The isolated samples of Genomic DNA was represented in the Fig 1. The average concentration of isolated DNA samples were observed to be 234.33 ng/µl and the optical density (OD) ratio was between 1.7 and 1.9 at 260/280 nm which indicates the DNA was good in concentration and quality. Polymorphism at the promoter region of
prolactin gene was observed with three different size of fragments namely 154, 130/154 and 130bp representing the II, ID and DD genotypes, respectively (Fig 2). These results were accordance with studies carried out by
Cui et al., (2006), Liang et al., (2006), Bagheri et al., (2013) and
Rashidi et al., (2012). According to the polymorphic patterns, a total number of 200 birds were grouped to three and designated with different genotypes II, ID and DD, respectively. Out of 200 birds of Tellicherry native chicken 130 birds were observed with II genotype, 19 birds were observed with ID genotype and 51 birds were produced DD genotype.
Genotype and allele frequency
The genotypic frequency of II, ID and DD of 24bp indel polymorphism were 0.650, 0.095 and 0.255, respectively in Tellicherry native chicken. These results were contrary to findings of
Jiang et al., (2005) and
Liang et al., (2006) in Blue-shell native chicken (0.060, 0.340 and 0.600) and Yuehuang native chicken (0.090, 0.470 and 0.440), correspondingly of China. Similar genotype frequency value (0.25) of DD was reported by
Brijendra et al., (2018) in Aseel bird. On the one hand, this variation in genotypic frequency of II, ID and DD in native chicken of Kerala compared to other native chickens may be due to the unknown inclusion of exotic germplasm in the backyard of Kerala. On the other hand, difference in breeds of chicken may also one of the reason for this genotypic variance. The allelic frequency of I and D of -358 site (24bp indel) was 0.6975 and 0.3025, respectively. Similar finding was stated by
Bagheri et al., (2013) as 0.65 and 0.35, respectively in Fars native chicken of Iran. In comparison, similar results were reported by
Rashidi et al., (2012), Lotfi et al., (2013), Bagheri et al., (2013), (
Lumatauw and Mu’in, 2016),
Yadav et al., (2018) and
Ahmadi et al., (2019) in Mazandaran province indigenous chicken, Japanese Quail, Iran native chicken, Papua local chicken, Kadaknath hens and Naked neck chicken, respectively. On the basis of above obtained results, the frequency of I allele is comparatively higher in all chicken breeds.
Association of 24bp insertion-deletion (indel) polymorphism with broodiness in Tellicherry native chicken
In Tellicherry native chicken, the mean broody days were, 6.42±8.08, 5.04±9.09 and 6.29±9.77 for the genotypes II, ID and DD, respectively. There was no significant difference among the genotypes of promoter region of
prolactin gene (24bp indel site). Similarly,
Jiang et al., (2005) conducted a study on association of polymorphisms for
prolactin and
prolactin receptor genes with broody traits in Blue shell chicken of China and found no significant change among the genotypes of 24bp indel polymorphism.
Liang et al., (2006) also performed a research study on polymorphisms of 52 flanking region of
prolactin gene in Yuehuang native chicken of China and reported that genotypes (II, ID and DD) of 24bp indel site did not show significant difference with broody trait. Backyard farming system is usually practiced by Indian farmers to rear native chicken having low egg and meat production potential. In general, most of the indigenous (Native) chicken produces 60 to 70 eggs per year as an average. Low productivity of backyard farming is mainly attributed to the poor production potential of existing indigenous germ plasm
Haunshi et al., (2009). Hence, to increase the productivity, some of the indigenous breeds are reared under cage system in an organized farm. For example, Tellicherry native chickens are maintained at All India Co-ordinated Research Project (AICRP) farm on Poultry improvement at Mannuthy, Thrissur, Kerala. This breed is mainly reared for egg and it produces 168 eggs up to 72 weeks of age which is comparatively higher than backyard native chickens. Broodiness and egg production are negatively correlated quantitative traits in poultry. It has been found that broodiness is less pronounced in native chickens reared under caged floor system which may improve the egg production (intensity of laying) to some extent. In our study also, Tellicherry chickens are observed with decreased number of broody days and increased in egg number.
Genotypically a 24bp insertion at the promoter region of
prolactin gene is the mainly responsible for non-broody behaviour in White Leghorn chicken breed. Since, the insertion of a 24bp nucleotide sequence in the promoter region of
prolactin gene, a possible ecotropic viral integration site-1 encoded factor (Evi-1) binding site is located in the 52 flanking region of the chicken
prolactin gene
Cui et al., (2005). Evi-1 was shown to be involved as a repressor in transcription of many genes
(Vinatzer et al., 2001 and
Izutsu et al., 2002). It has been reported that Evi-1 represses the expression of
prolactin gene in White Leghorn chickens by binding the Evi-1 binding site and further prevents broodiness that can improve egg production to some extent
Jiang et al., (2005). Hence, the White Leghorn chicken is producing more than 300 eggs per year. In this study, frequency I (insertion) allele was found to be higher in Tellicherry chicken population. These findings are in accordance with
Bagheri et al., (2013). Furthermore, they observed that chickens with II and ID genotypes had significantly (P>0.01) greater egg production (egg number) and laying rate than DD genotype. On the basis of above research findings, it was known that presence of I (insertion) allele in chicken has positive effect on egg production. In comparison, presence of D (deletion) allele tends to give negative effect on egg production in chicken. Thus, Tellicherry chicken showed comparatively higher egg production than other backyard native chickens. These results suggest that the broody trait on Tellicherry chicken population could be eliminated through increasing the frequency of I allele in the population upon controlled mating.