Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 4 (april 2021) : 463-468

Molecular Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Pattern of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in Mastitis Affected Dairy Cows

T. Ramasamy1,*, S. Keerthana1, M.R. Srinivasan1, D. Chandrasekar1, K. Porteen1, Anurag Borthakur1, A. Elamaran1, P. Sriram1
1Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai-600 007, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Ramasamy T., Keerthana S., Srinivasan M.R., Chandrasekar D., Porteen K., Borthakur Anurag, Elamaran A., Sriram P. (2020). Molecular Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Pattern of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in Mastitis Affected Dairy Cows . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(4): 463-468. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3972.
Background: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the latest challenges facing the scientific community. Raising the drug resistance is caused mainly by indiscriminate usage of antibiotics in human and animal subjects and the spread of antibiotic resistance between the two has an emerging global threat. Hence, current study aimed to study the antimicrobial resistance pattern and molecular detection of antibiotic resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli isolated from mastitis affected cows. 

Methods: Milk samples from mastitis affected cows were subjected to antibiotic sensitivity test and screened for presence of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli using differential growth media. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was done with the help of PCR by amplification of ‘nuc’ and ‘uspA’ gene respectively. MICs of Penicillin and Tetracycline were determined using microdilution method. 

Result: Antibiotic sensitivity pattern for Penicillin G, Ampicillin, Amoxycillin, Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamicin, Oxytetracycline, Tetracycline and Vancomycin were 74.19%, 100%, 93.50%, 61.29%, 29%, 35.48%, 9.70%, 9.70%, 70.96% and 70.96%  respectively. More than 87.90% of the S. aureus and 50% of the E. coli isolated were resistant to â-lactam antibiotics while 75% of the E.coli and 65.70% of the S. aureus isolated were resistant to Tetracycline antibiotics. The MICs of Penicillin for S.aureus and E.coli are 26.88 µg/ml and 13.54 µg/ml respectively and the MICs of Tetracycline for S. aureus and E. coli are 243.75 µg/ml and 960.93 µg/ml respectively which is 8-9 folds higher than the standard MICs. From the present study, it can be inferred that bovine mastitis cases are highly resistant to antimicrobial drugs. Results further indicate that Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli are both resistant to Penicillin and Tetracycline with very high MIC.  
Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most formidable challenges facing the scientific community (Ventola, 2015; Bilal et al., 2018). Owing to the indiscriminate usage of antibiotics in human and animal subjects, the problem of antibiotic resistance has only worsened and there isn’t much forthcoming as a way of a solution to this growing concern (Malik and Bhattacharyya, 2019). Even though the causes for emergence of antibiotic resistance are multifarious, there is wealth of evidence to suggest that milk consumption from cows that have been treated with antibiotics and are still within the withdrawal time period contributes significantly to the development of antimicrobial resistance in human beings (Sharma et al., 2018). Mastitis is one of the most commonly diagnosed infectious diseases in dairy cows and causes significant economic loss to the farmers (Singh et al., 2018; Chandrasekharan et al., 2014; Saini et al., 2012). Studies indicate that farmers across different parts of the country have incurred severe financial losses owing to outbreak of mastitis. (Sinha et al., 2014; Jingar et al., 2017). A wide range of organisms have been implicated in the occurrence of mastitis, chief among them being Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (Cremonesi et al., 2006; Clermont et al., 2000; Oliveira et al., 2000). Antibiotic therapy has been the mainstay in the treatment and control of mastitis. However, owing to their indiscriminate usage, emergence of resistance against a variety of antibiotics poses significant challenge for the clinicians and scientists alike (Kappeli et al., 2019; Igbinosa et al., 2016). Inappropriate usage of antimicrobials such as improper dose, drug or duration contributes the most to the increase in antimicrobial resistance without improving the outcome of treatment (Chandrasekaran et al., 2014). In view of the need to reduce antibiotic resistance and develop appropriate strategies in antibiotic usage, the present study has been undertaken to determine the antibiotic sensitivity pattern, molecular detection of antibiotic resistance gene and MICs to help us in our choice of antibiotics and determine drug resistance pattern.
Study area
 
The present study was carried out in the department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai-600007. The samples were collected from the Large Animal Medicine Unit, Department of Clinics, Madras Veterinary College Hospital, TANUVAS, Chennai-600 007. The study was conducted between January 2018 and March 2019.
 
