Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 12 (december 2021) : 1468-1475

Status of Subclinical Mastitis in Crossbred Cattle of Peri-urban Unorganized Herd of Middle Indo-gangetic Plains

Pankaj Kumar1,*, Rashmi Rekha Kumari2, Abhay Kumar3, Rohan Kumar Raman3, P.C. Chandran1, Manish Kumar4
1Division of Livestock and Fisheries Management, ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna-800 014, Bihar, India.
2Bihar Veterinary College, Patna-800 014, Bihar, India.
3Division of Socio-economica and Extension, ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna-800 014, Bihar, India.
4Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati-781 039, Assam, India.
Cite article:- Kumar Pankaj, Kumari Rekha Rashmi, Kumar Abhay, Raman Kumar Rohan, Chandran P.C., Kumar Manish (2021). Status of Subclinical Mastitis in Crossbred Cattle of Peri-urban Unorganized Herd of Middle Indo-gangetic Plains . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(12): 1468-1475. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4241.
Background: Mastitis is the most common and economically important disease of dairy cattle. Subclinical mastitis is a more important form in India than clinical mastitis. Subclinical mastitis (SCM) detection done by periodic examination of the udder health by evaluation of milk at the herd level or the individual cow level by milk somatic cell count (SCC), followed by culture of random milk samples. The presented study was undertaken by survey and sampling of milk from lactating crossbred cattle of unorganized dairy farms and farmer’s dairy of the peri-urban region of middle Indo-Gangetic Plains. The objective of the study was to monitor the status of SCM in crossbred cattle and associated changes in milk constitutes and oxidative stress in milk. 

Methods: A total of 147 lactating crossbred cattle were screened for SCM using the modified California Mastitis Test (CMT) using detergent based CMT reagent and compared with conventional CMT reagent, followed by SCC, milk constituents, bacterial isolation and antibiotic sensitivity testing (ABST). General information was collected in pre-tested questionnaire. The data obtained were statistically treated to evaluate significance of the study.

Conclusion: The overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis in peri-urban cross-bred cattle was 36.74% which varied with parity and stage of milking. Prevalence of subclinical mastitis was highest (55.77%) in cross-bred cattle in mid-lactation and Parity 3-5. The mean SCC was significantly higher (7.21±0.27) in subclinical mastitis compared to CMT negative (3.66±0.06) milk sample. Somatic cell count was positively and significantly correlated with CMT reactions using conventional CMT reagent (rs= 0.86) as well as modified CMT reagent (rs=0.815) attempted using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. The mean values of milk pH, fat and lactic acid acidity increased significantly (P≤0.01) in SCM compared to the milk of healthy cattle, except lactose which decreased significantly in SCM milk. The common contagious bacteria responsible for SCM isolate were coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp. (64.82%) isolates from these SCM milk followed by Streptococcus spp. ABST test conducted on random CMT positive milk sample indicated that gentamicin as most sensitive, followed by enrofloxacin. The present finding indicates the suitability of enrofloxacin as the most useful antibiotic for the treatment of subclinical mastitis in cross-bred cattle of the peri-urban area of middle Indo-Gangetic plains.
Mastitis is a major global problem of lactating bovine population in which lack of timely diagnosis and treatment often results in complete loss of udder. Mastitis is inflammation of the parenchyma of the mammary gland regardless of the cause and characterised by a range of physical and chemical changes in the milk and pathological changes in the glandular tissue. Clinical mastitis can be grossly detected by the presence of flakes, clots, discoloration in milk and swelling, pain and induration in the udder. However, in most subclinical mastitis (SCM), these grossly visible changes in both milk and udder are not visible and thus making diagnosis very difficult. Subclinical mastitis is an important form in India than clinical mastitis (Joshi and Gokhle, 2006; Pitkala et al., 2004) as it is of longer duration and prevalent more than 15 to 40 times the clinical mastitis (Elango et al., 2010). Other adverse effects of SCM are deterioration of milk quality and loss of production of animals apart from a source of infection to other animals within the herd. SCM can be screened routinely based on California Mastitis test (CMT) along with somatic cell count (SCC) and bacterial isolation. Somatic cells are protective for udder health. SCC is a useful marker for intramammary infection and consist of leucocytes and epithelial cells. A high SCC in milk indicates inflammation in the udder (Dürr et al., 2008). Strategies designed to improve the immune cells of the diseased udder during immunosuppressive stages and target oxidative-anti-oxidative defence would greatly affect the ability of the animal to resist the pathogenic infection (Dimri et al., 2013). The present study has been undertaken to study the physiological risk factors for subclinical mastitis and associated changes in the milk through screening cross-bred cattle of unorganised commercial farmer’s dairy.
Ethics statement
 
