Check list of Elasmobranchs
In the present study, a total of 44 species belonging to 8 orders, 13 families and 25 genera were recorded from Wadge Bank (Table1). The elasmobranchs are represented in 8 orders, of which Myliobatiformes contributed 36.4% with 17 species followed by Carcharhiniformes with 34.1 % having 15 species and Rajiformes11.4%, with 3 species (Fig 2). Among the 13 families recorded, Carcharhinidae is the dominant family with 12 species followed by Dasiyatidae 9 species and Myliobatidae with 5 species. A check list of elasmobranch diversity, its occurrence and with detailed taxonomic position is presented in Table 1. Earlier studies by Theivasigamani and Subbiah (2014) reported 65 species of elasmobranchs at Thoothukudi coast, indicated the dominance of Myliobatiformes and Carcharhiniformes with 49.23% and 32.31% respectively. Gowthaman (2011) reported 72 elasmobranch species belongs to 6 orders, 21 families and 42 genera from Gulf of Mannar, South east coast of India. Rajiformeswas found to be the dominant order followed by Carcharhiniformes (28) and Orectolobifomis (6).
High species richness was observed in Colachel with 43 species represented by 12 families, of which the family Carcharhinidaeis with 12 species followed by the family Dasiyatidae with 9 species and Myliobatidae with 4 species. In Vizhinjam the lowest species richness was recorded. A total of 26 species was represented by 9 families. Of the recorded 44 species, four are under endangered list and twelve species are under vulnerable list (IUCN, 2018) (Fig 3).
Biodiversity indices of elasmobranchs
Spatio-temporal variability in biodiversity indices such as Shannon-Wiener species diversity [H’ (log2)], Margalef’s species richness (d), Pielou’s evenness (J’), Taxonomic diversity (D), Taxonomic distinctness (D*) and Total Phylogenetic diversity (sPhi+) were calculated using PRIMER Version 6.
Species richness: The spatial variation in‘d’ value is given in Table 2. The highest (‘d’) value was observed at Colachel (4.55) followed by Chinnamuttom (4.07) and lowest value was observed in Vizhinjam (2.91).
The spatial variation in Shannon – Wiener diversity (H’) value was given in the Table 2.The highest (H’) value was observed at Colachel (4.17) followed by Chinnamuttom (4.11) and lowest at Vizhinjam (3.76). The spatial variation in Shannon-Wiener diversity (H’) value were ranged between 3.76 -4.17 in Wadge bank, South India. The number of species was observed to be in the range of 26-44. A higher indices (5.66 - 5.94 ) was reported in Gulf of Mannar, South east coast of India(Gowthaman, 2011). The diversity was lower at Wadge Bank, when compared to Gulf of mannar.
Species evenness
Evenness express how evenly the individuals in a community are distributed among the different species and it could be calculated by Pielous’s evenness. The spatial variation in ‘J’ among the different stations was ranged from 0.77 to 0.80 (Table 2). The value was more than 0.75 in all stations, showing in high amount of evenness.
Species evenness was lower at Chinnamuttom than at Vizhinjam and it may be due to the high species richness and dominance of individuals. The species evenness (J) was the lowest at Colachel. Similar high evenness have also been reported by the
Jitendrakumar et al., (2015) and (Gowthaman, 2011) at Mangalore and Gulf of Mannar coast respectively. The evenness index (J’) is strongly affected by species richness (Peet, 1974)
Taxonomic diversity (D)
The estimated taxonomic diversity (D) values for the three landing centres are given in the Table 2. The spatial variation in taxonomic diversity indicates that the Vizhinjam (54.08) landing centre showed the lowest variation while the Colachel (60.3) showed the highest variation followed by Chinnamuttom (58.69).
