General performance
The estimates of overall least-squares means and standard errors for ADM
1, ADM
2, ADM
3, ADM
4, ADM
5 and overall ADM were 564.07±18.34, 671.92±15.17, 633.41±10.75, 508.93±8.01, 329.72±7.93 and 540.79±10.78 ml, respectively (Table 1). The overall least-square means for average daily milk yield showed that highest average daily milk was recorded during 31
st to 60
th day (ADM
2) of lactation and thereafter it started declining with the advancement of lactation length.
Hassan et al., (2010) also reported that highest milk yield was in second month and lowest in the fifth month after kidding in Jamunapari goats. Similar finding for average daily milk (ADM) in Marwari was reported by
Rai et al., (2001) as 560±0.02 ml and 524.3±138.3 ml in Jamunapari by
Hassan et al., (2010). Contrary to this, lower means were reported as 362.40±15.91 ml by Pathodiya
et al., (2010) as well as by
Swami et al., (2005) as 0.380±0.034 ml in Sirohi and in Black Bengal as 354.76 ml by
Mia et al., (2014). However, higher means were reported by Singh and Ramchandran, (2007) as 627.70±46.2 ml in Sirohi goats.
Effect of non-genetic factors
The effect of various non-genetic factors affecting average daily milk yield at different stages of lactation have been presented in Table 2.
Random effect of sire was highly significant (P£0.01) on all traits under the study. Similar finding were in close agreement with reports of
Pathodiya et al., (2010) and
Yadav et al., (2004) that indicated existence of variation in transmitting ability of sire for milk performance traits.
The least squares analysis of variance revealed that the cluster-wise variation was highly significant (P£0.01) on all stages of average daily milk. These results were in accordance with that of
Pathodiya et al., (2010) in Sirohi goat. Average daily milk was lowest in Bojunda cluster and highest in Devgarh cluster, which was maintained throughout lactation length as compared to other clusters. Difference among average milk yield performances of clusters may be due to variation in management practices followed for goat rearing by the farmers in that area.
Period
s of birth had significant (P£ 0.01) on average daily milk at different stages of lactation months. Similar finding was reported
Swami et al., (2005); Singh and Ramchandran, (2007) and
Yadav et al., (2004). However,
Pathodiya et al., (2010) reported non-significant effect of period on overall average daily milk in goats. Average daily milk of different lactation stages was not observed at definite pattern in different periods. However, highest average daily milk was recorded during period 2010-13 as compared to others periods, which might be due to the differences in plane of nutrition, availability of top feeds, cropping pattern and climatic conditions during different periods.
The season of birth had highly significant (P£0.01) effect on ADM
2 and ADM
5, while significantly (P£0.05) affected on ADM
1 and ADM
3 (Table 1). However, effect of season of birth was non-significant on overall average daily milk of lactation. Also non-significant effect of season on overall average daily milk yield in Sirohi goat was reported by
Pathodiya et al., (2010). On the other hand, significant effect was observed on average daily milk yield by Singh and Ramchandran, (2007) and
Swami et al., (2005). Highest average daily milk yield was recorded during second month (ADM
2) of lactation in winter season kidding doe as compared to other kidding season, which might be due to combined effect of weather and feeding conditions in a particular season. This was confirmed by
Crepaldi et al., (2000) who observed that kidding season significantly affected the milk yield with goats kidding in winter season have higher milk production compared with those which kidded in the rainy and summer. Lower milk yield in rainy season may be linked to the greater occurrence of disease such as parasitical infestation and bacterial infection due to higher humidity and temperature.
The parity had statistically highly significant (P£0.01) effect on average daily milk yield traits of all lactation stages. Milk yield increased gradually with the advancement of parity in the present study. In the same way, several researchers reported significant (P£0.01) effect of parity on overall average milk yield of lactation
(Yadav et al., 2004; Singh and Ramchandran, 2007;
Pathodiya et al., 2010 and Mia
et al., 2014. However,
Swami et al., (2005) observed non-significant effect of parity on average daily milk yield in goat. The highest overall average milk yield was obtained in the fifth and above lactation, probably due to the increased animal size (greater digestive capacity) and udder combined with advancing age, which led to the development of the mammary glands (an increase in the number of alveoli and muscle fibres in a limb). Similarly Alkass and Merkhan, (2011) observed that milk yield of does increase gradually with increase of age in Alpine goat.
The effect of prolificacy was non-significant on average milk yield of all lactation stages under the study. However, doe’s which have multiple births produced more milk in comparison to does having single kid
s, which may be due to the stimulus provided by the sucking kids that increases production. The present finding was in agreement with the reports of
Swami et al., (2005) and
Pathodiya et al., (2010) in Sirohi goats.
The regression of dam’s weight at kidding was positive and highly significant (P£0.01) on average daily milk yield on ADM
1, ADM
2, ADM
3 and significant (p£0.05) to overall average daily milk yield of lactation. It indicated that body weight influenced the average daily milk yield of lactation. Gall, (1981) reported that body weight was the main source of variation in milk yield, he reported regression coefficient of milk yield on body weight to be 4.76 units in goat and Singh and Ramchandran (2004) and
Hermiz et al., (2004) also reported that significant effect of dam’s weight at kidding on average daily milk in goat.
Genetic and phenotypic parameters
The heritability estimates of all the average daily milk parameters in the present study were found ranging from 0.03±0.01 to 0.19±0.02 (Table 3). There are no literature references regarding estimated heritability for average daily milk yield at different lactation period in Sirohi goat so far. However, the estimated heritability for overall average daily milk yield in Sirohi goat was comparable with other breeds of goat.
The heritability estimates ranged from low to moderate indicated that non-additive genetic variance had greater influence. Similar heritability estimates was reported as 0.15±0.04 in Black Bengal goat by
Mia et al., (2014). However, higher heritability estimates were reported for overall average daily milk yield
(Pathodiya et al., 2010; Rai et al., 2001) in Sirohi goat.
The heritability estimate obtained from average daily milk yield was low, indicating that selection for ADM will take long time. The low heritability estimate and the fact that the trait can only be measured in female suggest that progeny testing is the best sire selection method for this particular trait. The low heritability of ADM indicated that higher ADM could be better achieved through a better control of the environmental conditions associated with the trait.
Phenotypic and genetic correlations
The genetic correlations obtained were positive and high between average daily milk of different lactation periods. The high estimates of genetic correlations of average milk yield of different periods with overall average daily milk yield indicated pleiotropic effects of genes.
Yadav et al., (2004) observed high genetic correlation between 150 days milk yield with peak milk yield in Kutchi goat. The phenotypic correlations were positive and low between ADM
1 and ADM
4, ADM
5 and medium between ADM
1 and ADM
4, ADM
5. This may be due to decline milk yield after peak during lactation process. Medium phenotypic correlations were observed between peak milk yields with overall average daily milk yield by
Pathodiya et al., (2010) in Sirohi goat.