Antimicrobial sensitivity testing
 
The milk samples were collected from mastitis affected cows following strict aseptic conditions. California Mastitis Test was used as a screening test for mastitis. The sensitivity of the isolates to various antibiotics was performed using disc diffusion method.  The disc diffusion method was performed using the procedure followed by Pu et al., (2014).
 
Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus
 
Bacteriological examination of the milk sample was carried out within 24 hrs of collection of the milk sample. Nutrient broth was prepared and 10 ml was transferred into sterile test tubes, autoclaved, cooled and stored. Milk swab was dipped in 10 ml of nutrient broth containing test tube, plugged with cotton and incubated at 37°C for 18 hrs. The inoculum was streaked onto aseptically prepared Mannitol Salt Agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 16-20 hrs. Growth of yellow coloured colonies indicated the presence of Staphylococcus organisms. The test was performed following the procedure of Kampf et al., (1998) with certain modifications. The isolates were stored in 50% glycerol solution in eppendroff tubes for further use.
 
Isolation and identification of Escherichia coli
 
Nutrient broth was prepared and 10 ml of it transferred to sterile test tube, autoclaved, cooled and then stored. The milk swab was dipped into 10 ml nutrient broth containing test tube, plugged with cotton and incubated at 37°C for 18 hrs. The inoculum was streaked onto Eosin Methylene Blue agar plates. Distinctive metallic green sheen on EMB indicates the presence of E.coli. The test was performed following the procedure of Horvath and Ropp (1974).
 
Biochemical tests
 
The isolated organisms were identified according to routine microbiological diagnostics, including cultural properties, catalase (Igbinosa et al., 2016) and coagulase (Boerlin, 2003), utilization of mannitol and triple sugar iron agar and gram staining.
 
Antibiotic susceptibility
 
It was determined by the standardized agar diffusion test on Muller-Hinton agar (HiMedia) using the following disks (HiMedia): ampicillin (10mcg), amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (20/10mcg), azithromycin (15mcg), ciprofloxacin (5mcg), cefuroxime (30mcg), ceftriaxone (30mcg), gentamicin (10mcg), penicillin-G (10U), oxytetracycline (30mcg), tetracycline (30mcg), vancomycin (30mcg). Isolates were classified as susceptible and resistant based upon interpretative criteria developed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2005).
 
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
 
Microdilution method modified with resazurin dye as a redox indicator was utilized to determine the MIC value of resistant drugs. Inoculum was prepared by suspending overnight agar plate cultures of the isolates in sterile normal saline equivalent of 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. The resazurin solution was prepared by dissolving 0.002g of resazurin powder (HiMedia) in 100mL of distilled water. The method was followed as reported by Sarkar et al., (2007) with slight modifications.
 
Plates were prepared under aseptic conditions. A sterile 96 well plate was labeled. A volume of 25µL of the broth medium was pipetted into columns 2 to 9, 10 and 12 of every row. To all other wells in the same row and to the second column, a volume of 25µL of the highest concentration of the drug was added. Serial dilutions were done from the second well to the ninth well by pipetting out 25µL from each well. The last 25µL from the ninth well was discarded. 100µL of the inoculum diluted to 0.5 McFarland standard was added to all the wells other than columns 10 and 11 which acted as the negative control for the media and the drug dilutions; 100µL of un-inoculated broth was added to the tenth and the eleventh wells instead. After incubating the well plate for 24 hours at 35±2°C, 5µL of 0.002% resazurin was added to all wells and was further incubated at 37°C for 3 hours.
 
DNA extraction for PCR analysis
 
DNA extraction was done by methods suggested by Fang and Goran (2003). A bacterial suspension prepared from a loopful of colonies from an overnight agar culture was prepared in 100µL of Nuclease free water. The suspension was boiled at 100 for 5 minutes and was chilled immediately at -20°C for 10 minutes. The clear supernatant obtained by centrifuging the chilled suspension at 10,000 rpm for 2 minutes served as the template for PCR reactions.
 
