The present cross sectional study revealed that, out of the 490 serum samples, 239 were positive for the presence of antibodies against BoHV-1 with an overall sero-prevalence of 48.78% (239/490) among cattle and buffalo population of the state. However, the sero-prevalence of BoHV1 in cattle was 37.77% (102/270) and in buffalo was 62.27% (137/220) as mentioned in Table 2. Statistically, overall sero-prevalence was significantly (p<0.01) higher in buffaloes (62.27%) as compared to cattle (37.77%). Out of all 22 districts of the state, highest sero-prevalence among cattle population was seen in district Faridabad (70%) and in buffalo it was Kaithal (90%). Moreover, the lowest sero-prevalence was observed in Rewari district
i.e., 5% and 20% for cattle and buffalo population respectively as mentioned in the Fig 3.
The chi-square analysis of percent sero-prevalence with various factors was done and the results are given in Table 3. Also, the overall sero-prevalence was significantly (p<0.05) higher in eastern zone (52.83%) of the state as compared to western zone (41.78%). Significantly, higher antibodies titre was observed in older animals (³6.5 years) followed by age group 2.5-4.5 years, 4.5-6.5 years than young animals (<2.5 years). There was no significant difference observed in overall sero-prevalence between male and female animals. In case of species wise chi-square analysis, only age was found significant factor associated with sero-prevalence for buffaloes, as the highest sero-prevalence (75.61%) was observed in older buffaloes (≥6.5 years) followed by age 2.5-4.5 years (69.64%), 4.5-6.5 years (58.51%) than young animals with age of <2.5 years(41.38%). Factors like breed, sex
etc. were not significantly (p>0.05) associated with BoHV1 sero-prevalence in cattle or buffaloes.
The Binary logistic regression was used to determine the likelihood of BoHV-1 due to various factors used in this study. The results of overall logistic regression analysis revealed that species, zone and age were significantly associated with sero-prevalence of BoHV-1. The likelihood of BoHV-1 was significantly 0.37 times lower (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.25; 0.54) in cattle than the reference category
i.e. buffaloes. In case of zone, the higher (1.52 times) likelihood was observed in eastern zone (OR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.03; 2.26) than western zone (OR=1.00). As compared to older animals (Age ³6.5 years), the likelihood of BoHV-1 was lower in other age groups with minimum in animals with age <2.5 years (0.34 times), followed by 4.5-6.5 years (0.57 times) and 2.5-4.5 years (0.82 times) as mentioned in Table 4. The comparison between percent sero-positivity in cattle and buffaloes of different districts of Haryana is mentioned in Table 5.
Sero-prevalence represents cumulative exposure to infection. The accuracy of serology must be addressed on both the individual level and at the level of a population. Positively identifying the occurrence of disease is usually based upon the presence of antibodies for that particular disease.
Sero-prevalence of BoHV-1 in bovines of Haryana state
Among the 490 samples collected from bovines, 239 were found positive and 251 were found negative accounting to an overall positive percentage of 48.78. Almost similar sero-prevalence of 49.86% was reported by
(Sulochana et al., 1981) in Kerala, 45.01% was reported by
(Deka et al., 2005) in Indian breeding bulls. Low sero-prevalence of 28.76% was reported by
(Dhand et al., 2002) in bovines of Punjab as compared with the present study. More or less similar result were obtained using ELISA on serum samples of cattle and buffaloes from different states like Uttar Pradesh by (
Singh and Yadav, 2010), who reported an overall sero-prevalence of 32.31% in bovines. The higher sero-positivity of 64.47% and 56.5% was reported by
Vaid et al., (1991) and
Samal et al., (1981) in Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh respectively.
Babu et al., 1984 also reported a higher rate of sero-prevalence of 65.78 percent in cattle from Andhra Pradesh. The sero-prevalence of BoHV-1 among dairy cattle of Assam was found to be 20.34%
(Chettri et al., 2015). Similar to this observations, 37.44% seropositivity was observed in cattle of Chattisgarh
(Samrath et al., 2016). The overall sero-positivity of 40.70% and 23.22% were reported at organized and un-organized farm respectively in cattle of Bidar
(Satbige et al., 2018).
Species-wise Sero-prevalence of BoHV-1
The higher sero-prevalence was seen in buffalo (62.27%) population as compared to cattle population (36.825%) in this study.
Thakur et al., (2017) reported higher sero-prevalence (38.14%) in buffaloes than cattle (26.78%) in Uttarakhand.
Trangadia et al., 2010 also reported high sero-prevalence in buffaloes (62.39%) than cattle (60.46%) in India. While in contrast to present study,
Khan (2004) reported an overall sero-prevalence of 21.30% for IBR by i-ELISA test and species wise incidence was found higher in cattle (23.40%) than in buffaloes (18.97%).
Gill et al., (1987) also reported a higher sero-prevalence of 47% in cattle than 14% in buffaloes.
Sex-wise Sero-prevalence of BoHV-1
An overall sero-positivity was seen to be 49.25% in female animal, while 38.10% in male. However, 38.04% female cattle and 62.62% female buffaloes were positive. Among males, 33.33% (5/15) cattle 50% (3/6) buffaloes were seen to be positive. Similarly,
Samrath (2009) found an overall (34.98%) sero-positivity in female animals and (32.78%) in males respectively. Similar observation were also reported by
Nandi et al., (2007) who observed 66% positivity in female, and 38% in male in Jhansi.
Sharma et al., (2006) reported higher sero-prevalence of IBR in female cattle as compared to male cattle
i.e. 56.92% and 20%, respectively in Himachal Pradesh. In general, higher sero-prevalence was observed in female as compared to male and same was also observed in this study. Since, none of the animal included in the study had been vaccinated against BoHV-1, the sero-prevalence obtained indicate that the animal had been exposed to the virus, assuming that the presence of antibodies can only be caused by exposure to the pathogen
(Kampa et al., 2004).