Size range
A total of 2020 specimens (1043 females, 708 males and 269 indeterminate/unsexed) of
G. filamentosus were analyzed. The size (TL) of
G. filamentosus ranged from 52 to 300 mm (mean ± SD = 147.8 ± 38.0 mm). The TL of females ranged from 70 to 300 mm (mean ± SD = 155.6 ± 35.6 mm), males from 60 to 275 mm TL (mean ± SD = 153.7 ± 33.4 mm) and indeterminate
G. filamentosus ranged from 52 to 180 mm TL (mean ± SD = 102.2 ± 23.5 mm).In the present study, the weight range was from 4.53-393.0 g for females, 2.80-310.88 g for males and 2.50-92.93 g for indeterminate fish. Therefore, for the pooled fish the weight ranged from 2.50 to 393.0 g in the study area.
Length-weight relationship
The estimates of the regression parameters for females, males, indeterminate and pooled data of
G. filamentosus obtained by regression analysis are given in Table 1.
The b values 2.9511 (r = 0.9759), 2.9364 (r = 0.9699), 2.9720 (r = 0.9526) and 3.0165 (r = 0.9789) were obtained for females, males, indeterminate and pooled
. G. filamentosus respectively. Correlation coefficients (r) for females, males, indeterminate and pooled sample were found to be significant (p<0.001) in all instances indicating good correlation between length and weight of
G. filamentosus.
The length-weight relationships of
G. filamentosus from July 2009 to June 2011 are as follows.
For female,
Log TW = -1.7716 + 2.9511 Log L (logarithmic equation)
TW = 0.01692 L
2.9511 (parabolic equation)
For male,
Log TW = -1.7526 + 2.9364 Log L (logarithmic equation)
TW = 0.01768 L
2.9364 (parabolic equation)
For indeterminate,
Log TW = -1.8343 + 2.9720 Log L (logarithmic equation)
TW = 0.01465 L
2.9720 (parabolic equation)
For pooled,
Log TW = -1.8521+ 3.0165 Log L (logarithmic equation)
TW = 0.01406 L
3.0165 (parabolic equation)
Analysis of covariance (Table 1) indicated that there is no significant difference in the length-weight relationship between the two sexes. But from the F - ratio, it is evident that there is significant difference in the length-weight relationship between the females and juveniles and males and juveniles (Table 2-4). Two tailed ‘t’ test was applied to see whether the ‘b” values arrived at for females, males and indeterminate fish were significantly different from the hypothesis value, 3 (Table 5). The results of the t-test applying the formula, t = |b-β|/sb, to test the significance of variation in the estimate of ‘b’ from the ideal fish were,
Females = 11.62, Males = 12.85 and Indeterminate = 3.03.
Condition factor
The monthly mean values ofcondition factors for males and females
G. filamentosus are presented in Table 7. In females, the Kn values higher than the average weight (1.0044) for a two-years period (July 2009-June2011) were in July 2009, August-November 2009, January-February 2010, April 2010, July 2010, December 2010, January 2011, March 2011 and May-June 2011 (Table 7). The Kn values lower than the average weight were in December 2009, March 2010, May-June 2010, August-November 2010, February 2011 and April 2011. The higher Kn value in female was in December 2010 (1.1186) and lowest in September 2010 (0.8871).
In males, the Kn values higher than the average weight (0.9905) was in July 2009-July 2011 and November 2010-June 2011. The Kn values lower than the average weight were in August 2010-October 2010, December 2010 and April 2011. The highest Kn value was in March 2011 (1.0630) and lowest in September 2010 (0.6977).
The length-weight relationship gives an idea about the mathematical relationship between length and weight of the fish. It also depicts variation in the observed weight of the individual fish from those expected. According to Le Cren (1951), this variation indicates the fatness, general wellbeing or gonadal development of the fish. The length-weight relationship of a fish can be described by the hypothetical cube law,
W = aL3, where
W represents weight of fish,
L represents length of fish and
are presents a constant. In this context, the cube law represents a condition of an ideal fish where in the fish maintains a constant shape n = 3 (Allen, 1938). If there is a change in density and form as a result of growth, there will be significant departure from the isometric growth pattern. Hence, the formula W = aL
b will be more useful in describing the length-weight relationship. The value of the exponent “n” in the parabolic equation usually lies between 2.5 and 4.00 (Hile, 1936; Martin, 1949). The parameters of length-weight relationship of gerreids estimated by various authors from different parts of the world are tabulated in Table 6. The range (2.14-3.72) of b values of the length-total weight relationship reported for
Gerres filamentosus from several regions of India is between 2.5 and 4.00.
