation in response could be due to level of inclusion
(Eklund et al., 2005) and the ratio of lysine: calorie in the basal diet
(Matthews et al., 1998).
Average body weight (kg), DMI (g/d) and (/ kgW0.75), CPI (g/d) and (g/ kgW0.75), energy utilization (GE intake, DE intake, ME intake) and nutritive value (%DCP andTDN) were comparable among the groups (Table 2 and 3). Similar findings were observed by
Schrama et al., (2003), where they studied the effect of betaine supplementation on energy metabolism in growing pigs. It had earlier been reported that due to its osmolytic properties; betaine can reduce energy expenditure for the ion pump, particularly in the cells of the gastrointestinal tract
(Simon, 1999). However, in this experiment, betaine supplementation in maternal diet during gestation showed no influence on energy utilization in piglets during the grower/finisher phase. The discrepancy in the response could be attributed to level of inclusion
(Eklund et al., 2005) and dietary lysine: calorie ratio
(Matthews et al., 1998). DMI, dry matter intake; CPI, crude protein intake; DCPI, digestible crude protein intake; GE, gross energy; DE, digestible energy; ME, metabolic energy; DCP, digestible crude protein; TDN, total digestible nutrient.
There was no significant difference in serum concentration of glucose (mg/dl), albumin (g/dl), globulin (g/dl), total protein (g/dl), A/G ratio, creatinine (mg/dl), cholesterol (mg/dl) and triglyceride (mg/dl) among the groups (Table 4). All the values were within normal range reported for pigs. Thus, it is evident that maternal supplementation of betaine during gestation showed no adverse effect on general metabolism of the progeny at later stages of life. This corroborates well with the findings of
Cai et al., (2014).
The serum concentration of SOD (ng/ml) was comparable (p>0.05) among the groups, whereas serum concentration of catalase (ng/ml) was significantly higher (p<0.05) in piglets born to dam exposed to supplementary betaine during gestation (Table 5). Similarly, supplementation of betaine in broiler diets improved the antioxidant status
(Jamina et al., 2020). This finding is also in accordance with that of
Mou et al., (2018), where they reported that supplementation with methyl donors increased the antioxidant capacity of sows as well as newborn piglets by increasing the activities of catalase and glutathione peroxidase. In another study, supplementation of antioxidant improved the antioxidant status and the ability of pigs to combat stress
(Chakraborty et al., 2018). Homocysteine (Hcy) concentrations in pigs are typically several folds higher than in other species, which results in increased levels of ROS. The betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase (BHMT) enzyme helps in the conversion of Hcy to Methionine by facilitating the transfer of methyl group from betaine.
The maternal nutrition might reduce oxidative stress in the placenta and thus affect the redox status of the offspring, which is in agreement with the results of
Lin et al., (2012), who reported that diets supplemented with methyl donors appear to decrease the homocysteine concentration in sows by the remethylation or trans-sulfuration pathways and increase maternal and offspring antioxidant capacity. This is in agreement with previous results; the present study showed that prepartum supplementation with betaine improved the antioxidant capacity of piglets.