Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 51 issue 1 (february 2017) : 187-192

Management practices and constraints of beef cattle production in communal areas of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

SH Molefi1 , CA Mbajiorgu*1 , Antwi MA2
1<p>Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science,&nbsp;University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus.</p>
Cite article:- Molefi1 SH, Mbajiorgu*1 CA, MA2 Antwi (2016). Management practices and constraints of beef cattle productionin communal areas of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51(1): 187-192. doi: 10.18805/ijar.11325.

A survey study was conducted to determine the management practices and constraints faced by beef cattle producers in 200 households in communal areas of Chief Albert Luthuli Municipality in Mpumalanga province. In this context, the results indicated that while 91.5% of farmers practiced continuous breeding in heifers at younger than two years of age, a higher number approximately 68.5% of farmers relied upon neighbours for breeding bulls.  Also, calving percentage was between 50% and 70% as reported by 43.5% of farmers whereas 54.5% of farmers reported 50% to 60% weaning percentage. However, 77.5% of the farmers weaned their calves at five to seven months. 100% of farmers freely grazed their beef cattle on the mountainside and over 93.5% of farmers used veld as a source of feed with 82% of farmers supplementing their beef cattle depending on the season. Overall, the main constraints reported by the respondents were disease (26%) and malnutrition (18%) during dry season. In conclusion, the study finds that regular and proper medication in addition to supplementing feeds can assist by reducing mortality rates and enhancing productivity.


  1. Amimo, J.O., Thumbi, S., Inyangala, B.O., Junga, J.O. and Mosi, R.O. (2011). Socioeconomic characteristics and perceptions of cattle keepers and constraints to cattle production in Western Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23.

  2. Beyene, ST., Mlisa, L. and Gxasheka, M. (2014). Local Perceptions of Livestock Husbandry and Rangeland Degradation in the Highlands of South Africa: Implications for Development Interventions. Journal of Human Ecology 47: 257-268.

  3. Bidi, NT., Dube, AB., Khombe, CT. and Assan, N. (2015). Community Based Small Scale Commercial Cattle Breeding Programme in Mangwe District of Zimbabwe. Agricultural Advances 4: 22-33.

  4. De Lange, AO., 2011. Communal Farming in Arid Regions. Grootfontein Agricultural Development Institute Fort Hare University. Karoo Agric, 6: 12-16. 

  5. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF). (2010). A Profile of the South African beef Market Value Chain.

  6. www.daff.gov.za/docs/AMCP/BeefMVCP2010-11.pdf (Accessed in March 2012).

  7. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF). (2012). A profile of the South African beef market value chain. Available from www.daff.gov.za/docs/AMCP/BeefMVCP2011-12.pdf (Accessed in March 2012).

  8. Gusha, J., Manyuchi, CR., Imbayarwo-Chikosi, VE., Hamandishe, VR., Katsande, S. and Zvinorova, PI., (2014). Production and Economic Performance of F1-crossbred Dairy Cattle fed Non-conventional Protein Supplements in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production 46: 229-234.

  9. Katiyatiya, CLF., Muchenje, V. and Mushunje, A., 2014. Farmers’ perceptions and knowledge of cattle adaptation to heat stress and tick resistance in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27: 1663.

  10. Masikati, P. (2010). Improving the Water Productivity of Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in the Semi-Arid Tropics of Zimbabwe: An Ex-Ante Analysis using Simulation Modelling. http://www zef.de/fileadmin/webfiles/downloads/    zefc_ecology development/eds 78 masikati text.pdf. (Accessed 17 January 2012).

  11. Mashoko, E., Muchenje, V., Ndlovu, T., Mapiye, C., Chimonyo, M. and Musemwa, L. (2007). Beef Cattle Production in a Peri-Urban Area of Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa 9:121-132.

  12. Mngomezulu, S., 2010. Formal marketing of cattle by communal farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, Can they take part (MSc thesis, Wageningen University, Netherlands). 

  13. Mpumalanga Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment. (2003). Mpumalanga State of the Environment Report. (DACE: Nelspruit).

  14. Mpumalanga DALA. (2006). Integrated Resource Information Report: Albert Luthuli.

  15. Munyai, FR. (2012). An Evaluation of Socio-Economic and Biophysical Aspects of Small-Scale Livestock Systems Based on a Case Study from Limpopo Province: Muduluni Village. PhD Thesis: University of the Free State.

  16. Mutibvu, T., Maburutse, B.E., Mbiriri, D.T. and Kashangura, M.T. (2012). Constraints and opportunities for increased livestock production in communal areas: A case study of Simbe, Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24:165.

  17. Nqeno, N., Chimonyo, M. and Mapiye, C. (2011). Farmers’ perceptions of the causes of low reproductive performance in cows kept under low-input communal production systems in South Africa. Tropical Animal Health Production 43: 315–321.

  18. Nowers, CB., Nobumba, LM. and Welgemoed, J. (2013). Reproduction and potential of communal cattle on sourveld in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Applied Animal Husbandry and Rural Development 6: 48-54.

  19. Scholtz, MM., Van Ryssen, JBJ., Meissner, HH. and Laker, MC. (2013). A South African Perspective on Livestock Production in relation to Greenhouse Gases and Water Usage. South African Journal of Animal Science 43: 247-254.

  20. Scholtz, MM. and Bester, J. (2010). The Effect of Stock Theft and Mortalities on the Livestock Industry in South Africa. Applied Animal Husbandry & Rural Development 3: 15-18.

  21. Sibanda, BS. (2014). Beef Cattle Development Initiatives: A Case of Matobo A2 Resettlement farms in Zimbabwe. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research 2: 197-204.

  22. Siegmund-Schultze, M., Lange, F., Schneiderat, U. and Steinbach, J. (2012). Performance, management and Objectives of Cattle Farming on Communal Ranges in Namibia. Journal of Arid Environments 80: 65-73.

  23. Sikhweni, N P. and Hassan, R. (2014). Opportunities and challenges facing small-scale cattle farmers living adjacent to Kruger National Park, Limpopo Province. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences 5: 38-43.

  24. SPSS Inc., 2015. SPSS version 22.0 for Windows User’s Guide. (SPSS Inc.: Chicago)

  25. Tada, O, Muchenje, V. and Dzama, K. (2013). Preferential Traits for Breeding Nguni Cattle in Low-Input In-Situ Conservation Production Systems. Springerplus 2: 195.

  26. Tavirimirwa, B., Mwembe, R., Ngulube, B., Banana, N.Y.D., Nyamushamba, G.B., Ncube, S. and Nkomboni, D. (2013). Communal cattle production in Zimbabwe: A. Development, 25:12. 

  27. Thomas, B., Togarepi, C. and Simasiku, A. (2014). Analysis of the Determinants of the Sustainability of Cattle Marketing Systems in Zambezi Region of North-Eastern Communal Area of Namibia. International Journal of Livestock Production 5: 129-136.

  28. Valbuena, D., Erenstein, O, Tui, SHK., Abdoulaye, T., Claessens, L., Duncan, AJ. and Van Wijk, MT. (2012). Conservation agriculture in mixed crop–livestock systems: scoping crop residue trade-offs in sub-saharan Africa and South Asia. Field Crops Research 132: 175-184

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)