Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 4 (april 2021) : 451-456

Probiotic Attributes of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 Isolated from Yak Cottage Cheese and the Impact of Its Feeding on Growth, Immunity, Caecal Microbiology and Jejunal Histology in the Starter Phase of Broiler Birds

Geeta1, Ajit S.Yadav1,*, Suchismita Pradhan1, Ravi Rajoria1, Asok Kumar M1, Gopi M1, Naveen Kumar Navani1, Ranjana Pathania1
1ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Bareilly-243 122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Cite article:- Geeta, S.Yadav Ajit, Pradhan Suchismita, Rajoria Ravi, M Kumar Asok, M Gopi, Navani Kumar Naveen, Pathania Ranjana (2020). Probiotic Attributes of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 Isolated from Yak Cottage Cheese and the Impact of Its Feeding on Growth, Immunity, Caecal Microbiology and Jejunal Histology in the Starter Phase of Broiler Birds . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(4): 451-456. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3970.
Background: The discovery of antibiotics was a great success in control of the pathogenic infections in living beings. In addition, it also played a significant role in upliftment of the meat industry with their use as the growth promoters in the food animals including poultry. However, massive and incorrect use of antibiotics has resulted in the adverse outcome of antibiotic resistance over the years. In order to limit the antibiotic resistance at industry level itself, exploration of the possible alternatives such as probiotics is the need of the hour to replace the antibiotics in poultry industry without compromising the productivity. Hence, the present study was conducted to explore the effects of a novel probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 on the production performance of the broilers with an aim to replace the antibiotics in poultry production. 

Methods: In the present study, a total of 128 broiler birds were grouped randomly into four treatment groups which were fed basal diet (BD) along with the different levels of L. fermentum NKN51,viz.,T1 (BD+107cfu/gm), T2(BD+106cfu/gm), T3 (BD+105cfu/gm) and T4 or control (BD only) for a period of 28 days so as to observe the effect of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 in the starter phase of the broiler birds in terms of growth, immunity, gut health and physiology.

Result: The result revealed that the group of broiler birds supplemented with Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 at the level of 107cfu/gm of basal feed had significantly better growth performance, cell mediated and humoral immunity, gut health and jejunal histology in terms of villus height, VH:CD ratio and intestinal absorption capacity. Thus, Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 was found as an ideal probiotic supplement exhibiting better potential in enhancing the efficiency of broiler birds in terms of improved productivity.
Augmentation in the perception of society towards the scientific acquaintance has led the people to turn out to be more vigilant concerning their health aspects. Therefore, the demand for animal protein has also increased in recent years. Poultry meat, being the most widely accepted world wide with no religious taboos, is well known for its specific taste, flavor and low-fat virtues. After the discovery of antibiotics, the poultry industry flourished more with their use as growth promoters in poultry production. Since decades, the antibiotics have been an imperative part of poultry production as a growth promoter (AGPs) but the extravagant use of these has resulted in amplified trouble of antibiotic resistance (Furtula et al., 2010; Forgetta et al., 2012), which eventually influences living beings in terms of their health issues (Diarra et al., 2010). Thus, with the ultimate aim of reducing resistance development in bacterial pathogens, there is an urgent need to look for such alternatives, which can be utilized as growth-promoters in broilers in addition to the ability to control pathogenic infections in them.
 
