Loading...

Modulation of Performance Index, Glucose and Cholesterol Level in Broiler Chickens Fed Diets Containing Different Supplements

DOI: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4122    | Article Id: B-4122 | Page : 823-826
Citation :- Modulation of Performance Index, Glucose and Cholesterol Level in Broiler Chickens Fed Diets Containing Different Supplements.Indian Journal of Animal Research.2021.(55):823-826
S.S. Chauhan, R.K. Sharma, A. Kumar, S.K. Shukla, J. Palod, M.K. Singh drmksingh_1@rediffmail.com
Address : Department of Poultry Science (PSC), Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya University of Veterinary Sciences and Cattle Research Institute (DUVASU), Mathura-281001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Submitted Date : 16-03-2020
Accepted Date : 23-10-2020

Abstract

Background: The present study evaluated the effect of dietary inclusion of various feed supplements and their combination on the performance index, glucose and serum cholesterol for 6 weeks. 
Methods: Day-old broiler chicks (n=252) were randomly assigned to seven treatment groups, each with 3 replicates. The first treatment was designated as control (T0) in which no supplement was added to the feed, while in treatments T1; organic mineral mixture (Organomin forte), T2; organic mineral mixture (Vannamin), T3; probiotics (Microguard), T4; enzyme (Brozyme -XPR) and probiotics, T5; emulsifier (Lipigon) were provided through feed. In the T6 group, 3 percent less energy was given through feed. 
Result: Significant improvement (p<0.05) was observed in performance index and HDL cholesterol and significant (P<0.05) decline in the glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in broilers under supplementary groups as compared to control groups. The results of the present study indicated that it is possible to produce lean meat to an extent by manipulating diets which lead to better performance index of broilers during the overall period, which led to the release of more nutrients which helped in absorption, assimilation and utilization.

Keywords

Broiler Cholesterol Lean meat Performance index Supplements

References

  1. Abdel-Fattah, S.A., El-Sanhoury, M.H., El-Mednay, N.M., Abdel-Azeem F. (2008). Thyroid activity, some blood constituents, organs morphology and performance of broiler chicks fed supplemental organic acids. Int. J. of Poult. Sci. 7(3): 215-222.
  2. Aluwong, T., Hassan, F.B., Raji, M.A., Kawu, M.U., Dzenda, T., Ayo, J.O. (2013). Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast on performance indices, serum enzymes and electrolytes of broiler chickens. African J. Biotech. 12(35): 5480-5485.
  3. Bird, J.M. (1955). Performance of growing chicken. J. Poult. Sci. 34: 1163-64.
  4. Chaudhary, N., Saikia, B., Dowarah, R., Tamuly, S., Sapcota, D. (2017). Effect of Feeding Curd as A Probiotic on Growth Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Blood Biochemical and Ceacal Microbial Profile in Broilers. Int. J. Livest. Res. 7(12): 165-173.
  5. Cowieson, A.J. (2010). Strategic selection of exogenous enzymes for corn-soya based poultry diets. J. Poult. Sci. 47: 1-7.
  6. Devrim, S.A., Aksu, T. and Ozsoy, B. (2010). The Effects of Lower Supplementation Levels of Organically Complexed Minerals (Zinc, Copper and Manganese) Versus Inorganic Forms on Hematological and Biochemical Parameters in Broilers. Kafkas. Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 16(4): 553- 559.
  7. Govil, K., Nayak, S., Baghel, R.P.S., Patil, A.K., Malapure, C.D. and Thakur, D. (2017). Performance of broiler chicken fed multicarbohydrases supplemented low energy diet. Vet. World 10(7): 727-31.
  8. Jia, Lin; Betters, Jenna, L. and Yu, Liqing (2011). Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) Protein in Intestinal and Hepatic Cholesterol Transport. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 73: 239-59.
  9. Jose, O.B., Alice, E.M., Eliane, S.N., Francisco, P., Alexandra, P. and Rafael, L.H. (2009). Enzymatic programs of broilers. Brazilian Arch. Bio. Tech. 52: 233-40.
  10. Kaushal, S., Sharma, R.K., Singh, D.V., Shukla, S.K., Kumar, S., Palod, J. and Singh, M.K. (2018). Modulation of performance index, nutrient utilization, sensory characteristic, glucose and cholesterol level in broiler chickens fed on dietary enzymes and probiotic as growth promoter. Ind. J. Pout. Sci. 53(3): 286-290.
  11. Kramer, C.Y. (1957). Extension of multiple range tests to group correlated adjusted means. Biometrics. 13: 13-17.
  12. Narasimha, J., Nagalakshmi, D., Reddy, Y.R. and Rao, S.T.V. (2016). Effect of supplementing non starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes to corn soybean meal based diets varying in energy on performance, egg quality, nutrient utilization and gut health in layers. Ind. J. Poult. Sci. 51(1): 29-35.
  13. Paryad, A. and Mahmoudi, M. (2008). Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance, blood constituents and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Appl. J. of Anim. Res. 3(12): 835-842.
  14. Ravindran, V. (2013). Feed enzymes: The science, practice and metabolic realities. J. Appli. Poult. Res. 22(3): 628-636.
  15. Saleh (2014). Effect of dietary mixture of Aspergillus probiotic and selenium nano-particles on growth, nutrient digestibilities, selected blood parameters and muscle fatty acid profile in broiler chickens. Anim. Sci. Papers and Reports. 32(1): 65-79.
  16. Shehab, A.E., Kamelia, M.Z., Khedr, N.E., Tahia, E.A. and Esmaeil, F.A. (2012). Effect of dietary enzyme supplementation on some biochemical and hematological parameters of Japanese quails. J. Anim. Sci. Adv. 2(9): 734-739.
  17. Singh, M.K., Sharma, R.K. and Singh, S.K. (2017). Neem supplementation for profitable poultry production: a review. Ind. J. Poult. Sci. 52: 239-245.
  18. Singh, M.K., Singh, S.K., Sharma, R.K., Singh, Brijesh, Kumar, Shive, Joshi, S.K., Kumar Sandeep and Sathapathy, S. (2015) Performance and carcass characteristics of guinea fowl fed on dietary Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf powder as growth promoter. Iranian J. Vet. Res. 16(1): 78-82.
  19. Thorat, S.G., Panwar, V.S., Dahiya, D.S. and Tewatia, B.S. (2015). Efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics and enzymes as growth promoters on the performance of broiler chicken. Haryana Vet. 54(1): 75-78.

Global Footprints