The study involved sampling of milk during routine milking aseptically from cattle with the consent of the farmers. There is no specific law for milk sample collection and hence no approval was mandatory.
 
Animals
 
The work was undertaken in 147 crossbred (CB) lactating cattle of unorganised commercial farmer’s dairy in the peri-urban region of middle Indo-Gangetic plains in 2016. All these CB cattle were in their early to mid-lactation phase and parity ranged from 1-5 as risk factors. The lactation period was considered early when animals were 15 to 60 days of lactation and mid between 60 to 120 days of lactation. All the 147 lactating cattle were apparently healthy with no gross clinical signs of mastitis in milk and udder. Dairy cattle with clinical mastitis were not included in the study. Management practices, health care, calf history, production record and marketing behaviour were also recorded. The laboratory works was carried out at ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna.
 
Sample collection
 
Milk samples (50 ml) were collected from each quarter of the animals in a sterile container and were analysed the same day. Before milk collection, the udder was washed with a commercial disinfectant solution containing Sodium dichloroisocyanurate (klengard®) and dried with a sterile cloth towel. The quarters were disinfected using sterile swab dipped in 70% ethanol. Milk samples were collected after discarding 2-3 stripping from each teat and were properly labelled.
 
California mastitis test screening
 
Preliminary pen-side milk samples were screened for SCM by California mastitis test with modified CMT reagent and validated with conventional (teepol based) CMT reagent. Modification in the reagent was attempted by replacement of teepol (Sigma) by commercial available detergent Ezee® (Godrej) to make the reagent cheaper and validated the results with anionic detergent Teepol® (Sigma-Aldrich) based CMT reagent. The final composition of modified CMT reagent was homogenous solution prepared by mixing 1.5 g Sodium, 0.5 ml Ezee, 0.01 g bromothymol purple and distilled water up to 100 ml. CMT diagnostic paddles were procured from Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana. CMT reaction is based upon the amount of cellular nuclear protein present in the milk sample (Greiner et al., 2000). The test was conducted and scored according to Schneider and Jasper (1964). An equal volume of milk and CMT reagent was mixed in each of the four cups of the CMT paddle. Each testing carried out in duplicate using conventional and modified CMT reagent. Mixing was accomplished by gentle circular motion in a horizontal plane. The reaction developed almost immediately with milk containing a high concentration of somatic cells. The peak of the reaction was obtained within 10 seconds and scored from 0 to +++ depending upon the severity of reaction (Fig 1 a and 1 b). 
 

Fig 1: Modified California mastitis test for indirect detection of subclinical mastitis in CMT paddle observed with 30 secs of mixing equal volume of milk and modified CMT reagent.

   
 
Somatic cell count
 
Somatic cell count was estimated manually by direct microscopy using the method described by Schalm et al., 1971. The milk samples were continuously mixed several times. The glass slide was placed over the template to outline four 1 sq.cm areas using a glass marker. Ten micro-liter of milk was spread evenly over the 1 sq.cm template.  The films were dried at room temperature. The dried slide was flooded with modified Newman-Lampert stain (Himedia) for 2 min. The excess stain was drained off and air-dried. The slide was rinsed under tap water and air-dried. Stained films were examined under oil immersion objective and the number of cells in 10 fields were counted.
 
Milk parameters
 
The pH of fresh milk samples were estimated using electronic pH meter (Eutech pH 2700, Thermo Scientific) after proper calibration. Lactose and fat content in milk was analysed by an automated milk analyser (Lactostar, Funke-Gerber). The titratable acidity of milk expressed as percentage lactic acid was estimated as per the procedure described by the Bureau of Indian Standards (1960).
 