Therefore, the exploration of the probiotic bacteria in the current scenario is the need of the hour for their further expedition as an alternative to antibiotics in the poultry industry. Among the probiotics, genus Lactobacillus is the most common group of probiotic bacteria to be used widely in the industry today. Although the probiotic properties of genus Lactobacillus, the natural gut inhabitants with GRAS status (Generally Recognized as Safe) are well known to researchers but even after being used extensively in the food industry, various inconsistent and adverse reports regarding the use of probiotic at some point of time are not uncommon, which may be as a result of lack of the information at genetic level itself (Sharma et al., 2018). Thus, at present, it becomes elemental to have a detailed study regarding the use of the respective probiotic bacteria with some known genetic properties before introducing into an animal model. L. fermentum, a promising probiotic bacterium, has undergone various research studies and is found to be bestowed with the various functional attributes which can be utilized for further application from a scientific point of view. Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51, a novel probiotic, isolated from Yak cottage cheese by IIT, Roorkee, India is reported to have a novel phytase, PhyLf of class PTP that can enhance the bioaccessibility of mineral ions. Its resistance to oxidative environment and gastric milieu along with the capability of releasing micronutrients are distinctive attributes of PhyLf which depicts a valid point for its further use in ameliorating the nutritional value of cereals and animal feed (Sharma et al., 2018). The present study was thus conducted to explore the effects of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 on performance parameters of slow-growing broilers including growth, immunity and gut physiology in their starter phase so as to address the wellbeing of the poultry birds with improved gut physiological conditions leading to better utilization of nutrients for maximum gains without the use of antibiotics.
The present study was conducted at the division of Post-Harvest Technology, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar in the year 2019 with due consent from the Institute’s Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC). A total of one hundred and twenty-eight day-old broiler chicks (n=128) of CARIBRO-VISHAL were procured from broiler farm, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, India, which were allotted randomly in four experimental groups in a completely randomized design (CRD). Each treatment group included 4 replicates with 8 chicks in each making a total of 32 chicks per treatment group. The broiler birds were raised under the standardized conditions of a deep litter system using paddy husk as a litter material with a floor space provision of 0.5-1 square ft per bird. Initially, the birds were provided with 23 hrs light with the light intensity of 3-4 foot-candle which was then reduced up to 16-18 hours with the light intensity of 0.5-1 foot-candle. On the first day, the brooding temperature was maintained around 95 °F which was then reduced 3-5 °F weekly till it reached 70 °F. The birds were reared for a period of 28 days to assess the effect of feeding of L. fermentum NKN51 in slow-growing broilers in the early phase of life (pre-starter and starter period). The culture of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 was isolated from Yak cottage cheese samples of Himachal Pradesh by the Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India and was revitalized with the use of MRS broth and agar. Each of the four treatment groups were fed different levels of Lactobacillus fermentum along with the basal feed i.e. T1 (basal feed + L. fermentum @ 107 cfu/gm of feed), T2 (basal feed + L. fermentum @ 106 cfu/gm of feed), T3 (basal feed + L. fermentum @ 105 cfu/gm of feed) and T4 (basal feed only). The Twas served as the control group. The components of the basal diet have been summarized in Table 1 (Mandal et al., 2013). During the experimental period of 28 days, growth performance parameters including weekly body weight, feed intake and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were evaluated. The in-vivo cell-mediated immunity response was evaluated as per the methodology of Cheng and Lamont (1988) on 25th  day post-hatch (n=8) as a response to phyto-haemagglutinin type P (PHA-P), whereas the humoral immunity was evaluated by using the method of Siegel and Gross (1980) with slight modification by injecting 1 ml of 1% sheep RBC suspension intravenously at 22nd  day post-hatch in broilers (n=8). On the 28th day (5 days post-immunization), 2 ml of blood was collected from the jugular vein, after which, immune serum was harvested and determination of antibody titer was done by haemagglutination test (HA) in which, the reciprocal of the highest dilution showing clear agglutination was taken as the end titer which was expressed as log2. Further, the gut microbiology was conducted as per the methodology of Tatini et al., (1984), where samples (n=8) of the caecal contents were serially diluted in 0.85% sterile saline solution to evaluate the Lactobacillus, total plate and E. coli counts using lactobacilli MRS agar, plate count agar and EMB agar, respectively.  The colony counts were noted from the countable dilutions and were expressed as log10 value of colony forming units per gram of intestinal contents (log10 cfu/g). In addition to these parameters, jejunal histomorphometry was also done for each of the treatment groups (n=8) to measure villus height, villus width, crypt depth, crypt width, villus height-crypt depth ratio and intestinal absorptive surface area. The formula used for calculating the mean absorptive surface area as follows (Kisielinski et al., 2002).
 
M = (villus W x villus L) + (villus W/2 + crypt W/2)2- (villus W/2)2/ (villus W/2 + crypt W/2)
 
Where,
M = intestinal absorptive surface area, villus W = mean width of villi, villus L = mean length of villi and crypt W = mean width of crypts.

Table 1: Composition of the basal diet for broilers used in the experiment.


 
The data obtained for each of the parameters were subjected to test of significance by analysis of variance (one way ANOVA) as per the methodology of Snedecor and Cochran (1994) using IBM-SPSS software package. The statistical significance was expressed as P<0.05 using Duncan’s multiple comparison tests to compare means.
The key indicator for the wellbeing of broilers can certainly be attributed to their growth performance since their performance is straightly associated with their feed utilization efficiency. The novel findings in this experiment revealed that the supplementation of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 @ 107 cfu/gm i.e. Tin the feed of slow broiler chicks resulted in significant (P<0.05) improvement in growth performance parameters including body weight (Table 2) and feed conversion ratio (Table 3). These findings are in agreement with the previous studies (Walkunde et al., 2011; Bai et al., 2013; Zhang and Kim, 2014; Li et al., 2019).
 

Table 2: Effect of different levels of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 supplementation on weekly body weight (grams) in broilers (Mean±SE).


 

Table 3: Effect of different levels of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 supplementation on feed conversion ratio and feed intake in broilers (Mean±SE).


