Gene and genotype frequencies
The PCR-RFLP pattern for 422 bp product of exon 2 and 3 of GH gene using the restriction enzyme
Hae III yielded two alleles resulting in three genotypes. The variant with no restriction site was scored as B type and the one having one restriction site with 366bp and 56bp was scored A-type. The band pattern of the three genotypes are presented in Fig 1 and Fig 2 respectively. The details of the gene and genotype frequencies are presented in Table 1. The test of homogeneity of both the population with respect to genotypes revealed that both the population had significantly (P<0.05) different genotypic frequencies. In other word, it can be suggested that Ganjam goat population had higher percentages of heterozygotes as compared to the Baigani goat population.
Out of the 100 Ganjam goats, 17 were of AA, 75 of AB and 8 were of BB genotype with corresponding genotype frequency of 0.17, 0.75 and 0.08 respectively. The allele frequency for ‘A’ and ‘B’ were 0.55 and 0.45 respectively. In Baigani goats the frequency for A and B alleles were 0.46 and 0.54 respectively and the genotype frequency was 0.15, 0.63 and 0.22 for AA, AB and BB respectively. The allele frequencies of A and B alleles reported in this study were in agreement with the studies of
Singh et al., (2015) where frequency of A and B alleles were 0.41 and 0.59 in Sirohi goats and 0.45 and 0.55 in Barbari goats. In Ganjam goats the frequency of ‘A’ allele was more than ‘B’ allele where as in Baigani goats frequency of B allele is high. Similarly the allele frequency of intermediate range (A allele: 0.5812 and B allele: 0.4188) was also reported by
Hua et al., (2009) in a Boer goat population. Similar allelic frequencies of 0.620 for A allele was reported by
Alakilli et al., (2012) in Barki goats.
Othman et al., (2015) also obtained gene frequencies of similar range in Egyptian goat breeds. The polymorphic variants of GH gene have also been reported in Malabari goats by
Chitra et al., (2004) using PCR-RFLP. Polymorphism in different exons of GH gene has been reported in Black Bengal goats by
Gupta et al., (2007), in Sirohi goats by
Kumar et al., (2008), in Jakhrana goats by
Gupta et al., (2009) and in a crossbred goat population by
An et al., (2010) using PCR-SSCP.
Association of genotypes with morphometric traits
The means for growth and morphometric trait such as Body weight (kg), Body length (cm), Wither height (cm), Chest girth (cm), Brisket height (cm), Head length (cm), Horn length (cm), Ear length (cm), Tail length (cm), Rump height (cm), Rump width (cm) and neck Circumference (cm) are presented in Table 2 for the three genotypes and in Table 3 for both the breeds. In all the twelve morphometric traits Ganjam goats had significantly (P<0.01) higher values than the Baigani goats, whereas head length was only significantly (P<0.03) greater than Baigani goats. Rump width was the only exception where no significant difference was observed between the two goat populations. The comparison of trend suggested that Baigani is smaller as compared to Ganjam goats.
AB genotypes had slightly higher values in most of the morphometric traits studied as compared to AA and BB genotypes, though the superiority was statistically not significant. Similar observations were reported by
Singh et al., (2015) in Sirohi and Barbari goats for body length at all ages. Similar findings were reported by
Wickramaratne et al., (2010) in Sangamneri goats for different regions of GH gene.
Hua et al., (2009) reported non-significant effect of genotypes on birth weight, body length, birth height, chest girth at birth, body weight at eleven month. However, he reported significant effect of genotype on chest girth at birth and weaning weight. Similarly
Zhang et al., (2008) in Nanjiang Huang goats,
Deng et al., (2010) in Xinong Saanen goats reported significant association of GH gene with body length at different ages. The differences in the performance of different genotypes might be due to the differential expression of the genotypes in different environmental situations and complex genotype-environment interactions.
The associations of the genotypes studied with types traits such as head profile, body coat colour pattern, ear type and horn type were presented in Table 4. It revealed that genotypes were significantly associated with head profile and horn types of the animals whereas there was no significant association of genotypes with coat colour profile and ear types of the animals.