Total oxidant and antioxidant capacity in milk
 
Total oxidant capacity in both CMT negative and CMT positive milk was measured using the method of Erel (2005). Similarly, total antioxidant capacity was measured by the method described by Erel (2004). Dimri et al., (2013) explained both the methods in detail. In this study, 25 samples of both CMT negative and CMT positive milk samples were randomly selected for evaluation for the total oxidant and antioxidant capacity.
 
Bacterial isolation and antibiotic sensitivity test (ABST)
 
The positive samples of milk were subjected to bacterial isolation in blood agar (Himedia) followed by selective media for Staphylococcus spp.
       
The identification of the causative organism in collected milk samples was carried by inoculating 10 µl of milk on 5% bovine blood agar plates with a sterile ‘L’ shaped loop by the quadrant streaking method. The causative organism of the milk samples was identified based on colony morphology and haemolytic pattern on 5% blood agar after anaerobic incubation of the streaked plates at 37°C for 24-48 h (Cowan and Steel, 1965). A gram staining of isolates was undertaken to assist the identification of the causative organism. Further identification of isolate at genus level was made using selective media such as Mannitol salt agar, Edward medium and MacConkey agar. Colonies with gross culture characteristics of Staphylococcus which grew on both 5% blood agar and Mannitol salt, were considered as Staphylococcus spp. Colonies with the gross characteristic of streptococci on blood agar and negative growth on Mannitol salt and MacConkey agar and positive growth on Edward media were categorized as Streptococcus spp. Culture growth on MacConkey agar was considered as gram-negative bacteria and was considered as coliforms based on staining characteristics.
       
Random CMT positive milk samples (n=20) were subjected to ABST using Mastitest ABST test kit TM (Himedia) as per manufacturer’s  instruction for assessing antibiotic resistance and sensitivity. Colour change in the vials inoculated for 16-18 hrs at room temperature indicates resistance to a particular antibiotic while a minimal colour change in vial indicates sensitivity to a particular antibiotic.   
 
Statistical analysis
 
The prevalence of subclinical mastitis by CMT and SCC was calculated as the proportion of affected cow/quarters of the base population. Statistical analysis of the data was done as per the standard procedures of Snedecor and Cochran (1994). Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used for validating modified CMT test reagent with conventional CMT test reagent and interpreted by the methods described by McHugh (2012). All the results are expressed as the mean±S.E. and statistical significance was accepted for p≤0.05 or greater. The multivariate statistical analysis like principal component analysis (PCA) is used (Miekley et al., 2013) on the four categories of cow milk and milk components parameters like SSC, pH, acidity, fat and lactose. PCA was performed on the normalised data sets to assess which factors in the milk were more variable with different risk factors.
The study conducted in the peri-urban region of Patna covering small dairy farmers, as they are the backbone of milk supply to individual consumer and gross dairy requirements in the city. These peri-urban dairy animals were cross-bred cattle brought from villages after recent parturition or purchased from the local market. These peri-urban cross-bred cattle were kept with the sole objective of liquid milk sale. They are either sent back to the village area or sold when they become dry or in the last trimester of pregnancy. These cattle were kept on a stall-fed system on a high concentrate diet and with two times hand-milking. Udder and teat cleaning was carried out before milking with clean water but the practice of wiping after washing or use of teat disinfectants was not practiced by any of the farmers. The practice of feeding during milking was dependent on milking place. When the milking was done at the customer’s door or any other market place, milking was done without feeding while feeding was practiced during milking at cattle shed. Dry cow therapy was not known to any of the farmers. Farmers were unaware of the state of subclinical mastitis. Calf health care and management were not considered with were high (74.15%) calf mortality below six months of age. The calf mortality was higher in males (97.10%; n=69) compared to females (53.85%; n=73) within the same age group, indicating negligence of the farmers. This negligence was identified as restricted colostrum and milk feeding, poor care and supplemental feeding and poor health management. The government policy on restriction of sale and culling of male calves and decreasing demand for bullock for farm work were also important factors responsible for their negligence (Ranjan, 2017). Similar reports of high calf mortality in commercial dairy farms of Andhra Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh have been observed for calf mortality and gender difference (Sreedhar and Sreenivas, 2015; Tiwari et al., 2007). Most farmers used manual teat massage for milk let down. This may be one of the possible reasons associated with calf mortality restricting natural milk let down by calf suckling.
       