 
One of the most imperative attributes of probiotic bacteria is considered to be its effect on the immune response. In the present study, the birds of the treatment groups fed probiotics @ 107 cfu/gm i.e. T1 had significantly (P<0.05) better cell-mediated and humoral immunity as compared to that of the control group (Table 4). These results are in agreement with the results of Fathi et al., (2017), describing that the dietary supplementation of probiotics imparted the positive response towards the serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and cell-mediated immunity as compared to that of the control, however, the immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin Y (IgY) were also improved but not significantly. The satisfactory immune response of dietary probiotics in broilers was also supported by other recent studies too (Seidavi et al., 2017). According to earlier studies, there is a close association between the microbiota of the gut and the intestinal immune system (Gabriel et al., 2006; Applegate et al., 2010). In another study conducted by Park et al., (2018), it was stated that the genome of L. fermentum constitutes candidate genes involved in the immune mechanism. The oral supplementation of L. fermentum can augment innate and adaptive immune cell generation, trafficking and function in the host (Westfall et al., 2018).
 

Table 4: Effect of different levels of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 supplementation on cell-mediated and humoral immunity in broilers (Mean±SE).


 
With the supplementation of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 in broiler feeding, the total plate and E.coli counts were found to be reduced significantly (P<0.05) as compared to that of the control group fed basal diet only, however, the Lactobacillus count was significantly (P<0.05) higher in probiotic fed broiler groups (Table 5). These results are in agreement with the results of Smulikowska et al., (2005) who documented that a probiotic in diets decreased the fecal microflora of broiler chickens. A comparable conclusion was presented by Gunal et al., (2006) explaining that the counts of these microbes were affected (P<0.05) by dietary treatments such as probiotic mixture. The decrease in the microbial count recovered from the faecal matter of chickens fed with Lactobacillus may have been attributable to the lactic acid production or production of antimicrobial substances and these were accredited to the concept of competitive exclusion of pathogens. Further, Yun et al., (2017) also concluded that faecal Lactobacillus count was found significantly higher in broilers fed probiotic as compared to control; however, there was no significant difference in the E. coli counts.  In contrast, Cengiz et al., (2015) proclaimed that the dietary probiotic supplementation in broilers did not affect the population of gut microflora.
 

Table 5: Effect of different levels of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 supplementation on gut microbiology in broilers (Mean±SE).


 
Further, supplementation of L. fermentum in broiler feed significantly (P<0.05) improved the villus height, villus width and villus height-crypt depth ratio thus enhancing the nutrient absorption capacity of the intestine (Table 6), which is in agreement with the earlier research findings (Al-Baadani et al., 2016: Ding et al., 2019). Increased villus height and villus width contributed towards the better intestinal absorptive surface area in the L. fermentum fed groups exhibiting maximum nutrient absorption in groups fed L. fermentum @ 107cfu/gm of basal feed.
 

Table 6: Effect of different levels of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51 supplementation on jejunal histomorphology of broilers (Mean±SE).

Thus, the data obtained from the present study revealed that the incorporation of Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51, a novel probiotic in broiler diet @ 107cfu/gm of feed can impart the better weight gain, improved feed efficiency, enriched immune status including both cell-mediated as well as humoral immunity along with the boosted gut health assuring reduced level of microbes and better nutrients absorption capacity of intestine.

  1. Al-Baadani, H.H., Abudabos, A.M., Al-Mufarrej, S.I. and Alzawqari, M. (2016). Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on intestinal histological changes in challenged broiler chickens. South African Journal of Animal Science. 46: 157-65.

  2. Applegate, T.J., Klose, V., Steiner, T., Ganner, A. and Schatzmayr, G. (2010). Probiotics and phytogenics for poultry: Myth or reality. Journal of Applied Poultry Research.19: 194-210.

  3. Bai, S.P., Wu, A.M., Ding, X.M., Lei, Y., Bai, J., Zhang, K.Y. and Chio, J.S. (2013). Effects of probiotic-supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 92: 663-70.

  4. Cengiz, Ö., Köksal, B.H., Tatlý, O., Sevim, Ö., Ahsan, U., Üner, A.G., Ulutaº, P.A., Beyaz, D., et al (2015). Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora and stress indicators of broilers. Poultry Science. 94: 2395-403.

  5. Cheng, S. and Lamont, S.J. (1988). Genetic analysis of immunocompetence measures in a white leghorn chicken line. Poultry Science. 67: 989-95.

  6. Diarra, M.S., Rempel, H., Champagne, J., Masson, L., Pritchard, J. and Topp, E. (2010). Distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Enterococcus spp. and characterization of isolates from broiler chickens. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 76:8033-43.

