Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 4 (april 2021) : 474-478

Bacteriological and Molecular Identification and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from Different Affections of Canines

Sejal S. Chaudhary1, Harshad C. Chauhan1,*, Kishan Kumar Sharma1, Sandip S. Patel1, Sushil Kumar Mohapatra1, Arun C. Patel1, Mehul D. Shrimali1, Bharat Singh Chandel1
1Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Banaskantha-385 005, Gujarat, India.
Cite article:- Chaudhary S. Sejal, Chauhan C. Harshad, Sharma Kumar Kishan, Patel S. Sandip, Mohapatra Kumar Sushil, Patel C. Arun, Shrimali D. Mehul, Chandel Singh Bharat (2020). Bacteriological and Molecular Identification and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from Different Affections of Canines . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(4): 474-478. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3965.
Background: The present study was done to ascertain prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus from various canine affections in Banaskantha district of Gujarat, India. Along with this, use of classical and molecular techniques were compared in identification and virulence characterization of this pathogen.

Methods: A total of 165 samples were collected and bacterial identification was carried out with bacteriological (phenotypic) techniques and confirmed by genus specific 16S rDNA and Staphylococcus aureus specific sa442 gene based PCR. Isolates were characterized for coagulase production, haemolysis activity and presence of spa gene.  

Result: Samples yielded, 88 (53.33%) Staphylococcus spp. via bacteriological and PCR methods. Clinically, 19 (21.59%), 28 (31.82%), 12 (13.64%), 15 (17.04%) and 14 (15.91%) isolates were from abscess/wound, pyoderma, respiratory problems, eye infections and Otitis, respectively. A total of 46/88 (52.27%) isolates were confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus in PCR. In tube coagulase test, 51/88 (57.95%) isolates were found positive. A tota of 42 isolates revealed presence of coa gene, including two tube coagulase negative isolates. Haemolytic activity revealed beta (51.14%) gamma (31.82%), alpha (13.64%) and alpha-beta (3.41%) haemolysis, respectively. X-region of Protein A (spa gene) was detected in 26 /46 (56.52%) isolates in PCR.
In dogs, Staphylococci represent an important group of commensals of skin and mucosal membranes.  Coagulase-positive Staphylococci (CoPS), Staphylococcus aureus, S. intermedius (now S. pseudintermedius), S. delphini and S. schleiferi spp. coagulans constitute the most frequent causes of canine Staphylococcal infections. Conventionally, Staphylococcus spp. is identified and characterized on the basis of phenotypical properties using classical bacteriological techniques. But due to huge variation in phenotypic characteristics (Sanjiv et al., 2008) several genetic methods have been used in the identification of staphylococci, including 16S rDNA sequencing, PCR amplification of 16S–23SrDNA intergenic spacer, Real-time PCR of 16S-rDNA and species-specific PCR amplification via primers targeting 16S-rDNA or the sodA gene. Thus, PCR based diagnostics methods of pathogen identification have now become rapid, sensitive and reliable tools to resolve bacterial etiology of various conditions and accepted as “gold standard” (Sasaki et al., 2010).
 
Rapid and accurate typing of S. aureus is crucial to understand the transmission of this infectious organism. Here also molecular technologies have largely replaced the classical phenotypic characterization methods. Even among these molecular typing methods, coa (Coagulase) and spa (Protein A) gene amplification have been considered a simple and accurate method for typing due to the presence of polymorphic repeat region that can be used for differentiating S. aureus isolates. This typing method has significant advantages in terms of speed, ease of use, standardization and reproducibility as compared to the MLST method and other techniques. ( Khichar et al., 2012).

In the present communication, we have determined the association of Staphylococcus spp. as an etiological agent of skin and other affections of dogs and further it was specifically identified and characterized via both bacteriological and molecular techniques to emphasize the growing importance of molecular diagnosis over conventional bacteriological techniques.
Sample collection and primary processing
 
The work was carried out in the Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat.  A total of 165 clinical samples were collected (2016-17), from various clinical affections of dog (Table 1)  and processed for the presence of S. aureus as per standard bacteriological techniques (Cowan and Steel, 1993; Markey et al., 2013). Vogus Proskauer test, mannitol and maltose fermentation were specifically used to differentiate the related species.
 

