Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 6 (june 2021) : 727-733

First Report on Better Functional Property of Black Chicken Meat from India

Renuka Sehrawat, Rekha Sharma, Sonika Ahlawat, Vivek Sharma, Mohan Singh Thakur, Manjeet Kaur, Madhu Sudan Tantia
1ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, India.
Cite article:- Sehrawat Renuka, Sharma Rekha, Ahlawat Sonika, Sharma Vivek, Thakur Singh Mohan, Kaur Manjeet, Tantia Sudan Madhu (2021). First Report on Better Functional Property of Black Chicken Meat from India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(6): 727-733. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4014.
Background: Indian domesticated chickens have a wide variety of phenotypes. Unlike other chicken breeds, Kadaknath chicken has black meat and is used by indigenous tribal people for its invigorating and therapeutic properties. To look for the functional traits that might be contributing towards the acclaimed benefits, free radical scavenging capacity and metal chelating ability of Kadaknath meat were explored for the first time in comparison to the commercial Cobb broiler. 
Methods: During the period 2018-2020, breast and thigh meat were collected from chickens (n=20/ group) at their commercial slaughter age. Meat extract was used for qualitative evaluation of protein as well as the antioxidant capacity utilizing diverse in vitro methods corresponding to different antioxidation mechanisms.
Result: Protein concentration (g/100g of tissue) in Kadaknath breast (25.25 ± 0.31) and thigh (19.98 ± 0.29) meat was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the Cobb. Breast meat had better scavenging capacity than the thigh. The superiority of the antioxidant capacity of Kadaknath meat was explicitly established by more than one in vitro assay. Free radical scavenging assays viz. 2,2-azinobis (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS); 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) had significantly (P < 0.05) higher values for Kadaknath in comparison to the Cobb broiler meat. Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) values (mM Fe2+/g of tissue) were also more in breast meat of Kadaknath (26.97±0.37) than the Cobb (15.24±0.40). Similarly, FRAP values were higher in Kadaknath (33.85±0.47) than the Cobb (19.2±0.31) thigh meat. Kadaknath had higher antioxidant capacity as reflected by metal chelation inhibition value. These findings help to explain the unique nutritional and functional characteristics of Kadaknath black-bone chicken and provide basic research data for exploring the commercial potential of its meat in the fields of functional foods, cosmeceuticals and nuutraceuticals.
  1. Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.E. and Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 28: 25-30.
  2. Da Silva, D.C.F., De Arruda, A.M.V. and Gonçalves, A.A. (2017). Quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat from free-range and industrial poultry system for the consumers. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 54: 1818-1826. 
  3. Damgaard, T.D., Otte, J., Meinert, L., Jensen, K., Lametsch, R. (2014). Antioxidant capacity of hydrolyzed porcine tissues. Food Science and Nutrition. 2: 282-288.
  4. Dharmayanthi, A.B., Terai, Y., Sulandari, S., Zein, M.S.A., Akiyama, T. and Satta, Y. (2017). The origin and evolution of fibromelanosis in domesticated chickens: Genomic comparison of Indonesian Cemani and Chinese Silkie breeds. Plos one. 12: e0173147.
  5. Dinis, T.C.P., Madeira, V.M.C. and Almeida, L.M. (1994). Action of phenolic derivatives (acetoaminophen, salycilate and 5aminosalycilate) as inhibitors of membrane lipid peroxidation and its peroxyl radical scavengers. Archieves of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 315: 161-169.
  6. Huang, S.C. and Kuo, J.C. (2000). Concentrations and antioxidative activity of anserine and carnosine in poultry meat extracts treated with demineralization and papain. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life sciences. 24: 193-201.
  7. Intarapichet, K.O. and Maikhunthod, B. (2005). Genotype and gender differences in carnosine extracts and antioxidant activities of chicken breast and thigh meats. Meat Science. 71: 634-642.
  8. Jayasena, D.D., Jung, S., Kim, H.J., Bae, Y. S.,Yong, H.I., Lee, J.H., Kim, J.G. and Jo, C. (2013). Comparison of quality traits of meat from Korean native chickens and broilers used in two different traditional Korean cuisines. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 26: 1038-46. 
  9. Jung, S., Bae, Y.S., Kim, H.J., Jayasena, D.D., Lee, J.H., Park, H.B., Heo, K.N. and Jo, C. (2013). Carnosine, anserine, creatine and inosine 5'-monophosphate contents in breast and thigh meats from 5 lines of Korean native chicken. Poultry Science. 92: 3275-3282.
  10. Kojima, S., Saegusa, H. and Sakata, M. (2014). Histidine-containing dipeptide concentration and antioxidant effects of meat extracts from Silky fowl: comparison with meat-type chicken breast and thigh meats. Food Science and Technology Research. 20: 621-628.
  11. Lengkidworraphiphat,P., Wongpoomchai, R., Taya, S. and Jaturasitha, S. (2020). Effect of genotypes on macronutrients and antioxidant capacity of chicken breast meat. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 33: 1817-1823.
  12. Li, D., Sun, G., Zhang, M., Cao, Y., Zhang, C., Fu, Y., Li, F., Li, G., Jiang, R., Han, R., Li, Z., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Liu, X., Li, W. and Kang, X. (2020). Breeding history and candidate genes responsible for black skin of Xichuan blackbone chicken. BMC Genomics. 21: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06900-8.
  13. Liu, M., Jing, H., Zhang, J., Che, G., Zhou, M., Gao, Z., Li, S., Ren, Z., Hao, L., Liu, Y. and Jia, L. (2016). Optimization of mycelia selenium polysaccharide extraction from agrocybe cylindracea sl-02 and assessment of their antioxidant and anti-ageing activities. Plos one. 11: e0160799.
  14. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin Phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193: 265-275. 
  15. Manhiani, P.S., Northcutt, J. K., Han, I., Bridges, W.C. and Dawson, P.L. (2013). Antioxidant activity of carnosine extracted from various poultry tissues. Poultry Science. 92: 444-453.
  16. Mirzaee, A., Afshoon, A. and Barmak, M.J. (2017). Antioxidant activity of meat from chicken and goat cooked in microwave cooking system. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research. 8: 1090-1094.
  17. Mohan, J., Sastry, K.V.H., Moudgal, R.P. and Tyagi, J.S. (2008). Performance profile of Kadaknath desi hens under normal rearing system. International Journal of Poultry Science. 43: 379-381.
  18. Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M. and Rice-Evans, C. (1999). Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 26: 1231-1237.
  19. Sacchetti, G., Mattia, C.D., Pittia, P. and Martino, G. (2008). Application of a radical scavenging activity test to measure the total antioxidant activity of poultry meat. Meat Science. 80: 1081-1085.
  20. Sarmadi, B.H. and Ismail, A.S. (2010). Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: A review. Peptides. 31: 1949-1956.
  21. Serpen, A., Gökmen, V. and Fogliano, V. (2012). Total antioxidant capacities of raw and cooked meats. Meat Science. 90: 60-65.
  22. Wang, L.H., Qiao, K.N., Ding, Q., Zhang, Y.Y., Sun, B.G. and Chen, H.T. (2018). Effects of two cooking methods on the taste components of Sanhuang chicken and Black bone silky fowl meat. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 42: 1-10. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)