PCR analysis
 
Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the mecA, tetK, tetM, blaSHV and tetB genes were carried out using the primers and the respective amplifications program. Reaction was performed in a final volume of 25µL of mixture containing 12.5µL of Master Mix (AmpliconTaqPol), 1µL each of the forward and reverse primer, 3µL of the template DNA and 7.5µL of nuclease free water. The products were analyzed by electrophoresis through 1.2% agarose gel. The PCR was carried out using appropriate protocol (Garibyan and Avashia, 2014). The primer sequences for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli and their resistant genes are depicted in Table 1, 3, 4. The cyclic conditions of Polymerase Chain Reaction for uspA and nuc gene is depicted in Table 2 and for amplification of resistance gene in Table 5.
 

Table 1: Primer sequences flanking the genes used for identification of E. coli and S. aureus.


 

Table 2: Cyclic conditions for Polymerase Chain Reaction of uspA and nuc gene.


 

Table 3: Primer sequences of E. coli antibiotic resistance genes.


 

Table 4: Primer sequences of Staphylococcus aureus antibiotic resistance genes.


 

Table 5: PCR cyclic conditions for the amplification of resistance genes.

Isolation, identification and molecular characterization
 
The phenotypic and biochemical analysis shows 100% and 94% prevalence respectively for S. aureus and the genotypic prevalence of S. aureus was found to be 12.9%. The prevalence of E. coli was found to be 12.9% based on the phenotypic test and 100% on biochemical test. The genotypic analysis reports 50% prevalence for E. coli. The results were found to be similar to earlier studies conducted by Chandrasekaran et al., (2014). The results accumulated from the tests are depicted in Table 6.
 

Table 6: The results of biochemical and genotypic confirmation tests.


 
Antibiotic sensitivity testing
 
The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of S. aureus and E. coli isolates from mastitis specimens against antimicrobial agents of different classes were found to be highly variable. Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern showed that the isolates were resistant to Ampicillin, Amoxicillin and Penicillin-G, Tetracycline and Oxytetracycline, Vancomycin, intermediately sensitive to Azithromycin and sensitive to Gentamicin, Enrofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin. There is abundant evidence to corroborate the emergence of resistance of penicillin and tetracycline for both Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (Foster, 2017; Ragbelti et al., 2016; Arabzadeh et al., 2018). The emergence of resistance can be ascribed to indiscriminate antibiotic usage and non-compliance to the recommended dose regimens. The antibiotic sensitivity pattern is depicted in Fig 1 and 2.
 

Fig 1: Antibiotic sensitivity profile of Staphylococcus aureus.


 

Fig 2: Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Escherichia coli.


 
Minimum inhibitory concentration
 
The MIC values of Penicillin against S. aureus and E. coli were found to be 26.90µg/ml and 13.54µg/ml respectively and the MIC values of Tetracycline against S. aureus and E. coli were 243.75µg/ml and 960.93µg/ml respectively. The data generated has been depicted in Table 7.
 
Polymerase chain reaction
 
The genotypic analysis of the antibiotic resistance in isolated microorganisms has brought forward the prevalence pattern of resistance genes in them. The prevalence resistance genes in S. aureus was 51.67% tet (K), 67.7%, tet (M) for tetracycline and 87.09% mec (A) for penicillin. In E. coli isolates the prevalence of resistance genes were recoded to be 50% for blaSHV and 75% for tet (B). Tetracyclines exert their antimicrobial effect by binding to the 30S ribosome and thereby preventing protein sysnthesis. Bacterial resistance to tetracycline is most commonly mediated by energy-dependent pumping of tetracycline out of the bacterial cell (Karami et al., 2006). The most common resistance mechanism of Escherichia coli to tetracycline is through energy dependent efflux pump which is encoded by tetA, tetB, tetC, tetD and tetG, with tetA and tetBgenes (Olowe et al., 2013). The resistance of Escherichia coli to tetracycline may be attributed to the presence of tetB gene which was detected in the current study with the help of PCR with a prevalence rate of 75%. Staphylococcus aureus acquires resistance to tetracycline by active efflux, resulting from the acquisition of the plasmid-located tetK and tetM genes (Emaneini et al., 2013).. In the current study, presence of tetK and tetM gene were detected by using PCR with a prevalence rate of 51.61% and 67.7% respectively. The resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to tetracycline can be ascribed to the efflux pump encoded by tetK and tetM genes. In Staphylococcus aureus, biosynthesis of the peptidoglycan is accomplished by the membrane-bound enzymes known as penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) (Sauvage et al., 2008). Staphylococcal resistance to penicillin is usually conferred by the acquisition of a non-native gene encoding a penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a), with significantly lower affinity for β-lactams. (Peacock et al., 2015)  High-level resistance to methicillin is caused by the mecA gene, which encodes an alternative penicillin-binding protein, PBP 2a (Weilders et al., 2002). Detection of mecA gene in the Staphylococcus aureus isolates leads us to presume that some of the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to Penicillin G may be owing to the alternative penicillin binding protein, PBP 2a synthesis. Each bla gene of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli was further subtyped to be blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-104, blaTEM-1 and blaSHV-12 which are responsible for conferring resistance to Beta lactam antibiotics (Ombarak et al., 2018).  In the present study, blaSHV gene was detected in Escherichia coli with a prevalence rate of 50% using PCR technique. The resistance of Escherichia coli to penicillin may be attributed to the presence of blaSHV gene which confers resistance by production of beta lactamase enzyme.The results of the PCR are depicted in Table 8 and 9, Fig 3, 4, 5 and 6.
 