Table 1: Detail of sample collection and percent positivity for Staphylococcus spp.


 
Bacteriological identification of Staphylococcus aureus
 
Based on primary processing the suspected Staphylococci were identified as S. aureus on the basis of coagulase and haemolysin production. For coagulase production, 0.5 ml of rehydrated coagulase plasma (Hi media, Mumbai) was added with added with 2-3 pure colonies in a sterile test tube. After incubating at 37°C, any degree of clotting within 4 hours was considered as positive result. Isolates were streaked on the 5% sheep blood agar and incubated aerobically overnight at 37°C for haemolysin and then at 4°C for 1-2 hours. Haemolysis patterns were classified as alpha, beta alpha-beta and gamma/no haemolysis.
 
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
 
PCR of different genes were carried out as per primers detail and cyclic conditions mentioned in Table  2 and 3. PCR was carried out with final reaction volume of 25 µl. The PCR products were run on agarose gel and recorded the presence of expected sized amplicons.
 

Table 2: Details of primers employed in PCR for amplification of genes.


 

Table 3: Details of cycling condition of PCR for amplification of genes.

Out of 165 samples processed, 88 (53.33%) Staphylococci isolates were obtained using conventional method. The sample details and percent positivity is as per Table 1.  Predominance of Staphylococcus in such types of canine affection dogs was in consonance with findings from west Bengal (Dey et al., 2016) and Jammu (Vanni et al., 2009), where 57.6% and 62.58% of cases were attributed to this bacterium, respectively. However, higher involvement has also been reported as 86.5 (Katarzyna et al., 2013), 86.5 (Ruzauskas et al., 2015), 94 (Melter et al., 2017) per cent cases, respectively. Whereas other reports (Tarazi et al., 2015; Reddy et al., 2016; Habibullah et al., 2017 and Yadav et al., 2018) stated lesser involvement of bacteria, principally because these  studies were targeted to S. aureus only.

Skin is considered primary site of Staphylococcus colonization, so, maximum cases were reported either as pyoderma or abscess/ wound. Even higher involvement than to present findings have been reported, in Jammu (68.55%) and Chennai (59 .0%) by (Beigh et al., (2013) and Chitra et al., (2018), respectively. The lower incidence can be attributed to hot and dry environment in this region which is less favourable for growth of organisms. Though, a lower isolation rate (16%) was observed from healthy and diseased dogs in south China (Feng et al., 2012). A similar incidence of otitis infection (Penna et al., 2009; Hamed and Shahram, 2012) and nasal infection (Katarzyna et al., 2013) were reported and substantiate findings of present work. Likewise, 58.8% incidence of ocular disease in dogs were attributed to same pathogen by Varges et al., (2009). These infections are likely to get its origin from bacterial population of skin and externally communicating mucous membranes.


Though the species of Staphylococcus involved in canine skin and associated membrane affection can be differentiated on biochemical testing but now- a- days PCR becomes method of choice (Sasaki et al., 2010; Tarazi et al., 2015). A simultaneous attempt was made to identify these isolates with PCR, using 16s rDNA based primers. All these 88 tentatively positive isolates yielded 228 bp fragment which confirmed them as Staphylococcus spp. Further, 46/88(52.27%) isolates were confirmed as S. aureus through PCR using sa442 gene primer.

Though, Kusumaningruma et al., (2016) observed the 16S rDNA primer as Staphylococcus aureus specific, however, in our study, Staphylococcus spp. other than Staphylococcus aureus, also showed positive result with this primer. So, 16S rDNA primer and 442 bp primer should be employed consecutively for genus and species level identification. (Martineau et al., 1998).
 
