Rumen microbes lack the enzyme machinery capable of decomposing lignocellulosic material. Studies
(Hristov et al., 2000; Nsereko et al., 2002) conducted in cattle showed that enzyme supplementation can influence ruminal variables, fibrolytic activity of ruminal fluid and microbial populations, but the effects seem to be dependent on the type of supplemented enzyme.The white rot fungi (WRF) are the most efficient to degrade lignin on account of their ligninolytic enzymes and predigestion of ligno-cellulosic materials with these enzymes enhances their digestibility for ruminants
(Sridhar et al., 2014; Arora et al., 2002). The procedure of treating the crop residues with lignolytic enzymes and laccase in particular appears to be a safe cost effective strategy to make the cellulose easily available for the ruminants thereby increasing the digestibility which in turn impacts animal performance
(Kumar et al., 2015).
Earlier, we reported an increase in ADG (gd-1) and dry matter digestibility (DMD) in Bannur sheep,fed finger millet straw treated with a mixture of exogenous lignolytic enzymes harvested from immobilized
Coriolus versicolor and
Ganoderma lucidium for 40 days compared to those fed untreated straw
(Sridhar et al., 2015). In the quest to effectively elucidate the effect of the laccase in bio delignification of crop residues, in this study, we evaluated the effects of feeding finger millet straw treated with exogenous laccase enzyme obtained from
Schizophyllum commune on body weight changes, DM intake and nutrient digestibility in cattle.
In the present study, two groups of heifers were fed with enzyme treated straw (Group II-40% enzyme and Group III-20% enzyme and Group I served as control where no enzyme was used) for a period of three weeks (14 days pre trial and 5 days trial period) and the effect on proximate composition analysis, lignin degradation and dry matter digestibility was analyzed. The heifers were fed with 70% treated and untreated straw along with 30% concentrate (Appendix I). Analysis of the body weights after 14- days of feeding showed marginal gain in body weights for GI, GII and GIII groups of 277.9 ± 68.47; 277.50 ± 46.43 and 278.85 ± 37.22 kgs respectively with an overall increase of 1.15, 4.25 and 3.60 kgs (Fig 2). The increase in Group II was better compared to other groups. Difference in weights however was not statistically significant in all the three groups with no significant variation in LS-means data as the period of study was only for three weeks.
The changes in proximate compositions of the feed after various treatments and the digestibility studies observed in different groups of heifers after feeding enzyme treated straw when compared to control group is tabulated in Table 1. The decrease obtained in NDF, ADF and ADL suggests that vegetal cell wall components of the straws were degraded, on account of laccase treatment. Values in NDF showed very marginal decrease in treatment groups when compared to control. However, decrease was more pronounced in ADF and ADL of Group II heifers compared to control, encouraging use of enzyme treatment.
Comparative study of lignin degradation and dry matter digestibility (Fig 3) in enzyme treated groups shows 15.40±4% decrease in lignin content in Group II and 4.67±1.50% in Group III owing to the fact that Group II heifers were fed with 40% enzyme treated straw and Group III heifers with 20% enzyme treated straw clearly indicating the positive effect of laccases on lignin degradation. In vitro dry matter digestibility studies showed an enormous increase of 39.65±3.20% digestibility in Group II and 30.81±4.30% digestibility in Group III experimental heifers again indicating the positive effect of laccases on digestibility with Group II heifers showing 10% greater digestibility than Group III. In both cases strong negative correlation was observed between lignin degradation and increase in
in vitro digestibility in both the treated groups compared to control. Treatment for
in vitro and
in vivo DMD did not cause any significant loss in DM when compared to control sample.
In the present study, no significant increase in the
in vivo dry matter digestibility was observed in the test groups fed with enzyme treated straw when compared to the control group which fed on untreated straw giving contrasting results compared to
in vitro dry matter studies. The reduced efficacy of exogenous enzymes applied to ensiled feeds may be due to inhibitory compounds in fermented feeds.
Nsereko et al., (2002) reported the presence of compounds in whole-crop barley silage that inhibited endo-1,4-β-xylanase activity of an enzyme product from
T. longibrachiatum by 23 to 50%, although there was no effect on cellulase activity. Applying enzymes to feed also provides a slow-release mechanism for enzymes in the rumen
(Beauchemin et al., 2003). Thus, the greater the proportion of the diet treated with enzymes, the greater the chances that enzymes endure in the rumen. This is also consistent with our earlier studies where different types of dry pastures were treated with 60% enzyme (1:25 w/v)
(Kumar et al., 2015) unlike the present scenario where Group II and Group III heifers are fed with enzyme treated straw at the rate of 40% and 20% enzyme respectively. Adding exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to dairy cow and feedlot cattle diets can potentially improve cell wall digestion and the efficiency of feed utilization by ruminants. Positive responses in milk production and growth rate have been observed for cattle fed with some enzyme products, although results have been inconsistent.
The enzymes from white rot fungi
Trametes versicolor (TV1, TV2),
Bjerkandera adusta (BA) and
Fomes fomentarius (FF), that are responsible for breaking down the bonds in lignin and within the matrix of cell wall carbohydrates were extracted, but without also extracting enzymes affecting hemicellulose and cellulose. Using these enzymes there was an increase in IVNDFD (P<0.05), resulting from treatment of wheat straw with enzyme extracts from BA, TV1 and TV2, reaching a difference of 13% for TV2 (P<0.05),
versus the non-treated straw control. The study indicated that enzyme extracts from white-rot fungi could be used to develop new approaches to overcome low digestibility of some plant cell walls and utilization of different substrates to produce enzyme extracts could lead to production of viable ligninolytic complexes which could improve the nutritive value of fibrous feeds
(Rodrigues et al., 2008).
The performance of confined beef cattle supplemented with amylolytic enzyme complex produced by fungus
Aspergillus awamori and a commercial product containing multienzyme complex, yeast and MOS was evaluated
(Oliveira et al., 2015). The addition of products did not significantly increase daily weight gain, intake, feed conversion and carcass yield of cattle. There was no difference between
in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVDMD) in the diets. The percentage of residual fecal starch was not influenced by exogenous amylolytic enzymes of amylase and compound treatments. The tested products were not able to improve animal performance.
Some of these variations in results of various studies can be attributed to under- or over-supplementation of enzyme, treatment time required for proper action on the feed and the level of productivity of the test animal. There is a need to understand the mode of action on the feed to improve on farm efficacy. With increase in demand for more productive ruminant animals, there is an urgent need for improving the digestibility of the feeds using lignolytic enzymes before feeding it to the ruminants making the trapped energy in the form of cellulose more available for digestion. Coming up with a proper enzyme to feed ratio considering all the intricate factors would definitely play a prominent role in future ruminant production systems.