Fig 3: Agarose gel electrophoresis of uspA gene PCR product for confirmation of E. coli.


 

Fig 4: Agarose gel electrophosed nuc gene PCR.


 

Fig 5: Agarose gel electrophoresed blaSHV gene product.


 

Fig 6: Agarose gel electrophoresed tet(K) gene product.



Table 8: Prevalence of genes in S. aureus.



Table 9: Prevalence of genes in E. coli.

From the current study, it can be concluded that mastitis in dairy cows are highly resistant to various antimicrobial drugs.  Present study further indicates Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli are both resistant to Penicillin and Tetracycline with very high MIC. There is a need to carry out further studies in this direction to better understand the resistance pattern of these antibiotics and also arrive at a dosage regimen.
Authors are thankful to the Professor and Head, Department of Clinics, Madras Veterinary College Teaching Hospital, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tami Nadu, India for providing the facilities required to conduct this study.

  1. Arabzadeh, F., Aeini, F., Keshavarzi, F., Behrvash S. (2018). Resistance to Tetracycline and Vancomycin of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Sanandaj Patients by Molecular Genotyping. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 6(4): 1-5.

  2. Bilal, A., Wei, W., Muhammad, I., Mohsin, K., Saima, M., Muhammad, H.R., Muhammad, A.N., et al. (2018). Antibiotic Resistance: A rundown of a global crisis. Infection and Drug Resistance. 11: 1645-1658.

  3. Boerlin, P., Peter, K., Hussy, D., Schaellibaum, M. (2003) Methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in cases of bovine mastitis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 41(2): 767-71. 

  4. Chandrasekaran, D., Venkatesan, P., Tirumurugaan, K.G., Nambi, A.P., Thirunavukkarasu P S, Kumanan K, Vairamuthu S, Ramesh S. (2014). Pattern of Antibiotic Resistant Mastitis in Dairy Cows. Veterinary World. 7(6): 389–394. 

  5. Clermont, O., Stephane, B., Edouard, B., Phane, B. (2000). Rapid and Simple Determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 10: 4555-58. 

  6. Cremonesi, P., Castiglioni, B., Malferrari, G., Biunno, I., Vimercati, C., Moroni, P., Morandi, S., Luzzana, M. (2006). Technical note: improved method for rapid DNA extraction of mastitis pathogens directly from milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 89(1): 163-69. 

  7. Emaneini, M., Bigverdi, R., Kalantar, D., Soroush, S., Jabalameli, F., Khoshgnab, B.N., Asadollahi, P., Taherikalani, M. (2013). Distribution of genes encoding tetracycline resistance and aminoglycoside modifying enzymes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a burn center. Annals of Burns and Fire Disaster. 26(2): 76-80.

  8. Fang, H. and Goran, H. (2003). Rapid screening and identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples by selective-broth and real-time PCR assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 41(7): 2894-99. 

  9. Foster, T.J. (2017). Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 41(3): 430-449. 

  10. Garibyan, L. and Avashia, N. (2014). Research techniques made simple: Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 133(3): e6.

  11. Horvath, R.S. and Ropp, M.E. (1974). Mechanism of action of Eosin Methylene Blue Agar in the differentiation of Escherichia coli and Enterobacter aerogenes. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 24(2): 221-224.

