Come up time (CUT)
Come up time to reach the reference retort temperature (121°C) varied between 3 - 6 minutes and should be kept as possible NCA (1968). Come up time of analogue shrimp curry and masala processed by steam - air and water immersion retort are presented in Table 2. In the present study, come up time (CUT) of 5 min for the analogue shrimp curry and masala thermally processed by steam - air and water immersion retort, respectively. These process times were sufficient to take commercially sterile.
Heating rate index
Heating rate index of analogue shrimp curry and masala processed by steam - air and water immersion retort are given in Table 2. In the present study, the maximum value of heating rate index indicated that 28 min in analogue shrimp masala and the minimum value was observed to be 19 min in curry processed by steam - air retort. The heating rate index was faster in curry medium by steam-air retort than in curry medium processed by water immersion application. Earlier reports were observed heating rate index of 18 min for jewfish paste
Thankamma et al., (1998) and the same values were observed in mackerel curry
Gopal et al., (1998), 25 - 32 min for seer fish curry
Ravishankar et al., (2002), 19 min for shrimp kuruma
Mohan et al., (2006), 19 - 23.30 min for prawn kuruma
Mohan et al., (2008), 13 - 18 min for fish peera from anchovy
Bindu et al., (2010), 18.60 to 24.50 min for rohu curry at different F
0 values
Majumdar et al., (2015), 17.50 min for tilapia sandwich paste Dhanapal
et al., (2016), 28.19 min for rohu balls curry
Majumdar et al., (2017), 10.50 - 11.71 min for eel steaks in brine,
Mugale et al., (2018a) and 8.88 - 10.15 min for eel curry
Mugale et al., (2018b). In most of the above studies, heating rate index values were within the range of 8.88 to 32 min. Similar reports were observed in this study, for convective heat transfer in food products, in contrast, the f
h value in conductive heat transfer are higher
i.e. 30 - 40 min
Horner, (1992). Heating rate index (f
h) for convective heating products has been reported to be dependent upon temperature of heating medium and condensing surface, steam - air flow rate and direction, surface size and orientation, viscosity, film thickness and stagnant air layer thickness
Tung et al., (1990). In this study, the difference of f
h values were ratio of product liquids to solids in the container, this could be due to higher rate of heat penetration in the product because of the different filling media and different types of retorts.
Lag factor for heating (Jh) and cooling (Jc)
The lag factor for heating (j
h) was significantly lower for analogue shrimp curry (1.26 min) processed by water immersion whereas it was highest for masala processed (1.34 min) by steam air retort, respectively (p< 0.05). Based on the results, it indicates highest jh values have a slower heat penetration and the lowest j
h value indicates faster cooling. Heating lag factor (J
h) that is close to or above1.0 and cooling lag factor (J
c) less than 1.0 is an indication of faster heat penetration and this is evident in steam- air in curry medium (J
h) 1.48 min and masala medium 1.34 min compared to 1.26 min of water immersion in curry medium. In this study, the heating lag factor (J
h) in both methods were above 1.0 with minimal lag period (
i.e., the come up time is very short); therefore, PID and ID overlap, so that J
h is equal to 1.0. However, in actual practice, there is always some gap in time period before a product could reach the retort temperature, leading to differences in come up time depending on the composition, size
etc. and hence to variations in jh value. Products heated under agitation have large jh values, but it takes some for the viscous forces of the product to be overcome by the inertial forces induced by the rolling of the can
Berry and Bradshaw (1980). As shown in Table 2, Lag factor for cooling curve (J
c) the analogue shrimp curry and masala medium processed by steam air 1.00 min and 1.08 min and to compared the water immersion retort in analogue shrimp curry medium had 0.97 min. These values which were in conformity with the values reported for convective heating liquid products
Horner (1992). J
c value increases with increase in processing temperature but in this study, retort temperature was set constant at 121°C so not much variation in these values was observed. Based on the result, the cooling lag factor was not considerably different from each other. In this study, (J
c) values were lower than the J
h values for all the analogue shrimp curry and masala medium in water immersion and steam air application processed products.
F0 value
In present study, the F
0 value for analogue shrimp product from lizard fish in curry medium was observed to be 10.53 min in steam - air and 10.48 min in water immersion, while the F
0 value for the analogue shrimp product from lizard fish packed in masala was 12.51 min in steam - air (Table 2). Depending upon the product and climatic conditions of storage, the F
0 value recommended for thermal processed fish products varies in the range of 5-20 minutes
Pflug and Chirstensen (1980),
Frott and Lewis (1994). There are no literatures available regarding analogue shrimp products in retortable pouches. In the present study, I conclude that the F
0 values were observed for analogue shrimp product from lizard fish in curry medium is slightly more or less similar to be 10.53 min and 10.48 min in steam - air and water immersion application. This process employed for analogue surimi curry was thus within the prescribed F
0 values for fish products. This process was also considered more suitable, as in home canning, conventional cooker operate at 15 psi, which is equivalent to around 121°C. In this study, higher F
0 value was observed for analogue shrimp product from lizard fish in masala medium was12.51min in steam - air application.