Total phylogenetic diversity (sPhi+)
The index denotes the taxonomic breadth/ total taxonomic path length and the average phylogenetic index are obtained by dividing the total phylogenetic diversity index by the number of species. In a healthy ecosystem, the total phylogenetic diversity will always be more (Table 2). The total phylogenetic diversity (sPhi+) value for Vizhinjam landing centre was 940 while the value was higher at Chinnamuttom landing centre (1500) and Colachel landing centre (1740). According to
Gowthaman, (2011) for the elasmobranchs diversity, the phylogenetic diversity value was higher at Thoothukudi coast (2275-3125) followed by Mandapam (2250-2775) and Trichendur (1900-2525). When compared to the phylogenetic diversity of Gulf of mannar, the phylogenetic diversity at Wadge Bank is lower.
Bray-Curtis similarity
Bray–Curtis similarity is useful in quantifying the compositional similarity between two different sites, based on counts at each sites (Ajmal
Khan et al., 2008). The highest similarity (98.97%) was occurring between Chinnamuttom and Colachel landing centres (Table 4). While analysing the seasonal variability in BC similarity index for whole Wadge Bank, it was found to be higher between pre-monsoon and post- monsoon in all the landing centres of Wadge Bank, whereas to the lowest similarity has been observed between monsoon and post-monsoon season (Table 5).
Gowthaman (2011) revealed that similar pre monsoon season BC similarities were observed at Gulf of mannar. Station wise fish diversity was transformed in to square root to study the seasonal Bray Curtis similarities and the result is given in (Fig 4).
K-Dominance curve
The K-dominance curve was obtained by plotting percentage of cumulative abundance against species rank K on a logarithmic scale. The spatial variation, seasonal variation and the monthly variation in dominance plot among the three different landing centres of Wadge Bank, South India. Among the three landing centres, the Colachel landing centres has a relatively larger cumulative relative abundance than the other two landing centres (Fig 5). Post- monsoonal cumulative relative abundance was higher when compared to other seasons (Fig 6). The dominant plot showed that curve for month October 2015, which lie on the lower side, extended further and rise slowly due to high density of species. As the percentage contribution of each species was added, that curve extends horizontally before reaching the cumulative 100%. This plot showed that density of fish species and the number of species richness was more during October 2015 than other months (Fig 7). During the present study, the numbers of species collected were higher during the month of October and by seasons-wise, higher during post-monsoon period. While studying the ichthyofaunal diversity by
Naomi et al., (2011) from southern Kerala and
Jitendrakumar et al., (2013) from Mangaluru coast, the elasmobranch diversity was highest during post monsoon period. This might be due to aggregation of fish in coastal waters due to upwelling, a common phenomenon observed in the west coast during south west monsoon (
Nair and Thampy 1980).
Cluster analysis
The purpose of cluster analysis is to organize the individuals into classes or groups such that within-groups and among groups similarities are analysed. The dendrogram result revealed that greater similarities were observed between Chinnamuttom and Colachel landing centres due to the high species richness, Vizhinjam landing centre forms separate cluster (Fig 8). The similarities between seasons are revealed, the Post-monsoonal and summer season formed separate cluster (Fig 9). It is due to more abundance of species occurred in that season at Wadge Bank.
Conservation and management
In the present study, among the 44 species of elasmobranchs were recorded and 9% of them are under endangered category whereas 27% comes under vulnerable Category (Fig 3). Maturing
Carcharhinus melenopterus and C. limbatus were landed around the length group of 95 cm and 105 cm respectively at Vizhinjam and Colachel landing centre. These sharks have to be allowed to grow and spawn at least once to avoid recruitment overfishing. The juvenile size of
Rhina ancylostoma and Himantura undulata were landed with the minimum length of 35 cm and 20 cm respectively at Colachel landing centre. To avoid growth overfishing these animals have to be allowed to grow. Since the species are captured in good numbers at smaller size and their reproductive potential is less, the conservation measures need to be followed strictly. The resource management initiatives like the enhancing gillnet mesh size and hook and line size may be strengthened. Trawl net operation should be minimised along the Wadge Bank region. Further shark diversity rich hot spots should be identified and protected
(Lucifora et al., 2011).
Elasmobranch conservation initiatives are at preliminary stage in India. These resources are playing important role in marine ecosystem and to protect these precious resources in Indian regions, study on elasmobranchs biology, aggregation sites and breeding has to be initiated.