The prevalence of subclinical mastitis in peri-urban cross-breed cattle based on CMT and associated changes in somatic cell count, milk pH, acidity, fat and lactose are depicted in Table 1. The overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis in peri-urban cross-bred cattle was 36.74% which varied with parity and stage of milking. Our finding of moderate SCM in peri-urban cattle of Bihar corroborates with the study carried out by International Livestock Research Institute in rural, peri-urban and urban households in Bihar (Hardenberg, 2016). However, a similar study carried out in buffaloes of the peri-urban region of Patna indicated a very high (61.87%) prevalence percentage of subclinical mastitis (Kumar et al., 2012). Our finding of lower prevalence of subclinical mastitis may be due to the selection of only apparently healthy lactating cattle of early and mid-lactation, assuming physiologically higher somatic cell count in late lactation mostly due to increasing in epithelial cells (Dohoo and Meek, 1982). Prevalence of subclinical mastitis was highest (55.77%) in cross-bred cattle in mid-lactation and Parity 3-5 and lowest (20%) in cattle in early lactation and parity 1-2. Exposure to pathogens increases with age and physiological increase in udder size. Higher parity increases the risk of trauma to the teats and udder, therefore the prevalence of mastitis increase with parity and stage of lactation (Ghosh and Prasad, 1998; Modh et al., 2017). A similar finding of increased incidence of mastitis with an increase in parity has been reported in a study conducted on the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in Swedish dairy (Jingar et al., 2014). Hiitiö et al., (2017) also reported in corroboration with our findings that increase parity as significant cow and herd factors associated with subclinical mastitis. Higher incidence recorded in parity 3 to 5 may be attributed to an increase in milk yield pressure and lowered immunity influencing an increase in somatic cell count (Mukherjee and Dang, 2011).
 
Subclinical mastitis and somatic cell count
 
The somatic cells include leucocytes of the blood and epithelial cells of the mammary gland and are measured as the number of cells per milliliter of milk (Fig 2 a,b). Somatic cell count was positively and significantly (P≤0.01, 2-tailed) correlated with CMT reactions using Teepol based conventional CMT reagent (rs= 0.86) as well as modified CMT reagent (rs=0.815) attempted using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. Similarly, the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient for measuring the reliability of modified CMT with conventional CMT was 0.7 indicating a substantial measure of agreement as described by McHugh (2012). The results of the Spearman correlation and Kappa coefficient indicated that the modified CMT reagent was equally effective in detecting milk SCC and subclinical mastitis. The result indicates that CMT screening is a suitable indirect test to assay SCC and so the status of infection in the mammary gland. It was observed that mean SCC was significantly (P≤0.01) higher (7.21±0.27) in subclinical mastitis compared to CMT negative (3.66±0.06) milk samples (Table 1). The mean SCC of CMT negative and positive milk samples increased with parity which corroborates with findings of Saravanan et al., (2015). However, a significant difference was observed in CMT negative samples between groups 2 and 3 (P≤0.01) and between 2 and 4 (P≤0.05). In CMT positive milk samples, the mean SCC difference between groups 2 and 3 was significant (P≤0.05), however, mean SCC was non-significantly higher with increasing parity in other groups. The SCC was non-significantly different between different stages of lactation though it was slightly higher in early lactation compared to mid-lactation. The findings corroborate with reports of past-published work that documents slightly higher somatic cells in the first month of lactation and then decrease in the second month of lactation followed by fluctuation till 300 days of milking (Singh and Dang, 2002).
 

Fig 2: Somatic cell count in milk stained with modified Newman- Lampert stain visualized under oil immersion (100x).


 

Table 1: Status of subclinical mastitis based on CMT results in crossbred cattle in early and mid-lactation and different parity and corresponding changes in milk parameters (means±S.E).

