The least squares means for body weight and shank length up to 12 weeks of age are presented in Table 1. The body weights differed significantly (P≤0.05) between the sexes from six weeks onwards, with higher body weights in males. During the initial period sex did not show any significant effect on growth. The average body weight of 1.7 kg in males and 1.4 kg in females at 12 weeks of age makes the birds suitable for dual purpose variety as the males were disposed of for meat purpose with premium price at 12 weeks of age. The appearance and gait of the birds due to the presence of Aseel inheritance attracts the farmers, thus increases adoption among the farmers and also fetches premium price in the market. In a previous study in the same two-way cross, higher body weights in males were reported while the body weights in hens were similar
(Rajkumar et al., 2019). Lower body weights than the present findings were recorded in three-way cross developed for backyard poultry farming
(Rajkumar et al., 2018; Padhi et al., 2016), in Nigerian chicken
(Ndofor-Foleng et al., 2015) and in White Leghorn layers
(Chandan et al., 2019). The differences in the body weights may be due to different chicken breeds/lines used for their development and also the purpose of their development either for egg or for both egg and meat. The higher body weights and shank length in 2-way cross might be due to the fact that the bird was developed using PD-1 line as male parent which was under selection for higher shank length for last 12 generations and PD-4 as female line, an improved native Aseel chicken known for higher shank length and improved for higher eight week body weight.
The carcass traits expressed as percentage of live weight are presented in Table 2. The live body weight at 12 weeks of age in sample of birds varied significantly (P≤0.05) between the sexes. Similar significant sex effects were observed by many authors in different chicken populations
(Iqbal et al., 2009; Kaya and Yildirim 2018;
Mutibvu et al., 2018). Sex had no significant effect on DP, neck, back and breast meat proportions. The DP observed in two-way cross was within the normal range (65-75%) as reported in literature
(Rajkumar et al., 2016; Haunshi et al., 2013; Sarsenbek et al., 2013; Rajkumar et al., 2011). The breast meat proportion was lower in the present study compared to the Aseel and normal broilers
(Rajkumar et al., 2016), which might be attributable to the selection criterion. The commercial broilers were selected for broader breast resulting in high breast proportion as well as the Aseel breed which is known for broader breasts. Males had strong legs with significantly high proportion of thigh meat similar to the findings of
Kaya and Yildirim (2018) in broiler chickens. Leg proportions in the present cross were similar to the findings in Aseel
(Rajkumar et al., 2016) as the present cross had 50% Aseel inheritance. High leg proportions in the present study might be due to the native Aseel chicken which had stronger legs and PD-1 line which was under selection for higher shank length. Similar findings were reported by many authors
(Rajkumar et al., 2016; Rajkumar et al., 2017; Padhi et al., 2016; Haunshi et al., 2013) in native and crossbred chicken. The strong shanks with high proportion of thigh meat in the present two-way cross is a desirable feature for the bird developed for free range backyard farming. The bone proportion was significantly higher in males as they have stronger and longer bones. The meat and meat bone ratio was statistically similar in both the sexes. Abdominal fat proportion was significantly (P≤0.05) higher in pullets, though it was less compared to the normal broilers. Lower abdominal fat was desirable characters for meat type birds as consumer prefer meat with low fat percentage. Low proportion of abdominal fat was reported
(Rajkumar et al., 2016; Haunshi et al., 2013) in native chicken. Giblets (heart, liver and Gizzard) did not show any significant variation in male and female birds. Feather proportion was significantly (P≤0.05) higher in males as they are characterized by long tail feathers and higher body mass. Lower feather proportion was observed in Aseel
(Rajkumar et al., 2016; Padhi et al., 2016; Padhi and Chatterjee 2013) compared to the present findings.
The results of meat quality attributes of two-way cross are presented in Table 3. Sex did not show any significant variation on pH, SFV and HP values. The optimum pH of 5.5 to 6.5 may be suitable for better meat quality and longer storage period. The pH values of meat recorded in the present study were in the normal range reported in the literature
(Sarsenbek et al., 2013). The meat quality primarily depends on the pH of the meat, low pH improves the shelf life of meat with pale colouration, while high pH results in dark, firm and dry (DFD) meat with poor storage quality due to accelerated microbial growth
(Rajkumar et al., 2016). Higher SFVs than the present study were observed in Chinese native chickens
(Chen et al., 2007); in Indian Aseel and broiler chicken
(Rajkumar et al., 2016). The lower SFV in the present study might be attributable to the age of the slaughter and body weight of the birds as SFV tend to increase with age
(Sarsenbek et al., 2013) and body mass
(Rajkumar et al., 2016). Lower SFVs were observed in broiler chicken reared in free range and intensive systems of rearing
(Funaro et al., 2014) compared to the present results. HP is directly proportional to the collagen content of the meat
(Rajkumar et al., 2016). SFV and HP concentration determines the tenderness and toughness of the meat. The yellowness (b*) differed significantly (P≤0.05) between the sexes and it was lower in males with variable myoglobin content in the muscle. Light (L*) and red (a*) colouration did not show any significant variation. The meat colour was due to the myoglobin content, chemical state of the haem structure and pH of meat (
Fletcher 2002). The pH influences the reflectance and transmittance of light in to the tissues and across the muscle fibers resulting in light and dark colouration of meat (
Swatland 2008). The fat and moisture content significantly (P≤0.05) differed between the sexes. Fat proportion was significantly (P≤0.05) higher in females and moisture proportion was significantly (P≤0.05) higher in males. Protein and ash proportions were similar in both the sexes. The quantity and quality of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, minerals and fatty acids present in the meat determines its value and quality (
Pearson and Gillet 1996). The chemical composition of protein, fat, ash and moisture observed in the meat of 2 way cross were within the range of earlier findings of protein (17.0-23.3%); fat (1.0-17.4%); ash (0.1-3.6%); moisture (60.4-76.14%)
(Rajkumar et al., 2017; Souza et al., 2011). The proximate composition parameters observed in the present findings are in accordance with Aseel chicken meat
(Rajkumar et al., 2017) which might be due to the fact that the present 2-way cross had Aseel inheritance as female parent.
The sensory evaluation of meat by an expert panel revealed that sex had no significant effect on all sensory attributes. The sensory attributes ranged from 6.55 to 7.15 (Table 4) on an eight point scale in 2 way cross meat indicating better consumer acceptability. The probable reason might be the presence of Aseel native inheritance as well as the Cornish inheritance, the established coloured meat purpose breed. The unique taste, firm texture, rich flavour and higher acceptability of native chicken meat are well documented in the literature
(Rajkumar et al., 2016; Jayasena et al., 2013).