During the characterization, 51/88 (57.95%) isolates were found positive for coagulase production and designated as Coagulase positive Staphylococcus spp., whereas remaining 37 were considered as Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS). Surprisingly, five isolates which were detected positive in tube coagulase test, were negative in PCR based on sa442 gene. These were most likely to be S. pseudintermedius, which showed very similar biochemical profile to S. aureus and widely involved in canine affection (Markey et al., 2013). As in phenotypic coagulase test, 51 isolates were found positive and only 46 identified as Staphylococcus aureus. Previously also, a similar rate of 51.4% and 56.25% of coagulase positive staphylococcus have been reported  by Penna et al., (2009) and Dilek et al., (2010), respectively. However, in contrast to the present finding, a higher i.e., 72% (Mubita et al., 1995)  and 87.2% (Bean et al., 2016)  and lower isolation rate of 28.07% (Silva, 2001), 35.4% (Ghosh et al., 2003) and 20.5% (Arzu et al.,  2009) of coagulase positive Staphylococcus have also been reported, respectively.
 
Therefore, these isolates were further screened by coa gene specific PCR. Out of 46 isolates of S. aureus, 42 (91.30%) isolates were found positive for coa gene, in which single amplicons of variable size were detected. Amplicon size of 600, 680, 710 and 850 bp were detected among 11, 9, 12 and 10 isolates, respectively. Only one isolate which was confirmed as S. aureus did not reveal any band indicating negative for coa gene, two isolates detected negative in tube coagulase test were found positive in coa gene based PCR.
 
Combining the genotypic and phenotypic results, out of 46 PCR positive isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, 42 and 04 isolates were confirmed as coagulase positive and negative, respectively by coa gene base PCR.  On the other hand, out of five tube coagulase positive but Sa442 gene negative isolates, 4 isolates were found negative for coa gene PCR. This way out, 51 Staphylococcus isolates positive for tube coagulase test, 09 detected negative in coa gene PCR and 04 among them were proven coa gene negative Staphylococcus aureus (CoNS) and other 05 might belong to other species. Moreover, during the study, two isolates detected negative in tube coagulase test were found positive in coa gene based PCR, which corroborated with earlier reports of Gharib et al., (2013) and Parth et al., (2016). Thus, the amplification of all the isolates by PCR was found to be an accurate and superior technique.
 
In earlier studies (Arzu et al., 2009),  for coagulase gene polymorphism by PCR, isolates produced one or more fragment sizes of PCR products viz., 470, 810, 490, 521, 570, 326, 437, 697, 710 and 1500, respectively. Number of repeats were similar with Khichar et al., (2012) who employed similar primer for bovine mastitic Staphylococcus aureus. However, in contrast to this, three amplicons of 600, 680 and 850 bp were recorded (Sanjiv et al., 2008). The reason for the polymorphism may be deletion or insertional mutations, particularly in 3’ end region of the coagulase gene.
 
Considering haemolysin production, out of 88 isolates, 12 (13.64%), 45 (51.14%), 28 (31.82%) and 3 (3.41%) showed alpha, beta, gamma and alpha-beta haemolysin production   respectively. Predominance of beta haemolysin producing Staphylococcus was in accordance with previous reports (Reddy et al., 2016; Habibullah et al., 2017). Earlier reports of similar frequency (Bhagat et al., 2017) reported 09.64% alpha, 56.63% beta, 32.53% gamma and 01.21% alpha-beta haemolysins. Contrastingly, 33.96 per cent of alpha, 49.06 per cent of beta, 07.55 per cent of gamma and 09.43 per cent of alpha-beta haemolysins have though been reported from Gujarat state (Parth et al., 2016).

In detection of X-region of protein A in spa gene by PCR, 26 (56.52%) isolates out of 46 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were found positive in which single amplicon in variable numbers was detected. Amplicon size of 243, 270, 296 and 306 bp with calculated number of 5, 6, 9 and 6 repeats, respectively were detected among 5 (19.23%), 6 (23.07%), 9 (34.61%) and 6 (23.07%) isolates, respectively indicative of polymorphisms of spa gene.
 