  7. Ding, S., Wang, Y., Yan, W., Li, A., Jiang, H. and Fang, J. (2019). Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum 15-1 and fructooligosaccharides on the response of broilers to pathogenic Escherichia coli O78 challenge. PloS one. 14: 0222877.

  8. Fathi, M. M., Ebeid, T. A., Al-Homidan, I., Soliman, N. K. and Abou-Emera, O. K. (2017). Influence of probiotic supplementation on immune response in broilers raised under hot climate. British Poultry Science. 58: 512-6.

  9. Forgetta, V., Rempel, H., Malouin, F., Vaillancourt, Jr. R., Topp, E., Dewar, K. and Diarra, M. S. (2012). Pathogenic and multidrug-resistant Escherichia fergusonii from broiler chicken. Poultry Science. 91: 512-25.

  10. Furtula, V., Farrell, E. G., Diarrassouba, F., Rempel, H., Pritchard, J. and Diarra, M. S. (2010). Veterinary pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolates in poultry litter from commercial farms and controlled feeding trials. Poultry Science. 89(1): 180-8.

  11. Gabriel, I., Lessire, M., Mallet, S. and Guillot, J. F. (2006). Microflora of the digestive tract: critical factors and consequences for poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 62: 499-511.

  12. Gunal, M., Yayli, G., Kaya, O., Karahan, N. and Sulak, O. (2006). The effects of antibiotic growth promoter, probiotic or organic acid supplementation on performance, intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science. 5: 149-55.

  13. Kisielinski, K., Willis, S., Prescher, A., Klosterhalfen, B. and Schumpelick, V. (2002). A simple new method to calculate small intestine absorptive surface in the rat. Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2: 131-5.

  14. Li, A., Wang, Y., Suolang, S., Mehmood, K., Jiang, X., Zhang, L., Li, Z., Waqas, M., Iqbal, M., Basang, W. and Li, J. (2019). Isolation and identification of potential Bacillus probiotics from free-ranging yaks of tibetan plateau. China. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 39(3).

  15. Mandal, A. B., Raju, M. V., Elangovan, A.V., Bhanja, S. K. and Sahoo, S. K. (2013). ICAR–Nutrient Requirements of Poultry.

  16. Park, M. R., Ryu, S., Maburutse, B. E., Oh, N. S., Kim, S. H., Oh, S., Jeong, S. Y., Jeong, D. Y., Oh, S. and Kim, Y. (2018). Probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum strain JDFM216 stimulates the longevity and immune response of Caenorhabditis elegans through a nuclear hormone receptor. Scientific Reports. 8: 7441.

  17. Seidavi, A., Dadashbeiki, M., Alimohammadi-Saraei, M. H., van den Hoven,R., et al (2017). Effects of dietary inclusion level of a mixture of probiotic cultures and enzymes on broiler chickens immunity response. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 24: 4637-44.

  18. Sharma, R., Kumar, P., Kaushal, V., Das, R. and Navani, N. K. (2018). A novel protein tyrosine phosphatase like phytase from Lactobacillus fermentum NKN51: Cloning, characterization and application in mineral release for food technology applications. Bioresource Technology. 249: 1000-1008.

  19. Siegel, P. B. and Gross, W. B. (1980). Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep rythrocytes. Directional Selection. Poultry Science. 59: 1-5.

  20. Smulikowska, S., Slizewska, K., Biernasiak, J., Mieczkowska, A. and Michalowski, P. (2005). The effect of a probiotic composed of Lactobacillus and yeasts and of flavomycin on the performance and faecal microflora of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 14: 483.

  21. Snedecor, G. M. and Cochran, G. W. (1994). Statistical Methods. Affiliated East West Press. Iowa State University Press. Ames.

  22. Tatini, R. S., Hoover, G. D., Lachica, F. V. and Speck, M. L. (1984). Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Food. 33: 411-423.

  23. Walkunde, T. R., Adangale, S. B. and Deshmukh, A. R. (2011). Effect of effective micro-organism (probiotics) technology on growth performance of broiler. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 45(4): 318-321.

  24. Westfall, S., Lomis, N. and Prakash, S. (2018). Longevity extension in Drosophila through gut-brain communication. Scientific Reports. 8: 8362.

  25. Yun, W., Lee, D. H., Choi, Y. I., Kim, I. H. and Cho, J. H. (2017). Effects of supplementation of probiotics and prebiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, organ weight, fecal microbiota, blood profile and excreta noxious gas emissions in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 26: 584-92.

  26. Zhang, Z. F. and Kim, I. H. (2014). Effects of multistrain probiotics on growth performance, apparent ileal nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, cecal microbial shedding and excreta odor contents in broilers. Poultry Science. 93: 364-70.

Editorial Board

View all (0)