Time matched control contraction response induced by CCh (10 µM) did not change the amplitude of contraction when the tissue remains contracted for 2 hrs (Fig 1). Amplitude of contraction was also not affected on repeated application of CCh (Fig 1b).
Application of L-arginine (10
-3 M) at the plateau of CCh-induced contraction elicited relaxation on goat DSM. The maximum relaxation produced by L-arginine was 53.03±0.99% (n=20, pooled data) when added at the steady state of CCh (10-5 M)-induced contraction (absolute force 0.85±0.02 g, n=20, pooled data).
Effect of methylene blue on L-arginine-elicited relaxation
Guanylyl cyclase inhibitor MB had no effect on L-arginine elicited relaxant response on goat DSM (Fig 2a). The per cent relaxation produced by L-arginine in absence and in presence of MB were 55.13±2.05% (n=4) and 57.75±1.29% (n=4), respectively. Interestingly, MB reduced the amplitudes of CCh-induced contractions (absolute force 0.66±0.06 g, n=4 in control and 0.47±0.04 g, n=4 in MB treated tissues) (Fig 2b).
MB has been shown to inhibit both NO mediated relaxation and an increase of cGMP in rat detrusor muscle
(Chung et al., 1996). The fact that MB failed to attenuate L-arginine elicited relaxant response in goat DSM negates the involvement of guanylate cyclase in L-arginine elicited relaxation. But, present study fails to explain the inhibitory effect of MB on amplitude of CCh-induced contraction.
Effect of L-NAME on L-arginine-elicited relaxation
L- arginine failed to induce any relaxation when goat DSM were pre-treated with L-NAME (3×10
-5 M) (Fig 3a). Thus, while the per cent relaxation produced by L-arginine was 45.87± 1.42 (n=4) in control, it was 0 (Zero) per cent (n=4) in L-NAME treated tissues (Fig 3b). Moreover, L-NAME had no significant effect on CCh (10
-5 M) - induced absolute force of contraction.
NO was not involved in L-arginine mediated K
ATP channel opening in goat coronary artery as L-arginine analogues could not inhibit L-arginine-elicited relaxation
(Deka et al., 2009). Contrary to this, activation of K
ATP channel was inhibited by pretreatment of porcine coronary smooth muscle cells with L-arginine analogues and it was concluded that K
ATP channel activation was due to generation of NO by the essential amino acid
(Miyoshi et al., 1994). Interestingly, L-NAME also could inhibit L-arginine elicited relaxation of CCh-contracted goat DSM implicating involvement of NO in L-arginine elicited relaxation in the present study.
Effect of K+ channel blockers on the relaxant responses of L-arginine in goat detrusor
L-arginine elicited relaxation was inhibited by pre-treatment of goat DSM with TEA (10
-3 M) for 20 min (Fig 4a). Thus,
while L-arginine evoked a relaxation of 48.5±2.53% (n=4) in control, it failed to elicit relaxation in TEA treated tissues (Fig 4b). Further, there was a reduction in CCh-induced amplitude of contraction in presence of TEA (absolute force 0.93±0.05 g, n=4 in control and 0.43±0.03 g, n=4, in TEA treated tissues, p£0.001) (Fig 4c).
Contrary to this, pre-treatment of the tissues with glibenclamide (10
-6 M) had no effect on either CCh-induced contraction or L-arginine-elicited relaxation. Rather, there was potentiation of L-arginine elicited relaxation in presence of glibenclamide (Fig 4d). The per cent relaxations elicited by L-arginine in absence and in presence of glibenclamide were 52.75±1.58% (n=4) and 58.75±1.56% (n=4), respectively.
TEA has been shown to inhibit L-arginine and bacterial lipopolysaccharide elicited large relaxation in rat isolated aorta (Hall
et al, 1996) and a role for the involvement of Ca
2+- activated K
+ channels in the mechanism of NO- dependent vasodilator action of L-arginine was suggested in rat aorta. On the other hand, L-arginine elicited relaxation was inhibited by K
ATP channel blocker; glibenclamide in goat coronary artery suggesting a role for involvement K
ATP channels in L-arginine mediated relaxant response in coronary artery
(Deka et al., 2009). However, in the present study, glibenclamide failed to attenuate L-arginine elicited relaxation and instead, TEA inhibited the L-arginine-elicited relaxation in CCh-contracted goat DSM. Therefore, L-arginine- elicited relaxation as observed in the present study is suggestive of mediating through opening of K
Ca channel in goat DSM. The observation that glibenclamide potentiated the L-arginine-elicited relaxation in detrusor tissue could be best explained by the fact that blocking of KATP channels would depolarize the smooth muscle tissues leading to an increase in the driving force of the outward K
+ current. Glibenclamide has earlier been reported to cause small depolarizing effect in smooth muscle of rat aorta
(Fauaz et al., 2000). K
+ channel blockers like Ba
2+, TEA and 4-AP have been reported to cause an increase in the magnitude of hyperpolarisation to a K
ATP channel opener cromakalim in rabbit mesenteric artery (Murphy and Brayden, 1995). Similarly, blocking of K
Ca channel with TEA also augmented L-arginine elicited relaxation in goat coronary artery smooth muscle
(Deka et al., 2009).