Screening of field samples for DEV by PCR
Eight (8) out of 12 samples tested, were found to be positive for presence of the viral DNA by PCR amplification of
DNA polymerase gene of DEV, as the amplicons of expected molecular size (446bp) were obtained. PCR has been widely used for detection of DEV
DNA polymerase gene
(EI-Samadony et al., 2013; Ahmed et al., 2015; EI-
Tholoth et al., 2019) and is also recommended by the OIE as DNA polymerse gene is highly conserved among all herpes viruses (OIE, 2018;
VanDevanter et al., 1996). Further, PCR is a highly sensitive technique, even moribund tissues also can be utilized to detect viral DNA. Although, at the field level the disease is presumptively diagnosed by history, symptoms and pathological lesions, confirmatory diagnosis can be made by PCR and sequencing of the amplicon or by virus isolation. So, PCR is an indispensable tool in diagnosis of duck plague.
Isolation of DEV and its pathogenicity in duck embryos
The infected duck embryos died within 5 to 7 d.p.i., showing the gross lesions like hemorrhages in head, legs and dorsal surface of the body (Fig 1), enlarged hemorrhagic liver with focal necrosis and the CAM appeared to be congested, hemorrhagic and thickened (Fig 2). On histopathological examination, liver showed congestion of blood vessel, degenerative hepatocellular necrosis, eosinophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies and vacuolar degeneration and the CAM showed congestion and hemorrhages (Fig 3). Characteristic intracytoplasmic and intranuclear inclusion bodies in the liver tissue of infected duckling/duck embryo have also been reported by other workers
(Jana et al., 2014). Further the presence of DEV viral DNA in the CAM and liver of the infected duck embryo was confirmed by PCR which yielded the expected amplicon size of 446 bp in agarose gel electrophoresis. Usually, the isolation of virus from field samples is best achieved by duckling inoculation compared to other methods like propagation in cell cultures and in duck embryos etc. However, if the susceptible ducklings are not available or if there is any ethical issue for use of natural host, the virus can alternatively be isolated in 10-12 day old embryonated duck eggs, through CAM route inoculation (OIE, 2018). We observed that for inoculum preparation, sonication of the infected tissue is better than manually triturating it as sonication helps to release the virus from the cells, being the virions are cell associated in nature.
Pathogenicity of the DEV field isolate in ducklings
Experimentally infected ducklings on 5
th- 6
th d.p.i. showed depression, soiled vent, greenish white watery diarrhoea, nasal discharge, less feed intake, ataxia or uncoordinated movement as both the legs showed paralysis, typical posture of breast touching on the ground and were unable to walk. Finally, all the three ducklings died within 5-7 d.p.i. Gross lesions like enlarged pale copper coloured liver (Fig 4) with irregularly distributed pinpoint hemorrhages and white foci of necrosis giving speckled appearance were found during postmortem examination. Spleen was also highly enlarged (Fig 4) and congested, in the intestine petechial hemorrhage was visible and diphtheritic lesions with bran like crusted plaque deposits on the oesophageal mucosa was observed. All the above clinical signs and lesions were in accordance with the findings of the earlier workers
(Akter et al., 2004; Hanaa et al., 2013; Rani et al., 2015; El
Tholoth et al., 2019). In DP the gross lesions are usually haemorrhage throughout the body and degenerative changes in the GI mucosa, parenchymatous organ and petechial haemorrhage in various visceral organs
(Konch et al., 2009). Most successful and efficient DEV isolation from the field samples are achieved by duckling inoculation as the young ducklings are highly susceptible to this virus and being the natural host.
Detection of viral DNA in the liver samples of infected ducklings
The viral DNA was detected in the liver samples of all the three experimentally infected ducklings by PCR amplification of the
DNA polymerase gene and the amplicons showed sharp and single band with expected molecular size of 446 bp in agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig 5). Although, the virus is pantropic in nature, it prefers to grow with high titer in liver and spleen and these are the preferred tissue samples for virus isolation.
Sequencing of amplicons and phylogenetic analysis
The DNA polymerase gene amplicon was sequenced and BLAST analysis of the nucleotide sequence showed about 99 to 100% homology with the already published sequences available in the NCBI GenBank, thus confirming our isolate as DEV, which was named as DEV/India/IVRI-2016 and the gene sequence has NCBI acc. no. KX511893.
For phylogenetic analysis, the sequence of
DNA polymerase gene of our DEV isolate (DEV/India/IVRI-2016) was compared with the sequences of other 23 isolates of DEV available in the NCBI GenBank (Table 1), which showed that our isolate has close genetic relationship especially with Chinese isolates, having 100% similarity (Fig 6). It seems that most of the Indian isolates including this one seems to be acquired from West Bengal, where DEV outbreak was first reported in India. However, earlier workers have reported that there is no much strain variation in this virus, as the whole genome sequencing of the DEV from different countries did not show much variation in nucleotide sequence
(Wu et al., 2012).
Antigenic detection of DEV in liver tissue by dot-ELISA
The infected liver suspension showed brown coloured dots similar to the positive control indicating its reactivity with anti-DEV serum; however, the negative control did not show any dot (Fig 7). Earlier we have reported detection of DEV antigens by immuno-histochemical techniques in the liver tissues of the experimentally infected ducklings
(Kumar et al., 2018) indicating immunoreactivity of the viral antigens in the tissues with the anti-DEV antibody. Thus, detection of DEV antigens by using specific serum antibodies is one easier method, but its sensitivity and specificity are not yet established.