Similar to the present findings, product size of 206, 243, 262, 277, 292, 306 and 339 bp with calculated numbers of 7, 8, 9, 10, 10, 11 and 12 repeats have been reported, respectively (Khichar et al., 2012). An study from Gujarat state Bhagat et al., (2016) revealed, 32 (58.18%) isolates out of 55 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were found positive for X-region of Protein A in spa gene showing single amplicons of variable sizes viz., 160, 243, 270, 296 and 306 bp with calculated number of 5, 8, 10, 10 and 11 repeats, respectively. Eighty isolates of S. aureus from noses of dogs were found positive for X-region of spa gene showing single amplicons of variable sizes viz., 290 bp, 310 bp 270 bp, respectively (Arzu et al.,2009).
Staphylococcus aureus is among the most important pathogen associated with canine skin and related mucous membranes affections. 16S-rDNA and sa442 gene based primers can be used consecutively to identify genus Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. As phenotypic demonstration of coagulase was ambiguous, PCR based characterization of Staphylococcus aureus using coa gene polymorphism can be used as unequivocal method, in supplementation with spa gene PCR and classification of haemolytic pattern.

  1. Arzu, F., Nergiz, A., Ertan, E.O., Duygu, C., Alper, C. (2009). Methicillin resistance profile and molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from noses of the healthy dogs. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 15: 925-930. 

  2. Bean, D.C. and Wigmore, S.M. (2016). Carriage rate and antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from healthy dogs in Victoria, Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal. 94: 456-460.

  3. Beigh, S.A., Soodan, J.S., Tantary, H., Tiko A. (2013). Comparative evaluation of Antibacterial alone and Antibacterial along with Zinc in Management of Pyoderma in Canines. Intas Polivet. 14: 388-390.

  4. Bhagat, A.G., Kher, H.N., Dadawala, A.I., Chauhan, H.C., Patel, B.K., Shrimali, M.D., Chandel B.S. (2017). Identification and characterization of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Bovine mastitis. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6: 223-230.

  5. Chitra, M.A., Jayanthy, C., Nagarajan, B. (2018). Virulence genes detection and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine skin infection in Chennai, India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B. 88: 355-361. 

  6. Cowan, S.T. and Steel K.J. (1993). Cowan and Steel’s manual for the identification of Medical bacteria, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pp 52-57. 

  7. Dey, S., Batabyal, K., Mahanti, A., Joardar, S.N., Samanta, I., Isore D.P. (2016). Antibiogram of bacterial isolates originated from clinical infections of dog in Kolkata, West Bengal. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 37: 5-8.

  8. Dilek, O., Sýrrý, A., Hulya, T., Kursad, Y., Sonay S. (2010). Methicillin resistance among Coagulase-positive Staphylococci isolated from dogs with otitis externa, skin wounds and pyoderma. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 16: 651-656.

  9. Feng, Y., Tian, W., Lin, D., Luo, Q., Zhou, Y., Yang, T., Deng, Y., Liu, Y.H., Liu, J.H. (2012). Prevalence and characterization of methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus pseud intermedius in pets from South China. Veterinary Microbiology. 160: 517-524.

  10. Gharib, A.A., Adel, A.M.A., Bendary, M.M. (2013). Detection of the Coa Gene in Staphylococcus aureus from Different Sources by Polymerase Chain Reaction. International Journal of Microbiology Research. 4: 37-42.

  11. Ghosh, R.N., Sarkar, P.B., Batabyal, K. (2003). Characterisation and haemolysin production of Coagulase positive Staphylococci isolated from cattle and pigs. Indian Journal Animal Health. 42: 35-37.

  12. Habibullah, A., Rahman, A.M.M.T., Haydar, M.R., Nazir, K.H.M.N.H., Rahman, M.T. (2017). Prevalence and molecular detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from dog and cats in Dhaka city. Bangladesh Journal Veterinary Medicine. 15: 51-57.

  13. Hamed, Z.M. and Shahram, J. (2012). Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria causing otitis externa in dogs. Veterinary Research Communications. 34: 435-444. 