  12. Igbinosa, E.O., Abeni, B., Lucy, U.A., Faith, E.O., Owen, O.I. (2016). Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other Staphylococcus species in raw meat samples intended for human consumption in Benin City, Nigeria: Implications for Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 13(10): 949-60.

  13. Jingar, S.C., Mahendra, S., Roy, A.K. (2017) Economic losses due to clinical mastitis in cross-bred cows. Dairy and Veterinary Sciences. 3(2): 555606. DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2017.03.555606.

  14. Kampf, G., Lecke, C., Cimbal, A.K., Weist, K., Ruden, H. (1998). Evaluation of mannitol salt agar for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by Disk Diffusion and Agar Screening. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 36 (8): 2254-2257.

  15. Kappeli, N., Morach, M., Zurfluh, K., Corti, S., Inderbinen, N.M., Stephan, R. (2019). Sequence types and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Streptococcus uberis isolated from bovine mastitis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

  16. Karami, M., Nowrouzian, F., Alderberth, I., Wold, A.E. (2006). Tetracycline Resistance in Escherichia coli and persistence in the infantile colonic microbiota. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 50(1): 156-161.

  17. Malik, B. and Bhattacharyya, S. (2019). Antibiotic drug-resistance as a complex system driven by socio-economic growth and antibiotic misuse. Scientific Reports.

  18. Oliveira, A.P., De, J.L., Watts, S.A., Aarestrup, F.M. (2000). Anti-microbial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Europe and the United States. Journal of Dairy Science. 83(4): 855-62. 

  19. Olowe, O.A., Idris, O.J., Taiwo, S.S. (2013) Prevalence of tet genes mediating tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Osun State, Nigeria. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology. 3(2): 135-140.

  20. Ombarak, R.A., Hinenoya, A., Elbagory, A.M., Yamasaki, S. (2018). Prevalence and molecular characterization of antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from raw milk and raw milk cheese in Egypt. Journal of Food Protection. 81 (2): 226-232.

  21. Peacock, S.J. and Peterson, G.K. (2015). Mechanisms of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 84: 577-601.

  22. Pu, W., Su, Y., Li, J., Li, C., Yang, Z., Deng, H. (2014). High incidence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-Positive staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) associated with bovine mastitis in China. PLoS ONE. 9:e88134.

  23. Ragbelti, C., Parlak, M., Bayram, Y., Guducuoglu, H., Ceylan, N. (2016). Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates in years. Interdisciplinary Perspective on Infectious Diseases. Article ID 9171395.

  24. Saini, V., McClure, J. T., Léger, D., Keefe, G. P., Scholl, D.T., Morck, D.W., Barkema, H. W. (2012). Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Common Mastitis Pathogens on Canadian Dairy Farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 95(8): 4319-32. 

  25. Sarker, S.D., Lutfun, N., Yashodharan, K. (2007). Microtitre plate-based antibacterial assay incorporating resazurin as an indicator of cell growth and its application in the in vitro antibacterial screening of phytochemicals. Methods. 42 (4): 321-24. 

  26. Sauvage, E., Kerff, F., Terrak, M., Ayala, J.A., Charlier, P. (2008). The penicillin-binding proteins: structure and role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiological Reviews. 32: 234-258.

  27. Sharma, C., Rokana, N., Chandra, M., Singh, B.P., Gulhane, R.D., Gill JPS, Puniya AK, Panwar H. (2018). Antimicrobial resistance: Its surveillance, impact and alternative management strategies in dairy animals. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 4(237): 1- 27.

  28. Singh, K., Chandra, M., Kaur, G., Narang, D., Gupta, D.K. (2018). Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern among the mastitis causing microorganisms. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 8: 54-64.

  29. Sinha, M., Thombare, N.N., Mondal, B. (2014). Subclinical mastitis in dairy animals. Incidence, Economics and predisposing factors. Scientific World Journal, Article ID 523984.

  30. Ventola, L.C. (2015). Antibiotic resistance Crisis. Pharmacology and Toxicology. 40 (4): 277-283.

  31. Weilders, C.L.C., Fluit, A.C., Brisse, S., Verhoef, J., Schmitz, F.J. (2002). Mec a gene is widely disseminated in Staphylococcus aureus population. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 40 (11): 3970-3975.

Editorial Board

View all (0)