Establishment of bilateral symmetryand accuracy of carcass data estimates in Ghungroo pig carcass

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3525    | Article Id: B-3525 | Page : 496-499
Citation :- Establishment of bilateral symmetryand accuracy of carcass data estimates in Ghungroo pig carcass.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2019.(53):496-499
R. Thomas, S. Banik, K. Barman, N.H. Mohan and D.K. Sarma thomasr12@rediffmail.com
Address : ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati –781 131, Assam, India.
Submitted Date : 9-11-2017
Accepted Date : 18-01-2018

Abstract

Ghungroo is the first registered pig breed of indigenous origin in India. The work was designed to develop a reference dissection method for carcasses by establishing bi-lateral symmetry and to determine whether or not differences exist between right and left sides of pig carcasses for some precisely measured physical and chemical traits. Carcass evaluation procedures could be simplified if selected measurements from one side accurately reflect the composition or meat quality of the entire carcass. Forty pigs of Ghungroo breed were selected to represent equally two sexes and two market weight groups. The pigs were slaughtered and after the carcasses were chilled they were carefully split into left and right sides. Least correlation coefficient (0.961) was observed for carcass length. The weights of all the five muscles evaluated differed slightly, but the left and right averages were not significantly different. Similarly, the mean difference for total intramuscular fat between left and right units of a muscle pair was not significant for any of the five muscles studied. Thus, the data obtained from left side of a Ghungroo pig carcass apparently was sufficiently accurate for most experimental purposes.

Keywords

Carcass sides Carcass symmetry Experimental cutting Ghungroo pig.

References

  1. AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edn. AOAC Int., Arlington, VA.
  2. Breidenstein, B.C., Kauffman, R.G., Laplant, T. and Norton, H.W. (1964). Left and right side carcass data of the pork carcass. Journal of Animal Science, 24:1054-1056.
  3. Butler, O.D., Garber, M.J. and Smith, R.L. (1956). Beef carcass composition and yield of wholesale cuts. Journal of Animal Science,15: 891-895.
  4. Johnson, R.K., Berg, E.P., Goodwin, R., Mabry, J.W., Miller, R.K., Robison, O.W., Sellers, H. and Tokach. M.D. (2004). Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses. Journal of Animal Science,82:2428–2441.
  5. Lasley, E.L. and Kline, E.A. (1957). Splitting and cutting errors in swine carcass evaluation. Journal of Animal Science, 16: 485-489.
  6. Lawrie, R.A. (1998). Lawrie’s Meat Science. 6th edn. pp. 12-36. Woodhead Publishing Ltd. Cambridge, England.
  7. Stahl, C.A., Heymann, H., Adhikari, K. and Berg, E.P. (2014). Pork quality attributes associated with bilateral carcass variation. Journal of Animal Science, 84: 456-462.
  8. Thomas, R., Banik, S., Barman, K., Mohan, N.H. and Sarma, D.K. (2016). Carcass composition and meat quality parameters of Ghungroo pigs. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86: 925–929.
  9. Wheeler, T.L., Shackelford, S.D. and Koohmaraie, M. (2000). Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles. Journal of Animal Science,78:958–965.

Global Footprints