  14. Katarzyna, G., Sabina, Z., Lidia, P. Krystyna, H. (2013). Staphylococci isolated from carriage sites and infected sites of dogs as a reservoir of multidrug resistance and methicillin resistance. Current Microbiology. 66: 169-173. 

  15. Khichar, V., Kataria, A.K., Sharma, R. (2012). Characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus of cattle mastitis origin for two virulence associated genes (coa and spa). Comparative Clinical Pathology. 23: 603-611.

  16. Kusumaningruma, H.D., Handayanic, L., Novriantic, R. (2016). Partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene of selected Staphylococcus aureus isolates and its antibiotic resistance. Media Peternakan. 39: 67-74.

  17. Lovseth, A., Loncarevic, S. Berdal, K.G. (2013). Modified multiplex PCR method for detection of pyrogenic exotoxins genes in staphylococcal isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 42: 3869-3872.

  18. Markey, B., Leonard, F., Archambault, M., Cullinane, A., Maguire, D. (2013). Clinical Veterinary Microbiology (2nd Edn.). Mosby.

  19. Martineau, F., Picard, F.J., Roy, P.H., Ouellette, M., Bergeron, M.G. (1998). Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 3: 618-623.

  20. Melter, O., Svec, P., Tkadlec, J., Doskar, J., Kinska, H., Pantucek, R. (2017). Characterisation of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine infections and determination of virulence factors using multiplex PCR. Veterinary Medicine-Czech. 62: 81-89.

  21. Mubita, D., Patel, D., Misra, D.S., Gupta, R.S., Mule, D. (1995). Characterization of Staphylococci from Nasal cavity of apparently healthy dogs from luska Zambia. Indian Journal of Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 16: 46-48.

  22. Parth, F.M., Chauhan, H.C., Bhagat, A.G., Chandel, B.S., Patel, M.V., Dadawala, A.I., Kher, H.N. (2016). Detection of virulence associated factors from Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Buffalo Bulletin. 35: 687-    696.

  23. Penna, B., Varges, R., Medeiros, L., Martins, G.M., Martins, R.R., Lilenbaum, W. (2009). Species distribution and anti- -microbial susceptibility of Staphylococci isolated from canine otitis externa. Veterinary Dermatology. 21: 292-    296.

  24. Reddy, B.S., Kumari, K.N., Sivajothi, S. (2016). Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from dogs with recurrent pyoderma. Journal of Dairy, Veterinary and Animal Research. 3: 62-65.

  25. Ruzauskas, M., Couto, N., Kerziene, S., Siugzdiniene, R., Klimiene, I., Virgailis, M., Pomba, C. (2015). Prevalence, species distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococci in Lithuanian pet animals. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 57: 27-33.

  26. Sanjiv, K., Kataria, A.K., Sharma R., Singh, G. (2008). Epidemiological typing of Staphylococcus aureus by DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism of coa gene. Veterinarski Arhiv. 7: 31-38.

  27. Sasaki, T., Tsubakishita, S., Tanaka, Y., Sakusabe, A., Ohtsuka, M., Hirotaki, S., Kawakami,T., Fukata, T., Hiramatsu K. (2010). Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 48: 765-769.

  28. Silva, N. (2001). Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus spp.isolated from canine chronic otitis externa. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 1678-4162.

  29. Tarazi, Y.H., Almajali, A.M., Ababneh, M.M.K., Ahmed, H.S., Jaran A.S. (2015). Molecular study on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from dogs and associated personnel in Jordan. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 5: 902-908. 

  30. Vanni, M., Tognetti, R., Pretti, C., Crema, F., Soldani, G., Meucci, V., Intorre L. (2009). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolated from dogs. Research in Veterinary Science. 87: 192-195.

  31. Varges, R., Penna, B., Martins, G., Martins, R., Lilenbaum, W. (2009). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococci isolated from naturally occurring canine external ocular diseases. Veterinary Ophthamology. 12: 216-220.

  32. Yadav, R., Kumar, A., Singh, V. Jayshree, Yadav S.K. (2018). Prevalence and antibiotyping of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in domestic animals in India. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 15: 222-225. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)