Carcass traits
The pre-slaughter body weights of the kids were 7.21±0.31 and 15.26±0.35 kg in T
1 and T
2 respectively. The production system of kids had significantly positive effect on all the carcass parameters studied (Table 2). The dressing percentage was significantly (P<0.01) higher in T
2 than in T
1. All the carcass traits like carcass length, heart girth, weight of fore limb, hind limb, shoulder, neck, rack and flank were significantly (P<0.01) higher in T
2 compared to T
1.
The meat quality characteristics of goat kids is influenced by the production systems
(Ozcan et al., 2014) and type of diet offered
(Ryan et al., 2007). There was significant effect of feeding broiler goat concentrate feed on the carcass characteristics. The carcass weight of T
2 was 2.27 times the car cass weight of natural suckling kids at slaughter. The results are in agreement with
Ryan et al., (2007) who reported significantly (
P<0.05) increased live weight, hot carcass weight, dressing percentage and length of carcass of concentrate diets fed goats compared to range-fed goats. Though,
Adam et al., (2010) found no influence of type of diet on carcass characteristics, the results are in confirmation with
Rhee et al., (2000) and
Safari et al., (2009). The results are in contrary to
Ozcan et al., (2014) as they reported higher growth rate of unweaned lambs and kids compared to weaned ones. They attributed those results to higher digestibility of dams milk than milk replacer and also the presence of a growth promoter in dams’ milk, which is absent in milk replacer (
Baumrucker and Blum, 1993). The higher weight gain among the broiler goat concentrate fed kids is due to availability of nutrients in the growing period (
Delgado-Pertínez et al., 2009) and due to development of digestive system as discussed in the earlier published article
(Prasad et al., 2019). Whereas, the decreasing trend of does milk production in its lactation limited the weight gain of kids in the natural system of rearing.
Significantly (P<0.05) higher dressing percentage in case of T
2 kids might be due to adequate availability of required nutrients for development of muscle mass. The dressing percentage increases with increasing slaughter weight
(Bonvillani et al., 2010). Whereas,
Sarker et al., (2015) found higher dressing percentages (P<0.05) in whole milk fed kids than in milk replacer groups. They attributed their results to higher gut fill associated with earlier rumen development in milk replacer fed kids than the whole milk consumed group.
The mean weights of non-carcass components like liver, kidney, heart, spleen, testicles, blood yield, head yield, skin, hind feet, fore feet, lung and trachea were significantly (P<0.01) higher in T
2, due to the higher slaughter weight compared to T
1 as presented in Table 3. Information on yield of non-carcass components of animals is important, where they are more valuable for the households especially in developing countries like India. The live weight of the animals majorly influences the yield of non-carcass components.
Meat quality characteristics
The values of meat quality characteristics are presented in the Table 4. The pH values of meat from both the groups did not differ significantly. The cooking loss, shear force and colorimeter values like
L* and
a* were significantly (P<0.01) different in the meat samples of kids fed broiler goat concentrate diet than control group.
The Meat which has an ideal ultimate pH (pH <5.8) results in acceptable meat tenderness and colour
(Yalcintan et al., 2018). The pH values were lower than the ultimate pH values for goat meat reported by
Kannan et al., (2001) which was above 6.
Meat color is an important parameter influencing consumer preference of purchasing and it is well known that animal diet could strongly affect meat color
(Priolo et al., 2001). Yalcintan et al., (2018) also reported significant influence of kids live weight on all chromometer values (
L*,
a*,
b*, hue angle, chroma), the lightness of meat tends to decrease, while redness value tends to increase as live weight increases. Lower
L* values in T
2 indicated that the meat obtained was darker than T
1. The higher positive
a*, b* value in T
2 indicated that the meat obtained from the kids in T
2 was dark reddish yellow compared to T
1. This could be due to direct influence of the diet and slaughter weight of the kids.
Ryan et al., (2007) reported similar results among the goats fed range diets, where they had lower
a*,
b*, hue angle, chroma and marbling scores. They also stated that the concentrate diet is necessary to improve color and marbling of the muscles. Thus, broiler goat production system positively influenced the colour of chevon as the consumer put importance on colour as an indicator of meat quality (
Kadim and Mahgoub, 2012).
Cooking losses from chevon is important because the water that remains in the cooked product is the major contributor to the juiciness of that product. Cooking losses of goat meat will be usually closer to 35% or above
(Webb et al., 2005). The higher cooking loss (%) for the meat samples in T
1 indicated that the meat of un-weaned kids had more water content as the limited fat content of meat possibly intensifies cooking losses (
Lawrie, 1998). This was contradictory to the report of
Ryan et al., (2007), who stated that “chops from concentrate fed goats had greater cooking loss compared to range fed goats”. Whereas,
Moreno-Indias et al., (2012) reported that the dietary treatment has no effect on the cooking loss of the goat meat.
The significantly (P<0.01) higher shear force values of meat samples in T
2 indicated that the meat samples of T
2 was having good meat consistency than T
1 due to better development of structural biomass of the muscles in broiler goat concentrate fed group.
Argüello
et_al(2005) reported lower shear force values and higher water holding capacity in the meat of kids suckling on the dam. Whereas,
Ryan et al., (2007) didn’t found differences between the meat samples of kids fed varying levels of concentrates in their diet.