  
 
Subclinical mastitis and associated changes in milk components
 
Inflammation and associated changes in the mammary gland due to pathogens during the subclinical stage of mastitis affect milk components and characteristics of the milk. However, gross physical changes are in general absent or not noticed in subclinical mastitis. The changes observed in milk pH, acidity as percentage lactic acid, lactose (%) and milk fat (%) associated with CMT results and SCC of 147 apparently healthy crossbred cattle are presented in Table 1. The results indicated that the mean values of all these parameters in milk increased significantly (P≤0.01) in SCM compared to the milk of healthy cattle except lactose, which decreased significantly in SCM cattle. These associated changes in milk parameters suggest that acidity, lactose and fat in milk may have some potential for monitoring SCM in crossbred cattle. These findings corroborate with the published reports that SCC has a significant effect on milk fat and lactose (Paixão et al., 2017; Zecconi et al., 2019). Milk parameters were non-significantly variable with the severity of CMT results and SCC except milk fat and lactose was significantly (P≤0.05) varied with the severity of SCM in groups 3 and 4. Among different milk parameters, acidity was significantly (P≤0.05) different between groups 1 and 2 in CMT negative milk sample while fat was significantly different between all groups. The mean milk fat percentage difference between groups 1 and 3; 2 and 3; 2 and 4 were highly (P≤0.01) significant while groups 1 and 4 differed significantly at 5% level. The findings indicate that the fat percentage in milk varies physiologically with different stages of milking and parity, while other parameters vary non-significantly with the different physiological states of cattle. Milk acidity also showed an increasing trend with the advancement of lactation in early parity healthy animals. These findings are in agreement with the earlier reports of Bhoite and Padekar (2002) who observed a significant effect of the stage of lactation on fat in crosses involving Jersey. Contrary to our findings, Sarkar et al., (2006) reported that the lactation stage had no influence on fat content but a significant effect observed on lactose content was in conformity with our report.  Similarly, Radhika et al., (2012) observed a non-significant effect of parity on fat percentage; however, the increase in fat with parity was similar to our findings.
       
The two principal components explained 79.93% variation in the data in which first component showed maximum 60.20% and second component showed 17.92% variation in the data sets. Here principal component 1 is dominated by group 4 and 3 respectively in order of their contribution and group 1 dominates principal component 2. The PCA biplot showed that group 4 is maximum affected while group 1 is less affected. The acidity of the milk as lactic acid  observed  maximum  for the  cross breed cow’s with SCM  in group 4 while minimum in  group 1 (Fig 4). The SSC, pH and acidity showed the reverse relation with the lactose contents in the milk during the mastitis.
 

Fig 3: ABST of CMT positive milk sample using commercial Mastitest kit (Himedia) visualized by colour changes.


 

Fig 4: PCA biplot between four groups of mastitis diagnosed cow milk and milk components showing group 1 (Early lactation and parity 1-2) is less affected and group 4 (mid-lactation and parity 3-5) is most affected of the studied samples.


 
Subclinical mastitis and oxidant-antioxidant capacity in milk
 
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are natural products of cellular metabolism. During the peripartum period of lactating cattle, mammary gland cells have a high metabolic rate and produce large amounts of reactive oxygen species (Jin et al., 2014). Increased ROS or decreased antioxidants can disrupt the balance and refer to as oxidative stress (Sordillo and Aitken, 2009). Association between oxidative stress and inflammation during intra-mammary infection and their role in the pathogenesis of mastitis has also been studied in the past (Turk et al., 2017, Weiss et al., 2004). Total oxidant and antioxidant capacity in the milk of cross -bred cattle were estimated to evaluate the role of oxidative stress in disease pathogenesis of SCM (Table 2). The total oxidant capacity was significantly (P≤0.01) high in CMT positive milk samples. Similarly, the total antioxidant capacity in SCM affected milk was significantly compromised (P≤0.01) compared to CMT negative milk samples. Oxidative stress due to an imbalance in oxidant and anti-oxidants in SCM milk indicates its role in the pathogenesis of the disease. It also indicates the possibilities of antioxidants to ameliorate the pathogenesis of inflammation in the mammary gland. Similar findings of higher total oxidant capacity and nitrous oxide in milk from SCM affected quarters compared to milk from healthy quarters of cow and buffaloes have been reported (Atakisi et al., 2010; Dimri et al., 2013). Thus, monitoring total oxidant and antioxidant capacity in milk could be used as an alternative diagnostic tool to screen subclinical mastitis in cross-bred cattle.   
 
