The experimentation on animals were approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee.
Collection, isolation and expansion of bone marrowderived mesenchymal stem cells
Animals were anesthetized using xylazine 6 mg/kg, followed 10 minutes later by ketamine 60 mg/kg, intramuscularly
(Amarpal et al., 2010). The bone marrow aspirate was collected using 18 G bone marrow biopsy needle from the lateral aspect of the iliac crest under aseptic conditions. About 2.5 ml of bone marrow was aspirated into a heparinized syringe from each side.
Bone marrow aspirate was processed for isolation and
ex-vivo expansion of bone marrow stem cells as per the established protocol
(Udehiya et al., 2013). Aspirated cell suspension was filtered and mononuclear cells were isolated by centrifugation over Histopaque (10,771; Sigma). Mononuclear cells were recovered and washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (70011-044, Gibco Life Technologies). Finally, mononuclear cells were suspended in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (D5769; Sigma) containing 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 50 μg/ml gentamycin sulphate (G1272; Sigma), onto tissue culture flasks and cultured in 5% CO
2 at 37°C. Following 48 hours in culture, the non-adherent cells were removed. Adhered cells were cultured up to 80-90% confluence by changing the medium at every 4
th day. The cells were then detached from the culture flasks by 0.25% trypsin solution and washed with PBS, followed by the seeding. Culture medium was changed on every 7
th day and cells were subcultured up to 3
rd passage. The 3
rd passage cells were collected for the further use in the treatment and cell count was adjusted to 1×10
6 cells/ml of PBS.
Characterization of guinea pig MSCs
Characterization of
in vitro cultured BM MSCs was done by tri-lineage differentiation.
Tri-lineage differentiation
Bone marrow MSCs isolated from guinea pig were cultured and at third passage the cells were seeded in 4 well culture plates for expansion. At 60-70% confluency, expansion media were replaced with differentiation media for osteogenic lineage using (A10066-01, StemPro, Gibco Life Technologies), chondrogenic (A10064-01, StemPro, Gibco Life Technologies),and adipogenic (A10065-01, StemPro, Gibco Life Technologies) differentiation kits. Differentiation media were changed twice a week for up to 21 days in all three lineages. After 21 days the cells were fixed with 10% formalin and stained with Alizarin Red S stain (A5533, Sigma-Aldrich), Alcian blue 8GX stain (05500, Sigma-Aldrich) and Oil O Red stain (O0625, Sigma-Aldrich) for analyzing the osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential, respectively. Differentiation potential was assessed by the presence of calcium deposits, sulfated and carboxylated mucopolysaccharides and appearance of lipid droplets for osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation respectively. The wells supplemented with complete expansion media served as negative control (Fig 1).
Experimental design
The wound healing was evaluated using 18 clinically healthy adult Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs of either sex, weighing 450-700g in the age group of 5-6 months. These animals were provided with standard diet and water
ad libitum and maintained under uniform managerial conditions. Animals were acclimatized to approaching and handling for 15 days prior to the commencement of the study. One square (2.5×2.5 cm
2) full thickness excisional skin wound was created surgically on the dorsum at thoraco-lumbar region of each animal under xylazine-ketamine anaesthesia
(Amarpal et al., 2010). The animals were divided into 3 groups having 6 animals in each group. The treatment administered in the animals of different groups is detailed in Table 1.
Each treatment was evaluated on a total of 6 wounds. Each wound was dressed with hydrogel (10% gel of Pluronic F127) up to day 5 and thereafter, the wounds were cleaned with PBS and dressed with 0.5% povidone iodine daily until complete healing. All the animals were housed in individual cages and administered with broad spectrum antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drugs for initial 5 days.
Gross wound evaluation
Grossly all the wounds of different groups were observed for quantity and type of exudate, peripheral swelling and complete healing of the wounds.
Wound contraction analysis
The rate of wound healing was evaluated on the basis of reduction in the wound area at subsequent intervals. Wound size was measured on 3
rd, 7
th, 14
th, 21
st, 28
th, 35
th and 42
nd postoperative days. Total contraction, percentage contraction and the mean percentage of wound contraction for each interval were calculated for each group.
Photographic evaluation
Wounds were photographed on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 post-surgery and evaluated by independent observers to assess the quality of wound healing and cosmetic outcome.
Histopathological analysis
Full-thickness skin tissue samples from 3 healing wounds of each group of animals were collected from centre of the healing tissue on 21
st and 42
nd postoperative days and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. After fixation, the tissues were processed by paraffin embedding technique and 4-5 µm thick tissue sections were cut and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain. The H&E stained sections were evaluated microscopically by using histological scoring system as per the method described by
Smith et al., 2008. Sections from regenerated tissue were observed under light microscope for presence and type of epithelialization, inflammation (cellular infiltration), fibroblast, collagen and neovascularization. The scoring system used to grade the healing in histological evaluation is presented in Table 2.
Histochemical analysis
Duplicate sections from each treatment group were stained using special staining techniques namely Masson’s Trichrome stain (
Masson, 1929;
Lillie, 1948) and Gomori’s Aldehyde Fuchsin method (
Mallory, 1942) for detection and grading of collagen and elastin fibres, respectively, in the healing tissue.
Statistical analysis
The means of parametric observations were compared by one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and DMRT (Duncan’s new multiple range test) using SPSS software. Non-parametric observations were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test (
Siegel and Castellan, 1998). The significance level was set to *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 for statistically significant and highly statistically significant differences, respectively.