Cardiac disease in canines is a common finding which may occur either primarily or most commonly as a concurrent disease. There is increased production and release of cTnT, ANP and BNP in cardiac diseases. Increase in the levels of natriuretic peptides is noticed in the early course of cardiac diseases due to stress on the heart wall. The present study was conducted to evaluate the assessment of cTnT, ANP and BNP for the diagnosis of cardiac diseases in comparison to echocardiography in canine.
Biomarkers
The present study was conducted on 40 cases, out of which 32 cases were showing only cardiac abnormalities and 8 cases were having cardiac abnormalities with renal affections. Renal involvement was diagnosed based on increased serum BUN and creatinine values. Diagnosis of cardiac diseases was made based on history, clinical examination, ECG findings, echocardiographic findings and concentration of biomarkers like cTnT, ANP and BNP. In dogs having cardiac involvement, the serum concentration of cTnT and BNP were found significantly (P<0.05) elevated in comparison to healthy control as depicted in Table 1. However, the serum concentration of ANP showed a non-significant increase in dogs with various cardiac abnormalities in comparison to healthy control. cTnT is a cytosolic protein and is released quickly whenever there is the destruction of cardiomyocyte, so, it is an early indicator of myocardial insult (
Langhorn and Willesen, 2016). ANP and BNP are both released from cardiac chambers but ANP has a shorter half-life as compared to BNP and is cleared earlier from the plasma which may be the reason for non-significant elevation in the ANP level in cardiomyopathies
(Kimura et al., 2007). Out of 40 cardiac cases, 26 cases showed cardiac abnormalities on echocardiography. cTnT and BNP levels in diseased animals (cTnT- 0.139±0.017 ng/mL and BNP- 623.3±195.4 pg/mL) were again found to be elevated at a significance level of (P<0.05) and (P<0.01), respectively when compared with healthy control (cTnT- 0.03±0.015 ng/mL and BNP- 64.26±29.62 pg/mL). While, ANP level in diseased animals (83.94±24.44 pg/mL) was having no significant difference as compared to healthy control (70.26±15.62 pg/mL). In cases which were diagnosed as having renal involvement along with cardiac abnormality, cTnT, ANP and BNP concentrations were also significantly (P<0.05) increased as compared to healthy control (Table 1). ANP values were significantly (P<0.05) increased in animals having both cardiac and renal disease as compared to animals with cardiac diseases only, whereas there was no significant difference in cTnT and BNP among these two groups as shown in Table 1. As ANP is a known potent natriuretic peptide and the kidney also acts as a site for its synthesis, so in patients having renal dysfunction along with cardiomyopathy, there may be an elevation in ANP level
(Shin et al., 1997).
Comparison of biomarkers with echocardiography
Echocardiographic examination was performed in animals and 26 out of 40 cases were found to be having cardiac abnormality, which were further selected for comparative study. Out of 26 positive cases in echocardiography, cTnT, BNP and ANP values were corresponding with 21, 23 and 10 cases, respectively. Both cTnT and echocardiography were in agreement for 21 and 8 cases (out of 40) as being positive and negative, respectively. Both ANP and echocardiography agreed for 10 and 9 cases as being positive and negative, respectively. Both BNP and echocardiography were in agreement for 23 and 11 cases as being positive and negative, respectively.
The sensitivity of cTnT, ANP and BNP was 80.76%, 38.46% and 88.46%, respectively and specificity was 57.14%, 64.28% and 78.57%, respectively when compared with echocardiography which is considered as a gold standard test. The overall agreement between echocardiography and BNP was 85% which was higher as compared to that of cTnT (72.5%) and ANP (47.5%) values as shown in Table 2. Among the three studied biomarkers, BNP was having higher sensitivity and specificity as compared to cTnT and ANP. Similarly,
Kumar et al., (2014) also reported higher sensitivity (72.2%) and specificity (93.9%) of NT-proBNP for diagnosis of cardiac diseases in canine and having an overall agreement of 89.3% with echocardiography.
Oyama et al., (2007) also reported that BNP is a better cardiac biomarker over ANP and cTnI. Low concentration of BNP or its parent protein proBNP is found in cases of non-cardiac origin whereas elevated values of these signify disease of cardiac origin (Oyama, 2015). In this particular study, significant (P<0.05) increase in the concentrations of cTnT, ANP and BNP were present in cases suffering with renal impairment along with cardiac involvement and similar findings are reported by
Miyagawa et al., (2013) in the case of acute or chronic renal diseases.
In the cTnT study, 0.03±0.01 ng/mL was considered as a cut-off for healthy animals, which gave a positive predictive value of 0.77 and a negative predictive value of 0.61.
Herman et al., (1999) considered 0.02±0.01 ng/mL as the cut-off value for cTnT in healthy animals. For BNP levels 64.26±29.62 pg/mL was considered as a cut-off in this study for healthy dogs, which meant all dogs having higher than this value of BNP were considered as suffering with cardiac disease which leads to a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.88 and 0.78, respectively. While
Kumar et al., (2014) and
Boswood et al., (2008) considered the cut-off values for NT-proBNP as 783.26±102.62 pg/mL and 210 pmol/L, respectively. For ANP, cut-off level was considered as 70.26 15.62 pg/mL in healthy animals, as a result a positive predictive value of 0.66 and a negative predictive value of 0.36 were obtained. Whereas
Smith et al., (2015) considered the cut-off value for ANP 18.5 pg/mL in healthy dogs. Kappa value, positive likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were higher for BNP than cTnT and ANP. Kappa value for BNP was 0.67, which falls in the category of substantial agreement of the test with that of the gold standard test (echocardiography). So, based on the various markers examined in this study, the BNP was having substantial agreement with echocardiography.