Bacterial isolate and antibiogram in SCM milk
 
All CMT positive milk samples (n=54) were inoculated on 5% bovine blood agar plates for bacterial isolation. Three milk samples did not yield any culture growth. Bacterial culture of milk samples were identified using the methods described above. Distribution of pathogens changes over time and dependent upon many factors, therefore, a bacteriological examination should be carried out to monitor udder health and plan treatment protocol (Pankaj et al., 2012). The different isolates identified from these milk samples are depicted in Table 3 along with their frequency. The most common contagious bacteria responsible for SCM was coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp. (64.82%) isolates from these SCM milk followed by Streptococcus spp. (14.81%) and mixed isolates (9.26%). Our findings corroborate with the findings of Hardenberg (2016) who reported Staphylococcus aureus as the predominant bacteria (28.3%) followed by other Staphylococcus species (21.3%) and Streptococcus species (17.9%) in cattle samples across rural, peri-urban and urban households in Bihar. Similar findings of a high prevalence of staphylococci have been reported from cattle milk affected with mastitis in India (Jena et al., 2015; Hegde et al., 2013; Pankaj et al., 2012). The low frequency of Coliforms (5.56%) suggests that environmental contamination causing subclinical mastitis, as a factor was lest responsible for SCM in the study area. The possible reason may be due to the awareness of livestock farmers of peri-urban areas towards environment hygiene.
 

Table 3: Bacterial isolates from CMT positive (n=54) samples.


         
ABST test conducted on random CMT positive milk sample indicated that gentamicin as most sensitive, followed by enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, Ampicillin/cloxacillin, tetracycline (Table 4). However, chloramphenicol, Streptomycin-penicillin were found to be non-sensitive to most samples. Gentamicin showed the highest sensitivity and least resistance but its use was restricted due to possibilities of its residue in milk (Martins et al., 2014). The present finding indicates the suitability of enrofloxacin as the most useful antibiotic for the treatment of subclinical mastitis. Pati and Mukherjee (2016) also showed a sensitivity pattern of S. aureus with maximum susceptibility towards fluoroquinolones, glycopeptide and extended-spectrum beta-lactam inhibitors class of antibiotics. The sensitivity results were similar to those for Staphylococcus aureus ABST since the majority of the isolate identified were Staphylococcus spp. in the present study. A similar type of pattern of antimicrobial drug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from subclinical bovine mastitis to penicillin and streptomycin and least to gentamicin (Mubarack et al., 2012; Schmidt et al., 2015).
 

Table 4: Antimicrobial susceptibility of random CMT positive milk samples (n=20) using Masti Test kit.

Peri-urban dairy crossbred cattle are susceptible to SCM with moderate prevalence due to managemental practices discussed above. The modified CMT reagent prepared based on commercial detergent to reduce the cost of preparation was comparable to conventional CMT reagent, thus can be recommended for SCM screening. Staphylococcus spp. was the most prominent pathogen isolated from SCM milk. We recommend the use of enrofloxacin for treatment based on ABST and the cost of the treatment. Dry cow therapy needs to be practiced by dairy farmers to further reduce the prevalence of SCM.

  1. Atakisi, O., Oral, H., Atakisi, E., Merhan, O., Pancarci, S.M., Ozcan, A., Marasli, S., Polat, B., Colak, A. and Kaya, S. (2010). Subclinical mastitis causes alterations in nitric oxide, total oxidant and antioxidant capacity in cow milk. Research in Veterinary Science. 89(1): 10-13.

  2. Bhoite, U.Y. and Padekar, R.N. (2002). Factors affecting milk yield and composition of Gir halfbreds. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 36(1): 67-69.

  3. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1960). In: Method of tests for dairy industry. Part I. Rapid examination of milk. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1469.

  4. Cowan, S.T. and Steel, K.J. (1965). Manual for the identification of medical bacteria. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria.

  5. Dimri, U., Sharma, M.C., Singh, S.K., Kumar, P., Jhambh, R., Singh, B., Bandhyopadhyay, S. and Verma, M.R. (2013). Amelioration of altered oxidant/antioxidant balance of Indian water buffaloes with subclinical mastitis by vitamins A, D 3, E and H supplementation. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 45(4): 971-978.