The length-weight relationship of
G. filamentosus in the present study showed that curvilinear pattern in sexes, indeterminate fish and pooled fish. During July 2009-June 2010, the b value was found to be 2.9540 for female, 2.9241 for male and 2.7472 for indeterminate fish. Whereas, the b values of the fish were found to be 2.9856, 2.9499 and 3.0961 (during July 2010-June 2011) for female, male and indeterminate fish, respectively. For the pooled year, the b value was found to be 2.9511 for female, 2.9364 for male, 2.9720 for indeterminate fish and 3.0165 for pooled fish. From the F-ratio, it is evident that there is no significant difference between male and female for the length-weight relationship. But there is significant between males and juveniles and females and juveniles for the length-weight relationship. From the‘t’ test (Table 5), it was confirmed that female, male and indeterminate fish followed non-isometric growth. Further, from this table, it is shown a negatively allometric pattern (b<3) in female, male and indeterminate fish which indicates that the rate of increase in body length is not proportional to the rate of increase in body weight. Since, the difference between the slopes of the regression of male and female was significant (P<0.05), it reflects a divergence in growth pattern in both the sexes. This change may be due to a number of factors including gonadal maturity, habitat, season, sex, stomach fullness, diet, preservation techniques, health and locality (Bagenal and Tesch, 1978; Froese, 2006). Such differences in values ‘b’ can be ascribed to one or a combination of most of the factors including differences in the number of specimens examined, area/season effects and distinctions in the observed length ranges of the specimens caught, to which duration of sample collection can be added as well (Moutopoulos and Stergiou, 2002). According to Jhingran (1968) and Frosta
et al. (2004), the slope ‘b’ shows that the rate of weight gains relative to growth in length and varies among different populations of the same species or within the same species. The correlation coefficients (r) indicate the degree of association between length and weight of the fish. The high values of correlation coefficients in both sexes revealed that there is a perfect relationship between the length and total weight in
G. filamentosus. Negative allometric growth for females, males and indeterminate fish, exhibited that they tend to become thinner as they grow larger. Similarly, the negative allometric pattern for all groups (females, males and indeterminate) has also been observed in same species,
G. filamentosus from Vembanad, India (Kurup and Samuel, 1987).
Golikatte (2002) found that on the basis of Gonado-Somatic Index (GSI), it was found convenient to divide the annual cycle of reproduction of
G. filamentosus into three phases along Karnataka coast, the pre-spawning period (March to June) characterised by high GSI values, spawning period (July to September) characterised by sharp decrease in weight of the gonads and post spawning period (October to February) characterised by progressive growth in weight of the gonads. They stated that the pattern of fluctuation of relative condition factor during different months of the year seemed identical in males and females of
G. filamentosus. The fluctuation in condition factor of both the sexes could be attributed to reproductive cycle or feeding intensity in the present study. The present study on the seasonal variation in the condition of males and females showed that the Kn values were more or less similar in both the sexes, thus indicating almost equal metabolic activity. The lowest values of females (0.8871) and males (0.6977) were noted in September 2010 which may be related to spawning of the fish. It is in agreement with the decrease in weight of the gonads in this month (spawning period) of
G. filamentosus from Sharavati estuary, Karnataka (Golikatte, 2002). But in September 2009, the Kn value was higher in both females (1.0107) and males (1.0192). There seems to be some relation in environmental factors and feeding habits in both the sexes.
Hart (1946) correlated fluctuations in the ponderal index with the attainment of maturity and spawning. Feeding intensity is not the probable cause for variation in ‘Kn’ value noticed during different months in male and female, since the feeding intensity was observed to be low in some months when the ‘Kn’ values were high. Hart (1946) observed that apart from seasonal variation there could be a secondary variation related to the length of the fish. However, with increase in age there could be a lower level of condition through the seasonal cycle consequent to the increased metabolic strain or spawning. Hence, it may be concluded that in
G. filamentosus from Mangalore region the changes in ‘Kn’ value may be in relation to some other reasons than reproductive cycle and feeding intensity.