Cook value
In the present study, the minimum cook value (C
g) was observed in steam - air retort 89.99 min and the maximum cook value (C
g) was 122.16 min in the analogue shrimp curry and masala, as against 108.81 min for analogue shrimp curry medium pack in water immersion retort. Some of the researchers reported the cook value of 89.79 min in seer fish moilee in retort pouch
Manju et al., (2004), 57.19 to 92.12 min in sardine
Ali et al., (2006), 86.14 min in shrimp kuruma
Mohan et al., (2006), 69.73 to 125.65 min for mackerel
Mallick et al., (2006), 83.19 to 86.14 min for prawn kuruma
Mohan et al., (2008). Bindu et al., (2010) observed the cook value of fish peera from anchovy at 66.02 min. The cook values of the restructured surimi gel products from white tripod fish ranged from 100 to 139 min at 121°C
Hema et al., (2015). Dhanapal et al., (2016) optimized the tilapia sandwich paste processed at 121.1°C and the F
0 value of 8 min and cook value of 75.02 min. The cook values of the product were found similar to the earlier reports. In most of the above studies, cook values achieved by the researchers were between 25 to 139 min. Based on the result of this study the cook value was also low in steam air than water immersion application and this study noticed the higher cook values during processing in masala medium processed by steam air application. In this study, F
0 value increased results in higher cook values meaning thereby more destruction of nutrients measured in terms of thiamine loss. Higher cook values also might result in loss of textural properties. Finally it is concluded that, the cook value was low in analogue shrimp curry processed by steam air application at 121.1°C and the textural properties were also good compared to other mediums.
Process time
The total process time for analogue shrimp curry was observed to be 35.99 min to achieve F0 value of 10.53 min in steam - air retort and 43.81 min for F
0 value of 10.48 min in water immersion for curry medium, while the total process time for the analogue shrimp product from lizardfish packed in masala medium was 48.30 min at F
0 value of 12.51 min in steam air application which included 58% of come up time. Earlier,
Ravishankar et al., (2002) reported the process time was 39.50 min and the total process time was included 42% of come up time, was 40.76 min for the storage of seer fish curry in retortable pouches up to 24 months. Later,
Manju et al., (2004) found a process time of 48.30 min which included 58% of the come up time as sufficient process value for the storage of seer fish moilee, a traditional fish based product of kerala in retort pouch at ambient temperature (27 ± 10°C).
Bindu et al., (2008) observed that the total process time taken to process the products at F
0 values of 5, 7 and 9 min were 29.22, 34.38 and 40. 57 min, respectively. It has been observed from the result that the total process time increases as F
0value of the product increases in fish peera in retort pouches.
Majumdar et al., (2015) observed that the total process time taken to reach F
0 values of 7, 8 and 9 min for Rohu - kalia were 37.50 min, 41.70 and 44.50 min respectively.
Sreelakshmi et al., (2015) optimized that the crab sandwich spread in retort pouch processed at 116.1°C, a process time (B) of 3.99 min, operator’s process time of 22.9 min and total process time of 48.5min were obtained. The least process time observed in steam application in curry medium can be attributed to the fast come up time in the method which resulted into faster heating rate. Similar reports were observed with the finding of
Adepoju et al., (2016), who explained that the total process time for milk fish in drypack and oil medium were observed the least process time observed in steam air application than in water immersion application. It can be attributed to the fast come up time in the method which resulted in to faster heating rate. This actually conforms with the similar finding of
Mohan et al., (2014), observed that the least process time observed for tuna with broccoli pack could be attributed to soft nature of broccoli, which resulted in the faster heating rate. These findings indicate that the relationship between the retort CUT and the total process time is directly proportional. From the data generated, it was observed that the rate of heat penetration was faster in steam application than in water immersion. The Tukey’s test performed on the heat penetration values obtained for the two heat treatment methods slightly showed significant differences (p <0.05). However, the heating rate indices of the samples processed in curry medium by steam application and in the curry medium by water immersion are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Cook value / F0 ratio
The cook value and F
0 ratio of analogue shrimp curry and masala medium processed by steam - air and water immersion retort is given in Table 2. The results showed that the lowest for analogue shrimp curry processed by steam air retort followed by masala medium and curry medium processed by water immersion retort, respectively. Cook value/ F
0 ratio in the range of 6.88 -15.30 was reported for mackerel in brine processed at different temperatures
Sreenath et al., (2008). Mansfield (1962) reported that sterilization rates are slower than cooking rates at low processing temperatures and higher than cooking rates at higher temperatures of processing. The Tukey’s test performed on the heat penetration values obtained for the two sterilization methods slightly showed significant differences (p<0.05). However, the heating rate indices of imitated shrimp products processed in curry medium by steam air retort and the curry medium by water immersion retort are not significantly different those samples (p>0.05).