Postoperatively all the animals were near normal and non weight bearing initially, but later started bear weight on the operated limb.
Radiographic observations
At 30
th day radiographic density was significantly high in group A (2 ±0) trailed by group C (1±0.51) and group B (1±0). The score for radiographic density improved with time in all the three groups (Table 2). In autograft, the gap was almost filled with callus but complete union was lacking as compared to groups B and group C (Fig 2). Similar observations were made by the study of
Gomes (2011), in radiographs after 21 days of surgery with no bone callus bridging. Remodelling was not found in initial stage of fracture repair in any of the groups by day 30, because of action of osteoblastic cells
(Lieberman et al., 2002). At 60
th day, higher radiographic density in groups A and C could again be attributed to enhanced osteogenesis occurring in these groups as compared to group B. These results were matching with gross healing, where in, the group A and C scaffolds were minimally distinguished with moderate amount of integration with host bone, whereas in group B, scaffolds were considerably perceptible (Fig 3). This finding correlated with the study of
Caporali (2006), where in bone callus was mostly noted near to the ulnar margin at 60 days. In group A, complete remodelling was seen, whereas, animals of groups B and C showed less remodelling. Scaffold started to become more radiolucent, which is a sign of scaffold resorption and remodelling. In an ideal osteoconduction process grafted bone slowly gets resorbed and replaced by new bone
(Yildirim et al., 2001). At the end of observation period (90
th day), radiographic density value was noted highest in group A (3±0) followed by group C (2±0.52) and group B (2±0). However, no significant difference was seen between groups C and B at all the intervals. Grossly at 90 days, seeded graft was superior to acellular graft however no significant difference was found (Table 4). Irregular callus was seen in most of the animals of group A, whereas in groups B and C soft callus (Fig 3). The radiopacity gradually decreased at 90
th day interval as compared to 60
th day in groups B and C (Fig 2). This may be due to gradual loss of graft material
(Caporali et al., 2006). The radiographic density at gap and intercortical junction had increased and periosteal reaction subsided overall. Among all the groups, groups A and C showed the highest reduction in bone defect as compared to group B. This can be attributed to provision of a prompt supply of osteogenic progenitor cells at the grafted area resulting in osteogenesis (
Burwell, 1985). In group A, complete remodelling was found and medullary canal formation was also seen. But remodelling was not completed in groups B and C. The incorporation of implanted bone scaffold may occur early or in later part of healing or may be prolonged without synthesis of new ostogenic tissue
(Choi et al., 1996).
Overall, Periosteal reaction was more intense in group A as compared to other groups, but it was observed less at 90
th day. A periosteal reaction occurs prominently in early part of bone healing and vanishes progressively (Table 3).
Synthesis of new bone formation occurs in reaction to any injury or stimuli to the periosteum (
Ved and Haller, 2002).
Histological observations
Histological evaluation and Median ±SD histological score of all the group of test animals on days 60 and 90 were given in Fig 4 and Table 5. Score of all parameters were added for total histological score. The total histological score at day 60 was significantly elevated in group A (9±0) trailed by groups C (5.5±0.81) and B (1.5±1.26).
The specimens of group A showed bony union, group C showed osteochondral union, while fibrous union was mainly evident in group B (Fig 4 A). Presence of pores in the scaffold, the newly formed bony tissue was easily identified from the host tissue in groups C and B. These results were similar to the study of
Wang (2010) on MSCs loaded tricalcium phosphate scaffold after 8 weeks of
in vivo implantation. Integration of graft into the host bone were maximum in groups C and A as compared to group B after 60 days, due to faster degradation of scaffold in group A than in group B. In group A, woven bone is seen due to progression of new bone growth. Active bone marrow formation and remodelling of graft was seen in group A. However, at day 60 in seeded graft, it started to appear and in acellular group bone marrow formation was still under progress in defect area (Fig 4 B 60 days). In group C, intense new bone formation was found in the edge of defect area as compared to group B, where the osteogenesis was noticed in the middle of defect. This results correlated with the work of
Kaveh (2010), in which they found that bone marrow seeded corticocancellous graft showed osteogenesis at the centre of graft, as compared to non seeded graft. Another study also suggested that bone synthesis in the middle region of implant was more pronounced in osteoblast containing processed bovine cancellous matrix in comparison to acellular
(Kneser et al., 2006). At day 90, there was significant difference between groups B and C. Complete organization of shaft was found in group A, but in seeded group union was found bony, followed by osteochondral to bony in group B (Fig 4 90C). Early calcification of grafted bone due to transformation of osteoblasts into osteocytes and liberation of Ca
2+ ion in the matrix was bringing about formation of bony union in control group and group C
(Breitbart et al., 2010). Neovascularisation was seen near the side of the graft and not at the edge of the graft, due to integration of graft to the host bone
(Hur et al., 2012). At host-graft junction intense osteoblastic activity and disintegrated scaffold were found in group C (Fig 4 C 90). Overall score for all histological parameters was highest for group A with reorganizing cortical bone formation and active red marrow formation with bony union. Seeded group was found better than acellular group in all parameters. This study suggested that composite grafts provide a better healing by new bone synthesis, less immunogenic and augmented integration to the host in comparison to acellular cancellous graft. Development of cell based bone grafting opens up new avenue for successful clinical use of composite graft for bone regenerations.