  6. Dohoo, I.R. and Meek, A.H. (1982). Somatic cell counts in bovine milk. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 23(4): 119.

  7. Dürr, J.W., Cue, R.I., Monardes, H.G., Moro-Méndez, J. and Wade, K.M. (2008). Milk losses associated with somatic cell counts per breed, parity and stage of lactation in Canadian dairy cattle. Livestock Science. 117: 225-232.

  8. Elango, A., Doraisamy, K.A., Rajarajan, G.and Kumaresan, G. (2010). Bacteriology of sub clinical mastitis and antibiogram of isolates recovered from cross bred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 44(4): 280-284.

  9. Erel, O. (2004). A novel automated method to measure total antioxidant response against potent free radical reactions. Clinical biochemistry. 37(2): 112-119.

  10. Erel, O. (2005). A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clinical biochemistry. 38(12):1103-1111.

  11. Ghosh, B. and Prasad, J. (1998). Milk yield and composition as influenced by udder measurements, in Jersey × Red Sindhi crosses. Indian Journal of Animal Production & Management. 14: 23-25.

  12. Hardenberg, F. (2016). Clinical and subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle and buffaloes in Bihar, India: Prevalence, major pathogens and risk factors. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

  13. Hegde, R., Isloor, S., Prabhu, K.N., Shome, B.R., Rathnamma, D., Suryanarayana, V.V.S., Yatiraj, S., Prasad, C.R., Krishnaveni, N., Sundareshan, S. and Akhila, D.S. (2013). Incidence of subclinical mastitis and prevalence of major mastitis pathogens in organized farms and unorganized sectors. Indian Journal of Microbiology. 53(3): 315-320.

  14. Hiitiö, H., Vakkamäki, J., Simojoki, H., Autio, T., Junnila, J., Pelkonen, S. and Pyörälä, S. (2017). Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in Finnish dairy cows: changes during recent decades and impact of cow and herd factors. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 59(1): 22.

  15. Jena, B., Pagrut, N.K., Sahoo, A. and Ahmed, A. (2015). Subclinical bovine mastitis in rural, peri-urban and suburban regions of Jaipur district of Rajasthan, India. Journal of Animal Research. 5(1): 175-182.

  16. Jin, L., Yan, S., Shi, B., Bao, H., Gong, J., Guo, X. and Li, J. (2014). Effects of vitamin A on the milk performance, antioxidant functions and immune functions of dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 192: 15-23.

  17. Jingar, S.C., Mehla, R.K., Singh, M., Kumar, A., Kantwa, S.C. and Singh, N. (2014). Comparative study on the incidence of mastitis during different parities in cows and buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(2): 194-197.

  18. Joshi, S. and Gokhale, S. (2006). Status of mastitis as an emerging disease in improved Periurban dairy farms in India. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1081: 74-83.

  19. Kumar, M., Singh, N.K. and Choudhary, R.K. (2012). Study of intrinsic factors responsible for prevalence of bovine mastitis in the peri-urban areas of Patna. Journal of Interacademicia. 16: 411-415.

  20. Martins, T., Santos, A.F.S., Miranda, M.S., Motta, T.P., Ambrósio, L.A., Pozzi, C.R. and Arcaro, J.R. (2014). Persistence of gentamicin residues in cow milk after intramammary treatment. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire. 165: 62-67.

  21. McHugh, M.L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica. 22(3): 276-282.

  22. Miekley, B., Traulsen, I. and Krieter, J. (2013). Principal component analysis for the early detection of mastitis and lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research. 80(3): 335-343.

  23. Modh, R.H., Islam, M.M., Patel, Y.G., Modi, R.J. and Wadhwani, K.N. (2017). Effect of parity on udder and teat biometry and its association with milk yield in Gir cows. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 6: 2068-2073.

  24. Mubarack, H.M., Doss, A., Vijayasanthi, M. and Venkataswamy, R. (2012). Antimicrobial Drug Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus from Subclinical Bovine Mastitis in Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, South India, Veterinay World. 5(6): 352-355.

  25. Mukherjee, J. and Dang, A.K. (2011). Immune activity of milk leukocytes during early lactation period in high and low yielding crossbred cows. Milchwissenschaft-Milk Science International. 66(4): 384-388.

  26. Paixão, M.G., Abreu, L.R., Richert, R. and Ruegg, P.L. (2017). Milk composition and health status from mammary gland quarters adjacent to glands affected with naturally occurring clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(9): 7522-7533.

  27. Pankaj, Sharma, A., Chhabra, R. and Sindhu, N. (2012). Prevalence of sub clinical mastitis in cows: Its etiology and antibiogram. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 46(4): 348-353.

  28. Pati, B.K. and Mukherjee, R. (2016). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates of Bovine Mastitis Origin and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern from Northern Plains of India. Journal of Veterinary Research Animal Husbandry. 1(1): 105.

  29. Pitkala, A., Haveri, M., Pyorala, S., Myllys, V. and Honkanen-Buzalski, T. (2004). Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001- Prevalence, distribution of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Dairy Science. 87: 2433-2441.

  30. Quinn, P.J., Markey, B.K., Leonard, F.C, Hartigan, P., Fanning S. and Fitzpatrick, E.S. (2011). In: Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Disease. New Jersey, U.S.A: Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.

  31. Radhika, G., Ajithkumar, S., Rani, A., Sathian, C.T., Anilkumar, K., Usha, A.P. and Dinesh, C.N. (2012). Milk yield and composition of crossbred cows in the hilly Wayanad district of Kerala, India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 82: 1251-1254. 

  32. Ranjan, Abhishek (2017). The unsuitable boy of India’s cattle economy. Village Square, epublication. https://www.villagesquare.in/2017/06/28/unsuitable-boy-indias-cattle-economy/.

  33. Sarkar, U., Gupta, A.K., Sarkar, V., Mohanty, T.K., Raina, V.S. and Prasad, S. (2006). Factors affecting test day milk yield and milk composition in dairy animals. Journal of Dairying, Foods and Home Science. 25: 129-132.

  34. Saravanan, R., Das, D.N., De, S. and Panneerselvam, S. (2015). Effect of season and parity on somatic cell count across zebu and crossbred cattle population. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 49(3): 383-387.

  35. Schalm, O.W., Carrol, J.E. and Jain, N.C. (1971). Bovine Mastitis. 1st Ed., Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA. pp: 132-153.

  36. Schmidt, T., Kock, M.M. and Ehlers, M.M. (2015). Diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis cases and close human contacts. Journal of Dairy Science. 98(9): 6256-6269.

  37. Schneider, R. and Jasper, D.E. (1964). Standardization of the California Mastitis Test. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 25: 1635.

  38. Singh, M. and Dang, A.K. (2002). Somatic cell count of milk. Technical Book. Karnal, India: Published by National Dairy Research Institute. pp. 1-25.

  39. Snedecor G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994) Statistical Methods. 8th ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

  40. Sordillo, L.M. and Aitken, S.L. (2009) Impact of oxidative stress on the health and immune function of dairy cattle. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology. 128(1-3): 104-109.

  41. Sreedhar, S. and Sreenivas, D. (2015). A study on calf mortality and managemental practices in commercial dairy farms. Livestock Research International. 3(4): 94-98. 

  42. Tiwari, R., Sharma, M.C. and Singh, B.P. (2007). Buffalo health care in commercial dairy farms: A field study in Uttar Pradesh (India). Livestock Research for Rural Development. 19(3): 62-64.

  43. Turk, R., Koledić, M., Maćešić, N., Benić, M., Dobranić, V., Đuričić, D., Cvetnić, L. and Samardžija, M. (2017). The role of oxidative stress and inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of mastitis in dairy cows. Mljekarstvo. 67: 91-101.

  44. Weiss, W.P., Hogan, J.S. and Smith, K.L. (2004). Changes in vitamin C concentrations in plasma and milk from dairy cows after an intramammary infusion of Escherichia coli. Journal of Dairy Science. 87(1): 32-37.

  45. Zecconi, A., Sesana, G., Vairani, D., Cipolla, M., Rizzi, N. and Zanini, L. (2019). Somatic cell count as a decision tool for selective dry cow therapy in Italy. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 18(1): 435-440.

Editorial Board

View all (0)